media - Michael Becker on Diigo

13 Oct 09

It doesn’t matter much to a fully integrated media conglomerate like News Corporation how its customers choose to access this content, as long as the transaction pays.
One of the first strong messages Journal reporters and editors received from their new owners was that Murdoch wants scoops. He wants his reporters out in front of every competitor on the planet.
1 more annotations...
- This means that, at a time when every big newspaper is tinkering with futuristic business models, Murdoch is doing so with both feet planted firmly in the past. His strategy for success in 2008 is to behave as though the year is 1908. So while his competitors retrench, Murdoch is going to war—by challenging The New York Times, in particular, to an old-fashioned newspaper battle. Except this time the stakes aren’t nickels in Times Square, but dominance in America, and the world.

31 Aug 09

BBC - Peston's Picks: What future for media and journalism?

BBC business editor Richard Preston's comments at the Richard Dunn Memorial Lecture, Aug. 29, 2009, in Edinburgh. Preston talks about a lot of things pertaining to financial journalism, but also the importance of blogging to his workflow.

www.bbc.co.uk/...future_for_media_and_jour.html - Preview

Richard Preston BBC blogging journalism lecture dissemination media

But although individual news organisations are probably in general weaker, facing both greater financial pressures and more competition than ever, the power of individual stories - and I suppose of journalists, from time to time - has increased. When a story takes off on the internet, as they have many times in respect of the credit crunch over the past couple of years, it's a massive worldwide explosion.
For me, the blog is at the core of everything I do, it is the bedrock of my output. The discipline of doing it shapes my thoughts. It disseminates to a wider world the stories and themes that I think matter. But it also spreads the word within the BBC - which is no coincidence, because it started life as an internal email for editors and staff. It gives me unlimited space to publish the kind of detail on an important story that I can't get into a three minute two-way on Today or a two-minutes-forty-seconds package on the Ten O'Clock News.

It connects me to the audience in a very important way. The comments left by readers contain useful insights - and they help me understand what really matters to people. That is not to say that I give them only what they want. I retain an old-fashioned view that in the end the licence fee pays for my putative skills in making judgements about what matters. Most important of all, the blog allows me and the BBC to own a big story and create a community of interested people around it. Sharing information - some of it hugely important, some of it less so - with a big and interested audience delivers that ownership and creates that committed community.
1 more annotations...
- Also, it is increasingly clear that much of the audience doesn't care whether they receive their information via the blog, some other internet channel, the TV, newspapers or radio.

16 Aug 09

12 Things Newspapers Should Do to Survive

Those who think there is one silver bullet to fix the newspaper business are mistaken. Newspapers have almost always had multiple streams of revenue to support themselves and the future will likely not be any different.

mashable.com/...newspaper-survival - Preview

journalism newspapers media Vadim Lavrusik Mashable

Newspapers are often still treating their websites as an afterthought because their advertising revenue is largely still coming from print. At the same time, the shift to getting more revenue from websites won’t happen until the websites are the first priority.
Reporters need to focus on primarily gathering information and how to present that information in multiple formats: websites, mobile platforms, social networks and finally print.
8 more annotations...
- Ryan Sholin, director of news innovation at Publish2, a company that specializes in link journalism, said journalists now have to be ready to produce journalism on multiple platforms, whether that is tweeting a headline, uploading a video through their iPhone or something else – journalism comes in all shapes and sizes.
- Newspapers need to figure out what they do well and report on that
- newspapers need to stop treating their websites as a dumping ground for print stories and treat each somewhat independently, carefully selecting the stories better suited for each media.
- the physical newspaper focus on less time-sensitive news and instead more analytical stories
- The print edition of a newspaper can serve to contextualize the news that has been posted, shared and retweeted online
- “The means of production are available to everyone. The distribution network is available to everyone,” Bradshaw said. “Rewriting a press release just doesn’t hack it anymore.” If sources are able to report news themselves, the bar is raised for news organizations to adopt and integrate real-time reporting on their websites.
- But social media can be a great tool for earning trust with your audience. Bradshaw said that individuals, not institutions, most effectively use social media, and so the role of the journalist in distribution becomes more important.
- He said eventually journalists will be expected to engage readers through comments, blogs, Twitter, etc., or it will be done by dedicated community managers.

