Skip to main content

Ross Hunter's Library tagged Sustainability   View Popular

13 Oct 09

Down to Earth - Raising Cattle, Kids and Consciousness » Blog Archive » Responsible ground beef, how can it compete?

  • And for the sake of our health, please keep raising and selling your pastured beef.


    The system of producing feedlot beef requires antibiotics to keep the cattle alive because the unnatural food they’re forced to eat makes them sick. Michael Pollan has illustrated this clearly.


    So what you provide us is non-sick beef.


    Looking across America we see an increasingly unwell population. And sick beef is cheap enough everyone can eat it all the time.


    Poor, foolish, overweight, health-impaired America.

07 Oct 09

Worldchanging Interview: Paul Hawken

  • What I discovered was people, themselves. And really just the number, and the breath, and depth of the ingenuity and authenticity in which people really applied themselves to being problem solvers and alleviate suffering, to addressing the ills of the world, and innovating and re-imagining what was possible. And they are organizing around different ways and different issues around different cultures and different manners. And when you stand back and you really get to see, if you will, not visually, not directly, but see it in a conceptual way, how large and diverse this movement is, then you just have to either laugh, or grin or smile.
  • Now then, you know what we pay attention to instead? All the institutional obstacles, and the resistance, and corruption, and financial chicanery, and on and on and on. And you look at that and you want to just jump off a bridge. And because you just see that, humans seem self serving, greedy, short sighted and violent. And if you just look at that, you just drink that potion, its toxic.
05 Oct 09

It’s Time for a Delicious Revolution | Conversations...

  • It turns out these same foods and methods of agriculture are often the best for the planet. Agriculture and the transportation, processing, storage, and preparation of food are a big part of our ecological impact. When it comes to environmental impact, how a family eats is more important than the type of car they choose to drive.
03 Oct 09

Community Markets Association of Williamson County

  • We are in a silent crisis in America because our food supply chain is being poisoned, and will ultimately be destroyed. What’s causing this is the action of corporate practices that exist only to strip every last dollar out of farming until the land is dead. Then the buyers of food will eat whatever they are fed to survive.


    This crisis needs to become louder. It needs to turn into the scream it really is. We are being killed by bad food, and the answer for each one of us lies within a few miles of where we live.

20 Mar 09

Climate Progress » Blog Archive » Welcome Rolling Stone readers to “America’s fiercest climate-change activist-blogger”

  • For any first-time visitors here because of the Rolling Stone special section “RS100: The people who are reinventing America,” this post is intended as an introduction to Climate Progress.


    [My apologies to regular CP readers for yet another introductory piece — and of course, for the tasetless RS cover — but I’ve kinda started hangin’ with a bad crowd now. And who doesn’t like ice cream?]

Climate Progress » Blog Archive » Climate competitiveness 2: When the global Ponzi scheme collapses (circa 2030), the only jobs left will be green

  • Like all Ponzi schemes, the system must collapse. When it does, the only jobs left standing will be those that are “green” — which can be defined as those jobs that do not plunder nonrenewable energy resources and natural capital and/or do not to destroy a livable climate.
  • I expect most opinion makers and the majority of the public to get desperate about reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the 2020s. But desperation is not collapse. I have tended to think that the inflection point is around 2030.
  • 1 more annotations...

Climate Progress » Blog Archive » The Campaign for an Energy Efficient America pushes an Energy Efficiency Resource Standard

  • For the most part, the debate has ignored the cheapest, cleanest energy source: using electricity more efficiently. Reducing energy demand and consumption would mean that we could do more while using less. According to McKinsey & Company, improving energy efficiency could offset 85 percent of projected electricity demand in 2030. Energy saved via efficiency improvements costs significantly less than conventional base-load electricity.
  • Even though efficiency reduces energy use, saves money, and reduce pollution, a win- win-win, most government and businesses are just awakening to the opportunities of efficiency investments. Uniting under the newly announced Campaign for an Energy Efficient America, more than 60 corporations and nonprofits strongly advocate a national Energy Efficiency Resource Standard (EERS) to mandate efficiency improvements across the country.

Climate Progress » Blog Archive » Obama at SCE Electric Vehicle Technical Center: “The nation that leads on energy will be the nation that leads the world in the 21st century”

  • Because these cars of tomorrow require the batteries of tomorrow, I am announcing that the Department of Energy is launching a $2 billion competitive grant program under the Recovery Act that will spark the manufacturing of the batteries and parts that run these cars, build or upgrade the factories that will produce them, and in the process, create thousands of jobs right here in America.


    Show us that your idea or your company is best-suited to meet America’s challenges, and we will give you a chance to prove it. And just because I’m here today doesn’t exempt all of you from that challenge — every company that wants a shot at these tax dollars has to prove their worth.


    We are also making a $400 million down-payment on the infrastructure necessary to get these cars on the road; and because these cars won’t leave the showroom unless consumers buy them, the Recovery Act includes a new tax credit of $7,500 to encourage Americans to plug one in at home.

