Taryn .'s Bookmarks tagged digital_media → View Popular
You are here: Diigo Home > Taryn .'s Bookmarks
Media's last diehard? -Victoria Barnsley (HarperCollins)
Tags: e-books, publishing, publishing_industry, technology, social_network, digital_media, president_obama, Google on 2008-11-08 -All Annotations (11) -About
more fromwww.thebookseller.com
-
The technology of these e-ink screens is developing rapidly. Right now, put in television terms, we’re still in the 1950is with a black and white model. But the future is bright and colourful. In the months to come we’ll have foldable screens, colour screens, screens which can handle moving images, screens with interactive clickable advertising And a company I think you’ll be hearing a lot about soon is Plastic Logic. Using technology developed in Cambridge they’re going to be producing an ereader with a flexible screen.
-
all the different players that make up the digital landscape - the network owners, the device manufacturers, the platform operators and the likes of us, the content providers. All l of these players, derive their value from different parts of the chain. The problem for us, is that for the first three – content is something to be squeezed in the value chain. For them, content is like petrol in a car -the relatively cheap motive power of a costly and complex machine. Whereas, for the content providers, content is more akin to wine in a bottle -something of high value in a cheap encapsulation. We want to retain the high value of content, but have it delivered on cheap, multiple, globally available, platforms, networks and devices.
-
Can everyone have a profitable future? Because the digital revolution is being driven by the first three, surprise, surprise, the price of content is being driven down. This is obviously very worrying. Equally worrying, is the fact that some of these players, are able to fund the development of all aspects of the value chain themselves. This brings me on to my fourth challenge which is media convergence. Sky is a good example of a company, that started as network player which went on to invest heavily in content and finally in hardware. Of more relevance to publishing, are the likes of Google and Amazon, who are broadening their remit and are both now in the hardware game.
-
Unfortunately, the book publishing industry, is probably too fragmented, and undercapitalised, to follow this route. Instead, it has to make sure it adds sufficient value to content, to retain its place in this converging world. Publishers recognise that they can’t subsume the activities of other players but they have to work with them, in a model that protects the value of content, and their role in developing it and selling it. That’s why the recent deal with Google, is of such historic importance.
-
Thankfully, the book industry is in better shape than the music industry. And I’m not as worried as some by risk of disintermediation. A publisher’s job is complex, and I believe we still have an important role to play going forward.
-
The old model whereby a publisher commissioned a work and then went through a series of steps to deliver it to a retailer, who delivered it to an unknown reader, isn’t enough. The interactivity of the Web allows readers to play a part in the process, to engage with authors and each other and in some instances, become authors themselves. The old linear model is becoming circular. For 500 years, the consumption of books was largely a private affair but the Internet has socialised that experience. If publishers are canny, they will see this as an opportunity to add more value and to create new revenue streams.
-
Going forward, we need to operate two models: - the existing model, whereby we add value by selecting, nurturing, marketing and finally selling content to the consumer – in whatever form they demand and a second model whereby we create value in the experiences around that content where we facilitate the dialogue between writers and readers.
-
This project is a purely marketing exercise aimed at increasing the continued relevance of Doris’s work to new generations but it also illustrates the kind of value, that can be added, by a publisher, to the experience of consuming a text. Connecting readers, writers, scholars, reviewers and bloggers, is all part of a publisher’s new mandate and with this project, we’re doing just that.
-
The interesting thing about authonomy is that by putting us at the centre of a hub of interactivity, between readers and would-be writers it provides us with a new business model. In addition to being a new pool for talent spotting, we’ve also created a community of people who love reading and writing. It’s growing at such a rate - over 2m page impressions in just 6 weeks – that we’ll soon be able to start generating advertising income.
-
The last initiative, I’d like to mention, is our most ambitious project to date – which we’ll be launching in January next year. It’s called Book Army and it’s a fantastic social networking site organised around books and authors. Every book and every author that’s in print
-
the secret weapon, in BookArmy’s arsenal, is a sophisticated algorithm, which generates book recommendations, based on feedback from other readers about their likes and dislikes.