26 Mar 09

2020 vision: What's next for news

Dan Conover guides us through a pretty reasonable tour of what he thinks the next decade of journalism is going to look like, and you know what? The Internet is a big deal. Shocking.

xark.typepad.com/...res-a-whats-next-overview.html - Preview

Dan Conover journalism Internet Web2.0 Web3.0 api online-first newsroom optimism future of journalism predictions xark media business opensource

the first meaningful test won't come until a major American city
loses its only metro daily. So wait.
Newspapers may be failing, but most do a passable job of limiting serious competition in their markets. What succeeds in the shadow of an established metro, therefore, may not be what ultimately winds up contending for the market positions vacated by Old Media giants.
1 more annotations...
- while most cities will generate enough
  revenue to support a professional press, watch for a wave of
  cooperative agreements between competing media companies and the
  popularization of the term “our broadcast partners.”

23 Mar 09

Old Growth Media And The Future Of News

This is the Steven Berlin Johnson speech that I wrote about in my blog post on March 22.

www.stevenberlinjohnson.com/...iif-you-happened-to-being.html - Preview

Steven Berlin Johnson journalism news media newspapers technology

What’s happened with technology and politics is happening elsewhere too, just on a different timetable. Sports, business, reviews of movies, books, restaurants – all the staples of the old newspaper format are proliferating online. There are more perspectives; there is more depth and more surface now. And that’s the new growth. It’s only started maturing.
Now there’s one objection to this ecosystems view of news that I take very seriously. It is far more complicated to navigate this new world than it is to sit down with your morning paper. There are vastly more options to choose from, and of course, there’s more noise now. For every Ars Technica there are a dozen lame rumor sites that just make things up with no accountability whatsoever. I’m confident that I get far more useful information from the new ecosystem than I did from traditional media along fifteen years ago, but I pride myself on being a very savvy information navigator. Can we expect the general public to navigate the new ecosystem with the same skill and discretion?
Let’s say for the sake of argument that we can’t. Let’s say it’s just too overwhelming for the average consumer to sort through all the new voices available online, to separate fact from fiction, reporting from rumor-mongering. Let’s say they need some kind of authoritative guide, to help them find all the useful information that’s proliferating out there in the wild.
If only there were some institution that had a reputation for journalistic integrity that had a staff of trained editors and a growing audience arriving at its web site every day seeking quality information. If only…
Of course, we have thousands of these institutions. They’re called newspapers.

21 Mar 09

What’s a medium?

Are all media converging? Does it matter whether you're a print, broadcast or radio journalist anymore?

www.buzzmachine.com/...whats-a-medium - Preview

media new media Jeff Jarvis buzzmachine CUNY journalism education

They all learn how to gather news and tell stories in audio, video, blogs, live blogs, wikis, Twitter, social tools, and whatever comes next. Of course, they also learn the eternal verities of journalism and techniques of reporting and writing. They are now exposed to the fundamentals of the business of journalism. As they progress through other classes in their subject specialties, they are required to create stories in various media.
We also watched our students from any track work in any track. And we’re getting better (and still need to get better) at requiring work in many media throughout the program.
1 more annotations...
- But now we will advise students to select courses based on what they want to do professionally as well as what they already know (because many students enter the school proficient in various new media).

04 Mar 09

The end of paper?

The ink-stained publishing world is battling against companies like Google and Yahoo that sell ads via any Internet-friendly gadget. And we know how that fight is going: The buy-ink-by-the-barrel types are struggling.

