The means of best confronting non-state actors or multinational threats is not the sledgehammer of US military force it is instead of confluence of diplomatic engagement, law enforcement tactics, civilian development agencies, democracy and good governance promotion and in some cases, our armed forces. While one could argue that this has always been true, the reality has been quite different. More often than not, we perceive our security threats in military terms and choose to respond in kind. But its about time we recognized that the military is not the primary tool in our arsenal for confronting security challenges, but simply one of many - and in some cases, perhaps the least effective.
Indeed, Metz says at the end of his post, "20 years hence, the U.S. Army’s role in promoting American security will decline precipitously." What I find most surprising about this assertion . . is that anyone finds this assertion surprising. If I could give one piece of advice to President Obama's national security team that I would hope they would follow, it is to assume that Dr. Metz prediction is correct.