Blown to Bits » Blog Archive » Guns A-Blazing in the Copyright Wars
also: http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cyberone/riaa/
Tags: digital_media, music, industry, copyright on 2008-10-31 -All Annotations (1) -About
more fromwww.bitsbook.com
-
Imagine a statute which, in the name of deterrence, provides for a $750 fine for each mile-per-hour that a driver exceeds the speed limit, with the fine escalating to $150,000 per mile over the limit if the driver knew he or she was speeding. Imagine that the fines are not publicized, and most drivers do not know they exist. Imagine that enforcement of the fines is put in the hands of a private, self-interested police force, that has no political accountability, that can pursue any defendant it chooses at its own whim, that can accept or reject payoffs in exchange for not prosecuting the tickets, and that pockets for itself all payoffs and fines. Imagine that a significant percentage of these fines were never contested, regardless of whether they had merit, because the individuals being fined have limited financial resources and little idea of whether they can prevail in front of an objective judicial body. To members of the born-digital generation, for whom sharing music on the Internet is as commonplace and innocuous as driving 60 in a 55 mph zone, the prosecution of Joel Tenenbaum and others like him is wholly analogous to this hypothetical. Congress lacks the constitutional power to delegate such a prosecutorial function to a private police, which is the role that the recording companies and its industry organization, the RIAA, is embodying.
My initial take on the Google-publishers settlement (The Googlization of Everything)
Tags: digital_media, Google, library, copyright on 2008-10-31 and saved by2 people -All Annotations (12) -About
more fromwww.googlizationofeverything.com
-
Google will establish and run a not-for-profit rights registry to allow rights holders to claim or establish control over out-of-print works. This registry would serve as a helpful database through which scholars and publishers may find rights holders to clear rights. As of today, there is no good database for such book rights for most of the books published in the 20th century. So this has the potential to be a major boon to research and publishing. In addition, it can help rights holders accrue royalties (meager thought they might be) by exploiting a market that currently does not work efficiently or effectively -- reprints or selections from out-of-print works. Google is doing what the U.S. Copyright Office should have done years ago. As usual, Google is making up for public failure -- the opposite of market failure.
-
Isn't this a tremendous anti-trust problem? Google has essentially set up a huge compulsory licensing system without the legislation that usually makes such systems work. One of the reasons it took a statutory move to create compulsory licensing for musical compositions was that Congress had to explicitly declare such a consortium and the organizations that run it (ASCAP, BMI) exempt from anti-trust laws. In addition, this proposed system excludes many publishers (such as university presses) and many authors (those not in the Authors' Guild). More importantly, this system excludes the other major search engines and the one competitor Google has in the digital book race: the Open Content Alliance. Don't they now have a very strong claim for an anti-trust action? [Oh, and please note that Google CEO Eric Schmidt was out campaigning for the likely next president last week ... coincidence?]
-
From the beginning, this has seemed to be a major example of corporate welfare. Libraries at public universities all over this country (including the one that employs me) have spent many billions of dollars collecting these books. Now they are just giving away access to one company that is cornering the market on on-line access. They did this without concern for user confidentiality, preservation, image quality, search prowess, metadata standards, or long-term sustainability. They chose the expedient way rather than the best way to build and extend their collections.
PLoS Medicine - Why Current Publication Practices May Distort Science
Modify current practice to elevate and incorporate more expansive data to accompany print articles or to be accessible in attractive formats associated with high-quality journals: combine the “magazine” and “archive” roles of journals.
Tags: science, biology, research, publishing, economics, digital_media on 2008-10-12 -All Annotations (7) -About
more frommedicine.plosjournals.org
-
The scientific publishing industry is used for career advancement [36]: publication in specific journals provides scientists with a status signal. As with other luxury items intentionally kept in short supply, there is a motivation to restrict access
-
Modify current practice to elevate and incorporate more expansive data to accompany print articles or to be accessible in attractive formats associated with high-quality journals: combine the “magazine” and “archive” roles of journals.
-
Economic Terms and Analogies in Scientific Publication
-
Production of scientific information is largely paid for by public investment, but the product is offered free to commercial intermediaries, and is culled by them with minimal cost, for sale back to the producers and their underwriters!
-
In the basic biological sciences, statistical considerations are secondary or nonexistent, results entirely unpredicted by hypotheses are celebrated, and there are few formal rules for reproducibility
-
For most published papers, “publication” often just signifies “final registration into oblivion”.
