Malachi Smith's Library tagged united-nations → View Popular

Filter:
All
Annotated

09 Dec 09

Climate treaty endangers U.S. | CapeCodOnline.com

www.capecodonline.com/...article - Preview

UN United-Nations Climate-Change-Treaty USA subversion Obama Democrats US-Govt Congress NWO American-citizens Third-World tyranny one-world-despots climate ploy

Climate treaty endangers U.S.
By PATRICIA STEBBINS

December 08, 2009
29 more annotations...
- Hanging over our freedom and sovereignty is a document called the“United Nations Climate ChangeTreaty.”
- So what, you may say?
  
  Here’s what.
- The plan is to have signatories from all countries –Third World, radical leftist nations, and us. Unless we forbid President Obama to sign up America, we’ll be caught in this awful net.
- Here’s what it says: 1. Create a world government with power over every nation signing; 2.Transfer wealth from the West to theThird World; 3. Enforce these measures.
- Now let’s explore what these measures mean to us.
- The first one creates a socialist world government, something our president appears to advocate.The wording provides the U.N. with power over our country, over our Constitution.
- Yes, this world government will have power over our government, imposing its will on our energy use, resources and jobs.
  Can you live with that?
- The second will force American taxpayers to support and subsidizeThird World nations – unstable countries, with no economies nor the capacity to rule themselves without dictators.
- If you think the economy and unemployment are bad now, just wait until this treaty goes into effect – IF we allow our president to sign it!
- In effect, this is redistribution of wealth, reducing the U.S. to Third World status and impoverishing our citizens.
- Stated in the document is the proviso that once a nation has signed, it may not cancel its membership without the approval of all the other member nations.
- The third goal of the treaty is the most ominous.
- Let that sink in.
- No future president, no elected Congress or Senate can vote to take us out of the agreement. And why would they agree to let us out – we will be the biggest cash cow they’ve ever had!
- Recently, theTimes printed an ominous article, quoting agencies of the U.N. and other governmental entities, including alarming statistics about the impending doom of the alleged global warming. Coincidentally, all these groups are dedicated to a one-world government controlling all energy and economies.
- Yet multitudes of prestigious independent scientists are loudly saying global warming is a hoax and effort to control nations
- I invite readers to check out the following sites and decide for yourselves: http://online.wsj.com/ article/SB100014240527487 035746045745005802856790 74.html?mod=googlenews_ wsj#printMode http://www.climatescienceinternational.
- Their voices go unheard by the media.
- Something dreadful is happening to our country.
- Our Democrat president and Congress are hell bent on imposing socialized medicine on us.They are pushing“cap and trade,” an energy program which will destroy our gas and coal industries and lose an estimated two million more jobs while chasing windmills and solar panels.
- They have given millions for a‘Teddy’ memorial (this inserted by Sen.
  John Kerry) in the defense budget!
- We are forced to watch as 40‘czars’are turning out to be a bunch of radical lunatics with unlimited power and answerable only to Obama.
- Our major automobile producers, banks, insurance companies are being run by the government while Congress refuses to investigate the corrupt ACORN and SEIU organizations.
- Our president and elected officials are planning to eliminate states’rights and give the federal government sweeping powers over things that are now under the rule of the states.
- This can result in gaining control over schools, energy production, the environment and the wealth of every U.S. citizen.
- Can’t happen in America?
- It IS happening and we must wake up and demand our legislators remember their oath to defend and protect our Constitution and liberties!
- Fed up with“Democrat Dictatorship” yet? Do you really want to send another one to Washington in January?
- Patricia Stebbins lives in East Sandwich.

03 Apr 09

Cliff Kincaid -- The Crackpot Mentor of State Department Nominee

www.newswithviews.com/...cliff305.htm - Preview

harold-hongju-koh united-nations state-department world-government yale harvard louis-sohn law-of-sea-treaty antichrist prophecy-fulfilled clinton-administration washington-dc us-government

The purpose,
he said, would be to disarm “each and every nation and to deter
or suppress any attempted international violence.”
This
“world authority” would also require a “United Nations
Revenue System,” drawing taxes from “each nation” of
the world, he said.
50 more annotations...
- The
  term “world government” is too benign for what Sohn proposed.
  The term “global dictatorship” would be more appropriate.
- But this is the direction that Koh apparently would take us.
- Koh,
  who served as Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Rights
  and Labor in the Clinton Administration, referred to Sohn during an October
  24, 2006, George Washington University Law School tribute as “my
  grandfather in the law” because Koh, his sister, and his father
  had all studied under “his watchful eye.”
  - The stereotypical "Illuminist Family" that many have talked about? - on 2009-04-03
  Add Sticky Note
- In an
  essay
  based on his remarks, Koh explained that “In a dazzling range of
  areas—including arms control, the law of the sea, the law of state
  responsibility, the law of international organizations, international
  environmental law, and international dispute resolution—Louis helped
  draft global ‘constitutions’ that sought both to allocate
  institutional responsibilities and to declare workable rules of international
  law.”
- But
  the influence didn’t end there.
- “Once I became an international
  law professor myself, Louis took me under his wing in a familial way,”
  Koh said.
- “We would have lunch together, once at Grand Central Station,
  but more regularly at the annual meeting of the American Society of International
  Law.”
  - A collation of traitors and shock troops for the International Criminal Cabal. - on 2009-04-03
  Add Sticky Note
- Sohn’s
  continuing influence was seen in Koh’s selection of Charles J. Brown
  as his chief of staff from 1999-2001 in the Clinton Administration.
- Brown
  later became the president and CEO of the Citizens for Global Solutions
  (CGS), the new name of the pro-world government World Federalist Association
  (WFA).
- The name of the organization was changed in order to divert public
  attention away from its origins in the world government movement.
- CGS
  collaborated with the Open Society Institute of George Soros against John
  Bolton’s nomination as U.S. Ambassador to the U.N.
- The
  World Federalists are sometimes regarded as small and without much influence,
  but the fact is that prominent personalities such as Walter Cronkite,
  the former CBS Evening News anchorman, are world federalists.
- What’s
  more, President Clinton and then-First Lady Hillary Clinton endorsed the
  group’s activities during the time of the Clinton Administration.
- Koh’s
  nomination will be considered by the Senate
  Foreign Relations Committee, but it’s questionable at this point
  which members, if any, will raise any objections.
- The committee is headed
  by Senator John Kerry and its ranking “Republican,” Richard
  Lugar of Indiana, is a major backer of the United Nations who worked closely
  with Obama when he was also a member of the committee.
- Lugar is a strong
  supporter of various U.N. treaties, including the Convention on the Law
  of the Sea (UNCLOS).
- UNCLOS
  has always been seen by these people as a major step down the road to
  world government.
- The World Federalists declared that, by “establishing
  global governance” over the seabeds of the oceans and that by stipulating
  that mining of those areas beyond national jurisdiction “should
  require payment of royalties” to a United Nations body, UNCLOS has
  created “a funding resource that would be independent of voluntary
  contributions by the treaty member nations.”
- Hence, through UNCLOS,
  global taxes on the U.S. would come into effect.
- Interestingly,
  Sohn and identified Soviet spy Alger Hiss, a top State Department official
  at the time, were both major players in the conferences that resulted
  in the creation of the United Nations in 1945. There is no clear record
  of them working together, however.
- Ignoring
  Hiss, Koh gushed that Sohn was “quite literally present at the creation
  of the U.N.” and “became nothing less than an architect of
  the new world order.”
- Koh seems to view his role as helping to complete
  construction of this edifice.
- In order
  to understand the ominous future that Sohn and his disciple Koh have planned
  for us, one must review Sohn’s book, World Peace Through World
  Law, which was first published in 1958 and co-authored with Grenville
  Clark of the World Federalists.
- It is considered a classic by World Federalists
  and is listed in the “timeline” of the history of world federalism.
- Sohn’s writings are also featured in the book, Uniting the Peoples
  and the Nations: Readings in World Federalism.
- In the
  preface to the book, Robert Woito writes that UNCLOS is an example of
  “how the broad principles outlined in World Peace Through World
  Law can be applied to a specific problem.”
- Sohn, he noted “played
  a significant role in the Law of the Sea conference.”
- As noted,
  Koh has declared that Sohn’s work on UNCLOS was one of several areas
  in which he helped draft global “constitutions” to manage
  international affairs.
- Koh called this the “transnational legal
  process” and noted that Sohn’s book, World Peace Through
  World Law, was part of a “stunningly ambitious global project.”
  Koh said that “unfortunately,” Sohn’s blueprint did
  not come to pass.
- Unfortunately?
  This is the tip-off that Koh wants to see this dangerous New World Order
  implemented.
- He is declaring, for all to see, that he favors Sohn’s
  concept of world government.
- As far
  as UNCLOS is concerned, Sohn’s fingerprints were all over it.
- The
  Washington Post acknowledged that Sohn, who died in 2006, “shaped
  the Law of the Sea Convention and the Law of the Sea Tribunal.”
  He was, according to a tribute in his honor, “instrumental”
  in shaping the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea.
- In World Peace Through World Law, one of his underlying principles
  was the need for “equitable management of mankind’s common
  resources—especially outer space and the oceans…”
- Sohn
  proposed a “United Nations Ocean Authority” that would eventually
  be expressed in UNCLOS as the International Seabed Authority, a vehicle
  to control vast areas of the oceans beyond the authority of sovereign
  states.
- The
  recipient of awards and medals from the American Society of International
  Law and the World Federalists of Canada, Sohn declared in World Peace
  Through World Law that “the race to exploit the oceans and
  the seabed can lead to new disastrous conflicts unless this ‘common
  heritage of mankind’ is put under United Nations management and
  supervision.”
- This
  revolutionary, even Marxist, concept, did in fact become part of UNCLOS.
  And it was one reason why President Ronald Reagan rejected it.
- In addition
  to a U.N. Ocean Authority, Sohn urged creation of:
  
