Malachi Smith's Library tagged legislation →  View Popular

"Auschwitz
– The Last Photo Album", Israel National News, April 21, 2009

The information provided in this short documentary is a capsulized
format of the voluminous historical book entitled, "The
Nazi Doctors: Medical Killing and the Psychology of Genocide",
by Robert Jay Lifton, Basic Books, Inc. Publishers, New York, 1986.

While this book is out of print, I would highly recommend you
trying to find it in the used book section of one of the many bookstores on
the Internet.

Your appreciation of the highly sophisticated manner in which
the Nazis exterminated 6 million Jews will grow exponentially as well as your
horror over the reality that Western society in general, and America in particular,
are following a parallel course of conditioning the people to accept the next
slaughter of the next despised minority -- Fundamental Christians.

In this first article on the German Holocaust from the night of
Kristallnacht, November 9, 1938, to the day when Allied forces closed the last
German death camp, May 5, 1945, we shall examine the way in which Hitler diabolically
prepared the German people for the murder of all Jews in Europe and how the
American people today have been conditioned in much the same way to hate the
Fundamental Christian.

Let us begin by examining Germany.

New Agers believe the same religious and societal tenets as did the Nazis (NEWS1004).

Both systems recognized the need for a superman leader, thoroughly trained in
the secret ways of the occult. Both groups preached that the world must come
together in a global system of government, religion, and economy, under the
leadership of their superman. And, both systems call their superman, Anti-Christ.

We have identified over 40 specific areas of commonality of belief and goals
between the New World Order of Adolf Hitler and that of the current leadership
throughout the world to the ultimate New World Order.

Since this is the truth, we should not be surprised to learn that American
society is traveling down a parallel path that Germany travelled from the late
1800's to 1938, when Hitler began his superheated persecution of the Jews.

We
shall discuss the manner in which the Nazis gradually drew the noose around
the collective necks of their major enemy, the Jews; then, we shall see that
the present New World Order is similarly drawing the noose around the necks
of their major enemy, the Born-Again, Fundamentalist Christian.

Prepare to be shocked.

Satan began to condition Germans to accept the Holocaust in the late 1800's,
when he prompted an explosion amongst the population in the popularity of the
old Nordic legends.

For the first time in centuries, Germans of every level
of society began to delve in these old heroic legends. Of course, the religion
of the Nordic tribes was Satanism. Therefore, Germans who were immersing themselves
in this old society were also being subtly immersed in Satanism.

Soon, Germans
began to subscribe to the values of Satanism in their personal lives, without
realizing it.

One of the major byproducts of this new love for the romantic warrior hero
was a belief that only the strong deserved to live.

Only the strong made the
nation powerful enough to defeat its enemies.

Conversely, the weak and the beggarly,
the sick and the ill, the handicapped, the mentally unfit, and the inherently
decrepit (the Jew), were seen as a drain on society.

A phrase was created to
describe these types of people, one that will reverberate throughout history
-- a life unworthy of life.

This attitude so permeated German society
that millions came to believe it in the deepest recesses of their heart.

However, as Germany approached the decade of the 1920's,
more Jewish hatred than ever began to be manifested. At first, this hatred was
carried out by individual Germans against fellow German Jews.

Jewish employees
began to realize that, suddenly, they were not being promoted, or were being
fired for no good reason. Universities and colleges began to pass internal rules
that kept Jewish scholars out of academia. Jewish children in schools began
to bitterly complain that they were mistreated in school by their classmates,
while too many teachers and administrators failed to right the wrong and punish
the guilty.

Collectively, German Jews could feel the tightening of the noose. Jews were
like most people in any other age; all they wanted was to be left alone in peace,
to be allowed to grow up, have a family, have grandchildren, and die a natural
death in peace. And, as most people, Jews were reluctant to believe the worst
case scenario, i.e., that the entire German nation could turn on them suddenly
and begin killing them. Even when Adolf Hitler made these threats come alive,
in print, when he published "Mein Kampf", most German
Jews refused to believe he could ever bring it to pass.

