Skip to main content

Adriana Lukas's Library tagged freedom   View Popular, Search in Google

May
2
2012

  • Privacy now is bolting the door two decades after the horse gave several week's advance notice, left after providing a forwarding address and has died of old age. Useful, but a little late.

Jun
28
2011

"To be clear, we should not fear this one patent application, but rather the larger technology that may be captured by governments and implemented in widespread standards that could have serious consequences, for example, by shutting down citizens’ ability to capture and disseminate video. The technology in this patent just may be a harbinger of that, and—for that reason—we will continue to watch it closely."

EFF freedom internet patent Apple video censorship governments

Feb
15
2011

interesting, but just like books, internet can be used to spread information or propaganda, educate people or control them. 

internet China control censorship propaganda freedom oppression

Feb
4
2011

Seems a fair critique of the man from what I have read by him. My conclusion is that Morozov is one of the 'professional contrarians' - coming to a noisy exposed area or topic, the only way to make yourself visible is to say the opposite of what everyone believes regardless of tubs, babies and bathwater... "Unfortunately, this message is buried amid a scattered, loosely argued series of attacks on a nebulous "cyber-utopian" movement, whose views are stated in the most general of terms, often in the form of quotes from CNN and other news agencies who are putatively summing up some notional cyber-utopian consensus. In his zeal to discredit this ideology (whatever it is), Morozov throws whatever he's got handy at anyone he can find who supports the idea of technology as a liberator, no matter how weak or silly his ammunition."

activism politics corydoctorow critique socialmedia twitter technology freedom utopia ideology opensource

  • Morozov is skeptical of technology's capacity to foment revolution and spread democracy. Free access to information isn't necessary or even important to toppling corrupt regimes, he says — this is a shibboleth of Reaganites and their sentimental view of Samizdat, Radio Free Europe and other cold war information efforts. The Soviet Union didn't fall because of political organising, brave dissidents, or photocopied zines – it fell because it was a badly run nightmare that lurched from crisis to crisis until it imploded.
  • He supports this caricature with a few of the dumbest quotes cherry-picked from the last two decades of "internet discourse," but neatly ignores all the serious work on the history of the net as distinct from other media – notably, he fails to mention or address the arguments raised in Timothy Wu's excellent The Master Switch that was published last year.

  • 10 more annotation(s)...
Dec
28
2010

yep, this is how I fear for the internet too... a must-read unpicking a really bad article (sadly by someone vaguely known) about wikileaks, internet, politics, culture and information.

internet censorship freedom information power ideology hackers wikileaks

  • Horrifying as this vision is, it simply distracts from the main lessons of the Wikileaks affair: the increasing control of (relatively) unaccountable corporations and states over the key components of the Internet, and their increased willingness to use this control in politicized ways to impose a "dissent tax" on content they find objectionable. Ability to disseminate one's ideas on the Internet is now a sine qua non of inclusion in the global public sphere. However, the Internet is not a true public sphere; it is a public sphere erected on private property, what I have dubbed a "quasi-public sphere," where the property owners can sideline and constrain dissent.
  • Lanier thus conflates the right to privacy of persons with the privilege of non-disclosure that states may sometimes exercise. Raising personhood in this context is irrelevant and dangerous. Misguided legal fictions aside, states and corporations are not persons and should not enjoy the considerations, such as an inherent right to privacy. On the contrary, they are subject to the people's right to transparent and accountable governance. Institutions, may, under certain conditions, exercise a privilege not to disclose particular kinds of information to the general public, but then only with justification.
  • 3 more annotation(s)...

it might be one of those things that doesn't work in theory but works in practice. The devil I suspect is in the detail...

autonomy business corporations innovation creativity freedom danpink

1 - 20 of 54 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page

Diigo is about better ways to research, share and collaborate on information. Learn more »

Join Diigo
Move to top