  •
  A United Nations Outer Space Authority
  
  • A World Development Authority
  
  • World judicial tribunals
  
  • A United Nations Peace Force, with a strength
  of between 200,000 and 400,000
  
  • A United Nations Peace Force Reserve with a strength
  of between 300,000 and 600,000
  
  • United Nations military bases
  
  • A United Nations Revenue System
- Sohn
  believed that the U.N. Peace Force would have “the most modern weapons
  and equipment,” including nuclear weapons.
- He wanted the U.N. to
  produce and supply its own weapons through a United Nations Military Supply
  and Research Agency.
- While
  Sohn’s role in crafting UNCLOS has not been the subject of examination
  by the Senate, his colleagues in the academic and legal communities are
  fully aware of what he proposed and what he did.
- “Louis contributed
  significantly to the formulation of a text for the U.N. Convention on
  the Law of the Sea,” noted Detlev F. Vagts, Bemis Professor of International
  Law Emeritus at Harvard Law School.
- Thomas
  M. Franck, the Murray and Ida Becker Professor Emeritus at the New York
  University School of Law, gave Sohn specific credit for Annex 7 of UNCLOS,
  “which established a model for the mandatory peaceful resolution
  of disputes.”
- Franck said that “many” representatives
  of “landlocked and disadvantaged states” during negotiations
  on UNCLOS “were former students [of Sohn] like me.”
- Daniel
  Barstow Magraw, president of the Center for International Environmental
  Law, identified Sohn as “one of four chief negotiators on the U.S.
  delegation to the Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea
  (UNCLOS III), which eventually produced the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention.”
- He quoted Elliot Richardson, the head of the U.S. delegation and “a
  student in the first class Louis taught at Harvard Law School,”
  as saying that Sohn was “an indispensable resource” for the
  U.S. delegation and the conference as a whole.
- Magraw
  conceded, however, that Sohn’s book, World Peace Through World
  Law, envisioned “an unusually strong world government…”
- As the
  Senate prepares to consider UNCLOS and other treaties, it is time to examine
  the influence of Sohn and other like-minded extremists, radicals, and
  revolutionaries.
- The Koh nomination is a good place to begin the scrutiny.
- ©
  2009 Cliff Kincaid - All Rights Reserved

25 Feb 09

The Obama Administration Sacrifices Israel - Forbes.com

www.forbes.com/...ntributors_united_nations.html - Preview

durban-II antisemitism obama state-department us-government obama-administration israel palestinians muslims european-union durban-I holocaust-denial united-nations

The Obama Administration Sacrifices Israel
Anne Bayefsky,
02.22.09,
51 more annotations...
- The cover-up on Durban II's anti-Semitic agenda.
- The Obama administration's decision to join the planning of the U.N.'s Durban II "anti-racism" conference has just taken a new twist: cover-up.
- On Friday, State Department officials and a member of the American Durban II delegation claimed the United States had worked actively to oppose efforts to brand Israel as racist in the committee drafting a Durban II declaration. The trouble is that they didn't.
- The Feb. 20 State Department press release says the U.S. delegation in Geneva "outline[d] our concerns with the current outcome document" and in particular "our strong reservations about the direction of the conference, as the draft document singles out Israel for criticism."
- One member of the delegation told The Washington Post: "The administration is pushing back against efforts to brand Israel as racist in this conference."
- In fact, tucked away in a Geneva hall with few observers, the U.S. had done just the opposite.
- The U.S. delegates had made no objection to a new proposal to nail Israel in an anti-racism manifesto that makes no other country-specific claims.
- Getting involved in activities intended to implement the 2001 Durban Declaration--after seven and a half years of refusing to lend the anti-Israel agenda any credibility--was controversial to be sure.
- But late on Saturday Feb. 14, the State Department slithered out a press release justifying the move.
- It claimed that "the intent of our participation is to work to try to change the direction in which the Review Conference is heading."
- Following what was clearly a planned public relations exercise, Washington Post columnist Colum Lynch championed the U.S. bravado in an article based on the story orchestrated by the American delegates.
- In his Feb. 20 article entitled: "U.S. Holds Firm on Reparations, Israel in U.N. Racism Talks," he fawned: "The Obama administration on Thursday concluded its first round of politically charged U.N. negotiations on racism, pressing foreign governments ... to desist from singling out Israel for criticism in a draft declaration to be presented at a U.N. conference in April."
- The reality, however, was nothing of the sort. Instead, Obama's Durban II team slipped easily into the U.N.'s anti-Israel and anti-Jewish environs, taking the approach that "fitting in" was best accomplished by staying silent.
- On Tuesday, the Palestinian delegation proposed inserting a new paragraph under the heading "Identification of further concrete measures and initiatives ... for combating and eliminating all manifestations of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance..." with the subtitle "General provisions on victims ... of discrimination."
- The paragraph includes: "Calls for ... the international protection of the Palestinian people throughout the occupied Palestinian territory."
- In other words, it claims that the Palestinian people are victims of Israeli racism and demands that all U.N. states provide protection from the affronts of the racist Jewish state.
- Furthermore, the new Palestinian provision "Calls for ... implementation of international legal obligations, including the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the wall..." This is a dramatic attempt to change an "advisory opinion" into a "legal obligation"--a status which attaches to no advisory opinion.
- The ICJ decision, which advises that the Israeli security fence is illegal, has always been rejected by the United States--hitherto. And with good reason.
- The Egyptian judge had voiced his opinion on the result before the case was even heard, in his capacity as a leading Egyptian diplomat.
- The terms of reference from the General Assembly who asked for the decision, and the documents they laid before the Court, predetermined the outcome.
- And as the strong dissent by the American judge and Holocaust survivor Tom Buergenthal pointed out, the Court came to its preposterous conclusion that "the right of legitimate or inherent self-defense is not applicable in the present case" without considering "the deadly terrorist attacks to which Israel is being subjected."
- But when the Palestinian delegation laid their new proposal before the drafting committee, what did Obama's team do? Nothing, absolutely nothing. They made no objection at all.
- It is impossible to argue that their silence was unintended. Over the course of the week's negotiations the American delegation had objected to a number of specific proposals.
- They had no trouble declaring "we share reservations on this paragraph," in the context of a demand to criminalize profiling.
- They "called for the deletion" of provisions undermining free speech like the suggestion to "take firm action against negative stereotyping of religions and defamation of religious personalities, holy books, scriptures and symbols."
- Their silence when it came to Israel was, therefore, deafening.
- It also had the very concrete result of not placing the Palestinian paragraph in dispute, and the diplomatic rule of thumb is that paragraphs that have not been flagged as controversial cannot be reopened for discussion, as negotiations finalize an end product.
- The Obama team was not only silent on the new "Israel is racist" language, it also said nothing when faced with Holocaust denial.
- Negotiators from the European Union suggested on Wednesday a new provision to "condemn without reservation any denial of the Holocaust and urges all states to reject denial of the Holocaust as an historical event, either in full, or in part, or any activities to this end."
- Iran--whose president is a Holocaust-denier--immediately objected and insisted that the proposal be "bracketed" or put in dispute.
- The move blocked the adoption of the proposal and ensured another battle over the reality of the Holocaust in April--at these supposedly "anti-racism" meetings.
- After Iran objected, the chair looked around the room, expecting a response. He said: "Is there any delegation wishing to comment on this new proposal by the European Union? It doesn't seem the case. We move on." U.S. delegates said nothing, even after the prompt.
- In marked contrast, after the E.U. objected to a provision calling for limits on free speech, the American delegation had no trouble piping up immediately: "I want to echo the comments from the E.U. This ... call for restrictions is something that my government is not able to accept."
- Again, the American silence must have been deliberate.
- Evidently, a U.S. team bent on legitimizing Durban II believed it would be counter-productive to object vigorously to sections most likely to be noticed by Americans skeptical about participation in the conference.
- They must have figured that no objection would mean no controversy, which in turn would mean there would be no cause for complaint from U.S. observers. That's one way to buy favors on the international stage, but it sure doesn't forward a stated intention of changing the Conference direction.
- Nor does it promote the ultimate need to change the anti-Semitic and anti-democratic direction of global human rights policy.
- The week's events also revealed that European negotiators have adopted the same strategy at Durban II that they did at Durban I. After the United States and Israel walked out of Durban I on Sept. 4, 2001, it was the European Union that cut the deal trading off a mention of the Holocaust and anti-Semitism for a reference to Palestinians victims of Israeli racism.
- Likewise, this week the European Union said nothing in response to the Palestinian proposal but pushed the Holocaust reference instead. No matter that discrimination against the Jewish state, and against Jews for supporting the Jewish state, is the major form of anti-Semitism today.
- The manipulation of Holocaust remembrance--knowing that Israel is the bulwark of the Jewish people against "never again"--is as cynical as it gets.
- European Union delegates confirmed that their silence on the Palestinian proposal was deliberate, commenting off-camera that the references to Israeli racism had already been made in the Durban I Declaration, and the purpose of Durban II is to implement Durban I.
- State department officials and U.S. delegates to Durban II's planning committee insist that their minds have not been made up.
- Friday's State department press release said "the United States has not made a decision about participating in the Durban Review Conference or about whether to engage in future preparations for the Conference, but the work done this week will be important information for taking these decisions."
- Similarly, The Washington Post reports, quoting an American delegate: "This is a fact-finding mission; it's just a first step ... Negotiations will probably resume in March or early April."
- The strategy is painfully obvious--spin out the time for considering whether or not to attend the April 20 conference until the train has left the station and jumping off would cause greater injury to multilateral relations than just taking a seat.
- The delay tactics are indefensible. The U.S. administration attended four full days of negotiation.
- During that time they witnessed the following: the failure to adopt a proposal to act against Holocaust denial, a new proposal to single out Israel, which will now be included in the draft without brackets, broad objections to anything having to do with sexual orientation, vigorous refusal by many states to back down on references to "Islamophobia" (the general allegation of a racist Western plot to discriminate against all Muslims), and numerous attacks on free speech.
- This "dialogue" is not promoting rights and freedoms. It is legitimizing a forum for disputing the essence of democracy, handing Holocaust deniers a global platform and manufacturing the means to demonize Israel in the interests of those states bent on the Jewish state's destruction.
- But you can be sure that the State Department report now on Obama's desk reads "can't tell yet, don't know, maybe, too early to tell." Why?
- If the Obama administration does not immediately announce that its foray into the morass of Durban II has led it to decide this is no place for genuine believers in human rights and freedoms, there is only one conclusion possible. His foreign policy of engagement amounts to a new willingness to sacrifice Israel and an indeterminate number of American values for the sake of a warm welcome from the enemies of freedom.
- Anne Bayefsky is a senior fellow of the Hudson Institute, director of the Touro Institute on Human Rights and the Holocaust and editor of www.EYEontheUN.org.