19 Mar 09

SUPER CHIMNEY






    • Summary



      The invention suggests employing a super tall chimney to facilitate heat exchange in
      the atmosphere as a remedy to Global Warming. Calculations show that if we construct a chimney 5 kilometers (3 mile)
      tall and 1 kilometer (0.7 mile) in diameter, we can expect the following amazing results:


      • Just 10 chimneys like the one proposed will offset
        Global Warming.

      • Each chimney will produce ~330,000 Mega Watts of
        electricity, which is equivalent to the amount of energy 15 super powerful nuclear
        stations produce

      • Each chimney will induce rain generation in
        surrounding areas and will produce roughly 70 million tons of water
        precipitation every day, which is equal 4% of Mississippi river flow in New
        Orleans or about 80 Jordan Rivers.

      • Each chimney will transform at least 300 square miles
        of desert into arable land.

      • Each chimney will trap approximately 1,500,000 tons of CO2 per year in the newly created arable area.





      The goal of this website is to explain the idea of
      utilizing super-chimney technology as a unique way to avert global warming
      catastrophe at the same time as generating clean energy and irrigation. After
      looking through the information on this site you will understand how this
      technology works, and -- in fact -- how simple it is!







      I suspect you might have questions, concerns, or criticism. In this
      regard, I urge you not to hesitate to contact me at mike@superchimney.org. I
      promise to do my best in replying to you in a timely fashion with more detailed
      explanations and discussion.


      Sincerely,


      Michael Pesochinsky

Transition Towns WIKI :: Main / HomePage

  • It all starts off when a small collection of motivated individuals within a community come together with a shared concern: how can our community respond to the challenges, and opportunities, of Peak Oil and Climate Change?


    They begin by forming an initiating group and then adopt the Transition Model (explained here at length, and in bits here and here) with the intention of engaging a significant proportion of the people in their community to kick off a Transition Initiative.

    • After going through a comprehensive and creative process of:

      • awareness raising around peak oil, climate change and the need to undertake a community lead process to rebuild resilience and reduce carbon
      • connecting with existing groups in the community
      • building bridges to local government
      • connecting with other transition initiatives
      • forming groups to look at all the key areas of life (food, energy, transport, health, heart & soul, economics & livelihoods, etc)
      • kicking off projects aimed at building people's understanding of resilience and carbon issues and community engagement
      • eventually launching a community defined, community implemented "Energy Descent Action Plan" over a 15 to 20 year timescale
  • 1 more annotations...

Repower America

  • What is Repower America?



    Repower America is the bold clean energy plan to “repower” our country with 100% clean electricity within 10 years.


    First described in a speech last July by Al Gore, Repower America means new industries with high-paying jobs. It means lower energy costs. And, it means substituting clean domestic sources of energy and a transition away from dirty coal and foreign oil. Read about the goal here.


    By making buildings and homes more efficient, ramping up renewable energy generation, constructing a unified national smart grid, and transitioning to clean and affordable plug-in cars, we can address our country’s economic and national security challenges—all while making huge strides to solve the climate crisis.

Videos | We Can Solve It

  • Videos



    Watch our cool ads and videos below and share them with your friends.



    Do you have a great video that you'd like to see on wecansolveit.org? Click here to submit a video. 

This Is Reality | The Details Behind The Facts

  • There are no homes in America powered by "clean" coal today. There are no "clean" coal power plants selling electricity in America today. In fact, America does not have a single demonstration "clean" coal plant that captures and safely stores its carbon pollution. The technologies that capture or safely store CO2 have not yet been integrated with coal power at commercial scale. This means that the roughly 600 coal plants producing electricity in the US today are not preventing their global warming pollution from entering the atmosphere. Although the technologies are being developed and tested, in reality, there is no such thing as "clean" coal power in America today.
16 Mar 09

An expensive approach to climate change | Cap and binge | The Economist

ap and Trade that Works

So far, cap and trade systems have not succeeded in reducing emissions of carbon dioxide from fossil fuel combustion enough to justify the economic hardship they’ve inflicted. The fundamental reasons for this failure are that the economic incentives and disincentives of this system have not hit the correct targets, and that the programs are prone to fraud and difficult to enforce. The following proposal corrects those problems.

1. Limit the scope of the cap and trade program to electric power generation. All fossil fuel use outside the program should be subject to a carbon tax (which could be implemented separately, perhaps with the tax rate following a price established by this program).

There are several reasons to confine the program to electric power generation only. First, limiting the number of pollution sources in the program makes it possible to enforce compliance, and second, electric power generation is fundamentally an energy conversion and delivery industry and not an energy consumer, and as such its incentives should be applied differently.

The most and least important reason to limit the scope of the program to electric power generation is that it makes the program politically possible right now. The electric power industry is already regulated, and many voters imagine cap and trade will solve the climate problem without costing them any money. Elected officials should be able to support this program without jeopardizing their re-elections.

