tony curzon price's Bookmarks tagged debate →  View Popular

As the
cultural historian Markman Ellis writes, in Eighteenth-Century Coffee-House
Culture, the British coffee house, a “heady combination of news, literature,
debate and writing”, was “the central locus of newly egalitarian practices
of discussion and conversation, including forms of structured discourse,
such as lectures and debates, as well as unregulated discourse, such as
gossip and chatter”.

The freedom of speech led to
time-wasting and “gabbling” (“Here men carried by instinct sipp muddy water,
and like Frogs confusedly murmur Insignificant Notes, which tickle their own
ears, and, to their inharmonious sense, make Music of jarring strings”). The
education on offer was “a school . . . without a master”.

The eighteenth-century coffee house was undoubtedly a great
vehicle for the reading of newspapers. A Continental observer in the late
eighteenth century noted that, whereas the French coffee house was a place
where games were played, in Britain “you neither see billiards nor
backgammon tables” because people frequent coffee houses principally to read
“the PAPERS”. There was a close and sometimes volatile relationship between
the coffee-men and the newspaper-men, which came to a head in 1728, when the
coffee-men launched an abortive scheme for setting up their own newspapers.
Coffee shops had long been used as places for reading papers without having
to pay for them. The coffee-men resented the high price of newspapers and
the fact that there were so many of them. The newspaper-men objected that
coffee houses relied on newspapers to attract custom. There is a comparable
symbiosis now between cafés and information, whether in the form of
newspapers (Starbucks has an exclusive deal with The Times, Costa with the
Daily Telegraph) or internet connection. It is hard to see which party owes
most to whom. As a pamphleteer of 1729 wrote, “Papers mutually beget
company, and Company papers”.

Creating a wider conversation really means expanding our love. Thinking harder really means building trust. It is an economy of exchange and a performance whose purpose is to reveal something transforming. Unlike Rousseau at openDemocracy, I am not interested in generating agreement and discovering the "General Will." Rather, it is discovering the fact that we are all sharing a room together and we have to learn how to get along.

Soc. He is Greek, and speaks Greek, does he
not?

We determined to meet once a fortnight from
November to June, at the Freemasons' Tavern, and we had soon a
splendid list of members, containing, along with several members
of parliament, nearly all the most noted speakers of the
Cambridge Union and of the Oxford United Debating Society. It is
curiously illustrative of the tendencies of the time, that our
principal difficulty in recruiting for the Society was to find a
sufficient number of Tory speakers. Almost all whom we could
press into the service were Liberals, of different orders and
degrees. Besides those already named, we had Macaulay, Thirlwall,
Praed, Lord Howick, Samuel Wilberforce (afterwards Bishop of
Oxford), Charles Poulett Thomson (afterwards Lord Sydenham),
Edward and Henry Lytton Bulwer, Fonblanque, and many others whom
I cannot now recollect, but who made themselves afterwards more
or less conspicuous in public or literary life. Nothing could
seem more promising.

Президент Израиля Моше Кацав может быть обвинен в изнасиловании, сексуальных домогательствах в отношении нескольких женщин, главным образом сотрудниц своего офиса, а также в том, что удовлетворял необоснованные прошения о помиловании и незаконно прослушивал телефонные разговоры. Официальное решение о возможности судебного преследования президента будет принимать генеральный прокурор.

Was its source in Plato’s artful use of the Socratic dialogue to convey various meanings to different readers without actually speaking in his own name?