24 Feb 09

Nancy Levant -- The Federal Land Lording Agenda

www.newswithviews.com/...nancy119.htm - Preview

nancy-levant agenda-21 united-nations relocation america usban-areas rural-areas low-wages poor politicians community-activists acorn obama freddie-mac fannie-mae us-government nwo

THE
FEDERAL LAND LORDING AGENDA
By
Nancy Levant

February 14, 2009

NewsWithViews.com
24 more annotations...
- “The
  cancer that infected our economy was housing.” — Sen.
  John Ensign, Republican from Nevada, the Senate Policy Committee Chairman
- Senator
  Ensign’s statement is a truth worth screaming and clarifying.
  The cancer that infected our economy was and remains the intention of
  politicians and their financial and career string pullers to eliminate
  private property rights.
- If you choose to call that “housing”,
  so be it. But masking this truth by manipulating the American people
  with Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, AIG failures, etcetera, etcetera, ain’t
  gonna fly.
- In
  1992, the United Nations stated in its blueprint for the 21st century
  (Agenda 21) that there is to be no privately-held property — be
  it land or the homes that sit upon the land — for anyone.
- All
  property, according to Agenda 21, is to be “owned” by government.
- Agenda 21 also details the plan for “human
  relocation” stating that all member nations must implement
  “human relocation” plans.
- So today, we witness flood, fire,
  snow and ice, and power-grid relocations — annually — and
  with Homeland military assistance/insistence. We, as the people of this
  nation, are indeed “relocating.”
- And
  to where are we relocating? That depends upon the decisions your local
  regional councils have made — the appointees whose names you do
  not know — regarding which locale will receive development dollars
  and which areas are to be closed down for nature’s sake.
- It’s
  funny how the nation’s rural areas are in annual “natural
  crisis” while specifically-identified urban areas are highly and
  solely developed.
- Small towns and burgs are dying and jobs, mostly $7
  to $10 per hour jobs, are increasing in regionally-identified and funded
  urban areas.
- And
  then, we have “stimulus” dollars in the billions going to
  national parks, and state and federal wilderness areas while no dollars
  go to small towns, rural, and dying America.
- So to our politicians I
  ask: How, exactly, does one live in a designated “human settlement”,
  as so stated in Agenda 21, on an $8 to $10 per hour job?
- How does one
  support a home or rent, utility bills, cable/internet bills, automobiles,
  transportation to and from work, insurance, and food with low-wage part
  time jobs?
- The
  urban areas, as we know, are completely overtaken by corporate chain
  businesses which pay minimum wages to their part time employees.
- Equally,
  we know that good jobs always go to community movers, shakers, their
  friends, families, and social development associates.
- We also hear that
  higher education is being cut off from the minimum wage masses as universities
  are turning away college applicants and cutting off financial aid opportunities.
- So
  as we get poorer, less and less educated, and transplanted to new areas,
  new lifestyles, and with no “social” contacts to ensure
  full time employment, the question is very simple. What percentage of
  the American population is required to fulfill the “equity”
  clauses of Agenda 21?
- How many people in America are designated to live
  like poverty-stricken third-worlders to achieve global equity and a
  “local” third-world labor force for political corporations?
- And
  one more question: Since the “government” now owns the nations
  largest mortgage holders (Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, AIG, etc.), do they
  own your homes and property as well?
- You know, the homes and property
  you can no longer pay for?
- I suggest you watch for the federal rental
  solution. Soon, America, you will be paying rent to the feds to live
  in “their” housing.
- One plus one equals two. Even the uneducated
  masses can figure that one out.
- Join
  us on Govern
  America every Saturday morning from 8AM to 11AM Eastern Standard
  Time. This Saturday, February 14th our guest will be Michael
  Shaw from Freedom
  Advocates. To listen live, click
  here.
  
  © 2009 Nancy Levant - All
  Rights Reserve
- Nancy Levant is
  a renowned writer for Constitutional governance and American culture.
  She is the author of The
  Cultural Devastation of American Women: The Strange and Frightening Decline
  of the American Female (and her dreadful timing).
  
  She is an opponent
  of deceptive governance and politicians, global governance by deception,
  political feminism, the public school system, political economics based
  upon manufactured wars and their corporate benefactors, and the Federal
  Reserve System. She is also a nationwide and lively radio personality.
  To book an engagement with Nancy Levant, send an email request to:
  
  Not available

16 Jan 09

The Rainbow Swastika - The Gods of the New Age

"One of the biggest advantages we have as New Agers is,

once the occult, metaphysical and New Age terminology
is removed,

we have concepts and techniques that are very acceptable
to the general public.

So we can change the names... demonstrate the power...

open the door to millions who normally would not be receptive."

(Dick Sutphen, "Infiltrating the New Age into Society,"