Incredibly, even as Jews were forced in ghettos as they awaited their final
extermination, they continued to live in the illusion that their persecution
was temporary and that Hitler would never, ever really try to carry out the
words of deathmaking in "Mein Kampf". All the Nazis
had to do to ensure that Jews would blindly walk into the death showers was
to comfort them with kind words in a crematorium designed to look like a nursing
home.

Today, too many people continue to live in their illusions. They refuse to
be warned of the coming Holocaust against Christians, insisting that they continue
living in their strong delusions.

The worsening hatred and persecution of the Jews took a strong turn for the
worse when Hitler assumed power in 1933.

Now, German Government resources began
to pour through every avenue of society to step up the attack.

One of the major
new weapons against the Jew was propaganda -- primarily posters, radio, and
the new movie industry. Jews were consistently painted stereotypically as being
non-human, dangerous to society, greedy, stupid, etc.

The greatest propaganda
film of all time was the Nazi film, "The Wandering Jew". This
film depicted the Jew as wandering over the earth, infesting every country with
their filth. This film graphically portrayed the Jew as being rats, a stereotype
that stuck in the minds of millions of Germans. Objective historians agree that
"The Wandering Jew" made the Holocaust not only possible,
but inevitable.

The year was 1938; all Hitler needed was an excuse
to crack the whip on the Jew. And, make no mistake about the fact that he would
get that excuse, even if he had to invent the specific act of provocation.

Hitler
was convinced that the average German on the street would do nothing to stop
an all-out assault.

Now, the stage was set for wholesale public persecution of the Jews.

As we move into the actual implementation
of this New World Order, understand that American Government provocateurs might
very well be at work behind the scenes to produce the violence they need to
accomplish their coveted goal.

Hitler did not have to wait long, for Satan is a master at arranging events
with just the right timing. On November 7, 1938, in Paris, France, a young and
very distraught Jewish man shot and killed a German diplomatic officer with
a revolver, as a protest against Jewish mistreatment.

Hitler and his cronies
had the incident for which they had been waiting. On the evening of November
9, the Satanic Joseph Goebbels, Nazi Minister of Propaganda, ordered that demonstrations
against this murder begin immediately.

German newspapers, totally under Nazi
control, reported the stories of these riots as though they were spontaneous,
as though these represented the final breakthrough of pent-up German emotion
against the Jew. Hitler and Goebbels painted the entire Jewish population
of Germany with the same broad brush as they painted the Jewish murderer of
the German diplomat.

These Nazis used an event they knew was definitely not
representative of the Jewish population, as the excuse to initiate a policy
of the most brutal persecution. The entire Jewish people were made to suffer,
and ultimately die, for the murder of this one German.

The result was one of the truly horrifying episodes in all of recorded history.
The Reverend Paul Schenck writes, in his book, "The Extermination of
Christianity", that this "spontaneous" demonstration, called
Kristallnacht -- the night of the broken glass -- transformed German society
forever, ultimately resulting in Hitler's Final Solution of the Jewish "problem"
in the ovens of the Holocaust.

Hitler galvanized the whole German population
into action against his one major, identifiable enemy, the Jew. If the Jew had
not existed in Germany in the numbers and the influence in which they did, Hitler
would have had to invent some other enemy.

As a result of his deadly persecution against the Jews, Hitler was able to
seize absolute dictatorial control of Germany. Using the chaos which his own
plans had created, Hitler became Germany's all powerful military ruler. The
Holocaust had begun.

Does the leadership of this new order have
a strong, identifiable enemy against whom the American people could be galvanized?
Yes, they do, and they plan to use this group in the same way in which Hitler
used the Jew -- to seize absolute, dictatorial power.

The Neo-Nazi New World Order is about
to break upon us with full force.

Now, return with me to America, today.

Who is this group? The
Fundamentalist, Born-Again Christian.

I have noticed that the
authors of the New World Order enthusiastically welcome all members of all other
religions into their ranks, except for one -- Fundamentalist Born-Again Christians.

Something, or someone, is really getting their anger aroused against this group.
And, most importantly, the American Government and Media are cooperating in
an effort to systematically condition the average citizen on the street against
Born-Again Christians. The planned result will be the same -- an outbreak of
intense persecution that will simultaneously eradicate the Christian, and deliver
the kingdom to Anti-Christ.