money.cnn.com/...index.htm - Preview

Fortune paper ink digital dissemination publishing media e-ink

Never pick a fight with someone who buys ink by the barrel. Mark Twain's advice was apt in its time but sounds downright quaint these days.
Industry insiders say Hearst is close to launching a wireless e-reader with a large screen tailored to the newspaper and magazine industry.
- Could we be looking at a future in which every publication puts out its own e-reader? Rather than going to the newsstand to buy a copy of Newsweek or Fortune, you'd simply buy that mag's e-reader once and then update it with fresh content as desired. - on 2009-03-04
Add Sticky Note
5 more annotations...
- The Kindle might be the salvation of books, but magazines and newspapers have a different business model. They rely on revenue from reader subscriptions and from advertising, and those trends are not encouraging.
- Rupert Murdoch is looking hard at e-readers. He has always believed that the role of the media is to get consumers their newspapers and magazines conveniently, on as many platforms as possible. Today that means News Corp. may have to get into the e-reader business, both on the hardware and software side.
- That raises some thorny issues. When the next generation of e-readers first hit the market, they will cost as much as $800. Will a customer be willing to buy a device that could download only the Wall Street Journal, the New York Post, and other News Corp. properties? Probably not. That means any print publisher that gets into the e-reader distribution game will have to offer an open system in which you can download any magazine or newspaper. A publisher that wants to control distribution will need to sign licenses with competitors that in all likelihood would rather be offering their own e-reader catalogs. Prepare for a battle royal.
- As more and more high-quality articles are protected behind Internet walls, people are likely to subscribe to magazines and newspapers on these devices just as they buy books.
- To reach that critical mass, e-readers will need to drop dramatically in price. The magic pricetag, according to research by the Reynolds Journalism Institute at the University of Missouri, is in the neighborhood of $200 - but that's a far cry from the $800 often quoted for the next generation of e-readers. One tactic would be for publishers to subsidize the cost of the readers in the same way that U.S. cellphone companies subsidize the cost of handsets.
  - More evidence, I think, that we'll see a fractured media future. Even though our cell phones can call each other, our service is provided by different companies operating on different but compatible networks. That's a necessity because it's what cell phone consumers expect.
    
    Will readers expect interoperatibility out of their e-readers? I doubt they'll even think to ask for it in the first generation. - on 2009-03-04
  Add Sticky Note

25 Feb 09

Three Ways the Media is Innovating with New Interfaces

Micro Persuasion shows us three ways that media Web sites are using innovative interfaces

www.micropersuasion.com/...media-innovation.html - Preview

interface media Sporting_News nytexplorer design journalism publishing

16 Feb 09

Print newspapers may die, but investigative reporting must be saved

Bruce Ackerman and Ian Ayres at the Guardian argue that saving the way news is distributed (on paper) is far less important than ensuring that news coverage and investigative journalism are safe.

www.guardian.co.uk/...tigative-journalism-endowments - Preview

journalism Bruce Ackerman Ian Ayres Guardian media endowments

There is a third way out. We urge democracies throughout the world to consider the creation of national endowments for journalism that are carefully designed to confront the impending collapse of investigative reporting.
It will take decades to revitalise investigative journalism if we allow the present corps of reporters to disintegrate. This is happening at an alarming rate.
3 more annotations...
- A near-monopoly would mean the death of critical inquiry.
- More fundamentally, a system of private endowments creates perverse incentives. Insulated from the profit motive, the endowments will pursue their own agendas without paying much attention to the issues that the public really cares about.
- The crisis in reporting comes at the worst possible time, when a broad range of industries are lining up for big bail-outs. We generally oppose government efforts to second-guess the market. But this case really is special. Liberal democracy can survive a crisis in the auto or construction industry, but it cannot do without a vibrant fourth estate.

08 Feb 09

The demise of newspapers means better journalism

Jim Stovall believes journalism itself will improve even as the old media decline.

jprof.blogspot.com/...f-newspapers-means-better.html - Preview

journalism Jim Stovall new media media

Stovall says we can expect more reporting, more reporters, different ways of telling a story, the recognition that journalism happens outside of traditional news organizations, more respect for the audience, better writing and better reporting from the new digital age. - superjaberwocky on 2009-02-08

But the medium they work so hard to produce -- the paper -- is holding back journalism from doing the best job that it can for society. The sooner the paper is gone, the better.

12 Jan 09

Scoopless in Seattle: P-I beat on own sad news

The only insult that can compound the injury of having your newspaper shot out from under you is to hear the news first from a competing television station.

newsosaur.blogspot.com/...n-seattle-p-i-beat-on-own.html - Preview

Seattle Post-Intelligencer newspapers Alan Mutter media MSM main stream media

10 Jan 09

Networked link journalism: A revolution quietly begins in Washington state

The discussion about journalism’s future so often focuses on Big Changes — Kill the print edition! Flips for everyone! Reinvent business models NOW! — that it’s easy to forget how simple innovation can be.

publishing2.com/...tly-begins-in-washington-state - Preview

news Twitter journalism media new media Josh Korr Publishing 2.0 publishing innovation dissemination