_New Age Activist_, Summer 1986, p.14)
- As a good many Evangelical Christian "suckers" are buying into - on 2009-01-15
Add Sticky Note
This ploy has allowed NA "change agents" (as they are
known to insiders) to infiltrate the unsuspecting Jewish community in the
Trojan Horse of semantics. They say all the "right" things, work
hard in service and scholarship, win leadership positions, and only then
do they set out to reshape the old concepts to fit the "new paradigm".
- As has happened within the Christian Evangelical community - on 2009-01-15
Add Sticky Note
88 more annotations...
- However, the Jewish idea of one personal
  G-d who rules alone is so offensive that the knowledgeable NAer will not
  even pretend to be speaking the same language at that point.
  - The NAs' hatred of the Jewish God (and the Christians) - on 2009-01-15
  Add Sticky Note
- He (It) is nothing more than an Energy Force which is
  everywhere (and nowhere), in everything (and in every non-thing).
  - The "Antichrist's" "god of forces" as the Book of Daniel explains it? - on 2009-01-15
  Add Sticky Note
- NA
  history teaches that they appeared (the word used is "descended") on earth
  18 million years ago, during the Lemurian Age, introducing themselves in
  both physical and etheric bodies [presumably apparitions] as "Brothers
  of Light".
  - SEE: Genesis 6 and the Book of Enoch for their real identity - on 2009-01-15
  Add Sticky Note
- a group of ancient beings, many of whom once started out on our (earthly
  human) plane, but have now evolved to the level where they are no longer
  shackled by physical matter and can be considered divine (to be addressed
  as "great Lord" or "Master").
  - The fallen angelic host of Genesis 6 and their Nephilim offspring - on 2009-01-15
  Add Sticky Note
- The flowchart for the Hierarchy is vast and very confusing,
  but to simplify the picture, Alice Bailey presents the Hierarchy in various
  geometric figures throughout her work _Externalisation of the Hierarchy_.
  - Paul referred to these as "principalities, powers in high places and the rulers of darkness of this present age." - on 2009-01-15
  Add Sticky Note
- The "Heavenly
  Man" in charge of earth's evolution is "Sanat Kumara".
  - "Sanat Kumara" = Satan (the "anointed cherub that covereth) - on 2009-01-15
  Add Sticky Note
- Sanat Kumara is therefore considered
  the Head of the Hierarchy as far as earthlings are concerned (see more
  below).
  - Because in truth, he is a fallen angel - on 2009-01-15
  Add Sticky Note
- The fact that the Christians learned this "misnomer"
  and many other mistakes from the Jews is evidence of the need for Christianity
  to be "purged" of Jewish influences.
  - Christians need to be purged of Jewish concepts - on 2009-01-15
  Add Sticky Note
- At
  the crucial times of new ages, such as the advent of a "subrace" [see Human
  History section], a spirit known as "Maitreya" or "World Teacher" -
  the most "highly evolved being" known to man - descends from a hidden high
  place or "power vortex" (variously identified as the Himalayas or outer
  space) and "overshadows" a chosen spokesman, who then relays his "transmissions",
  which are instructions from the Hierarchy to guide the human race into
  the next cycle of "evolution".
  - The Antichrist - on 2009-01-15
  Add Sticky Note
- Although
  the Christian title is used often, Creme and other NA spokesmen insist
  that Maitreya is the one all the world faiths are waiting for, including
  Jews who await the Messiah.
  - Antichrist - on 2009-01-15
  Add Sticky Note
- At some point, Maitreya (by then in a physical
  body) will allow Lucifer to enter the human vehicle as well, when all are
  "freed from the unreasoning fear" of that latter name - an event which
  will usher in the "Luciferic initiation" [see in The
  Plan section]
  - Antichrist and Satan...the time of "the Mark?" - on 2009-01-15
  Add Sticky Note
- Astrologically he is represented by the planet Venus,
  known as the Morning Star, "the first radiant beam that does away with
  the darkness of night. It is a symbol of the development of the divine
  light in man."
- This being and his mission are indeed already symbolized in many cultures,
  say NAers.
- The
  Grail legend, a tale full of Luciferic symbolism, was the theme for another
  of Wagner's works, "Parsifal" (see _Wagner's Parsifal_ by Rolf May, where
  the Grail itself is "the stone which fell from Lucifer's crown as he plunged
  to earth [bringing] the mental principle to evolving humanity," or "as
  Wagner remarked, 'Grail consciousness'".)
- (Belderis) Accordingly, "Morning Star" is the name of one
  of the more popular pieces by occultist composer Richard Wagner.
- [For more on the Grail, see the
  Nazism
  section.]
- The Greeks presented him as Prometheus, the gnostics as
  Ophiomorphos, the Norse legends as Loki, the Chinese as the Dragon.
  Egyptians and Hindus worship the cobra, and many others the serpent, as
  forms which Lucifer has taken on to bring wisdom to man.
- Witches
  worship Lucifer in the form of a goat-man, known in nature cults as "Pan"
  (the deity honored at Findhorn and credited with their miraculous agricultural
  methods; see _The Magic of Findhorn_ by Paul Hawken).
- Findhorn leader Robert
  Ogilvie Crombie (or "Roc") claims that Pan appeared to him and "sadly"
  confessed that he is "the devil" of the Jewish-Christian tradition;
- concerning
  this "giant faun" Roc says: "For his purpose he had to find someone who
  showed no fear of him.... It is important for the future of mankind that
  belief in the Nature Spirits and their god Pan is reestablished and that
  they are seen in their true light." (_The Magic of Findhorn_, p.217)
- Lucifer is personally in charge of human evolution [see
  below].
- As such, he presides over the coming "planetary
  initiation", the ultimate goal in the New Age "Plan".
- He, with the
  intermediary help of Maitreya, is credited by Creme (in various essays,
  interviews and lectures) as having "nourished" all the genius which humankind
  has produced, including Freud, Jung,
  Picasso, Mahatma Gandhi, Karl Marx and Einstein (all of these reaching
  a "2nd level" initiation).
- Lucifer arrived here 18-1/2 million years ago
  from the planet Venus, which became known by one of his names, "The Morning
  Star".
- The number 666, revered
  by many occultists as Lucifer's sacred number, is to be used wherever possible
  to hasten his appearance.
  - 666 - on 2009-01-15
  Add Sticky Note
- According to Creme (see his radio interview
  with Art Bell, July 10, 1998), this number represents "the beast" or
  the "Antichrist energy", which is not to be feared but simply accepted
  and even welcomed as the "destructive aspect"
  of God himself.
- Creme also repeated Bailey's teaching that this
  destructive energy is "the Will aspect" of the Divine
  which worked through both the Roman emperor Nero and Hitler.
  [Creme gets a bit befuddled here as he tries to point out the beneficial
  service rendered by Hitler in destroying evil, while remaining politically
  correct in keeping Hitler on the side of evil.]
  - Nero: the destroyer of Christians and Hitler, the destroyer of Jews. - on 2009-01-15
  Add Sticky Note
- This energy is "deliberately released" to destroy the old
  and make way for the new.
  - A great deal is embodied in this one sentence....destruction of every genuine follower of Jesus and eventually the 1/3 of Jews who refuse to acknowledge the Antichrist's self proclomation as "God." - on 2009-01-15
  Add Sticky Note
- Among the other informative
  bits, Creme notes in his interview that this eradication of the "old conceptions"
  will hit Bible-based faith in particular:
  - Persecution of Christians - on 2009-01-15
  Add Sticky Note
- "The people who will find it
  probably hardest of all to accept Maitreya are the leaders of the Christian
  and - uh - the Jewish organizations."
- In the same breath, though, he makes
  it clear that he really means the Jews: "They had the same problem 2000
  years ago when Jesus was there among them and they didn't recognize him."
- [It is standard NA tactic
  to fault the Jews for rejecting Christ, which both Jews and Christians
  fail to recognize as manipulation. Unfortunately, interviewer Bell chose
  not to pick up on the clear implications for how the Jews will fare in
  Maitreya's kingdom. His only reply was, "Yep, yep, I know."]
- [This number 666 is not meaningful to Jews, but early
  Christian tradition, while still close to its Jewish roots, called it "the
  number of the beast", an evil being empowered by "the dragon" to make war
  against the Jews and Christians who refuse to worship him - see New Testament,
  Revelation 13.
- This creature corresponds to numerous Jewish
  aggadot
  (legends) describing "Armilus", an idol that Satan brings to life and that
  is accepted by the nations as "god" and "messiah"; he also makes war against
  Israel when they refuse to acknowledge him.
- As for Satan himself, the Jewish
  tradition refers to "Samael", which HPB inexplicably endorses. See below.]
- One of the earliest
  outspoken promoters of Lucifer is David Spangler, one of the original leaders
  of Findhorn (in Scotland) and now a lecturer and author in the U.S.
- 4a. Lucifer and "Christ":
- The
  back cover of one of his books promotes him as "the shaman of the New Age
  Movement". (_Emergence: The Rebirth of the Sacred_, 1984)
- Spangler,
  a staunch Bailey disciple, is noteworthy for his articulate weaving of
  the various NA concepts of Lucifer into a single presentation, a 1977 book
  with the interesting title, _Reflections on the Christ_.
- The title, far
  from indicating confusion, emphasizes Spangler's conviction that Lucifer
  and the Christ are "twin sides" of the same "power" (see Spangler's recent
  book, co-authored with Professor William Irwin Thompson, _The Reimagination
  of the World_);
- therefore, Lucifer is to be considered literally a "reflection
  of the Christ", and
  vice versa.
- In _Reflections_ Lucifer is variously
  described (all in the same sentence) as "an angel, a being, a great and
  mighty planetary consciousness." (p.38)
- This energy may or may not
  be personified, as the situation demands.
- According to Spangler, "the light
  that reveals to us the path to the Christ come from Lucifer. He is the
  light giver." His task is to "prepare man in all ways for the experience
  of Christhood." (p.43)
- [I would caution
  Jews not to apply this understanding to the Christian "Christ". Spangler
  would be the first to agree that his "Christ" is not a Jew from the 1st
  century.]
- Conversely, "Christ is the same force as Lucifer
  but moving in seemingly the opposite direction." (p.38)
- 4b. Lucifer, aka Satan, aka "Jehovah":
- Blavatsky,
  unlike later Theosophists, has no difficulty in reconciling Lucifer and
  Satan as the same being: "Lucifer is the LOGOS in his highest, and
  the "Adversary" [Satan] in his lowest aspect - both of which are reflected
  in our Ego." (_The Secret Doctrine_, II, p.162)
- About Satan himself,
  HPB (_SD_ II, p.388-389) sets aside her contempt of orthodox Judaism
  long enough to cite the "Rabbins" [sic] and the Talmud which records that
  "'the evil Spirit, Satan, and Samael, the angel of Death, are the same'
  - (Babba Battra [sic], 16a)."
- She also relies on "the Rabbins [sic]
  teaching that 'Kin [sic] (Cain), the Evil, was the Son of Eve by Samael,
  the devil who took Adam's place'".
- These two rabbinic quotes are
  [somehow] seen by her to support a revised, "correct reading of verse 1
  (chapter iv, Genesis) in the original Hebrew text" which proves that "Cain
  is identical with Jehovah". HPB refers here to Eve's declaration,
  "Kaniti ish et Hashem", translated as, "I obtained a man with G-d".
- [For the real rabbinic interpretation, see Rashi's
  simple comment, "b'zeh shutafim anu imo" - "in this [act of creation]