-
Low acceptance rates create an illusion of exclusivity based on merit and more frenzied competition among scientists “selling” manuscripts.
50+ web tools for creating web-based stories
still don't get the fascination with
Tags: digital_media, story, tool on 2008-10-04 and saved by322 people -All Annotations (18) -About
more fromcogdogroo.wikispaces.com
Full Text: Keen vs. Weinberger - WSJ.com
we are not replicating the mainstream media. We're building something new. We're doing it together. Its fundamental elements are not bricks of content but the mortar of links, and links are connections of meaning and involvement. We're creating an infrastructure of meaning, miscellaneous but dripping with potential for finding and understanding what matters to us.
Tags: amateur, andrew_keen, social_network, digital_media, media, industry on 2008-09-26 and saved by25 people -All Annotations (21) -About
more fromonline.wsj.com
-
When everyone claims to be an author, there can be no art, no reliable information, no audience.
-
you join a long list of those who predict the decline of civilization and pin the blame on the latest popular medium, except this time it's not comic books, TV, or shock jock radio. It's the Web.
-
from the beginning the Web has been about inventing ways to make its own massness -- its miscellaneousness -- useful.
-
The Web is abundance, while the old media are premised -- in their model of knowledge as well as in their economics -- on scarcity.
-
You bemoan the loss of "the essential epistemological anchor of truth" and the "impartiality of the authoritative, accountable expert." It's easy to agree with that when it comes to facts, the sort of stuff we consult almanacs for. But when it comes to the more important and harder issues, where we want to understand our world -- science, politics, the arts -- are you quite as comfortable with the notion that there are identifiable epistemological anchors? Or is your epistemology in fact rooted in the scarcity that has silently shaped the traditional media?
-
The more we know, the less we will know. You see, to use this chaotic media efficaciously, we need to invent our own taxonomies
-
You and I agree that genuine talent is scarce and needs nurturing. But your picture of talent is formed by the binary view the traditional media have forced on us. Because it's been so expensive to produce, market and distribute cultural products (books, records, films), the lucky few who get published get access to a mass audience, and the rest trail off the map. So, traditional distribution makes it look like talent is a you-got- it-or-you-don't proposition -- you're an artist or you're a monkey. That doesn't reflect the scarcity of talent so much as the scarcity of distribution
-
Talent is not either/or. Recording contracts are.
With the Web, we can still listen to the world's greatest, but we can find others who touch us even though their technique isn't perfect.
Note the "we can find." We couldn't if finding required creating our own taxonomies
-
you ask if I'm convinced that the Web benefits intellectuals. Yes, I am. And that's because, while some talent is indeed solitary, many types of talent prosper in connection with others. That is especially true for the development of ideas. Knowledge is generally not a game for one. It is and always has been a collaborative process. And it is a process, not as settled, sure, and knowable by authorities as it would be comforting to believe
-
Without any doubt, I am in the richest, most stimulating, most fruitful swirl of thought, knowledge, ideas and feeling ever in my life...far more productive than when I was consigned to talking only with professionals and credentialed experts. This is fundamental to my experience of the Web
-
I agree wholeheartedly with your comments about the online academic community. Any medium which brings experts and professional authorities together is healthy. I am thrilled that you've discovered such a rich intellectual community online. If this is Web 2.0, then I love Web 2.0. I'm a Cluetrainer when it comes to serious people conversing fruitfully on the Internet. The problem, however, with Web 2.0 is that most of the conversation seems to be taking place anonymously, conducted -- in a manner of speaking -- by people who are more interested in vulgar insult than respectful intellectual intercourse. The comments sections of most major website are littered with this trash. As is the blogosphere. So, yes, the Internet is great for experts to discover one another and conduct responsible conversation. It's the monkey chorus on the democratized web that bother me.
-
My biggest concern with Web 2.0 is the critique of mainstream media that, implicitly or otherwise, drives its agenda. It's the idea that mainstream media is a racket run by gatekeepers protecting the interests of a small, privileged group of people. Thus, by flattening media, by doing away with the gatekeepers, Web 2.0 is righting cultural injustice and offering people like your friends Joe and Maria an opportunity to monetize their talent. But the problem is that gatekeepers -- the agents, editors, recording engineers -- these are the very engineers of talent. Web 2.0's distintermediated media unstitches the ecosystem that has historically nurtured talent. Web 2.0 misunderstands and romanticizes talent. It's not about the individual -- it's about the media ecosystem.
