Rudy Garns's Library tagged → View Popular
Qualitative Experience in Machines
Lycan. Abstracted from ‘Qualitative experience in machines,’ The Digital Phoenix: How computers are changing philosophy.
Creature Consciousness
Animal studies tests the boundary between human and animal—and between academic and advocate
FIVE PROBLEMS IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF MIND By Stuart Kauffman
I have presented the mind-brain identity theory in the context of two physical theories: first one in which a multiparticle quantum-classical system is capable of decohering reversibly to classicity, or classicity for all practical purposes. This allows mind to have consequences for brain without having to act by efficient cause on brain. This appears to resolve two outstanding problems in the philosophy of mind that have plagued us since Descartes: how the mind 'acts on' matter - it does so acausally via decoherence. How does mind act on mind - via the quantum decohering-recohering dynamical behavior of the mind-brain identity system. (Edge)
Roy Baumeister: "Free will, Consciousness, and Human Social Life"
"Roy Baumeister of Florida State University speaks about the usefulness and complexity of consciousness and human culture."
Do Brains Make Minds?
Joining host Robert Kuhn is consciousness expert David Chalmers; philosopher of mind John Searle; anthropologist Marilyn Schlitz; theoretical physicist Fred Alan Wolf; and neuropsychologist Barry Beyerstein. The panelists discuss the connection between the gray matter called a brain, the thoughts we think, the mind-body connection, and whether there's something more to the human mind than what resides in the brain. (ResearchChannel)
Dan Dennett on our consciousness | Video on TED.com
Philosopher Dan Dennett makes a compelling argument that not only don't we understand our own consciousness, but that half the time our brains are actively fooling us.
Interview with Daniel Dennett. | Nirmukta
Dr. Dennett is a philosopher first although his ideas are strongly influenced by and develop on scientific ideas. His books have a way of cutting through the philosophical jargon, to present clear ways of thinking about fascinating subjects. He offers examples and analogies that help to make these areas of thought, ranging from consciousness to religion, accessible to all. I recently had the chance to ask him some questions for Nirmukta. Here is that interview:
Alva Noe, You are not your brain
We have become too reductive in understanding ourselves, argues philosopher Alva Noe. Our thoughts and desires are shaped by more than neurons firing inside our heads. (Salon)
Crabs Not Only Suffer Pain, But Retain Memory Of It
New research published by a Queen's University Belfast academic has shown that crabs not only suffer pain but that they retain a memory of it.
The Attentional Spotlight
The experience of ‘looking out of the corner of the eye’ using peripheral vision is commonplace but it conceals a unusual fact about attention. That is that we probably spend a lot more of our time than we might imagine with our ‘mind’s eye’ looking in a different direction to our eyeballs. (PsyBlog)
Dan Dennett: Cute, sexy, sweet and funny--an evolutionary riddle
Philosopher and scientist Dan Dennett argues that human consciousness and free will are the result of physical processes and are not what we traditionally think they are. (TED)
Unconscious decisions
Benjamin Libet’s experimental finding that decisions had in effect already been made before the conscious mind became aware of making them is both famous and controversial; now new research (published in a ‘Brief Communication’ in Nature Neuroscience by Chun Siong Soon, Marcel Brass, Hans-Jochen Heinze and John-Dylan Haynes) goes beyond it. Whereas the delay between decision and awareness detected by Libet lasted 500 milliseconds, the new research seems to show that decisions can be predicted up to ten seconds before the deciders are aware of having made up their minds. (Conscious Entities)
-
Whereas the delay between decision and awareness detected by Libet lasted 500 milliseconds, the new research seems to show that decisions can be predicted up to ten seconds before the deciders are aware of having made up their minds.
-
In the SMA the researchers found activity which predicted the decision some five seconds before the moment of conscious awareness, but it was elsewhere that the earliest signs appeared - in the frontopolar cortex and the precuneus. Here the subject’s decision could be seen as much as seven seconds ahead of time: allowing for the delay in the fMRI response, this tots up to a real figure of ten seconds.
- 3 more annotations...
Benjamin Libet - Libet's short delay.
The experiments carried out by Benjamin Libet into the timing of conscious awareness (briefly described here ) have provoked, and go on provoking, a vast amount of discussion. His own theory of consciousness as a kind of field has received somewhat less attention; and the strange brain-cutting experiment he proposed to test it seems likely to remain unperformed for the foreseeable future. A large number of papers and discussions have been published: in 2004, Libet finally summarised his own account in the book 'Mind Time'. (consciousentities.com)
-
whatever the voltage or frequency of the
pulses, the stimulus had to persist for about 500 milliseconds before the
subject became consciously aware of it. -
But we also respond to
events, and here a delay is highly relevant and noticeable. - 12 more annotations...
Selected Tags
Related Tags
Sponsored Links
Top Contributors
Groups interested in consciou...
-
Gnosticism
Items: 6 | Visits: 104
Created by: J N
-
Androids, Zombies and Brains
A collection of bookmarks f...
Items: 114 | Visits: 66
Created by: Rudy Garns
-
Psychodelics
about these guys and also a...
Items: 9 | Visits: 10
Created by: tom o'brien
Diigo is about better ways to research, share and collaborate on information. Learn more »
Join Diigo