From the moment the Evangelical Christian community began to accept President
Bush as one of their own, I warned that this was a mistake of monumental proportion!

If Bush were to become greatly discredited, then his major supporters could
become discredited as well. As Bush dragged this country the the muck and mire
of the wars against Iraq and Afghanistan, as he became ever more unpopular for
his stance on many issues, we continued to warn that Fundamental Christians
could be as targeted by a future President as the Jews were targeted by Adolf
Hitler.

Sadly, our warnings were ignored and today, the beginnings of a hatred toward
genuine Christians is clearly visible.

From an historic, sociologic point of view, one can see evidences of
upcoming persecution by the majority against a minority
when certain events begin to occur: Let us examine these seven events which
herald the coming of persecution of an identifiable minority.

When Christian
street preachers in Pennsylvania are arrested for passing out tracts and preaching
the Gospel, and the court system actually charges them, you have every reason
to expect that actual persecution and eventual holocaust is on the horizon.

Evidence Number 2 is closely related to this first one:

Societal Evidence #
2. When the court system begins to impose far heavier sentences
against the leadership of the minority than would be expected or than has been
the case historically for that type of "offense".

This type of activity began with the case against Reverend Jim Baker 20 years
ago. While no Christian leader condoned Baker's behavior, many were severely
taken aback by the imposed sentence of 45 years in prison. This sentence was
frankly unbelievable!! Murderers, drug dealers, and extortionists do not receive
this heavy of a sentence. And, in Baker's case, no one was murdered, and no
drugs were alleged to have been part of the case. When the public outcry did
not come, leadership of the New World Order knew they could step up their program
against the Fundamentalist Christian.

Societal Evidence #3. When
the rhetoric against the minority begins to be superheated.

Militant feminine
leaders, and the leadership of Gays and Lesbians have been engaged in superheated
rhetoric for many years now. These leaders have been advocating extremely strong
measures against the hated Fundamentalist Christians who dare oppose their agenda.
But, when the supreme leader of the majority begins to attack
the minority on some issue(s), uses superheated language and resorts to innuendo,
lies, and distortions in his attack, you know certainly that persecution is
about to begin.

When President Clinton threatened pro-life leader, Bob Jewett,
during a televised Michigan town meeting with overt Government action against
him, everyone should have known the lateness of the hour. Clinton stated, "I'm
gonna make sure you Operation Rescue types spend the rest of your lives in jail".
(Quoted from Paul Schenck's book, "The Extermination of Christianity",
p. 76).

Notice that Clinton was threatening to become personally involved in
the government campaign against the anti-abortion movement, and especially notice
the specific threat of lifetime jail. This is a sure sign of the impending outbreak
of official, severe persecution.

Societal Evidence # 4. When
laws begin to be enacted specifically targeting the minority.

For several
years, Christians have been targeted through zoning regulations and the reduction
of tax privileges.

A good example of this type of activity which presages overt
persecution is reported by the "Prophecy In The News" newsletter.
Effective January 1, 1994, the IRS will no longer allow charitable deductions
to be taken on the full amount of book and tape purchases; rather, the charitable
contribution claimed must be only for the amount that is over and above the
"Fair-Market Value" of such material.

Remember, the issue here is
not the merits of the ruling. The issue here is that an official department
of the Federal government, the IRS, created a ruling that is unconstitutional.

Our Constitution specifically prohibits this type of action. The First Amendment
clearly states, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment
of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof".

Remember, every President since Woodrow Wilson has been leading this country
to the New World Order.

You also know that persecution is about to break out when rhetoric begins to
be heard that laws should be enacted against the hated minority.

Societal Evidence # 5. When
the court system and the Justice system begin to ignore fundamental laws
(in our case, the Constitution) as they press their attack.

One of the
most telling signs of an impending persecution is when the criminal justice
system begins to rule consistently against the minority, especially when these
adverse rulings completely contradict past precedent and current law. We have
already spoken about the unusually heavy sentences meted out to Jim Baker.

