Robert Maguire's Library tagged → View Popular
Daily brief: 5 N. Va. men arrested, questioned in Pakistan on possible jihadist links | The AfPak Channel
-
However,
recent reports say that a police source in Sargodha said the five men
have told FBI investigators that they went to Pakistan to take part in
jihad, while security officials report that the men were allegedly
planning to strike "sensitive installations" in Pakistan (CBS, AP, Reuters, AFP, McClatchy, AP).
Three Pakistanis have also been detained, one on suspicion of links to
the 2007 suicide attack outside the Pakistani air base at Sargodha (AJE). -
Five
U.S. citizens from the suburbs of northern Virginia were arrested at
the home of an activist allegedly affiliated with Jaish-e-Mohammed in
Sargodha, a town in Punjab province in Pakistan, after going missing
from their U.S. homes about a week ago, and are currently being
questioned by Pakistani authorities on suspicion of links to terrorism (NYT, AP, BBC, Telegraph, Dawn). JeM was involved with the 2002 murder of Daniel Pearl, a Wall Street Journal
reporter, and an assassination attempt on former Pakistani President
Gen. Pervez Musharraf, though its roots are fighting Indian forces in
the disputed Kashmir territories (AJE, Bloomberg, AFP). - 5 more annotations...
How Americans See The World - The Daily Dish | By Andrew Sullivan
-
Only 16% of the public has a favorable
view of Pakistan, our essential partner in the new AfPak strategy --
barely more than have a favorable view of Iran (11%) -- and unfavorable
views of Pakistan have gone from 39% to 68% since last year. Yikes.
And the partisan gap on Israel is interesting, if not new: in the
general public, 68% of Republicans and 43% of Democrats say that they
sympathize with Israel more than with the Palestinians. Among [Council on Foreign Relations]
experts, a solid 41% plurality say that they sympathize with both
Israel and the Palestinians equally.
Georgia to the rescue... again | FP Passport
-
A big chunk of them will also come from Georgia, a non-NATO member with an ulterior motive:
But the rest of the troops mentioned are
either already deployed, or coming from a country whose desperate,
loose cannon leader is pretty much discredited internationally. From a
military perspective, Georgia's contribution is welcome news. But from
a
political perspective, it represents more that country's desperation to
join NATO than a grand victory for Obama's new strategy.
According to the Washington Post, NATO officials are counting on at least 900 troops from Georgia. Grunstein thinks it might be as high as 3,300.
About those civilian fatalities | The AfPak Channel
-
we read it with great interest and were struck by one of Shane's anonymous
sources, a government official who claims that the more than 80 drone strikes
in less than two years have killed "more than 400" enemy fighters and "just
over 20" civilians. -
A study we conducted in mid-October, based on a careful
analysis of the most accurate media counts of the strikes, found
that between some 370 and 540 militants were killed by drone strikes in Pakistan since the start of 2008. There have been a few more strikes since
the study was released, bringing the total of militants killed to between 384 and 578. So that's
close enough to be in the same range as the government official's estimate of
more than 400 militants killed. - 1 more annotations...
Key to Afghan crisis: tea and education | csmonitor.com
-
ask American schoolchildren how often they talk with their grandparents about the important events of history in
the past -
maybe 10 percent
- 31 more annotations...
the highlights of Richard Armitage's interview with Prism - By Tom Ricks | The Best Defense
-
-
"The second surprise was frankly how successful we were for
the first 4 years-almost 5 years-at keeping the ISI [Pakistan's Inter-Service
Intelligence] relatively out of it. They were so shocked with the speed at
which we invaded Afghanistan that I think the ISI felt it was only a matter of
time until we prevailed." - 5 more annotations...
Obama: Cunning Again? - The Daily Dish | By Andrew Sullivan
-
I love the time line that Obama has proposed for withdrawing our troops
from Afghanistan. Crafty. The neocons (McCain for one) are already
saying that it gives comfort to the enemy, that they will just wait
until we leave and then attack again. And the reason this is bad is
what?
I think the hope of the White House is that the Taliban
will lay low. If the Taliban want to wait until we leave, perhaps
there is time for the Afghans to train and begin to defend themselves.
If the Taliban attacks, there are enough troops to counter their
attacks and weaken them by attrition. A win/win for us.
Obama
is also telling the Afghans in the street that we are leaving, which
hopefully will say to them that we are not their enemy, not their
occupiers, and hopefully keep ordinary patriotic Afghans from joining
the Taliban.
Very cool.
Running the Table | Foreign Policy
-
We need a surge in Afghanistan. It worked in Iraq!
-
Afghanistan is Obama's Vietnam!
- 11 more annotations...
Daily brief: Obama expected to announce Afghanistan decision December 1 | The AfPak Channel
-
The
top U.S. and NATO commander in the country, Gen. Stanley McChrystal,
and the U.S. ambassador to Kabul, Amb. Karl Eikenberry, have both
reportedly been told to prepare to testify before Congress "as early as
next week," so they can offer support for the president's decision (Washington Post, NPR).
Defense Secretary Robert Gates, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Adm. Mike Mullen are also expected to
brief Congress on the subject (Los Angeles Times). - 3 more annotations...
