Malachi Smith's Library tagged science →  View Popular

By Bob Unruh

<!--- copywrite only show on NON commentary pages as per joseph meeting 8/23/06 ------>


<!-- copyright -->
© 2009 WorldNetDaily

Robinson, a research professor of chemistry, cofounded the Linus Pauling Institute of Science and Medicine with Linus Pauling in 1973, and later cofounded the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine.

Paul later cited the petition results in  statement to Congress.

Old, somewhat washed-out
picture of Aquino as a young army officer (left);
more recent picture of Aquino (right)

Transforming child-abductees
into sex slaves. Former FBI agent Ted Gunderson has
written and commented extensively on organized pedophile
abductions. Gunderson believes that as many as 50,000
children are involved each year in such abductions,
and - other than the 2,500 found dead after their abductions
- THEY ARE NEVER FOUND AGAIN. The government likes to
pretend that the abductors of these children are "dirty
old men;" but the manner and permanence in which most
have disappeared belies the fact that something much
more sinister is "afoot." The efforts of "dirty old
Men" simply cannot account for the "thoroughness" of
what's happening.

Blum writes:

"From 1945 to the end of the century, the United States
attempted to overthrow more than 40 foreign governments [by
assassinating their leaders], and to crush more than 30 populist-nationalist
movements struggling against intolerable regimes. In the process,
the US caused the end of life for several million people,
and condemned millions more to a life of agony and despair."

In a May 22, 2006 article
entitled, Come Out of the White House With Your Hands
Up, Blum wrote,

William Blum

Gary Webb: Kill the Messenger

Professor G. Cope Schellhorn writes:

"Death by gunshot to the head. Death by probable poisoning.
Death by probable strangulation. Deaths possibly by implantation
of deadly viruses. No one lives forever. Yet the recent suspicious
deaths of UFO investigators Phil Schneider, Ron Johnson, Con
Routine, Ann Livingston and Karla Turner, as well as the deaths
of a host of researchers in the past, only seem to add emphasis
to a reality with which many of the more aware UFOlogists
are now quite familiar:

Schellhorn continues:

"Mysterious and suspicious deaths among UFO investigators
arc nothing new.

It's
like something out of Mad Magazine, and includes such
well-known names (at least in UFO circles) as -



• Phil Schneider
• Ron Rummel
• Ron Johnson
• Danny Casolaro
• Deck Slayton
• Brian Lynch
• Don Elkin
• Roger Hill
• Jonathan Walsh
• Ashad Sharif
• Trevor Knight
• Peter Ferry
• Alistair Beckman
• Andrew Hall
• M.K. Jessup
• James McDonald
• Dorothy Kilgallen
• M. K. Jessup
• Frank Edwards
• Arthur Bryant
• Richard Church
• Willie Ley
• Etc., etc.

Schellhorn goes on:

"How do we explain the rash of heart attacks that took so
many lives: Frank Edwards, Rep. Rouse, author H. T. Wilkins,
Henry E Kock, publicity director of the Universal Research
Society of America, author Frank Scully and contactee George
Adamski?

The
headlines (left) read "homosexual ring;" but that's
not true: It was a pedophile ring. Gary Caradori (left),
an investigator for the Nebraska State Senate Committee
was killed in connection with this case. Just before
he was murdered, Caradori called committee chairman
Loran Schmit, and said, 'I got … [the proof] Loran.
We've got 'em by the balls." That evening, Caradori
caught a plane out of Chicago to Omaha. He was on his
way back from the All Star game in Chicago with his
son, but the plane came apart in the air (in other words,
it blew up) and crashed. The NTSB refused to issue a
ruling on the cause of the crash. While he had been
in Chicago, Caradori had been working on leads he had
developed in the Franklin case - leads that he told
Loran "ran from Offutt Air Force Base to the White House."
Gary's briefcase and papers were inexplicably missing
from the crash site, along with the two rear seats of
the plane.

Hersh went on to say:

"The Central Intelligence Agency has been very deeply involved
in DOMESTIC activities [involving murder] against people
they thought to be enemies of the state."

THINK ABOUT THAT - THE MURDER OF CHILDREN IN THE INTEREST
OF AMERICA'S "ROGUE GOVERNMENT." The instance is related
in Mara Leveritt's book. The Boys on the Track.

And so, once again we are brought back to the words of Christ

"As it was in the days of Noe [Noah], so shall it be also
in the days of the [coming of the] Son of man." (Luke 17:26)

It's not with reason that the Lord has warned us to -

"COME OUT OF HER, MY PEOPLE, that ye be not partakers
of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues." (Revelation
18:4)

It's not without reason that the Lord has declared Babylon
(i.e., the United States) to be -

"... the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul
spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird [i.e.,
evil entity]." (Revelation 18:2)

My good friend, Constance Cumbey once told me a story about
idiots like these; she said:

And as were the days of Noah, so shall be the coming of the
Son of man.