-
our culture overall would be foolish to stick within the safe boundaries of the old credentialing system...
Especially since the old talent system, the fate of which you bemoan actually doesn't work the way you say it does, and does not yield the results you claim for it. The mainstream media's business model does not aim at nurturing talent. It aims at moving units. It therefore does exactly what you complain the Web does: It panders to the market.
-
The Web is only a web because we're building links that say "Here's something worth your time, and here's why." It's a little act of selflessness in which a person who has our attention directs it elsewhere.
-
There is therefore hope here that in the midst of the ever-present low culture, we will together educate our tastes, seeing more of the world than the traditional media could ever show us, and learn to appreciate it. Included in this hope is, of course, the fact that the traditional gatekeepers are themselves online, telling us what is worth attending to and why. Now their influence depends on how convincing and articulate they are, not on their control over the on-off switch on the broadcast tower or printing press. That is, the gate keeping goes from dictating what we can read to telling us what we ought to read.
-
It's way too early to declare that artists will not be financially supported on the Web. We are at the beginning of a painful transition. We're not yet done inventing.
-
The Web is not mass culture, so we can't just look at the most popular sites to see what's going on. Most of the action is in the long tail of users, sites with just a handful of links going to them. So, pointing to the "short head" of highly popular sites not only tells us little, it views the Web through a distorting lens, as if sites were read-only publications rather than part of a web of conversations.
-
Yochai Benkler's seminal "The Wealth of Networks" (which is available, of course, in its entirety for free online)
-
Most of all, a serious discussion of amateurism has to be able to admit that it may have some benefits. For example:
-
The rise of amateurism creates a new ecology in which personal relationships can add value to the experience
-
Collections of amateurs can do things that professionals cannot
if:book: this is a world of imagination & digitisation
a team of inspired people to create an illuminated book online, containing the poetry of William Blake, new writing, art and song inspired by Blake’s work, and the voices of many readers
Tags: william_blake, digital_media, networked_book, written_for_the_web, event on 2008-09-26 -All Annotations (3) -About
more fromwww.futureofthebook.org
-
our trade is the creation and execution of projects which bring writers and readers together, commissioning new work for specific settings. A good arts festival sparks conversations around the themes it explores and the events it makes happen.
-
So many web projects go encyclopaedic and neverending. The book of the future will be linked to a community, open to revision and extension, but also bounded in a meaningful way, a satisfying artistic entity, porous but not pointless.
-
We hope to build an international community of readers around our blog of the project’s progress, www.songsofimaginationanddigitisation.net, including students at all levels who have Blake as a set text. We want the Songs to be a springboard into all kinds of reading.
A History of the Future of Narrative: Robert Coover (ELO)
skip ahead to 25 minutes or so
Tags: digital_media, literature, e-books, publishing, history, writing, video on 2008-09-25 -All Annotations (1) -About
more fromeliterature.org
- @ 29:00 digital authors...will learn how to reshape code for their own unique purposes...with the consequence of continual innovation, vanguard code work fostering vanguard literature...all forms of art and discourse are affected by digital...post by taryn930 on 2008-09-25
lots of talk on gadgetry, multi-modal forms of delivery
33:00 addresses the naysers, somewhat feebly
36:30 strong wrap-up - writers use the technology available to them
35:20 re-define the novel
if:book: a unified field theory of publishing in the networked era
Tags: writer, writing, reading, networked_book, e-books, publishing, publishing_industry, digital_media on 2008-09-08 and saved by5 people -All Annotations (59) -About
more fromwww.futureofthebook.org
-
Ever since we published Ken Wark's Gamer Theory I've tended to think of the author of a networked book as a leader of a group effort, similar in many respects to the role of a professor in a seminar. The professor has presumably set the topic and likely knows more about it than the other participants, but her role is to lead the group in a combined effort to synthesize and extend knowledge. This is not to suggest that one size will fit all authors
-
A mother in London recently described her ten-year old boy's reading behavior: “He'll be reading a (printed) book. He'll put the book down and go to the book's website. Then, he'll check what other readers are writing in the forums, and maybe leave a message himself, then return to the book. He'll put the book down again and google a query that's occurred to him.”