Forget walled gardens — this is the spirit of journalism’s future.
In some ways the networked linking process is an extension of how newsrooms collaborate with traditional wire services, but I think the Washington project is more than that. Papers using a traditional wire service aren’t really collaborating. They’re primarily trying to a) extend the reach of their stories, and b) get access to material they can’t afford to produce on their own.
2 more annotations...
- The Washington link projects should serve as models for the entire news industry. They show that collaborative linking draws readers, is easy, and costs nothing more than time (and not even much of that).
- This is the power of collaborative news networks. By forming a network, newsrooms can discover not just a greater volume of news, but a greater volume of relevant, high-quality news than one person, one newsroom, or one wire service could alone.
  - The collaborative coverage provides something that a simple Google News search cannot: content that has been hand-picked by intelligent human beings. The links will be more relevant than any a search algorithm can produce. - on 2009-01-10
  Add Sticky Note

08 Jan 09

Digital guru Clay Shirky's media forecast and predictions for 2009

A self-confessed 'pretty unlikely early adopter', the digital guru Clay Shirky still proved to be uncannily prescient about the impact of the web - which is why Tom Teodorczuk is getting his media forecast for 2009

www.guardian.co.uk/...uture-newspapers-digital-media - Preview

newspapers journalism Clay Shirky new media media

Yet he foresees that a recession may produce greater industry clarity by forcing radical action, which he explains as a boss saying to staff: "'Bonfire, this is Hail Mary time!', instead of: 'This year we made as much money as last year but we're still restructuring dramatically.'"
"As with the printing press, the loss of professional control will be bad for many of society's core institutions," he writes.
4 more annotations...
- The great misfortune of newspapers in this era is that they were such a good idea for such a long time that people felt the newspaper business model was part of a deep truth about the world, rather than just the way things happened to be.
  - He compares the newspaper industry to the fall of the Soviet Union. Some people in the eastern European countries could remember a time before the Soviets and had an easier time transitioning into the post-Soviet era. Most Russians couldn't remember a time before the union.
    
    Newspapers, he says, are like the Russians, unable to remember a time before themselves. - on 2009-01-08
  Add Sticky Note
- The steady loss of advertising revenue, accelerated by the recession, has normalised the idea that it's acceptable to move to the web. Even if we have the shallowest recession and advertising comes back as it inevitably does, more of it will go to the web. I think that's it for newspapers.
- The 500-year-old accident of economics occasioned by the printing press - high upfront cost and filtering happening at the source of publication - is over.
  - He's right here. There is no supernatural reason why newspapers or print should be the chief means of information dissemination in the world. The printing press was an invention that served the need of society at the time, and it grew in profitability in accordance with its popularity.
    
    But that's over now. You no longer need to read things on paper, which means you can skip the entire production, shipping and warehousing, heck even the retail portions of the print business and get straight to the text you want to read.
    
    Sure, maybe reading it on a screen is less comfortable than reading it on paper, but, then again, you could always print it. Why does printed matter always have to be on the publishers' paper, on the publishers' terms? - on 2009-01-08
  Add Sticky Note
- The job of the next decade is mostly going to be taking the raw revolutionary capability that's now apparent and really seeing what we can do with it.

07 Jan 09

Dailies go Darwin

If you're a tree, you're probably feeling pretty good right now. We've long known that the traditional newspaper — a hard-copy compendium of the previous day's events, printed on an obscene amount of wood byproduct — was terminally ill.

thephoenix.com/...74454-Dailies-go-Darwin - Preview

newspapers new media Adam Reilly media journalism publishing

But the term "newspaper" has another meaning, too: it's an organization staffed with men and women who report and analyze the news for the public. Newspapers in this sense aren't about to go extinct. They are being reinvented, however. And judging from the almost unthinkable changes that transpired on the media landscape this past year — particularly over the past few months — this reinvention will reach unprecedented heights in 2009, with once-sacrosanct forms and practices being abruptly jettisoned and new models and methods assuming starring roles. As with biological evolution, some of this change will be beautiful, some of it will be ugly, and some of it will just . . . be. Here's a preview.
consider what Detroit Free Press publisher David Hunke recently told National Public Radio: "We think it's time to quit sticking our heads a bit in the sand [and] taking incremental steps . . . in the name of hoping that it comes back to the way it used to be in years gone by."