For as in those days which were before the flood they were
eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until
the day that Noah entered into the ark,

"And they knew not until the flood came, and took them all
away; so shall be the coming of the Son of man." (Matthew
24:37-39)

There are those, of course, who say, "We are Christians." To
those, I would simply say what Jesus said to the Jews so many
years ago:

"Think not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our
father: for I say unto you, that God is able of these stones
to raise up children unto Abraham." (Matthew 3:9)

God bless you all,

S.R. Shearer

Antipas Ministries

ANSWER:  Beverly, I do agree with
you that there are many other

inhabited
worlds. You are absolutely right on that. We are not the only

beings
in this universe.

1.
It is widely assumed that man stumbled on for millions of years

unable
to accomplish anything on his own. Then suddenly, he appears

with
high intelligence out of nowhere - just a few thousand years ago -

and
evolution can't explain that.

2.
If the evolution theory is true, then this is out of character and does

not
make sense. Mankind for so long with NOTHING, then suddenly

with
EVERYTHING.

Evolution is unable to account for that sudden

extreme
change. It is unable to explain such a SUDDEN acquisition of

 intelligence.
There has to be another explanation.

3.
Since such advanced thinking capabilities and complex technology

could
not just appear from nothing, some have speculated that maybe

galactic
visitors were responsible... that these aliens crossbred with

primates
to produce modern man, then left behind artifacts from their

visit.
Yes, it's an interesting theory.

4.
However, in Dead Men's Secrets I give six good reasons
why this

could not be so.

5. We've just noted in Point
3 that such advanced thinking capabilities

and
complex technology could not just appear from nothing, that is, 

they
could not just evolve. And if evolution could not do it on this planet,

it
is equally impossible to explain a more highly intelligent man evolving

on
some other planet.

6. That
is, high intelligence cannot be the product of chance evolution,

whether
here or anywhere else in the universe. There has to be another

explanation. 

Man
did appear suddenly - at the top, not at the bottom.

The
same would have to be true for beings on other worlds. They did not

just
"evolve".

7.
And if that takes us to a Prime Intelligence who created them, let us

look
to that same Prime Intelligence for our own origins. It makes sense.

6.
The bottom line is this: Man is a created artifact, far more wonderful than

any
computer.

He was carefully planned and endowed with the gift of language

and
the most amazing intellect, as well as a feeling for handcrafts and

technology.
As well as the capacity to commune with his Maker, the Prime

Intelligence.

QUESTION: Do you have, or what book
can you recommend, for study on

races of the people of
the world? Is there material or a web site that can give

me
answers to questions like the origin of the races?  James,
S. Africa

ANSWER:
 Here's a book that should help. It is entitled "In Search of ... the

Origin
of Nations".  For details on the book and how
to order, go to
http://www.originofnations.org/insearchof_originofnations/index.html

Man started

out with a superior intellect
and a feeling for handcrafts and technology.

The evidence is of subsequent
deterioration, not evolution.

That evidence

is consistent with the scenario
of history presented in the Bible

We should bear in mind that
the Bible is not a book about technology and

science, although when it casually
touches on such things its statements are

found to be valid. Its theme
is basically something quite different - -the

QUESTION:  I consider myself an intelligent
person but for the life of me I will

never
understand why all the secrecy and denial that all these things exist, what

do
you think? Shirley

ANSWER:  As you know, you won’t hear these things in
school.  Shattered myths

still
dominate the textbooks we learn from.

Do
you know that up to 200 years after the flat earth theory was disproved, schools

in Europe were still teaching it as fact?

Entrenched
theories do die hard. It takes time.

And the discoveries
I am sharing do challenge the entrenched evolution theory.

However,
a hopeful trend is emerging.

Biology
tutor Sue Addinell (Islington 6th Form College in UK) reported the

changing
nature of the biology syllabus.

In the 1990s there had been a

shift
away from the evidence for evolution towards the practical application

of
biological science. One current textbook now had no mention of Darwin

in
its index.

It is no wonder that
leading evolutionists such as Steve Jones and Richard
Dawkins are becoming
so incensed. They are losing and they can't understand

it.

Andrew Jacobs reported in the
New York Times of January 30, 2004 that

“Education
officials in the state of Georgia removed the word “evolution” and

scaled
back ideas about the natural selection of species in a proposed set of

guidelines
for school science classes.”

That’s
a start!

Many honest scientists are caught up in
the system – and sincerely misinformed.

It was all they
were taught. They do not know about the evidence against it.

Constant
exposure to something, in most cases, leads to its acceptance. As

Hitler acknowledged, “Tell
a lie long enough and people will come to believe it.”