-
once we acknowledge the intrinsic relationship between reading and writing as equally crucial elements of the same equation — we can begin to redefine the roles of publisher and editor. An old-style formulation might be that t publishers and editors serve the packaging and distribution of authors’ ideas. A new formulation might be that publishers and editors contribute to building a community that involves an author and a group of readers who are exploring a subject.
-
Authors should be able to choose the level of moderation/participation at which they want to engage; ditto for readers.
-
It's not necessary for ALL projects to take this continuous/never-finished form.
-
main distinction of this new model is not type of media but the mechanism of distribution
-
in the long term arc of change i am imagining, novels will not continue to be the dominant form of fiction. My bet now is that to understand where fiction is going we should look at what’s happening with “video games.”
-
emergence of celebrity editors and readers
-
Over time we are also likely to see the emergence of "professional readers" whose work consistus of tagging our digitized culture
-
It’s important to design sites that are outward-looking, emphasizing the fact that boundaries with the rest of the net are porous.
-
Books can have momentum, not in the current sense of position on a best-seller or Amazon list, but rather in the size and activity-level of their communities.
-
Books can be imagined as channels, especially when they "gather" other books around them.
-
imagine google searches that make visible not just the interconnections between hits but also how the content of each hit relates to the rest of the document and/or discipline it’s part of
Trent Reznor’s Frustration and Fury - Take It. It’s Free.
Tags: music, digital_media, industry, art on 2008-06-11 -All Annotations (0) -About
more fromwww.nytimes.com
-
the superstar exodus from major labels. Acts with large audiences and established brands like Radiohead, Madonna and the Eagles no longer need the labels’ star-making clout. They have calculated that they can do better, and have more options, outside the old system.
-
Mr. Reznor, 43, is an unlikely combination of recluse, showman, tortured Romantic, workaholic and tech geek — which may just be an effective personality for a musician in the digital age.
-
Unlike the Eagles and Radiohead he’s not taking years to make albums; he has recognized that while he grew up treating an album like a novel, younger listeners, freely downloading music and setting their iPods on shuffle, are more likely to treat it like a magazine.
-
Playing live, his laptop now replaces pedals and effects. Mr. Reznor even posts online all the raw digital tracks from Nine Inch Nails albums for anyone to remix. “I’m done with them,” he said. “Why not?”
-
He had thought that fans would willingly pay the price of a latte to support musicians directly. But fewer than 20 percent did so. “I think I was just naïve.”
At the time he called the project a failure, but he has reconsidered. “The numbers of the people that paid for that record, versus the people that paid for his last record, were greater,” he said. “He made infinitely more money from that record than he did from his other one. It increased his name value probably tenfold. At the end of the day, counting free downloads, it was probably five or six or seven times higher than the amount sold on his last record. I don’t know how you could look at that as a failure.”
-
“What I’m trying to do is use the stage as an interactive instrument,” Mr. Reznor said. “I’m in the world of science fiction now.”
John Palfrey - Born Digital
Tags: digital_media, education, gen_x, gen_y on 2007-10-28 and saved by4 people -All Annotations (0) -About
more fromblogs.law.harvard.edu
-
The point of our research, in the first instance, is to take up these terms Digital Native and Digital Immigrant, and work them over. What I think we’ve found is that age is relevant, but not dispositive. What I think we are describing in our book is a set of traits — having to do with how people interact with information, with one another, and with institutions — that are more likely to be found in those Born Digital, but not certainly so. Many people Born Digital have some but not all of these traits. Many people who were not Born Digital — you (who read this blogpost) and me and Urs and perhaps most Berkmaniacs, to be sure — have these traits and more, more even than most Digital Natives. That’s essential to the puzzle of the book. There is a generational gap, but it’s not purely a generational gap. It’s more complicated.
-
The term is referencing those who understand that the world is networked, that cultures exist beyond geographical coordinates, and that mediating technologies allow cultures to flourish in new ways. Digital natives are not invested in ‘life on the screen’ or ‘going virtual’ but on using technology as an artifact that allows them to negotiate culture. In other words, a ‘digital native’ understands that there is no such thing as ‘going online’ but rather, what is important is the way in which people move between geographically-organized interactions and network-organized interactions. To them, it’s all about the networks, even if those networks have coherent geographical boundaries.”
