ANSWER:  As you know, you won’t hear these things in
school.  Shattered myths

still
dominate the textbooks we learn from.

Do
you know that up to 200 years after the flat earth theory was disproved, schools

in Europe were still teaching it as fact?

Entrenched
theories do die hard. It takes time.

And the discoveries
I am sharing do challenge the entrenched evolution theory.

However,
a hopeful trend is emerging.

Biology
tutor Sue Addinell (Islington 6th Form College in UK) reported the

changing
nature of the biology syllabus.

In the 1990s there had been a

shift
away from the evidence for evolution towards the practical application

of
biological science. One current textbook now had no mention of Darwin

in
its index.

It is no wonder that
leading evolutionists such as Steve Jones and Richard
Dawkins are becoming
so incensed. They are losing and they can't understand

it.

Andrew Jacobs reported in the
New York Times of January 30, 2004 that

“Education
officials in the state of Georgia removed the word “evolution” and

scaled
back ideas about the natural selection of species in a proposed set of

guidelines
for school science classes.”

That’s
a start!

Many honest scientists are caught up in
the system – and sincerely misinformed.

It was all they
were taught. They do not know about the evidence against it.

Constant
exposure to something, in most cases, leads to its acceptance. As

Hitler acknowledged, “Tell
a lie long enough and people will come to believe it.”

However,
we do need to face this fact. The present system is in the grip of

powerful
men with enormous money behind them – and an agenda.

Established
systems of science, education and public media are thoroughly

committed
to the belief that macro-evolution is a “fact”, so you will seldom

hear
the FACTS about discoveries which totally upset that belief.

Carl Sagan
clones repeatedly spout off words such as “billions and billions of

years”. 
And ten years of evolution is crammed down the throats of our children. 

By and large the Establishment
refuses to accept the fossil evidence at face value.

Most
university graduates have acquired their degrees through this system.

They
now find their careers, their reputations and their very livelihood at risk,

should
they admit publicly that what they have been teaching is a big mistake.

Many
who have renounced the theory of evolution have not only lost funding

for
their projects, they have also been misrepresented, ridiculed 
and fired. And

much of their research has then
been destroyed. Examples of such treatment

could fill
volumes.

And here’s something
else to consider. It is almost impossible for any person

who
has taken a public stance on a certain position, to make a public admission

that
what he has taught is wrong.

So
the unsuspecting public continues to be fed this planned menu. Those in charge

influence the education
system, the media and the publishing industry.

QUESTION: 
I wonder if you have any information regarding a gold

chain that was found
in a lump of coal somewhere in America (I'm pretty

sure
it was 1800 and something). I read about a long time ago, but I can

not
seem to find out anything about it.

 I
enjoy your website and tantalising emails. Keep it up.   Dan Soper

ANSWER:
On June 9, 1891, Mrs S.W. Culp in Morrinsville, Illinois,
accidentally
dropped a shovelful of coal on the floor. One large piece broke
open. Inside
it was an intricately made 8 carat gold chain, 10 inches long,
coiled and
embedded. When the coal broke into two pieces, the two ends

of
the chain remained attached, one to each piece of coal.

The
coal, said to be of the "carboniferous era", several million years ago,

came
from a mine in Pennsylvania. (Morrinsville Times,  June 11, 1891) 

This,
and other evidences of man found in coal, go against the prevailing

evolutionary
dogma that coal was formed millions of years before man

appeared
on earth.

1.
that man is millions of years older than thought, or

2.
that the coal is not millions of years old.

I
have a newly released book on this and other discoveries of this nature.

QUESTION:

Could you explain to me in
the simplest form you can what is radiometric
dating and how it works, so
I can understand the basic concept of it. Olga

ANSWER:  The methods that can give us ideas of the earth’s
age

(“geological clocks”, one calls them) are
all based on the theory that natural

processes
which occur steadily through time will produce cumulative and

often
measurable results.

Three
popular dating methods are uranium into lead, potassium into argon,

and
rubidium into strontium. 

In each case, when a molten rock cools and

solidifies,
then any radio-active “parent” element is supposed to decay into

its
“daughter” element at a known, slow rate.  The amount
of each still

remaining today in a rock will
tell us the “age” of that rock

Carbon
dating is another method, used to determine how long ago something

in
the animal or vegetable kingdom died.

It
is based on the radioactive decay rate in organic matter. 

While
it is alive, very living thing absorbs cosmic radio-active carbon-14 from

the
atmosphere.

At death, this intake ceases and the radiocarbon
in the

organism begins
to disintegrate.  The amount of remaining C-14 is used
to

calculate how long
ago the organism died.

The validity of
carbon dating depends on three assumptions:

 
1.         That the amount
of cosmic radiation in the atmosphere has remained

constant at all
times in all places;

 
2.     
That the sample tested has not been contaminated
by recent microbes

or
bacteria;

3.         That there has
been no exchange with the outside world.

When
carbon dating was first announced by Dr. Libby in 1949, it was thought

to
be the last word, but that early confidence is no longer justified.

It
has been discovered that cosmic radiations vary widely, due to many factors,

natural
and industrial.

Suppose
you enter a sealed room which contains nothing but a burning candle. 

You
are asked to determine how long the candle has been burning. You soon

realise
how impossible this is.  You could measure the relative
amounts of oxygen

and
carbon dioxide in the room;  or you could try to figure
out how long the

melted
wax took to accumulate.

But
you cannot know whether someone had opened and re-shut the window. 

Was
it ever put out and re-lit?  Could some interruption
have caused it to burn

faster?

There
is room for enormous error.

Dating cannot deal with unique events.  They’re gone. 
You cannot re-run them. 

You
cannot repeat a test on them.

Every
radiometric dating method we operate today is invalid as a scientific test

for
the past.  You cannot guarantee it.  It
remains nothing more than a reasoned

guess.

There are so many unknown factors to consider.  And
these are not appreciated

by many scientists
who use the method itself.

Science
cannot deal with the past.  Consequently, there is
no test available now

that
can give you a scientifically guaranteed date for the past. 
All we can do is

use
the methods about which we can make assumptions that are reasonable.

So when you’re told a certain date has been proved, you’re hearing someone

who
either doesn’t understand the scientific test, or who (hopefully not) is lying

to you.

QUESTION:

Do
you fear for your life when you find these things?

QUESTION:

What
is your Opinion on the "Hollow Earth" theory?

QUESTION:

How
many other nations know about these discoveries?

QUESTION:

Do
they cover it all up TOO?

ANSWER:

<!-- copyright -->
© 2008 RaidersNewsNetwork

The existing Wasp - soon with Gargoyle Mode.