On January 24, 1994, the United States Supreme Court unanimously
ruled that the infamous RICOH Act could be used against abortion protestors.
This ruling is most shocking, because the Supreme Court has allowed RICOH's
use to be expanded far beyond its original goal.

However, this next example is most important, because it blatantly violates
our Constitution.

For those of you who might
not be familiar with the RICOH Act, let me briefly explain. The
RICOH Act was passed in 1970, designed specifically against drug running
and corrupt racketeering rings. Since people become involved in this type activity
because of the huge profits realized, lawmakers designed RICOH to deprive
drug lords of their illegally gotten assets.

The RICOH Act empowers the
U.S. Government to seize all the assets of an individual only on the basis
of an accusation. Government law enforcement agencies
do not have to wait for court conviction
to seize all the assets of the accused; they can seize assets on the basis of
an accusation only. And, if the accused wins acquittal in a court of
law, the Federal Government does not have to return all the assets they had
seized.

It did not matter to lawmakers or the President that the Constitution, upon
which the legal system of this country is based, forbids this type of action
prior to court conviction. The Constitution guarantees that accused is presumed
innocent until proven guilty, and must receive "due process"
of the law.

But, today, every person who tries to hold a government agency or
official to what the Constitution says is immediately considered a "domestic
terrorist". Our society is far down the path to totalitarianism!

This law is the type a totalitarian dictator would issue. In fact, the passage
of this RICOH Act was a most blatant example of "pre-Totalitarian
legislation".

Legal "experts" predicted that RICOH would
be immediately struck down by the Supreme Court, because it was so obviously
unconstitutional. However, they did not realize that the entire Justice System
is supportive of the New World Order agenda. Our judges are most biased; most
of them are as committed to the tenets of the New World Order as any politician.
The fact the High Court allowed RICOH to stand proves this allegation
beyond argument.

When RICOH was being passed some discerning Christian leaders believed
the ultimate target was not the hated drug lords, but Born-Again Fundamentalist
Christians; and, they warned the people. These clear thinking leaders were laughed
to scorn; no one believed them. They were accused of being morbidly afraid.
No one is accusing them now. This ruling makes it obvious the target is Fundamental
Christianity.

We may expect more such laws in the near future. The day when Christians, both
leaders and followers, are arrested and their assets seized, is close at hand.
This is one of the strongest indications that the planned persecution is imminent.

In the night
known as Kristallnacht, the first overt German government action against the
Jew, tens of thousands of Jews were arrested and sent to preconstructed concentration
camps. Yet, the media reported that only 36 people had been killed and only
36 seriously injured. What a lie.

Societal Evidence # 6. When
the media becomes the willing participant in the ideological attack on the minority,
when their reporting becomes biased and deliberately distorted.

The media was cooperating in this Nazi New
World Order plan, and had been for many years. Their newspapers, magazines,
and movies had been cooperating in the desecration of the Jew in the minds of
Gentile Germans for decades, conditioning people to believe the worst about
their Jewish neighbors.

In the same way, American media has been portraying Fundamentalist Christians
as, "a stooge, a hypocrite, a charlatan, a racist, an anti-Semite, mentally
ill, a thief, a con artist, a child molester, a rapist, a murderer and a cannibal!"
(Schenck, "The Extermination of Christianity", p. 89).

Movies,
TV shows, and popular music groups have been conditioning their followers for
several decades to believe these lies. The time has come when the majority of
people in our population will not greatly complain when Christians are overtly
attacked and killed. And, just as in Germany, enough American men and women
have come to hate Christians sufficiently to actively participate in
the murder. Another sign of impending persecution. A big one.

Before we leave the subject of the media, we need to speak of Christian radio
and Internet, long an thorn near to the heart of New World Order adherents.

Using Christian radio and Internet, leaders have boldly spoken the Truth of
the Gospel of Jesus to an audience that is potentially as large as secular media.
With this Christian alternative media, there is no way that New World Order
leadership can prohibit someone from hearing the Gospel and becoming saved.

Only Christian
media speaks out boldly and often against the Gays Rights Agenda, Drug Legalization,
the ACLU, the pro-New World Order agenda of the National Education Association
(NEA), and many other issues. Christian media is daily spraying this nation
with the truth, for any one who wants to listen.