However,
we do need to face this fact. The present system is in the grip of

powerful
men with enormous money behind them – and an agenda.

Established
systems of science, education and public media are thoroughly

committed
to the belief that macro-evolution is a “fact”, so you will seldom

hear
the FACTS about discoveries which totally upset that belief.

Carl Sagan
clones repeatedly spout off words such as “billions and billions of

years”. 
And ten years of evolution is crammed down the throats of our children. 

By and large the Establishment
refuses to accept the fossil evidence at face value.

Most
university graduates have acquired their degrees through this system.

They
now find their careers, their reputations and their very livelihood at risk,

should
they admit publicly that what they have been teaching is a big mistake.

Many
who have renounced the theory of evolution have not only lost funding

for
their projects, they have also been misrepresented, ridiculed 
and fired. And

much of their research has then
been destroyed. Examples of such treatment

could fill
volumes.

And here’s something
else to consider. It is almost impossible for any person

who
has taken a public stance on a certain position, to make a public admission

that
what he has taught is wrong.

So
the unsuspecting public continues to be fed this planned menu. Those in charge

influence the education
system, the media and the publishing industry.

QUESTION: 
I wonder if you have any information regarding a gold

chain that was found
in a lump of coal somewhere in America (I'm pretty

sure
it was 1800 and something). I read about a long time ago, but I can

not
seem to find out anything about it.

 I
enjoy your website and tantalising emails. Keep it up.   Dan Soper

ANSWER:
On June 9, 1891, Mrs S.W. Culp in Morrinsville, Illinois,
accidentally
dropped a shovelful of coal on the floor. One large piece broke
open. Inside
it was an intricately made 8 carat gold chain, 10 inches long,
coiled and
embedded. When the coal broke into two pieces, the two ends

of
the chain remained attached, one to each piece of coal.

The
coal, said to be of the "carboniferous era", several million years ago,

came
from a mine in Pennsylvania. (Morrinsville Times,  June 11, 1891) 

This,
and other evidences of man found in coal, go against the prevailing

evolutionary
dogma that coal was formed millions of years before man

appeared
on earth.

1.
that man is millions of years older than thought, or

2.
that the coal is not millions of years old.

I
have a newly released book on this and other discoveries of this nature.

QUESTION:

Could you explain to me in
the simplest form you can what is radiometric
dating and how it works, so
I can understand the basic concept of it. Olga

ANSWER:  The methods that can give us ideas of the earth’s
age

(“geological clocks”, one calls them) are
all based on the theory that natural

processes
which occur steadily through time will produce cumulative and

often
measurable results.

Three
popular dating methods are uranium into lead, potassium into argon,

and
rubidium into strontium. 

In each case, when a molten rock cools and

solidifies,
then any radio-active “parent” element is supposed to decay into

its
“daughter” element at a known, slow rate.  The amount
of each still

remaining today in a rock will
tell us the “age” of that rock

Carbon
dating is another method, used to determine how long ago something

in
the animal or vegetable kingdom died.

It
is based on the radioactive decay rate in organic matter. 

While
it is alive, very living thing absorbs cosmic radio-active carbon-14 from

the
atmosphere.

At death, this intake ceases and the radiocarbon
in the

organism begins
to disintegrate.  The amount of remaining C-14 is used
to

calculate how long
ago the organism died.

The validity of
carbon dating depends on three assumptions:

 
1.         That the amount
of cosmic radiation in the atmosphere has remained

constant at all
times in all places;

 
2.     
That the sample tested has not been contaminated
by recent microbes

or
bacteria;

3.         That there has
been no exchange with the outside world.

When
carbon dating was first announced by Dr. Libby in 1949, it was thought

to
be the last word, but that early confidence is no longer justified.

It
has been discovered that cosmic radiations vary widely, due to many factors,

natural
and industrial.

Suppose
you enter a sealed room which contains nothing but a burning candle. 

You
are asked to determine how long the candle has been burning. You soon

realise
how impossible this is.  You could measure the relative
amounts of oxygen

and
carbon dioxide in the room;  or you could try to figure
out how long the

melted
wax took to accumulate.

But
you cannot know whether someone had opened and re-shut the window. 

Was
it ever put out and re-lit?  Could some interruption
have caused it to burn

faster?

There
is room for enormous error.

Dating cannot deal with unique events.  They’re gone. 
You cannot re-run them. 

You
cannot repeat a test on them.

Every
radiometric dating method we operate today is invalid as a scientific test

for
the past.  You cannot guarantee it.  It
remains nothing more than a reasoned

guess.

There are so many unknown factors to consider.  And
these are not appreciated

by many scientists
who use the method itself.

Science
cannot deal with the past.  Consequently, there is
no test available now

that
can give you a scientifically guaranteed date for the past. 
All we can do is

use
the methods about which we can make assumptions that are reasonable.