  we [Adam and Eve] are partners with Him [G-d]."
- At any rate, it's
  strange that HPB should fuss over the "original Hebrew" when she writes,
  "The Hebrew Bible exists no more [except as] garbled falsifications."
- Stranger still that the all-knowing "Masters" related to her that the "square
  letters Jews rely on are characters of an unknown, dead language" which
  cannot be traced farther back than "the fourth century A.D."
- The
  discovery of the Dead Sea Scroll of Isaiah must have come as a nasty
  shock to the enlightened ones. Yet HPB has Israeli disciples studying at
  the Theosophical Society center in
  Tel Aviv.]
- Confident of her line of reasoning, HPB then forms the
  following conclusion (_Doctrine_ II, p.389): "It becomes easy to see that
  Jehovah (mankind, or 'Jah-hovah') [sic - a sample of HPB's Hebrew proficiency]
  and Satan (therefore the tempting Serpent) are one and the same in every
  particular." [a sample of her blatant contradictions - or shall we say,
  those of the "Masters" who dictated to her. For her other comments on "Jehovah",
  see
  below.]
- She goes on: "Satan represents metaphysically simply the reverse
  or the polar opposite of everything in nature. He is the 'adversary', allegorically,
  the 'murderer', and the great Enemy of all, because there is nothing in
  the whole universe that has not two sides... But in that case, light, goodness,
  beauty, etc., may be called Satan with as much propriety as the Devil,
  since they are the adversaries of darkness, badness, and ugliness."
- Elsewhere,
  she neatly sums up: "Lucifer is divine and terrestrial light, the
  'Holy Ghost' and 'Satan', at one and the same time." (p.513)
- Interestingly,
  Blavatsky repeatedly quotes Jewish "Kabalists" who support the idea that
  Satan is to be honored as the "cosmic reflection of God". (p.234) [See
  more under Kabbalah in the
  Missionizing section.]
- However, she dismisses any enlightenment on the
  part of the Jews; they merely learned it "from the Chaldeans and Egyptians".
  (p.240)
- She also resorts to the same labels later used by Alice
  Bailey: "And now it stands proven that Satan, or the Red Fiery Dragon...
  and Lucifer, or 'Light-Bearer,' is in us: it is our Mind... the emanation
  of the very essence of the pure divine principal Mahat (Intelligence),
  which radiates direct from the Divine mind."
- In the end (p.513), however, HPB clings to a sort of monotheism
  of her own: "Satan is the god ofour planet, and the only god." (p.234,
  emphasis hers)
- 5. The god who "created" man:
  Sanat Kumara.
- For themselves, however,
  the Creator is the head of the Hierarchy, known as Sanat Kumara [SK].
- NA messages to the public encourage
  "faith in the loving Creator" or "thanksgiving to the Lord of Creation",
  phrased to allow everyone his own interpretation.
- Although SK's level of enlightenment earned him
  the right to enter into "Nirvana", he instead made the "supreme sacrifice"
  of turning back to creation and taking the responsibility to create us
  into gods.
  - No...he got his butt kicked in the cosmic war of rebellion - on 2009-01-15
  Add Sticky Note
- Bailey
  affirms that Sanat Kumara's job is indeed to destroy, using
  the Shamballa energy, to make room for the new (_Externalisation_ II, p.89).
  - The Bible's "Apollyon" - the "Destroyer" - the "Beast" from the Pit - on 2009-01-16
  Add Sticky Note
- Lucis Trust, the organization
  dedicated to distributing Bailey's writings, considers the Shamballa force
  to be "a demonstration of the beneficent will of God", in that it "tends
  to destroy all forms that hinder the emergence of a new and better world
  [especially in] the political field." (from Lucis Trust essay explaining
  Shamballa, Sept. 1999.
  - Bush's Neocon "doctrine" of bringing "democracy" at the end of a gun - on 2009-01-16
  Add Sticky Note
- Bailey waxes eloquent
  in describing SK's purity and sinless state (_Initiation_, p.28-29).
  She characterizes him as the incarnation of "one of the 7 spirits before
  the Throne - the greatest of all Avatars".
  - Satan - on 2009-01-16
  Add Sticky Note
- She also borrows liberally
  from Christian imagery, even quoting New Testament passages to describe
  him. In this passage, she even goes so far as to say that Sanat is
  "literally the Planetary Logos Himself", and describes the Logos as taking
  "the form of Sanat Kumara", the other two being "the outcome of the triple
  nature of the Planetary Logos."
  - Equating Satan with "Logos" - the Word..i.e. Jesus the Christ - on 2009-01-16
  Add Sticky Note
- but is yet to "come into full manifestation upon the physical plane".
  - Until "he (the Holy Spirit) who prevents (restrains the manifestation of ultimate evil) is taken out of the way... - on 2009-01-16
  Add Sticky Note
- These beings, who already know their higher selves as god, are divine from
  our standpoint. They know of our race's condition and have offered mankind
  their help in evolving into godhood.
  - The message of the UFOs, ETs and Aliens - on 2009-01-16
  Add Sticky Note
- In response to human need, some of these Masters become
  "Avatars" by occasionally taking up residence on the physical plane within
  a human host, known as "incarnation" (in their own body) or "overshadowing"
  (sharing the body with another soul).
  - The Devil's twist on demon possession - on 2009-01-16
  Add Sticky Note
- Montgomery, who claims to have received her information
  through channeling, writes: "Most Walk-ins zealously guard the secret of
  their altered identity, because people tend to fear" the phenomenon (p.47)
  and would launch "witchhunts" (p.125).
  - Or immediately call an exorcist; which would foil the plan of the "Walk-in" - on 2009-01-16
  Add Sticky Note
- and she
  prophesies of a walk-in US President at some point (p.207).
  - Barack Obama? - on 2009-01-16
  Add Sticky Note
- According to Montgomery, the human mind is "vacated"
  so that "the entity slips in" (_Strangers_ p.25).
  - The whole "Satanic" point of Yoga/meditation. - on 2009-01-16
  Add Sticky Note
- The Hierarchy promotes the idea that every
  possible universe is equally "real" in your mind, where as an enlightened
  person you can "create your own reality" at will.
  - One of the favorite sayings of Bush's Neocons - on 2009-01-16
  Add Sticky Note
- Hillary Clinton, US First Lady for two terms and candidate
  for New York Senator, revealed in 1996 that she regularly consults with
  "the spirit of Eleanor Roosevelt" for advice. (_The Skeptic Magazine_,
  "Ten Years of
  Skeptism") [Hillary is solidly behind NA educational principles - see
  that
  section for details.]
  - Hillary Clinton - on 2009-01-16
  Add Sticky Note
- Prime players were "El Morya" and
  "Master Kuthumi", both of them "5th degree initiates" who dictated _Isis
  Unveiled_ to Helena Blavatsky - as claimed in a "direct testimony" attributed
  to the spirit (El Morya, _The Chela and the Path_, p.122)
  - This "El Morya"...is it possible he is that evil angel "Moriah" spoken of by Thomas Horn of Raiders News Network?....the "Angel in the Whirlwind?" - on 2009-01-16
  Add Sticky Note
- Even Alice Bailey herself, who dedicated her life as a channel
  for the "Masters", got the ax nearly 30 years ago in a similarly ungrateful
  tone: "In the past we have had to withdraw our support from those who were
  given the opportunity to represent us. The one who for a time had
  the opportunity of representing the master Djwal Kuhl soon lost that authority
  through intellectual pride and the brittleness of the lower mental body,
  which can never be the channel of the mind of God. Thus I expose to you
  the false teachings subtly woven into the work of Alice Bailey, whose failure
  to surrender totally rendered her unfit as an instrument of the Tibetan
  Master." ("Master Kuthumi", "An Expose of False Teachings", _Pearls of
  Wisdom_ 19/5, Feb. 1, 1976, p.28)
  - Satan's discards - on 2009-01-16
  Add Sticky Note
- Moreover, the "Great Ones" are training humans to
  be "cooperators in the work of destruction," by directing the "interplanetary
  force" created by "certain mantrams and words" against this Being and against
  those who follow Him. [The Great
  Invocation is the most widely used example.]
  - God and the Christians are referred to here as the obstructionists and hinderers of Satan's and the NAs' master plans......And yes...we are! - on 2009-01-16
  Add Sticky Note
- Finally, Bailey says, "The hated 'Dweller on the Threshold'
  thus gradually dies for lack of sustenance." [Here the true nature of the
  Hierarchy momentarily peeps out: their desire to destroy the "Dweller"
  has its source in hatred, an evil motive attributed to only
  the most unenlightened of humans. Jews, for instance. It also betrays
  fear, another unenlightened attribute.]
  - The demonic host of fallen angels' and their "Master's" hatred of God - on 2009-01-16
  Add Sticky Note
- Seeing that Bailey counts the current
  solar system as only the "second", we have only one other. The race
  hailing from that system is clearly guilty for bringing their unwelcome
  "Emanation form" along with them - one who in that age was considered a
  "principle", in other words a God.
  - In other words: Jesus the Christ...very God and Son of God....Praise His name forever!!! - on 2009-01-16
  Add Sticky Note
- It was the last round of this war between Light and Dark
  that ended the Atlantean Age and forced the Hierarchy, champions of the
  White Lodge, to withdraw into space and leave earth in the hands of the
  inexplicably victorious Black Lodge.
  - A demonic twist to the Biblical Flood epoch; where the "one" and only "True" God of righteousness wearied at the wickedness of his creation under the evil fallen angels, brought their reign of terror to an end by sending a global cataclysm of flood waters to cleanse the earth. The fallen angels, some imprisoned in "chains of darkness" and their free roaming evil "brothers" in a sense did vacate an earth and temporal dwelling never meant for them and either were imprisoned in the bowels of the earth or hightailed it to the spiritual dimension of "Space" from which they came. - on 2009-01-16
  Add Sticky Note
- Although the Black Lodge remains nameless,
  their activities are described: "The Forces of Darkness are powerful energies,
  working to preserve that which is ancient and material.... They consequently
  block deliberately the inflow of that which is new and life-giving; they
  work to prevent the understanding of that which is of the New Age; they
  endeavor to preserve that which is familiar and old... to bring blindness
  to the peoples and to feed steadily the existing fires of hate, of separateness,
  of criticism and of cruelty." (_Externalisation_ II, p.75)
  - The Holy God and Christians are just messing it all up - on 2009-01-16
  Add Sticky Note
- The only ways NA disciples can fight the Forces of Darkness
  are to refuse to entertain any thoughts which their agents promote, to
  faithfully recite the Great Invocation, and to try to make contact with
  "the forces of Shamballa or of the Hierarchy." (p.73, 76)
  - In other words: reject the pleas of Christians for salvation and resist the Holy Spirit. - on 2009-01-16
  Add Sticky Note
- Meanwhile,
  "the forces of separateness and of hate... use the Jewish race to stir
  up world difficulty." (p.77)
  - Boy!!! Does this phrase sound familiar in 2008-2009!!! - on 2009-01-16
  Add Sticky Note
- It is only when "the mind aspect (the third [Lucifer]
  aspect of the personality) is more fully developed, then the focus of the
  effort of the Dark Forces will change and the problem of the Jews will
  disappear." (p.88) [Elsewhere,
  Bailey makes it clear that for the "problem of the Jews" to disappear,
  the Jews themselves have to disappear.]
  - Persecution and total eradication by death of Jews and by extension...Christians - on 2009-01-16
  Add Sticky Note

