Skip to main content

Feb
20
2012

"the law recognizes that there is a legitimate reason to reverse-engineer a competitor's products and make new products that replace, expand and augment them. Companies don't like this. It interferes with the "razor blade" business model of subsid...

pinboardimport urheberrecht copyright drm

May
28
2009

  • it encourages the person to start downloading infringing copies for free from the net, since these copies are all DRM-free.
Mar
28
2009

  • DRM, despite what they might say, does not "enable new business models" at all. It simply gives the content holders the illusion that they can somehow control the content.
  • . One copy is all it takes and then nothing is "slowed down" at all.
  • 1 more annotation(s)...
Jan
14
2009

  • the three simple facts that a few industries are finally realizing: (1) DRM does not work (2) DRM diminishes the value of your product (3) DRM pisses off your users.
Jul
2
2007

  • Die Plattfirma EMI hat als erste der vier Großen einen Vertrag mit Snocap abgeschlossen, um DRM-freie Musik über Blogs und Social-Networking-Seiten zu verkaufen. Die Titel gibt es im MP3-Format mit 320 KBit/s.<!--/content--> 

       <!-- BANNER --> 
     <!-- BEGIN ADITIONTAG Contentunit tag for website: golem.de, contentunit: av-ros-cad, type: dynamic, size: (range, 200x200 - 480x400) --> <script src="http://adfarm1.adition.com/js?wp_id=5031" type="text/javascript"></script> <!-- END ADITIONTAG --> 
      
     <!--content-->Durch die Kooperation mit Snocap kann EMI seine Musik über die so genannten "Snocap MyStors" vermarkten, kleine Shops, die auf den Websites der Künstler integriert werden. 

     EMI nutzt die Snocap-MyStores auch auf eigenen Websites, steigt also quasi in einen Direktvertrieb seiner Musik ein. Dabei wird die Musik ohne DRM angeboten, kodiert als MP3 mit 320 KBit/s. Der Preis liegt bei 1,30 US-Dollar pro Titel. 
May
3
2007

  • Can you address the seeming conflict between the fact that Kevin Rose has a show available for download (The Broken) that contains illegal hacks for DVDs, XBox games and CDs, but Digg removed a post from a user that contained information that would allow someone to hack an HD DVD?

      

    Revision3 is a content creator, not a content aggregator. There is no similarity between the two businesses. You are refering to a show where the two hosts played characters that are exaggerations. The intent is to be funny. Obviously they make jokes about pirating and hacking.

      

    What about the assertion that because Kevin’s show DiggNation had HD DVD as a sponsor this is somehow connected to the deletion of the HD DVD hack code on Digg.com?

      

    Diggnation is a show where they discuss their dissatisfaction with DRM. But there is no connection between the shows on Revision3 and Digg.com.

      

    OK, but the show DiggNation is primarily based on posts listed on the Digg.com website. The content on Digg.com is the meat of the DiggNation show...

      

    In the case of HD DVD being a sponsor on Revision3, if Revision3 takes a call from an agency that wants advertising space on DiggNation, it is no way connected to anything that’s on Digg.com.

  • On another note, I see that you recently opened Digg’s API to the public. But in the recent past Kevin Rose mentioned that Digg would have to protect its trademark. So far, Twitter has allowed sites to exist with “twitter” in their names as more users experiment with the Twitter API. Along the same lines, will you continue to go after sites that use the Digg API and use “digg” in their names?

      

    Good question. We never cared about people using Digg’s data. The issue is if someone creates a site that uses Digg in the domain name. If it were just up to us, we would allow it. But if someone names a product or sells a product with Digg in the name, it is an issue and we could have to enforce our trademark. But you pose a very good question. You can expect some commentary in the future about how we intend to deal with the trademark issue.

Apr
3
2007

  • Premium

    Die Wahl von AAC sei aber ebenso eine Business-Entscheidung von Apple gewesen, wie die Erhöhung des Preises für dieses "Premium-Angebot", beides müssten andere Partner nicht wiederholen. Vor allem letzteres verblüfft einigermaßen, hatte sich Steve Jobs doch in den letzten Jahren regelmäßig öffentlich gegen die Wünsche der Musikindustrie den Preis für einzelne Songs zu erhöhen, verwehrt.

  • Damit das Ende dieses gerade in den Monaten vor dem Anti-DRM-Bekenntnis von Steve Jobs heftig unter Beschuss gekommenen "iTunes/iPod-Lock-In", auch wirklich Realität wird, braucht es natürlich noch neue Kooperationen. Denn die im iTunes schon bald zum Verkauf stehen sollenden Lieder sollen zwar DRM-frei sein, aber im von nur wenigen Playern unterstützten AAC-Format daherkommen.
  • 3 more annotation(s)...
Feb
28
2007

  •  Scholl said flatly that DRM doesn't work. "The idea that DRM gives us choice isn't right," he said.  

     "The economics of the business are over for good and aren't ever going to be the way they were before," Scholl said. This is a position that some in the music industry are starting to warm up to.

Feb
15
2007

  • Almost two-thirds of music industry executives think removing digital locks from downloadable music would make more people buy the tracks, finds a survey.
  • Many of those responding said current DRM systems were "not fit for purpose" and got in the way of what consumers wanted to do.
  • 2 more annotation(s)...
Feb
13
2007

  • This ignores the fact that some of the music on the iTunes store is also available without FairPlay or indeed DRM of any sort from other, less restrictive, services like eMusic. 

      It also ignores the reality that Microsoft's widely licensed system has been cracked the same number of times as Fairplay, so the evidence would seem to indicate that Jobs fears are not justified.

  • But Jobs can see which way the wind is blowing, and he can see that the record companies are finally tiring of their painful, expensive and ultimately unsatisfactory relationship with DRM. 

     They have stopped trying to sell broken CDs that can't be ripped to disk, and as a result nearly all of the music that they so painstakingly control when sold over the net is available at higher quality and lower cost to anyone who cares to spend the time taking it.

  • 1 more annotation(s)...
1 - 11 of 11
Showing 20 items per page

Diigo is about better ways to research, share and collaborate on information. Learn more »

Join Diigo
Move to top