Skip to main content

Todd Suomela's Library tagged framing   View Popular, Search in Google

Feb
22
2012

Here’s the thing: Twitter is part of the “real world.” The Internet is part of the world.

In association with Wellman et al.’s work on the geography of networks, a rich and informative research domain takes shape. With Morning Edition we want a broad reading of Internet scholarship; what we end up with is gotcha reporting on a single study situated in the context of canards and red herrings. Followed, of course, by a reminder to listeners to “follow us on Twitter.”

twitter social-media internet media journalism framing description social-science research geography

Sep
3
2011

"Progressives need a fundamentally new approach to politics. They have been losing not just because conservatives have so much more money and power, but also because they have accepted the conservatives’ framing of political debates. They have accepted a framing where conservatives want market outcomes whereas liberals want the government to intervene to bring about outcomes that they consider fair.

This is not true. Conservatives rely on the government all the time, most importantly in structuring the market in ways that ensure that income flows upwards. The framing that conservatives like the market while liberals like the government puts liberals in the position of seeming to want to tax the winners to help the losers. "

politics economics framing power markets government conservative progressive

Apr
2
2011

"Who, then, does it serve to imagine that we are wolves and sheep, fools and savages? Lee Clarke, a disaster sociologist and professor at Rutgers, wrote after Hurricane Katrina, “Disaster myths are not politically neutral, but rather work systematically to the advantage of elites. Elites cling to the panic myth because to acknowledge the truth of the situation would lead to very different policy prescriptions than the ones currently in vogue.” That is to say, if we are wolves and sheep, and so not to be trusted, then they are the shepherds and the wolf-killers."

disaster media metaphor propaganda militarism government framing crisis earthquake country(Japan)

"It has long been understood by disaster researchers that both the general public and organizational actors tend to believe in various disaster myths. Notions that disasters are accompanied by looting, social disorganization, and deviant behavior are examples of such myths. Research shows that the mass media play a significant role in promulgating erroneous beliefs about disaster behavior. Following Hurricane Katrina, the response of disaster victims was framed by the media in ways that greatly exaggerated the incidence and severity of looting and lawlessness. Media reports initially employed a “civil unrest” frame and later characterized victim behavior as equivalent to urban warfare. The media emphasis on lawlessness and the need for strict social control both reflects and reinforces political discourse calling for a greater role for the military in disaster management. Such policy positions are indicators of the strength of militarism as an ideology in the United States. "

disaster media metaphor propaganda militarism government framing crisis law

Jul
27
2009

There is, I think, a very good argument to be made that Obama should be seen as similar to Tony Blair. Blair's argument was that Labor could do a better job of implementing the Tory agenda than the Tories could themselves. This was actually the same argument that Eisenhower made regarding the New Deal. And while Obama's political ideology makes him almost Blair's doppelganger, it's the example of Eisenhower that is most revealing, because Eisenhower was a Republican President in a Democratic era, who was elected as a war hero, not for his politics.

politics liberal framing progressive infrastructure instinct intellect about(GeorgeLakoff) people:BarackObama

  • The exact opposite is true of Obama.  He is the first Democratic President of what promises to be a new Democratic era-unless he blows it, which he very well could do if he fails to deliver some of the very needed change that the nation has been clamoring for.  He was elected specifically on the premise of a need for change, and specifically in opposition to the politics of George W. Bush.  So everything he does to accommodate, ala Blair or Eisenhower, is an undermining of his mandate. 

    Why does he do it? The reasons are no doubt multiple and complex.  But one over-riding factor is that he has come of age politically during a period dominated by conservatives waging hegemonic warfare, while progressives have not even woken up to what is happening.  And one result of that is that Obama accepts as given the way that conservatives have framed a great many issues.  Locked into their ideological framework, he then tries to do some warm-and-fuzzy things within the confines of that framework.  But their framework necessarily limits those warm-and-fuzzy things to mere gestures at best, if not deceptive packaging for genuinely evil policies. 

    My point here is simple:  One does not have to buy into Obama's worldview at all to see some truth in him having progressive instincts.  What's lacking is a progressive intellect--or even just an independent critical one.  Instincts are important, of course.  But they're not enough.  Especially when you're talking abuot the President of the United States. We already learned that with George W. Bush. 

Mar
9
2009

The fundamental barrier today is the way that the issues are framed, by Democrats and Republicans alike. Thus the problem is defined not as making credit available for individuals and businesses, but as saving the banks and the shadow banking system. The goal is not to provide healthcare to all citizens, but to enable all citizens to purchase private health insurance. The objective is not to ensure universal access to higher education; it is to insure universal access to colleges and universities. In these and other cases, the means is confused with the end. The ultimate goal -- providing credit, healthcare or education -- is identified with the interests of non-governmental for-profit or nonprofit providers of that service. If these private institutions fail to provide the public service in a low-cost, effective and equitable way, then they must be subsidized even more. The idea of achieving the same public goals through simpler, more direct and efficient means that would cut out the middleman appears to be heresy to the Obama administration.

liberal politics framing public-goods government people:BarackObama

Feb
9
2009

"The heart of hangover theory, wrote Krugman, is the idea of overinvestment — 'the idea that slumps are the price we pay for booms, that the suffering the economy experiences during a recession are the price we pay for the excesses of the previous expansion.'" - seems akin to Lakoff's Moral Politics analysis.

economics explanation hangover-theory story language label framing

in list: Economic Crisis

Jan
30
2009

Scientists and journalists have been known to talk past each other, both using language rooted in professional shorthand...

Thanks to a series of Metcalf Institute workshops funded by the National Science Foundation, journalists and climate scientists have been able to address these barriers and develop recommendations for effective communication.

climate environment journalism media communication framing

1 - 20 of 30 Next ›
Showing 20 items per page

Diigo is about better ways to research, share and collaborate on information. Learn more »

Join Diigo
Move to top