25 Sep 08

We need international regulation to protect global economy, Brown tells world leaders | Politics | guardian.co.uk

World financial "dictator" idea pushed by UK's Gordon Brown

www.guardian.co.uk/...gordonbrown.marketturmoil - Preview

gordon-brown british nwo united-nations global economy dictator tsar new-york goals agenda elite luciferians moguls wives charity

We need international regulation to protect global economy, Brown tells world leaders
Gordon Brown uses New York meeting to promote his plan for installing international regulator to survey world markets
21 more annotations...
- Patrick Wintour
  
  guardian.co.uk,
  
  Thursday September 25 2008
- Gordon Brown is promoting his plan for an international regulator to oversee the international financial markets and prevent further economic turbulence during talks with world leaders in New York.
- The prime minister convened a meeting of leaders - including Spanish prime minister Jose Zapatero, European commission president Jose Barrroso, Australian prime minister Kevin Rudd, Brazilian president Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and Danish prime minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen - to discuss the global credit crisis at in the Waldorf hotel last night.
- On his way to New York, Brown revealed he was examining the way British pension funds facilitate short selling by lending their stock to hedge funds.
- Brown praised the bail out of Wall Street, saying it was necessary to stop the financial institutions freezing up by removing illiquid or so-called toxic assets.
  - I seem to recall we Americans fighting a war 200 hundred years ago to get rid of pontificating Brits,standing on American soil, telling we Americans what we need to do! - on 2008-09-25
  Add Sticky Note
- The prime minister is fighting for a multi-part package with world leaders, but has no meeting scheduled with senior US Treasury figures as they battle in Washington with Congress to win legislative approval for the $700bn package.
- He has called for international regulation, greater transparency and responsibility in executive bonuses to encourage longer-term decision making.
- Brown believes the IMF, working with the Financial Stability Forum - a group of central banks, regulators and international bodies - "should be at the heart of an early warning system for financial turbulence affecting the global economy".
- He has also been privately testing the water to see whether there are grounds for restarting world trade talks in the near future.
- Many world leaders are in New York for the special UN general assembly devoted to trying to meet the millennium development goals, as well as former US president Bill Clinton's annual Global Initiative meeting.
  - Collection of assholes! - on 2008-09-25
  Add Sticky Note
- Initial polls suggest Brown's standing in the polls has been boosted by his promise in his conference speech to be the rock of stability in the credit crisis.
  - Brown running for the "money manager of the world" spot? - on 2008-09-25
  Add Sticky Note
- Brown is determined to spend the two days in New York fighting both for more money for the world's poor and a weighty package to sort out the credit crisis.
- Brown will be aware that the economy can swing votes massively, and will have witnessed the Democratic presidential candidate, Barack Obama, enjoying a poll surge as the Republicans suffer from the incumbency factor.
- Brown insists he has done everything he needed to increase liquidity in UK markets, and privately complains the crisis could have been minimised had his proposals on international regulation been implemented earlier.
- He says his form of risk-based regulation has worked, but the scale of the new financial instruments outwitted the regulators.
- Brown is concerned that the costs of the credit crisis, as well as the economic down turn, will mean the developed world turns off the tap on funding to alleviate poverty.
- He has been working on ambitious packages on education, health and eradicating deaths from malaria by 2015.
- His aides, as well as some of the celebrities accompanying him, such as supermodel Elle Macpherson, have spoken of fears of donor fatigue as people struggle to pay the rent.
- Macpherson is determined to stress that aid does help fight poverty.
- The supermodel was accompanying Sarah Brown, the prime minister's wife, along with Sarah Ferguson, the Duchess of York, a dedicated charity worker, to a leader's wives dinner convened to raise awareness for Brown's White Ribbon Alliance and Safe Motherhood charity.
  - A pack of bullshit - on 2008-09-25
  Add Sticky Note
- The dinner in Manhatten was co-hosted by Queen Rania of Jordan and Wendi Murdoch, the wide of the media mogul.

24 Sep 08

UN chief calls for 'global leadership'

www.breitbart.com/article.php - Preview

ban-ki-moon un united-nations globalists leadership world-leadership nwo chief africa poverty meeting nationalism international

UN chief calls for 'global leadership'
Sep 23 10:20 AM US/Eastern
15 more annotations...
- UN chief Ban Ki-moon on Tuesday stressed the need for "global leadership" as he pressed world leaders not to pursue narrow national interests in the face of hard economic times.
- "I see a danger of nations looking more inward, rather than toward a shared future," he said at the opening of the UN General Assembly's annual debate.
- He spoke of a "challenge of global leadership" to tackle the world's worsening financial, energy and food crises.
  - Oh, he and they are going to get "global leadership" alright - on 2008-09-24
  Add Sticky Note
- "We see new centers of power and leadership -- in Asia, Latin America and across the newly developed world," Ban told more than 120 heads of state or government, including Presidents George W. Bush of the United States and Nicolas Sarkozy of France.
- "In this new world, our challenges are increasingly those of collaboration rather than confrontation," he added.
- "Nations can no longer protect their interests, or advance the well-being of their people, without the partnership of the rest."
  - Pushing NWO...of course - on 2008-09-24
  Add Sticky Note
- On the world's current financial crisis, the UN secretary general stressed the need to "restore order to the international financial markets".
- "We need a new understanding on business ethics and governance, with more compassion and less uncritical faith in the 'magic' of markets," the UN boss said.
- Ban, who has chosen implementation of key poverty reduction goals as a major theme of this year's debate, said he saw "a danger of retreating from the progress we have made, particularly in the realm of development and more equitably sharing the fruits of global growth."
- "Global growth has raised billions of people out of poverty. However, if you are among the world's poor, you have never felt poverty so sharply."
- On Thursday, he will host a summit meeting on implementation of the poverty reduction Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) on the margins of the General Assembly session.
- Ban said he would use Thursday's summit to press world leaders, the private sector, foundations, and civil society to make "ambitious and concrete" proposals to ensure that these goals are implemented by a 2015 deadline.
- Monday, a summit meeting on Africa's development needs adopted a political declaration urging rich countries to honor their pledge to double their annual aid to the continent, which is struggling to meet the MDGs.
- And returning to the theme of global leadership, Ban told the assembly: "It takes leadership to honor our pledges and our promises in the face of fiscal constraints and political opposition.
- "It takes leadership to commit our soldiers to a cause of peace in faraway places. It takes leadership to speak out for justice. To act on climate change despite wonderful voices against you."

20 Sep 08

Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute: Top UN Official Applauds Plummeting Births, Calls for Protection of Sodomy

Volume 11, Number 40

September 18, 2008
Top UN Official Applauds Plummeting Births, Calls for Protection of Sodomy
17 more annotations...
- By Susan Yoshihara, Ph.D.
- (NEW YORK – C-FAM) At United Nations headquarters last week, UN Population Fund (UNFPA) executive director Thoraya Obaid called for more funding for population programs, including reducing fertility, promoting “reproductive health services,” and “de-stigmatizing” sodomy.
- Obaid began her remarks by commemorating the 40th anniversary of Paul Erlich's book, The Population Bomb, which alarmed readers about the threat of “overpopulation” and justified the establishment of UNFPA.
- While she admitted the book’s prediction of “massive starvation on a large scale has not come to pass,” she nonetheless called for renewed commitment to boilerplate population control policies such as promoting smaller families, warning nations that world population had grown from 3.5 billion to 6.7 billion since 1968.
- Obaid said there is a causal relationship between fertility decline and economic development, but this claim has been seriously challenged by the emerging evidence.
- A landmark study published earlier this year by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), for example, found that contrary to conventional wisdom, the “Asian Miracle,” in which economic development followed a drop in fertility, was the exception to the rule.
- It also showed why the world will become more violent and less secure in the next thirty years due in part to rapid changes in fertility rates.
- The executive director called for more funding of “education and reproductive health” in line with UNFPA’s mandate from the International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) outcome document
- “which,” Obaid told member states, “your governments have adopted.”
- Left unmentioned was the fact that ICPD explicitly safeguards each nation’s right to protect the unborn in their laws, and that it explicitly rules out abortion as a method of family planning.
- The omission was especially notable since Obaid then said that “we need increased political will and teamwork to scale up quality reproductive health services,” a term interpreted by various UN agencies and human rights experts as including abortion.
  - And just who is this old hag witch and who put her in charge of my reproductive health or that of my children? - on 2008-09-20
  Add Sticky Note
- Specifically, she asserted that “we will not achieve MDG 5 [Millennium Development Goal for reducing maternal mortality] unless women have universal access to reproductive health.”
- Nations have repeatedly rejected the inclusion of reproductive health in the MDGs, and Obaid notably dropped any reference to a new “target” for reproductive health, something that drew sharp rebukes from the US delegation in her last annual report.
- Perhaps most controversial was Obaid’s claim, during her discussion of HIV prevention, that nations must “fight even harder against stigma and discrimination,” and included “men having sex with men," among marginalized groups needing special protection along with women and children.
  - UN official calling for special protection for queers and sodomites... - on 2008-09-20
  Add Sticky Note
- She then mentioned “forces that do not like our agenda,” claiming that “Threats are made against…UN family planning programs in particular.”
- She did not provide specifics, but said that “Our focus in 2008 has been to consolidate inter-faith networks for population and development,” and announced a UNFPA-sponsored Global Faith-Based Organization Forum in Istanbul next month to “enhance this strategic partnership.”
  - The Hag makes reference to genuine Christians and other traditional values groups who oppose infanticide via abortion. She then refers too and advocates a global "Faith" conclave and union of agreement between the world faiths in order to remove the road blocks impeding child and infant murders (abortion) and by extension...sodomy 'till your eyes pop out... - on 2008-09-20
  Add Sticky Note
- Obaid lauded the fact that UNFPA’s funding increased in 2008 by $50 million to a total of $470 million, and announced that UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon decided to extend her term in office by an additional two years.