So when you’re told a certain date has been proved, you’re hearing someone

who
either doesn’t understand the scientific test, or who (hopefully not) is lying

to you.

QUESTION:

Do
you fear for your life when you find these things?

QUESTION:

What
is your Opinion on the "Hollow Earth" theory?

QUESTION:

How
many other nations know about these discoveries?

QUESTION:

Do
they cover it all up TOO?

ANSWER:

Al Gore. Photograph by Graeme Robertson

The proposed legislation has set off a ferocious debate about the costs of dealing with climate change - with conservative Democrats and Republicans saying reducing America's use of oil will deepen unemployment and hurt average American families.

Republicans in the Senate have threatened to boycott a session today that had been called to move forward a draft of a 920-page proposed law to deal with climate change.

Professor Schneider urged me to get an important point out in this story:

You need to “warn the public against believing the discipline during the Nazi period was uniform,” he said.

He wrote:

The study of the Ancient Near East as far as it relates to peoples of a foreign race, of a nature alien to us and thus impossible to comprehend fully in its peculiarity, is doomed to resignation as soon as the problems exceed what can be established rationally.

Therefore, it fails with regard to the new claim of values and losses its right to exist (...). Where the threshold of deeper questioning has been tred upon – as in Egyptology –, serious decisions have now to be taken.

Walther Wolf was an Egyptologist at Leipzig who had pro-Nazi leanings.

He is known for lecturing while wearing a SA uniform.

Wolf viewed Akhenaten to be a poor pharaoh because he 'Did not uncover ideas that were lying dormant in the depth of their Volkstum, and fight for their full potential of development.'

“This is clearly worded on the template of the role assigned to Hitler,” wrote Schneider.

Said Scharff of Wolf’s work:

In it the attempt is made to understand the Egyptian culture from a new angle of view which is apparently rooted in National Socialistic ideology (...). Such slogans of today which may have a predominant significance in other areas, are of little use with regard to Ancient Egypt.

In a 1935 letter to Adolf Erman, he lamented what was happening in Germany. He wrote-

The Nuremberg legislation has completely paralyzed us and cut our thread of life, it has annihilated our zest of life and my zest of work (...). I was always proud to be able to say "civis Germanus sum", and cannot bear it to be locked up in a ghetto.

Steindorff wrote in 1945, after he was safely in the United States that,

During my darkest days at Leipzig, some weeks after the pogrom of November, 1938, he came to our house in Leipzig and invited me and my wife to go with him and find asylum in his house at Bonn, though to give us sanctuary might well have resulted in his confinement in a concentration camp.

He wrote about Junker that,

It is very difficult to describe the character of this man because he has none. I have heard that it was rumored in England that Junker acted as a spy in Egypt.  I do not believe it.  He was too clever to compromise himself by such activity.  He played safe. 

Albert Einstein (then based in Berlin) and his colleage at Göttingen, Nobel Laureate James Frankh, both resigned in protest. They were hoping that other professors would resign in solidarity.

That didn’t happen.

Kees certainly didn’t hide his far-right views. On Akhenaten he wrote,

One is certainly wrong to portray Amenophis IV as a gushing idealist who wished to turn the world's quarrels to eternal peace by the gracious sermon of human reconciliation and who therefore declined any warfare abroad.

To be a great reformer, he lacked the creative force to anticipate, in the way of a seer, issues that were fermenting and wanted to take shape, and to shape them, and not the least did his personality lack authoritative charisma, carrying the stigma of repulsive ugliness.

He himself possessed too many traits that were contrary to the Ancient Egyptian ideal of a master race; he was licentious, effusive, led by emotions, morally debauched and obstinate.

Courtesy German Federal Archive and wikimedia. Photo of a model of "Germania" Hitler's revamped Berlin. It would have included a museum where Nefertiti's bust was close to Hitler's.

“This was, what I think, a decisive turning point in the international history of Egyptology,” Said Professor Schneider. 

“Germany lost its status and it has to struggle for many decades after the war until it again became recognized and appreciated (in) the discipline,” he said adding, “Germany had basically sacrificed, through the NS regime, its academic standing.”

Owen Jarus is a freelance writer based in Toronto ,Canada. He has written articles on archaeology for a variety of media outlets including The Canadian Press newswire (CP), U of T Magazine, The Mississauga News and The Guelph Mercury. Education: BA from the University of Toronto in History, Geography and Near & Middle Eastern Civilizations. BJourn in Journalism from Ryerson University.

Last three pieces by this author: The Egyptian Pharoah Who Helped Win a Nobel Prize, 2,000 year old, Ten Commandments scroll image now on Heritage Key, Interview: Jean-Francois Millaire on Exploring Gallinazo Group