Rudy Garns's Library tagged → View Popular, Search in Google
Create- a group for your interests the Wiki way.
Connect- find like-minded people & build a Wiki group together.
Share- your passion & help build other Wiki groups!
"This article details the development of the Library Instruction Wiki (http://instructionwiki.org): an effort to develop a web-based, knowledge sharing resource. Though some library instruction is specific to a given institution or class, much of what instruction librarians teach is similar. Library instructors have repeatedly expressed the desire to share resources, ideas and expertise. With the increasing presence of social software applications, the options for technology-enabled knowledge sharing have grown dramatically in recent years. The success of Wikipedia illustrates how wikis can be used to build collective knowledge-building projects. The authors describe the process of using a wiki to build such a resource. Drawing on research connecting communities of practice, information and communication technology and knowledge management, the authors also examine the social and cultural challenges they faced trying to use communication technology with a dispersed network of practitioners. Implementation details including software selection and installation, customization, and marketing are discussed. A year after its initial launch, contributions to the wiki have slowed despite consistent and enthusiastic support for the concept. The authors examine possible reasons for this limited activity, and suggest next steps for this wiki and for further research." Journal of Web Librarianship, Vol. 1, No. 1. (2007), pp. 27-44.
"There are three different rubrics featured on this page.
The first one, 'Digital Story' covers criterion A and B and is to be used by all classrooms for assessing the multimedia artifact. It will also be used by the judges for the digital story awards.
The second rubric, 'Engagement, Reflection and Evaluation' (criterion C and D) is optional for teachers to use at the conclusion of the project.
The first and second rubrics have been designed to compliment each other, hence the progression from criterion A to D.
The third rubric, 'Wiki Grading Rubric' is also optional and provides a tool for assessing student contribution and engagement with the wiki editing process." (flatclassroomproject)
"Scholarpedia feels and looks like Wikipedia - the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit. Indeed, both are powered by the same program - MediaWiki. Both allow visitors to review and modify articles simply by clicking on the edit this article link.
However, Scholarpedia differs from Wikipedia in some very important ways:
* Each article is written by an expert (invited or elected by the public).
* Each article is anonymously peer reviewed to ensure accurate and reliable information.
* Each article has a curator - typically its author -- who is responsible for its content.
* Any modification of the article needs to be approved by the curator before it appears in the final, approved version. "
Selected Tags
Related Tags
Top Contributors
Groups interested in wiki
-
Wiki Examples
Collection of classroom, stu...
Items: 66 | Visits: 273
Created by: Caroline Bucky
-
Wikispaces
Items: 6 | Visits: 640
Created by: Claire Miller
-
Wiki Wiki
Items: 19 | Visits: 184
Created by: Toshiro Shimura
Highlighter, Sticky notes, Tagging, Groups and Network: integrated suite dramatically boosting research productivity. Learn more »
Join Diigo