2. Define a cap in terms of metric tons of carbon dioxide emitted per megawatt hour generated and sold.

Specifying emissions per megawatt-hour targets the generation mix rather than the total amount of power supplied to the grid, and will guide power company choices for new generation facilities and upgrades to existing facilities.

3. Distribute allowances that reflect the cap to all generators, including non-polluting generators, based on the amount of electricity they sell. Require allowances to be used to purchase fossil fuels fo

www.economist.com/...displaystory.cfm - Preview

Sustainability

12 Mar 09

Toxic Assets

  • The banks, the Fed and Treasury are playing a hiding game, if they do actually have a good idea of what the assets are worth - they don't want the share prices to collapse (more than they have).



    The astronomical amounts involved in credit default swaps are often mentioned, as in the WaPo piece referred to by JHM. But who are these amounts owed to, people on Mars? If someone is obliged to pay, someone else has to receive. To a considerable extent there is a colossal bookkeeping problem, which won't be cleared up as long as people have reasons to hide the true situation.

  • I have no quarrel with Dean's comments here, but think we need to focus on a larger picture. Regarding the figures put forward in the Post op-ed cited by JHM, I would guess that the 5 to 30 cents on the dollar valuation is one that merely takes into account the orgy of asset inflation over the past couple decades, but NOT the fact that economic arrangements such as suburbia and the present food system are not viable without enormous energy inputs that are completely unsustainable. Surely the needed transformation of our economy and society in the face of the death trap we have set for ourselves is the number one priority, along with a new set of financial arrangements that must be completely subordinated to this goal - NOT shoring up the existing banks. I agree that along the way the banks will have to be placed in receivership, but the concern expressed in several of the comments over proper asset pricing and open books, is also, to my mind, something of a diversion from what is most important.
10 Mar 09

Building a green economy strong enough to lift people out of poverty — Green For All

  • What's the best way to give Americans of all socioeconomic backgrounds a tangible stake in fighting for issues like global warming?


    Easy: Make it their livelihood. Every day, about 135 million people go to work in the U.S. Imagine what would happen if millions of those jobs — plus new ones created for people who are currently unemployed — were in fields like renewable energy, sustainable agriculture, and green building.


    Our two crucial concerns about survival — the environment and making a living — would be combined. A person's commitment to their job would also be their commitment to the planet.

Overshoot: Ecological Basis of Revolutionary Change

classic text Overshoot: The Ecological Basis of Revolutionary Change - William Catton

www.mnforsustain.org/ton_excerpt_overshoot_1982.htm - Preview

Sustainability

  • Circumstance: The Age of Exuberance is over, population has already overshot
    carrying capacity, and prodigal Homo sapiens has drawn down the world's savings
    deposits.


    Consequence: All forms of human organization and behavior that are based on the
    assumption of limitlessness must change to forms that accord with finite limits.

  • Unrecognized Preview


    The Industrial Revolution made us precariously dependent on nature's dwindling
    legacy of non-renewable resources, even though we did not at first recognize
    this fact. Many major events of modern history were unforeseen results of
    actions taken with inadequate awareness of ecological mechanisms. Peoples and
    governments never intended some of the outcomes their actions would incur.

The Gospel of Consumption | Orion Magazine

  • Today “work and more work” is the accepted way of doing things. If anything, improvements to the labor-saving machinery since the 1920s have intensified the trend. Machines can save labor, but only if they go idle when we possess enough of what they can produce. In other words, the machinery offers us an opportunity to work less, an opportunity that as a society we have chosen not to take. Instead, we have allowed the owners of those machines to define their purpose: not reduction of labor, but “higher productivity”—and with it the imperative to consume virtually everything that the machinery can possibly produce.

GrowthBusters.com » Find Out More

  • We are hooked on a system that depends on growth

    It no longer provides the prosperity or happiness we seek

    It is unsustainable

Change Everything Now | Orion Magazine

  • At the current rates, the world economy will be twice as big as it is today in seventeen years. That carries the potential for enormous additional destruction. The environmental movement has a lot of wonderful things about it, and it’s accomplished a lot. But it’s not up to this challenge of dealing with this amount of environmental loss and destruction.



    The fundamental thing that’s happened is that our efforts to clean up the environment are being overwhelmed by the sheer increase in the size of the economy. And there’s no reason to think that won’t continue. So we have to ask, what is it about our society that puts such an extraordinary premium on growth? Is it justified? Why is that growth so destructive? And what do we do about it?



    Capitalism is a growth machine. What it really cares about is earning a profit and reinvesting a large share of that and growing continually. Profits can be enhanced if the companies are not paying for the cost of their environmental destruction—so they fight [paying it] tooth and nail. The companies themselves are now quite huge, quite powerful, quite global, and no longer just the main economic actors in our society. They are the main political actors also.

1 - 20 of 24 Next ›
Showing 20 items per page

Diigo is about better ways to research, share and collaborate on information. Learn more »

Join Diigo