Elena LaVictoire's Library tagged women →  View Popular

This story came to mind on reading baby boom actress Geena Davis' interview with The Daily Beast Website. There are no good roles for women her age, said the 53-year-old star of such iconic feminist films as "Thelma & Louise" (1991) and "A League of Their Own" (1992). Her male co-stars, Brad Pitt and Tom Hanks, are still hot box office at 45 and 52, respectively.

By most any yardstick, Davis still looks superb. Furthermore, she has a brainy appeal that should transcend starlet parts. Recall her recent role as a U.S. president in the television series "Commander in Chief." But there Davis was, in a bare office promoting an independent film that no distributor has picked up.

The lament that Hollywood drops female stars as they age is not new. But truth be told, it's not very friendly to women actors of any age. Martha Lauzen, a professor of communications at San Diego State University, has been tracking women's progress in the film industry for a long time. Her conclusion: Progress has not been made.

Today only 28 percent of the movie actors with speaking parts are female. In 1946, the number was 25 percent. The few actresses chosen are mostly under 40, and even the supposedly older parts are filled with women far younger than their characters.

In "Alexander" (2004), Angela Jolie was one year older than the actor playing her son. As the mature Mrs. Robinson in "The Graduate" (1967), Anne Bancroft was only six years older than Dustin Hoffman, the recent college boy she was trying to seduce. Gloria Swanson had just turned 50 when she portrayed the haggard Norma Desmond.

As a result of this odd casting, "our eyes are not used to seeing older female characters when they do show up," Lauzen tells me. "We judge them as being older than they really are."