05 Jan 09

Goodbye hyperlocal, hello microlocal

Adrian Holovaty points out that "hyperlocal" has a very fluid definition and gets used in a lot of situations where the word "local" would do just as well. Holovaty proposes a new and more precise term: "microlocal."

www.holovaty.com/...0156 - Preview

hyperlocal newspapers news media new media Adrian Holovaty Everyblock jargon microlocal

31 Dec 08

The Internet Is Bad For The Truth

The Internet, by its nature, destroys that shaping experience by which countries or cultures live a "moment" together, writes columnist Melik Kaylan.

www.forbes.com/...ion-oped-cx_mk_1223kaylan.html - Preview

Internet truth authority media new media Forbes

We confront a bewildering sea change in mass communications, and nobody seems to have clue where we're headed.
The gatekeepers had served the vital function of filtering, marketing and branding talent. By creating celebrity, they'd helped focus the attention of mass audiences toward shared tastes, shared cultural experiences and, ultimately, shared values (however dubious).
5 more annotations...
- At first I thought they didn't trust the media monopolies or the political slant in every report they read ranging from blogs to newspapers. But I've come to sense a profounder cause at work: the fragmentation of the very process by which we form opinion, or taste, or ultimately a sense of the truth.
- I grew up in the U.K. at a time when the television offered two state channels and one commercial channel. It meant that mandarins with high taste determined the level of culture to be nightly consumed by the citizenry. It also meant that the country as a whole experienced culture, even counterculture, in unison.
  - I don't really think you can ever experience "counter-culture" through a top-down-controlled system. - on 2008-12-31
  Add Sticky Note
- But there is a point at which multi-cultural, multi-ethnic, trans-national, infinite and contradictory sources of information simply confuse and bewilder the individual and fragment the perceptual consensus.
- Here is the reductio ad absurdum of endless "inclusivity" or "inclusiveness"--it ultimately destroys the category that contains it. Endless truths destroy the notion of truth. If anything can be art, you have no idea what defines art, and you start watching other people to get clues.
  - This is the very essence of deconstruction. As to whether that is a good thing or not... - on 2008-12-31
  Add Sticky Note
- The Internet, by its nature, destroys that shaping experience by which countries or cultures live a "moment" together. It's not a normative medium as the BBC was in my youth. It simply feeds the consumer's pre-formed tastes, it doesn't form them. If you know what you want, the Internet is a great tool. But how do you develop your tastes, or political biases or moral code--the criteria that help you to choose--in the first place? My bet is, in the coming decades, it won't be through the media anymore.

30 Dec 08

Principles for a New Media Literacy

Media are becoming democratized. Digital media tools, increasingly cheap and ubiquitous, have spawned a massive amount of creation at all levels, most notably from the ranks of the grassroots in contrast to traditional, one-to-many publications and broadcasts. The networks that made this possible have provided vast access to what people have created — potentially a global audience for anyone’s creation.

citmedia.org/...iples-for-a-new-media-literacy - Preview

new media literacy journalism media Center for Citizen Media attention publishing

Media are becoming democratized. Digital media tools, increasingly cheap and ubiquitous, have spawned a massive amount of creation at all levels, most notably from the ranks of the grassroots in contrast to traditional, one-to-many publications and broadcasts. The networks that made this possible have provided vast access to what people have created — potentially a global audience for anyone’s creation.
Digital media tools, increasingly cheap and ubiquitous, have spawned a massive amount of creation at all levels, most notably from the ranks of the grassroots in contrast to traditional, one-to-many publications and broadcasts.
13 more annotations...
- In this emergent global conversation, which has created a tsunami of information, what can we trust?
- To get this right, we’ll have to re-think, or at least re-apply, some older cultural norms in distinctly modern ways.
- Trust and credibility are not new to the Digital Age.
- The new media environment is rich with potential for excellence. But it is equally open to error, honest or otherwise, and persuasion morphs into manipulation more readily than ever.
- In the traditional news world, even though we understood the prevalence of minor errors in stories, even by reputable journalists, we also understood that, by and large, the better media organizations get things pretty much right. The small mistakes undermine any notion of absolute trust, but we accept the overall value of the work.
  