18 Sep 08

Part 7: YouTube - - NWO, ILLUMINATI, SATANISM, & THE CIA - 7of14 -

www.youtube.com/watch - Preview

ted-gunderson fbi nwo state-governments biosphere-reserve world-bankers rockefeller us-government elite united-nations traitors treasury-dept nazis surveillance devils luciferians

NWO, ILLUMINATI, SATANISM, & THE CIA - 7of14
1 more annotations...
- From: 911truthnc
  
  Added:
  March 15, 2007
  
  (more info)
  
  (less info)
  
  Want to Subscribe?
  
  Sign in to YouTube now!
  
  Sign in with your Google Account!
  
  Retired FBI Senior Special-Agent-In-Charge
  Ted L. G...
  
  Retired FBI Senior Special-Agent-In-Charge
  Ted L. Gunderson compiled box loads of
  research and had assembled a number
  of reports in recent years which
  described unimaginable "operations"
  of treachery, sadistic savagery,
  degradation, abuse, and murder caused
  by intelligence agents of the
  United States government against
  its own citizens, especially children.

President Medvedev threatens Russian Arctic annexation - Times Online

September 18, 2008
President Medvedev threatens Russian Arctic annexation
19 more annotations...
- Tony Halpin in Moscow
- Russia triggered a fresh scramble for the oil wealth of the Arctic yesterday
  when President Medvedev called on his security chiefs to establish a formal
  border in the region.
- Mr Medvedev laid claim to a vast tranche of the Arctic, telling his National
  Security Council that it had “strategic importance” for Russia.
- The US
  Geological Survey estimates that the region contains 90 billion barrels of
  oil, as well as gas reserves – all of it increasingly accessible as global
  warming shrinks the ice cap.
- “We must wrap up all the formalities for drawing the external border in the
  continental shelf. This is our direct responsibility to future generations,”
  Mr Medvedev told the Kremlin meeting.
- Nikolai Patrushev, the director of the council, said that Russia would defend
  its interests in the Arctic against rival claims from the United States,
  Canada, Norway and Denmark.
  - The vodka swilling beet eaters are on the march.... - on 2008-09-18
  Add Sticky Note
- “We must define the borders in the north of our
  country, where the Arctic lies. Our estimate is that it makes up 18 per cent
  of our territory. And we are saying that 20,000km of the state border runs
  in this region.”
- The Federal Security Service under Mr Patrushev created a special Arctic
  Directorate in 2004 to further Russian interests in the region.
- He even flew
  to the North Pole to plant a Russian flag.
- The order to assert the Kremlin’s rights came just over a year after a team of
  Russian explorers became the first to reach the Arctic seabed.
- They dived
  4,261 metres (13,980ft) in two mini-submarines and planted a titanium flag
  on the ocean floor to stake Russia’s claim to an area of territory the size
  of Western Europe.
- The expedition brought back soil samples as part of Russia’s campaign to
  demonstrate that the Lomonosov Ridge, an underwater shelf that runs through
  the Arctic, is an extension of its territory.
- Russia lodged a claim in 2001
  to 463,000 square miles (1.2 million sq km) of the Arctic ocean with the UN
  Convention on the Law of the Sea.
- The UN asked for more scientific data and
  Russia is planning to submit a fresh application next year.
- Canada, Norway, the US and Denmark – which has sovereignty over Greenland –
  all reject Russia’s arguments.
- Denmark and Canada claim that the Lomonosov
  Ridge is linked to their territories, while Norway is conducting a survey to
  strengthen its case.
- Under international law each country is entitled to
  control an economic zone within 200 miles of its continental shelf, but the
  limits of the shelf are disputed.
- Canada’s then Foreign Minister, Peter MacKay, dismissed the Russian expedition
  as a throwback to 15th-century imperialism, saying: “You can’t go around the
  world and plant flags and say ‘We’re claiming this territory’.”
- Russia’s descent to the seabed unnerved its rivals, however, by demonstrating
  its ability to enforce a physical presence in the hostile Arctic environment.

14 Sep 08

Russia says it must stake claim to Arctic resources | U.S. | Reuters

www.reuters.com/...idUSLC30090620080912 - Preview

russia gog-magog arctic mineral-wealth oil-reserves continental-shelf claims usa canada denmark norway lomonosov-ridge siberia base united-nations law-of-sea treaty

Russia says it must stake claim to Arctic resources
Fri Sep 12, 2008
15 more annotations...
- By Guy Faulconbridge
- MOSCOW (Reuters) - Russia must stake its claim to a slice of the Arctic's vast resources, the secretary of Russia's Security Council said on Friday at an unprecedented session of the council held on a desolate Arctic island.
- Russia, the world's second biggest oil exporter, is in a race with Canada, Denmark, Norway and the United States for control of the oil, gas and precious metals that would become more accessible if global warming shrinks the Arctic ice cap.
- Underlining Russia's claims to the region, Security Council Secretary Nikolai Patrushev assembled the defence and interior ministers and the speakers of both houses of parliament for the meeting on the Arctic island, Russian news agencies reported.
- Russia, the world's biggest country, says a whole swathe of the Arctic seabed should belong to it because the area is really an extension of the Siberian continental shelf.
- "The Arctic must become Russia's main strategic resource base," Russian news agencies quoted Patrushev as saying. The Council usually meets only in Moscow.
- Patrushev, formerly Russia's powerful domestic spy chief, said competition from other Arctic powers was increasing and that Russia must strengthen transport links across its Arctic regions to drive development.
- Canada, Norway, Russia, the United States and Denmark -- which governs Greenland -- all have a shoreline within the Arctic Circle, and have a 200-mile (320-km) economic zone around the north of their coastlines.
- Russian officials say they are entitled to a bigger share.
  - Ahhh..poor babies... - on 2008-09-14
  Add Sticky Note
- They base the claim on the contention that the Lomonosov ridge, a vast underwater mountain range that runs underneath the Arctic, is an extension of the Siberian continental shelf.
- Under the United Nations Law of the Sea treaty, any state with an Arctic coastline that wishes to stake a claim to a greater share of the Arctic must lodge its submission with the U.N.'s Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf.
- Russian geologists estimate the Arctic seabed has at least 9 billion to 10 billion tonnes of fuel equivalent, about the same as Russia's total oil reserves.
- Last year a submersible with a senior Russian lawmaker on board planted a Russian flag on the Arctic seabed. The crew were greeted as heroes when they returned to Moscow.
- Russian news agencies said the special Security Council session was held at the Nagurskaya base, Russia's most northerly border outpost.
- The base is on Alexandra's Land, part of the Russian-controlled Franz Josef archipelago.

15 Aug 08

Chuck Baldwin -- America's Greatest Threat

www.newswithviews.com/...baldwin463.htm - Preview

chuck-baldwin america threats united-nations nwo north-american-union spp us-government democrats republicans usa independence sovereignty daniel-webster russia iran china

AMERICA'S GREATEST
THREAT
By
Chuck Baldwin

August 15, 2008

NewsWithViews.com
33 more annotations...
- Every
  time violence erupts somewhere in the world, our national leaders and
  news media make it sound like that particular outbreak is America's
  greatest threat.
- The conflict between Russia and Georgia is no exception.
  Almost as soon as news of the conflict broke, the presumptive Republican
  Presidential nominee, John McCain, was suggesting that the United States
  (or the United Nations) should send troops to the scene.
- I guess two
  wars are not enough for McCain; he now wants to start a third. (And
  with all his talk about bombing Iran, make that four.)
- And talk all
  over Washington, D.C., was mostly about what kind of military response
  the United States should take.
- Have
  people lost their minds?
- Or do people really believe that the United
  States is the world's--or should we say the United Nations'--policeman?
  Apparently, that is what our national leaders from both major parties
  believe.
- Let's
  face it: most of America's foreign policy over the last several decades
  has been more about fulfilling the U.N.'s global desires than protecting
  the people and property of the United States.
- And, yes, that includes
  America's invasion of Iraq.
- Do
  readers not remember that soon after launching the invasion of Iraq,
  President Bush appeared before the United Nations and plainly told that
  sinister organization that the reason he had ordered the invasion of
  Iraq was to "defend . . . the credibility of the United Nations"?
- Frankly, I did not know the United Nations had any credibility worth
  defending.
- Nevertheless, G.W. Bush was willing to sacrifice over 4,000
  American lives for the express purpose of defending the U.N.'s "credibility."
  Now, John McCain appears willing to send troops to Georgia.
- I
  will not use this column to analyze the specific events leading up to
  Russia's attack against Georgia, except to say that one can count on
  the fact that there is much more to the story than what NBC, CBS, ABC,
  and CNN are telling us.
- In
  addition, one of the major fallacies being perpetrated by most in Washington,
  D.C., is the notion that America is somehow strengthened and protected
  by aggressive meddling in the affairs of foreign countries.
- Such a philosophy
  was considered anathema to America's Founding Fathers. They rightly
  understood that such reasoning created more problems than it solved
  and that it made America more vulnerable, not more secure.
- Regardless
  of what the underlying and overriding reasons for Russia's attack might
  have been, I will say here and now that the Russian-Georgian conflict
  is not America's greatest threat.
- I will also be so bold as to say that
  Iran or North Korea is not America's greatest threat, either.
- In fact,
  I will categorically state that no foreign nation (although, of all
  foreign nations, Red China should undoubtedly be our biggest concern--and
  none of our national leaders seem the least bit concerned about it)
  is America's greatest threat. America's greatest threat comes from within.
  And I am not alone in that opinion.
- Daniel
  Webster warned, "There is no nation on earth powerful enough to
  accomplish our overthrow. Our destruction, should it come at all, will
  be from another quarter. From the inattention of the people to the concerns
  of their government, from their carelessness and negligence. I must
  confess that I do apprehend some danger. I fear that they may place
  too implicit a confidence in their public servants and fail properly
  to scrutinize their conduct; that in this way they may be made the dupes
  of designing men, and become the instruments of their own undoing."
- While
  the national media focuses on Russia, Georgia, Iraq, Afghanistan, or
  Iran, our own leaders are quietly molding the clay of our own demise
  right here at home.
- Both political parties, and the standard-bearers
  they select, are facilitating the surrender of our national sovereignty
  and independence.
- They are working in darkness to build an international
  community where the laws and principles of individual nation-states
  (including America's) are made subservient to the laws and principles
  of international entities. This is America's greatest threat.
- For
  example, John McCain supports the International Criminal Court.
- Can
  you believe this? Can you imagine U.S. citizens being hauled off before
  an international court to be tried for crimes?
- Imagine an international
  court whose rulings and opinions overrule U.S. rulings and opinions.
  Imagine a court setting where the constitutional protections of the
  Bill of Rights are null and void. Imagine a court setting where international
  law trumps U.S. or state laws. If that is not a surrender of U.S. sovereignty,
  nothing is! And John McCain is all for it.
- Furthermore,
  both John McCain and Barack Obama support NAFTA, the WTO, GATT, and
  the FTAA.
- Both major party candidates support the NAFTA superhighway,
  the creation of a North American Community (which is the precursor to
  a North American Union), the SPP, and the United Nations.
- Ladies
  and Gentlemen, America is on the verge of losing its independence and
  its national sovereignty. And both major political parties (along with
  a compliant national media) are equally culpable.
- And mark this down:
  when America loses its independence and national sovereignty, we also
  lose our freedoms and liberties.
- Please remember that before a Constitution
  and Bill of Rights could be drafted, there was first drafted a Declaration
  of Independence. It is the Declaration of Independence that lays the
  cornerstone and builds the wall of protection around the Constitution
  and Bill of Rights.
- Lose the Declaration and we lose the Constitution
  and Bill of Rights.
- No,
  the greatest threat to America does not come from Russia, Iraq, Iran,
  or any other foreign country. America's greatest threat comes from a
  complacent populace who would sit back and do nothing while our own
  civil magistrates surrender our nation's sovereignty and independence
  to international interests.
- Think
  about it: 232 years after Thomas Jefferson drafted the Declaration of
  Independence, and after our Founding Fathers pledged their lives, fortunes,
  and sacred honor to defend that document, our nation's leaders from
  both major parties are in the process of ceding America back to the
  kind of global empire from which we fought to break free. This is America's
  greatest threat!
- ©
  2008 Chuck Baldwin - All Rights Reserved

