Elena LaVictoire's Library tagged → View Popular
Mommy, What Did You Do in the Industrial Revolution? - Semaine Mondiale pour l'Accouchement Respecté
Excellent article on the state of birth in this country. I had a couple of thoughts while reading it.
A couple of years ago I had a discussion with a woman who had pretty much opted for a Cesarean at her first prenatal visit! She didn't with to be challenged on it either. I never considered the perspective that "high risk" in this country has come to mean "special." And that's how ACOG has come to make it so acceptable.
I also wonder why the feminists and "green" people haven't picked on this. Industrialized birth today takes power away from women. This is just as bad ad the old day when women were tied down during labor, like my mother was, back in the 50s and 60s. Yet other than Ricky Lake, I'm not hearing a peep from them.
As far s the green movement, I guess it's okay to keep the earth clean and pure but to savage women's body with invasive medical procedures seems to be okay.
-
The cesarean rate in the US has been rising for decades, and in 2006 hit an all-time high of 31% (Hamilton, 2007.) This record is likely to stand for only a brief time, that is, until figures are
released for 2007. Can it really be that one-third of women are unable to birth without high-level technological support? And is there an endpoint in sight? “In the next decade or so the
industrial revolution in obstetrics could make Cesarean delivery consistently safer than the birth process that evolution gave us.” (Gawande, 2006, 8) Against such an argument, who could hope to
stand? -
Although he lauds the
success—often unheralded-- of obstetrics in saving mothers’ and infants’ lives, I hear within the paean a threnody for the vanishing art. Skilled obstetricians like those legends of the past,
whose names lived on in the maneuvers they devised to usher babies into the world, are vanishing from current practice: goodbye, Lovset; hit the road, Rubin; Mauriceau, it’s been swell, but we’re
through. - 8 more annotations...
injennuous: The Myth of CPD
When I hear about a new mom going to her OB/GYN for a first prenatal appointment and being told that she "probably" is going to need a C-section because she couldn't possibly have a baby naturally, I cringe. I cringe because it happened to me and I went on to have several babies larger than my first one. Here are some other moms who have done the same!
Sunday Housecall w/ Dr. Rosenfeld - FOXNews.com
http://www.foxnews.com/video2/video08.html?maven_referralObject=3075279&maven_referralPlaylistId=&sRevUrl=http://www.foxnews.com/health/drrosenfeld/index.html
C-section babies more at risk for diabetes
CfM ~ Supporting The Midwives Model of Care
CFMs rebuttal to ACOG's anti-homebirth press release.
Preeclampsia and Eclampsia Revisited
-
Delivery is generally recommended for women with severe preeclampsia, even if the fetus is at less than 38 weeks' gestation (Table 3). When severe preeclampsia is diagnosed in a pregnant woman at preterm gestation (usually <32 wk), however, an initial observation period and conservative expectant management in a tertiary care center may be attempted cautiously (Table 3).[65,66] When eclampsia develops, expedient delivery is mandated, regardless of gestational age.
Once it is determined that delivery is required, labor induction should be performed without delay. The goals during the intrapartum period are to prevent seizures, stabilize blood pressure, and promote delivery. During labor and delivery, women with preeclampsia-eclampsia receive IV magnesium sulfate for seizure prophylaxis, usually as a loading dose of 4 to 6 g magnesium sulfate × 7H2O infused for 20 minutes followed by a continuous IV infusion at 2 g/h. Because magnesium is excreted in the urine, blood levels also depend on urine output. Serum blood levels should be monitored. The therapeutic range for magnesium sulfate is generally considered to be 4 to 8 mg/dl. In a patient with elevated creatinine or oliguria, the patient's magnesium level should be followed carefully and the magnesium sulfate infusion adjusted accordingly.
-
Continuous electronic fetal heart rate and uterine activity monitoring should be instituted in all cases. Vaginal delivery is safer than cesarean section in women with preeclampsia-eclampsia and usually should be attempted unless there are other obstetric indications for cesarean delivery. Certain women at preterm gestation with severe preeclampsia or eclampsia in whom the cervix is unfavorable for vaginal delivery may benefit from cesarean section without attempting labor induction.
Eclampsia: Induced or Cesarean Delivery Information on Healthline
Another article on treatment of choice in eclampsia before 30 weeks- Csection.
Preeclampsia -- familydoctor.org
Article specifically stating Cesection treatment of choice if mother or baby in danger
-
A cesarean section (an operation to deliver the baby) is more likely if your health or your baby's health is in danger.
Birth, The American Way | Newsweek Culture | Newsweek.com
But the image that viewers may find most shocking is that of a baby being cut out of a woman's abdomen via Caesarean. This, according to Lake, the executive producer of the film, and Abby Epstein, the film's director, is the right reactio
-
But the image that viewers may find most shocking is that of a baby being cut out of a woman's abdomen via Caesarean. This, according to Lake, the executive producer of the film, and Abby Epstein, the film's director, is the right reactio
-
should not be a first choice for healthy mothers.
- 6 more annotations...