-
emerging global culture of people relating to information, one another, and institutions in ways that, taken together, has great promise for the future of democracies. Digital Natives — people born digital — give us reason for hope that this global culture could emerge. Some of their behaviors also give reason to worry, at the same time, about things like privacy, safety, information overload, and IP worries. We need to take these problems seriously and get in front of them, without ruining the environment that makes all the wonderful things possible.
In this book, we argue in favor of greater connectivity. That connectivity might be between parents or teachers or lawmakers who don’t live any part of their lives online and our kids who do. That connectivity might be between those in industry who are threatened by what these kids and others (us) are up to online and the culture that we represent. That connectivity might be between technology companies and their users, whose identities they seek otherwise to control. That connectivity might be between those of us in the rich world and those in less rich parts of the world, as GV makes possible. And so forth.
The Well-tempered Web - Alex Ross
Tags: classical, digital_media, industry, music, publishing_industry on 2007-10-21 -All Annotations (0) -About
more fromwww.newyorker.com
-
The anonymity of Internet browsing has made classical music more accessible to non-fanatics; first-time listeners can read reviews, compare audio samples, and decide on, for example, a Beethoven recording by Wilhelm Furtwängler, all without risking the humiliation of mispronouncing the conductor’s name under the sour gaze of a record clerk. Likewise, first-time concertgoers and operagoers can shop for tickets, study synopses of unfamiliar plots, listen to snippets of unfamiliar music, follow performers’ blogs, and otherwise get their bearings on the lunar tundra of the classical experience.
-
Those who see the dawning of a new golden age should bear in mind the “Snakes on a Plane” rule: things invariably appear more important on the Internet than they are in the real world.
-
Only since 2006 or 2007 has there been a piece of return on the investment, through the digital.” Digital sales now account for twenty-five per cent of his revenues, and, because of drastically lower production and distribution costs, he makes much more profit on each sale.
-
So I am looking past downloads to subscriptions.” He spoke about the possibility of selling preprogrammed MP3 players—say, a fifty-dollar unit loaded with fifty hours of Mozart.
With some amusement, Heymann took note of a recent story in the Times Magazine, by Lynn Hirschberg, about the record producer Rick Rubin, who earlier this year became the co-chairman of Columbia Records. In the article, Rubin looked ahead to a time when a listener could forgo the buying of individual CDs or downloads in favor of a subscription to a large-scale online musical library. “You’d pay, say, $19.95 a month,” Rubin told Hirschberg. When pop moguls start taking tips from German classical-music producers, something new is under the sun.
-
recordings have played an outsized role in the modern era; they should simply be “souvenirs” of performances, he told me. MP3s and live audio streams, disembodied and often tinny in sound, are very souvenir-like; they don’t pretend to re-create an orchestra in one’s living room, and may actually lead listeners to exercise their imaginations as a way of making up for sonic shortcomings.
CommentPress » codex, not print
Tags: digital_media, publishing_industry, books on 2007-10-20 -All Annotations (0) -About
more frommediacommons.futureofthebook.org
-
the bookness of the book derives less from its material composition — ink-on-paper — than from its organization, the sequenced, bound, and cut leaves. As the conventional wisdom holds, it is the development of that form — the shift from the scroll to the codex — that, as Stallybrass argues in “Books and Scrolls: Navigating the Bible,” enabled “the capacity for random access” (42), allowing a reader to turn immediately to any particular point in a text, thus facilitating the reader’s active engagement in and manipulation of the textual object. Turning our material focus from print to binding as the source of bookness holds significant implications for scholars working on new, electronic modes of textuality, and in particular, on the future of the book. For if this is the case — that the formal properties of the book that have the greatest impact on our reading experience are derived not from print, but rather from the codex — one might suggest that researchers working on new ways of transforming ink-on-paper to pixels-on-screens may be working on the wrong problem
-
Despite having greater capacities for random access to texts via searching and other modes of linking, electronic publishing’s reliance on scrolling text too often fails to take account of the ways that cognitive practices of reading are spatially organized.
-
At stake is not the success or failure of one particular technology, but rather our ability to produce a reading experience that provides net-native principles of organization as compelling as those of the codex.
Notation: * = Private bookmark and comment|… = Clipping [?] | … = Public highlight [?]