Additionally, Christian radio/Internet is very bold in proclaiming Biblical
absolute values to a world which has rejected absolute values.

However, it is difficult, high profile, and very risky, to simply pass a law
prohibiting Christian media. There are still too many people who understand
free exercise of religion issues that would likely protest.

A far better way
to skin this cat is to regulate Christian alternative media out of existence.
Such a law is making its way through Congress, known as the "Fairness
In Broadcasting Act". Under the provisions of this bill, when the license
of an individual radio station comes up for renewal, the listening audience
is invited to write to government regulators with any comments. If just a handful
of people protest the program content of a radio station, government FTC regulators
have the discretion to refuse to renew that station's license.

Thus, Christian media is under attack as never before in history. Another sign
of the end.

Societal Evidence #7. When
deliberate death making begins to occur in society, led by the official leadership,
you know that the upcoming persecution is close; because, if leaders can boldly
kill people of one group without suffering public defeat, they know they can
then kill people of whatever group they desire.

Public acceptance of Abortion
On Demand and Euthanasia are stepping stones to the planned holocaust against
the really big enemy of the New World Order, the Born-Again, Fundamental Christian.

If the public reacts negatively,
the majority leadership will back off from their plans. If the public does not
react negatively, or supports the beginning steps of persecution, the leadership
becomes emboldened to move more rapidly to the "Final Solution".

When all these societal factors are beginning to occur, the leadership of the
majority will be daily looking at public reaction.

Are you spiritually ready? Is your family? Are you adequately
protecting your loved ones? This is the reason for this ministry, to enable
you to first understand the peril facing you, and then help you develop strategies
to warn and protect your loved ones. Once
you have been thoroughly trained, you can also use your knowledge as a means
to open the door of discussion with an unsaved person. I have been able to use
it many times, and have seen people come to Jesus Christ as a result. These
perilous times are also a time when we can reach many souls for Jesus Christ,
making an eternal difference.

Rice says Russia on path to isolation, irrelevance

There wasn’t any question about what was happening. The abortions were going wrong. The babies weren’t cooperating. They wouldn’t die as planned.

Or, as Illinois state senator Barack Obama so touchingly put it, there was “movement or some indication that, in fact, they’re not just coming out limp and dead.”

No, Senator. They wouldn’t go along with the program. They wouldn’t just come out limp and dead.

They were coming out alive. Born alive. Babies.

Vulnerable human beings Obama, in his detached pomposity, might otherwise include among “the least of my brothers.”

But of course, an abortion extremist can’t very well be invoking Saint Matthew, can he?

So, for Obama, the shunning of these least of our brothers and sisters — millions of them — is somehow not among America’s greatest moral failings.

No. In Obama’s hardball, hard-Left world, these least become “that fetus, or child — however you want to describe it.”

Most of us, of course, opt for “child,” particularly when the “it” is born and living and breathing and in need of our help.

Particularly when the “it” is clinging not to guns or religion but to life.

But not Barack Obama.

As an Illinois state senator, he voted to permit infanticide. And now, running for president, he banks on media adulation to insulate him from his past.

The record, however, doesn’t lie.

Obama heard the testimony of a nurse, Jill Stanek. She recounted how she’d spent 45 minutes holding a living baby left to die.

Infanticide is a bracing word. But in this context, it’s the only word that fits.

The child had lacked the good grace to expire as planned in an induced-labor abortion — one in which an abortionist artificially induces labor with the expectation that the underdeveloped “fetus, or child — however you want to describe it” will not survive the delivery.

It wasn’t that unusual. The induced-labor method was used for late-term abortions. Many of the babies were strong enough to survive the delivery. At least for a time.

Stanek encountered another nurse carrying the child to a “soiled utility room” where it would be left to die.

So something had to be done with them. They couldn’t be left out in the open, struggling in the presence of fellow human beings. After all, those fellow human beings — health-care providers — would then be forced to confront the inconvenient question of why they were standing idly by. That would hold a mirror up to the whole grisly business.