11 Aug 08

The Green Agenda - The First Global Revolution

Looking at the Club of Rome, it's members and agenda

green-agenda.com/globalrevolution.html - Preview

club-rome al-gore united-nations david-rockefeller gaia mother-earth pagans members nwo elite antichrist end-times godless global-government 666 devils dictators conspiracy

They state that
even if population was frozen at 1975 levels, and industrial activity
at 1985 levels, then the earth’s ecosystems would still
ultimately collapse.
even back in 1972 the Club considered modern
industrial society to be completely unsustainable.
48 more annotations...
- The CoR has not changed these views in the
  slightest, in fact, in the last three decades their warnings have
  become increasingly more urgent and alarmist. They call this imminent
  collapse the ‘World
  Problematique’
  and their proposed solution the ‘World
  Resolutique.’
- The
  Limits to Growth is considered to
  be the most successful environmental publication ever produced and
  propelled the Club of Rome to its current position of an
  environmental thought-leader and a major consultant to the United
  Nations.
- Throughout the 1970s and 80s the
  concept that humanity was irreparably damaging the earth gained
  credence and facilitated the formation of mainstream and activist
  environmental groups.
- However the Club does produce many ‘discussion
  reports’
  that can be found on its website.
- All meetings of the CoR are held
  ‘behind closed doors’ and no public records are kept.
- The United Nations contracts the
  Club of Rome to prepare ‘Policy Guidance Documents’ which
  it uses in formulating its policies and programmes.
- As many high ranking UN officials are
  actually CoR members, this is like a man asking himself for advice,
  and then agreeing with that advice. Not very objective!
- Twenty
  years after the Limits to Growth
  the CoR published another major report that became an instant
  best-seller. In The First Global Revolution
  the Club of Rome claimed that the time to act had run out. It was now
  or never.
- Delay in beginning corrective measures will increase the
  damage to the world ecological system and ultimately reduce the human
  population that will eventually be supportable.
- They also stated that
  that democratic governments were far too short-sighted to deal with
  the ‘problematique’ and new forms of governance are
  urgently required.
- In order not too violate any copyright
  protection I will not reproduce the text of the book on this site.
  However, it is permissible for me to quote a brief excerpt in the
  context of this wider discussion. The complete
  text can
  be found on Google Books.
- As you read the following quotes please
  remember the names of the leaders listed above.
- This is not some
  quirky little cult. This is the stated
  agenda of the
  leaders of the environmental movement:
- It would seem that humans need a common
  motivation, namely a common adversary, to organize and act
  together in the vacuum;
- such a motivation must be found to bring the
  divided nations together to face an outside enemy, either a real
  one or else one invented for the purpose.
- New enemies
  therefore have to be identified.
  New strategies imagined, new
  weapons devised.
- The common enemy of humanity is man.
- In
  searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that
  pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and
  the like would fit the bill.
- All these dangers are caused by
  human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and
  behavior that they can be overcome.
- The real enemy then, is
  humanity itself.
- The old democracies have functioned
  reasonably well over the last 200 years, but they appear now to be in
  a phase of complacent stagnation with little evidence of real
  leadership and innovation
- Democracy is not a panacea.
  It cannot organize everything and it is unaware of its own limits.
- Sacrilegious though this may
  sound, democracy is no longer well suited for the tasks ahead.
- So,
  long before Global Warming became a well known issue Al Gore and his
  Club of Rome colleagues stated that they would use the threat of
  global warming to unite humanity and "set
  the scene for mankind's encounter with the planet."
- In the same way that shamans and sooth-sayers in medieval times used
  their advance knowledge of when eclipses would occur to control and
  terrify their followers, they would use a natural phenomenon as their
  'enemy' to achieve their objectives.
- But then they state that
  although Global Warming would be presented as the initial enemy, the
  real enemy of humanity would be portrayed as man himself
- I am
  already noticing how frequently the terms climate change and
  overpopulation are being uttered in the same breath.
- Having
  discovered that all these influential environmental leaders were
  associated with the Club of Rome I set about reading all the reports,
  lectures and speeches on their website as well as the reports
  commissioned by the UN. I was amazed to find that they lay out their
  entire agenda for anyone who has eyes to see.
- Exactly the same
  themes, concepts and phrases are repeated continuously throughout
  their publications.
- They are full of references to 'imminent
  collapse', 'dying planet',
  'our mother Gaia', 'wrenching
  transformation', 'united global
  society', 'global consciousness',
  'new forms of governance' etc.
  They truly intend to bring about the world's First
  Global Revolution.
- The
  Kosmos
  Journal provides
  perhaps the best insight into their worldview.
- This Journal was
  founded by the Club of Rome in partnership with with several of its
  sibling organizations. As described in my article, The
  Green Web,
  the CoR has established a network of supporting organizations, each
  focussing on a different aspect of their agenda.
- The Kosmos Journal
  contains many articles written by CoR members.
- The basic premise of
  their worldview is:
- "Modern
  industrial civilisation is fast outstripping the Earth's natural
  regenerative and life-supporting capacity..."
- "At
  current rates of resource depletion and environmental degradation a
  near complete collapse of ecological integrity will occur within the
  next 100 years..."
- "Gaia, our Mother, who nutured
  humanity for countless millenia within her womb of evolution, is
  dying..."
- “A small window of opportunity now exists
  to transform humanity into a sustainable global interdepedant society
  based on respect and reverence for Earth..."
- "A
  radical change from the current trajectory is required, a complete
  reordering of global society..."
- "Humans only truly
  unite when faced with a powerful external enemy..."
- "At
  this time a new enemy must be found, one either real or invented for
  the purpose..."
- "Democracy has failed us, a new
  system of global governance, based on environmental imperatives, must
  be implemented quickly..."
- Gaia,
  Global Warming, and Global Governance are intricately entwined,
  if one truly believes in Gaia, and that she is being fatally harmed
  by the current system, then a new system of global governance and
  control would appear to be the only answer.
- Global Warming provides
  the ideal 'enemy' to bring about this objective.
- It is easy for these
  global elitists to talk about sacrifice, wrenching transformation,
  population control and halving the use of fossil fuels but the
  implications are truely horrendous.
- Even if you think this is
  all nonsense I would ask you to at least read these
  quotes and excerpts,
  and think about the implications of their agenda.
- Everyday I am
  amazed at how quickly things are changing. It is coming hard and
  fast.
- As Al Gore said in the closing sentence of
  his statement after he won the Nobel Peace Prize ... "This
  is just the beginning."
  
  
  
  The Agenda
  
  Global Revolution
  The Turning Point
  Gaia's Gurus
  The Green Web
  Global Consciousness
  Sustainable Development
  Agenda 21
  The Earth Charter
  A United World
  The Gaia Hypothesis
  Deep Ecology
  The Spiritual UN
  A United Faith
  Settled Science?
  What about Greenland?
  The Carbon Currency
  A New Economy
  
  About the Author
  
  Links
  
  Contact Us
  
  
  <script type="text/javascript">
  var sc_project=2763262;
  var sc_invisible=0;
  var sc_partition=28;
  var sc_security="9b735d8c";
  </script>
  
  <script src="http://www.statcounter.com/counter/counter_xhtml.js" type="text/javascript"></script>