Beyond the Multiplex: "The Business of Being Born" | Salon Arts & Entertainment
In the case of Abby Epstein's documentary"The Business of Being Born"(which Rebecca Traistercoveredlast year at the Tribeca Film Festival), Netflix is arguably the film's principal exhibitor. After screening in a few major cities this month, Epstein's b
-
In the case of Abby Epstein's documentary "The Business of Being Born" (which Rebecca Traister covered last year at the Tribeca Film Festival), Netflix is arguably the film's principal exhibitor. After screening in a few major cities this month, Epstein's button-pusher on the natural-childbirth and midwifery movements will be made available by Netflix "to women everywhere" in February, as the film's press kit puts it.
-
It only makes sense to reach an audience that largely consists of pregnant women (or would-be pregnant ones) in their living rooms.
The True Face of Birth: 10 responses to ACOG's statement on home birth
For the first time, ACOG has suddenly started supporting freestanding birth centers, a drastic shift from its long-standing opposition to out-of-hospital births. The research on birth centers has not changed—in fact, the outcomes from theNational Birt
-
For the first time, ACOG has suddenly started supporting freestanding birth centers, a drastic shift from its long-standing opposition to out-of-hospital births. The research on birth centers has not changed—in fact, the outcomes from the National Birth Center Study are similar
-
I would argue that it is hardly fashionable or trendy in that sense. Women choosing home birth face significant social stigma. It is not an easy or socially acceptable path. Instead, it is a choice that some women will always make out of deeply held philosophical or religious beliefs. This statement also implies that women choose home birth for frivolous reasons without serious thought or carefully weighing the risks and benefits of various options.
- 9 more annotations...
Belly Tales » ACOG’s Statement on Homebirths
Many other websites have covered this topic in exhaustive detail, so I’ll refer you to them in just a moment, but first a few comments of my own. As Rixa rightly pointed out on her blogThe True Face of Birth, ACOG’s sudden acceptance of out-of-hospi
-
Many other websites have covered this topic in exhaustive detail, so I’ll refer you to them in just a moment, but first a few comments of my own. As Rixa rightly pointed out on her blog The True Face of Birth, ACOG’s sudden acceptance of out-of-hospital birth facilities (i.e. freestanding birth centers) flies directly in the face of their earlier November, 2006 Statement on the subject, where they were adamant that the hospital “is the safest setting for labor, delivery, and the immediate postpartum period,” and that “ACOG strongly opposes out-of-hospital births.” I wonder what caused the sudden change of heart?
-
There has got to be so much back-room wheeling and dealing and politics involved in all of this that one can only wonder at the motives. But crucially, why must support of freestanding birth centers be at the expense of homebirth?
- 5 more annotations...
The Business of Being Born: A Must-See Documentary for Expectant Parents - Dr. Ben Kim .com
: the best experiences of our lives so far have been the home births of our two sons.
Labor for our second born was about two hours long, and to have our toddler son there with us to greet our new baby made it special in a way that I have difficul
-
: the best experiences of our lives so far have been the home births of our two sons.
-
Labor for our second born was about two hours long, and to have our toddler son there with us to greet our new baby made it special in a way that I have difficulty describing. In a way, I feel that having our toddler son there to help welcome his little brother set the tone for their relationship forever.
- 6 more annotations...
On the Other Hand: ACOG says homebirth is a fashionable trend
A well-written discussion of why ACOG holds the positions that it does, and how that affects the lives of mothers.
It stated “Our doctors will no longer perform VBAC.”
ince the doctors in that practice were males, it was difficult to imagi
-
A well-written discussion of why ACOG holds the positions that it does, and how that affects the lives of mothers.
- mydomesticchurch on 2008-02-25
-
It stated “Our doctors will no longer perform VBAC.”
-
ince the doctors in that practice were males, it was difficult to imagine them performing a vaginal birth. Doctors do not perform vaginal births. Pregnant women do.
- 9 more annotations...
The Education of Genevieve: Has Ricki Lake gotten to ACOG?
In anunusual statementreleased this week, ACOG denounces the research evidence on planned, midwife-attended home birth, saying that such studies “have not been scientifically rigorous.” ACOG goes further to accuse the woman who chooses home birth of
-
In an unusual statement released this week, ACOG denounces the research evidence on planned, midwife-attended home birth, saying that such studies “have not been scientifically rigorous.” ACOG goes further to accuse the woman who chooses home birth of putting “herself and her baby’s health and life at unnecessary risk,” and argues that “choosing to deliver a baby at home…is to place the process of giving birth over the goal of having a healthy baby.”
-
There’s a lot to unpack here. The midwives’ campaign countered yesterday with its own statement, calling out ACOG for playing the “bad mother” card. Indeed, ACOG’s statement strikes at pregnant women twice, first implying that they’re selfish for valuing the “process of giving birth,” and second for being too posh — or too fat — to push.
- 2 more annotations...
Selected Tags
Related Tags
Sponsored Links
Top Contributors
Groups interested in cesarean
-
Cesarean Section
This is about the different...
Items: 7 | Visits: 17
Created by: saroona
Diigo is about better ways to research, share and collaborate on information. Learn more »
Join Diigo
