Rudy Garns's Library tagged → View Popular, Search in Google
"Well the simplest way of understanding justice is giving people what they deserve. This idea goes back to Aristotle. The real difficulty begins with figuring out who deserves what and why."
"Harvard philosopher Michael Sandel in conversation with Nigel Warburton outlines 3 answers to the question 'What is Justice?', Jeremy Bentham's, Immanuel Kant's, and Aristotle's."
This seminar will critically examine the contemporary debates on justice centred on John Rawls’s A Theory of Justice. We’ll be looking at Utilitarianism (Wk. 2), Rawls’s theory (Wks. 3 & 4), the challenges to it from libertarianism (Wk. 5), communitarianism (Wk. 6), luck egalitarianism (Wk. 7), feminism (Wk. 8), and socialism (Wk. 9), and the question of global justice (Wk. 10).
This web page is based primarily on ideas contained in John Rawls' influential book A Theory of Justice (Harvard University Press, 1971), which has been discussed by many philosophers and nonphilosophers alike. Its ideas are often quoted and paraphrased in textbooks for Introduction to Philosophy, Ethics, and Business Ethics courses. But Rawls has gone beyond his views of 1971, and philosophy courses are beginning to take his important later thinking into account. The later ideas of Rawls to some extent build on the earlier work summarized below.
A course reading guide by John Kilcullen for Modern Political Theory
-
It is as if he supposes that freedom is a good thing and inequality a bad thing.
The X's marked areas where Kiehl had discovered abnormally low grey matter density in Dugan's brain. In a curious meeting of law and neuroscience, those X's would help jurors decide whether he should be executed or sentenced to life in prison. Did the way Dugan's brain had developed leave him spring-loaded for violence? Or had he chosen freely when he abducted, raped and killed a 10-year-old girl in 1983?
in list: Neuroethics
Hsu et al. 320 (5879): 1092 -- Science
Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench Judge John Scurfield said Thursday that Li, 40, could not be found guilty of murder and is not criminally responsible for the crime because he was mentally ill at the time of the killing.
in list: Neuroethics
In our legal system, judges and juries have to assign responsibility for crimes and decide on appropriate punishments. A new imaging study reveals which area of the brain plays a key role in these cognitive processes. (Scientific American)
in list: Informatics
"n recent years, there has been lots of speculation on the potential intersection of neuroscience and the legal system. Will brain imaging became a fool-proof lie detector? Are some violent offenders suffering from a defective emotional brain that's beyond their control? Should we replace the insanity defense with a less rationalist account of human morality? etc, etc. The assumption is that the latest tools of science can help us refine our squishy concepts of justice, which we've inherited from Plato, the Old Testament and the 18th century British legal system. Needless to say, Plato didn't have fMRI." (Jonah Lehrer, The Frontal Cortex)
in list: Neuroethics
Selected Tags
Related Tags
Top Contributors
Groups interested in justice
-
Issues - Jena6
Collection of links to the J...
Items: 5 | Visits: 50
Created by: aeschylus
-
Justice Project - Economic Inequality
Items: 27 | Visits: 38
Created by: Sakshi Shah
-
Legal Links
A collection of law-related ...
Items: 337 | Visits: 71
Created by: Ashley Tolleson
Diigo is about better ways to research, share and collaborate on information. Learn more »
Join Diigo