Daily brief: Clinton in Kabul for Karzai's inauguration | The AfPak Channel
-
Whether
Karzai will appoint reformers or stack his cabinet with political
friends remains an open question that worries Afghan and international
observers alike (AFP, Independent). -
U.S. officials have reportedly given Karzai a list of 40 people it
considers "clean enough" to participate in his new cabinet.
Presumably
not included on the "clean enough" list is the president's half-brother
Ahmed Wali Karzai, who has become a "symbol of cronyism and a lightning
rod for criticism of all that is wrong with Karzai's administration" (AP). Alexandra Zavis has a must-read on the plague of corruption in Afghanistan (Los Angeles Times). - 4 more annotations...
Informed Comment: Pakistani Military Takes Taliban Strongholds; Maulana Fazlullah Surfaces in Afghanistan
-
On Tuesday, for instance, Pakistani troops took the militant stronghold of Laddah, South Waziristan,, reporting that they found a large cache of jihadi literature, mainly in Arabic. The town, formerly of 10,000, appears to have been a training camp for guerrillas, including "Arabs and Uzbeks." The Pakistani arm's assault on the place left it in ruins, and all 10,000 civilian inhabitants had already fled, albeit the remaining militants put up a hard fight.
-

- 3 more annotations...
Why is Richard Holbrooke going to Russia? (Updated) | The Cable
-
State Department spokesman Ian Kelly told The Cable that Holbrooke is going to Russia "for meetings with his special representative counterpart and to discuss U.S.-Russia cooperation regarding Afghanistan," but said he couldn't be more specific.
Daily brief: U.S. ambassador to Kabul cautions against more troops | The AfPak Channel
-
The
president reportedly felt it necessary after yesterday's meeting to
clarify that U.S. commitment to Afghanistan is "not open-ended" and
that Kabul must improve governance in the country, according to an
administration official (AFP, CNN, Al Jazeera).
Helene Cooper assesses, however, that the international community lacks
sufficient leverage over Karzai and will not fully pull out of the
country (New York Times). And analysts and officials alike lament the continued involvement of warlords in Afghanistan's political system (AP). -
NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen asserted yesterday that he
expects allies to provide more resources for NATO's training mission in
Afghanistan. - 3 more annotations...
An articulate plan for security | The AfPak Channel
-
As someone who talks to many Afghans -- from government
officials to shopkeepers, students and others -- and the international
community on a daily basis, the answer is very clear: Afghans need security and
stability before anything else can be put forth. -
In terms of security, more troops are fundamental. But this
has to be spelled out clearly by the Obama administration. When speaking to
Afghans here, they agree that more troops are needed, but an entire plan is
also needed to know when the troops will arrive, where they will be deployed, what
will they carry out, and -- this is what concerns Afghans a lot -- when they
will be leaving. The what part is the most important one; Afghans here agree
that more troops are necessary to support Afghanistan's own security forces,
the Afghan National Army and the Afghan National Police. - 2 more annotations...
More talking, not more troops | The AfPak Channel
-
Building a country at gunpoint has failed.
-
But how many roads are
built in rural Afghanistan
these days without paying bribes to local insurgents? How many Pashtun
villagers would get polio vaccinations without permission from the Taliban?
Making the country better doesn't necessarily require fighting the insurgents;
in many cases, it requires working with them. - 3 more annotations...
AfPak experts advise Obama | The AfPak Channel
-
Graeme Smith, More
talking, not more troopsJ Alexander Thier, Prioritize
in AfghanistanMichael Innes, Nearly
Anywhere Terrorists OperateGretchen Peters, It's not about the number of troops
Asma Nemati, An
articulate plan for securityPeter Bergen,
Time
for the heavy lifting
Daily brief: Obama reportedly considering 4 Afghanistan options | The AfPak Channel
-
Three
of Obama's top advisers -- Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Defense
Secretary Robert Gates, and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Adm. Mike
Mullen -- are reportedly coalescing around a proposal to send 30,000 or
more U.S. soldiers to Afghanistan (New York Times). -
Obama is expected to
ask NATO allies to contribute 4,000 more troops to Afghanistan to "help
break the deadlock," though his request is set to be ignored, reports
Michael Evans (Times of London) - 4 more annotations...
Interview on the Charlie Rose Show
-
QUESTION: Is Germany on board with respect to Afghanistan?
SECRETARY CLINTON: I think Germany is committed to the effort in Afghanistan. They’re waiting, like the rest of the world is, the United States, and through President Obama, to announce our intentions and our way forward. But they have a deep understanding of why this is important for NATO, why this is important for the larger international community. And I think that given the right measures of accountability that we need to be seeking from President Karzai and his government, we’re going to see a commitment not just from Germany, but from many of our NATO allies.
Selected Tags
Related Tags
Sponsored Links
Top Contributors
Groups interested in pakistan
-
Asia
Items: 29 | Visits: 47
Created by: sussex cdec
-
Afghanistan -- Pakistan
This listing will track 'im...
Items: 10 | Visits: 147
Created by: liveinfreedom .
-
Pakistan Top Stories
Items: 330 | Visits: 438
Created by: Salah K
Highlighter, Sticky notes, Tagging, Groups and Network: integrated suite dramatically boosting research productivity. Learn more »
Join Diigo