  In a world with seemingly infinite sources of information, this equation is harder to solve. But we can make a start by being better informed about what we read, hear and watch.
- But most of that coverage focuses on reporting related to corporate maneuvering and profiles of stars — not bad to do but not sufficient to what the public needs.
- Apart from raw market mechanisms and the legal system’s bludgeon of libel lawsuits — both, sadly, are flawed as countermeasures to poor journalism — we have had a largely unaccountable press. New media tools are pulling down some walls and helping to create the possibility of deeper nonlegal accountability. More thorough and robust media criticism, and a conversation around it, will serve us all better.
- Media saturation requires us to become more active as consumers, in part to manage the flood of data pouring over us each day but also to make informed judgments about the significance of what we do see.
- We have come to learn that the tabloid’s front-page headline about Barack Obama’s alien love child via a Martian mate is almost certainly false, despite the fact that the publication sells millions of copies each week. We know that popularity in the traditional media world is not a proxy for quality.
- Part of our development as human beings is the creation of what we might call an internal “BS meter” — a sense of understanding when we’re seeing or hearing nonsense and when we’re hearing the truth, or something that we have reason to trust. Let’s call it, then, a “trust meter” instead of a BS meter. Either way, I imagine it ranging, say, from +30 to –30. Using that scale, a news article in the New York Times or Wall Street Journal might start out in strongly positive territory, perhaps at +26 or +27 on the trust meter. (I can think of very few journalists who start at +30 on any topic.)
  
  An anonymous comment on a random blog, by contrast, starts with negative credibility, say –26 or –27. Why on earth should we believe anything said by someone who’s unwilling to stand behind his or her own words? In most cases, the answer is that we should not. The random, anonymous commenter on a random blog should have to work hard just to achieve zero credibility, much less move into positive territory.
- Pseudonyms are becoming an online staple
  - They have always been an online staple. Always. - on 2008-12-30
  Add Sticky Note
- For all this, anonymity is essential to preserve. It protects whistleblowers and others for whom speech can be unfairly dangerous. But when people don’t stand behind their words, a reader should always wonder why and make appropriate adjustments.
- “Things I Believe” — a 10-point list of topics about which I’d come to previous conclusions. They weren’t moral or ethical in nature. Rather, they were issue-oriented, and about my job as a business and technology
  
  columnist.
  
  Every six months or so, I’d go down the list and systematically attack every proposition, looking for flaws in what I’d previously taken for granted.

18 Dec 08

MediaShift Idea Lab: News and Information as Digital Media Come of Age

Commentary from PBS's MediaShift Idea Lab on the Center for Internet & Society's recently released series of papers on the challenges of the networked and the digital to journalism.

www.pbs.org/...and-information-as-digita.html - Preview

journalism PBS new media media

There is enormous potential to expand the reach of journalism and to bring it closer to the people who need it.
The tools that enable new kinds of reporting, flexible ways to combine information, and networks that connect people to information and to each other are getting better.

Berkman Publication Series - Media Republic

Over the past year, researchers at the Berkman Center for Internet & Society have reached out to a broad range of media experts to help in this assessment of the changes in new media over the past several years and to take a sober look at the successes and ongoing challenges.

cyber.law.harvard.edu/...mediarepublic - Preview

media journalism new media

02 Dec 08

Trademark, Schmademark

Copy editor Bill Walsh takes issue with most of the decorative capitalization and punctuation in company logos. In short, journalists should be grownups and write company names based on grammatical rules, not on how PR flacks and lawyers say they should b

www.theslot.com/webnames.html - Preview

trademarks Bill_Walsh the_slot copy editing punctuation capitalization journalism writing style marketing grammar media

Michael Becker's Library tagged media → View Popular

Mr. Murdoch Goes to War

BBC - Peston's Picks: What future for media and journalism?

12 Things Newspapers Should Do to Survive

2020 vision: What's next for news

Old Growth Media And The Future Of News

What’s a medium?

The end of paper?

Three Ways the Media is Innovating with New Interfaces

Print newspapers may die, but investigative reporting must be saved

The demise of newspapers means better journalism

Scoopless in Seattle: P-I beat on own sad news

Networked link journalism: A revolution quietly begins in Washington state

Digital guru Clay Shirky's media forecast and predictions for 2009

Dailies go Darwin

Goodbye hyperlocal, hello microlocal

The Internet Is Bad For The Truth

Principles for a New Media Literacy

MediaShift Idea Lab: News and Information as Digital Media Come of Age

Berkman Publication Series - Media Republic

Trademark, Schmademark

Selected Tags

Related Tags

Sponsored Links

Top Contributors

Groups interested in media

Cartoons

Ad4dcss/Digital Citizenship

Media & Culture @ HM

Blog World Expo -Sponsors

Credibility in the New News

Blog World Expo - Exhibitors