Better the utility room. Alone, out of sight and out of mind. Next case.

Stanek’s account enraged the public and shamed into silence most of the country’s staunchest pro-abortion activists. Most, not all. Not Barack Obama.

My friend Hadley Arkes ingeniously argued that legislatures, including Congress, should take up “Born Alive” legislation: laws making explicit what decency already made undeniable: that from the moment of birth — from the moment one is expelled or extracted alive from the birth canal — a human being is entitled to all the protections the law accords to living persons.

Such laws were enacted by overwhelming margins. In the United States Congress, even such pro-abortion activists as Sen. Barbara Boxer went along.

But not Barack Obama. In the Illinois senate, he opposed Born-Alive tooth and nail.

The shocking extremism of that position — giving infanticide the nod over compassion and life — is profoundly embarrassing to him now.

So he has lied about what he did. He has offered various conflicting explanations, ranging from the assertion that he didn’t oppose the anti-infanticide legislation (he did), to the assertion that he opposed it because it didn’t contain a superfluous clause reaffirming abortion rights (it did), to the assertion that it was unnecessary because Illinois law already protected the children of botched abortions (it didn’t — and even if it arguably did, why oppose a clarification?).

What Obama hasn’t offered, however, is the rationalization he vigorously posited during the 2002 Illinois senate debate.

Don’t take my word for it. There’s a transcript of a state senate debate, which took place on April 4, 2002. That transcript is available here (the pertinent section runs from pages 31 to 34). I quote it extensively below (italics mine).

After being recognized, Obama challenged the Born-Alive bill’s sponsor as follows:

OBAMA: Yeah. Just along the same lines. Obviously, this is an issue that we’ve debated extensively both in committee an on the floor so I — you know, I don’t want to belabor it.

one of the things that we were concerned about, or at least I expressed some concern about, was what impact this would have with respect to the relationship between the doctor and the patient and what liabilities the doctor might have in this situation.

So, can you just describe for me, under this legislation, what’s going to be required for a doctor to meet the requirements you’ve set forth?

SENATOR O’MALLEY: First of all, there is established, under this legislation, that a child born under such circumstances would receive all reasonable measures consistent with good medical practice, and that’s as defined, of course, by the … practice of medicine in the community where this would occur.

It also requires, in two instances, that … an attending physician be brought in to assist and advise with respect to the issue of viability and, in particular, where … there’s a suspicion on behalf of the physician that the child … may be [viable,] … the attending physician would make that determination as to whether that would be the case….

The other one is where the child is actually born alive … in which case, then, the physician would call as soon as practically possible for a second physician to come in and determine the viability.

SENATOR OBAMA: So — and again, I’m — I’m not going to prolong this, but I just want to be clear because I think this was the source of the objections of the Medical Society. As I understand it, this puts the burden on the attending physician who has determined, since they were performing this procedure, that, in fact, this is a nonviable fetus; that if that fetus, or child —

however way you want to describe it — is now outside the mother’s womb and the doctor continues to think that it’s nonviable but there’s, let’s say, movement or some indication that, in fact, they’re not just coming out limp and dead,

that, in fact, they would then have to call a second physician to monitor and check off and make sure that this is not a live child that could be saved. Is that correct?

SENATOR OBAMA: Let me just go to the bill, very quickly. Essentially, I think as — as this emerged during debate and during committee, the only plausible rationale, to my mind, for this legislation would be if you had a suspicion that a doctor, the attending physician, who has made an assessment that this is a nonviable fetus and that, let’s say for the purpose of the mother’s health, is being — that — that — labor is being induced, that that physician (a) is going to make the wrong assessment and (b) if the physician discovered, after the labor had been induced, that, in fact, he made an error, or she made an error, and, in fact, that this was not a nonviable fetus but, in fact, a live child, that that physician, of his own accord or her own accord, would not try to exercise the sort of medical measures and practices that would be involved in saving that child.

if you think there are possibilities that doctors would not do that, then maybe this bill makes sense, but I — I suspect and my impression is, is that the Medical Society suspects as well that doctors feel that they would be under that obligation, that they would already be making these determinations and that, essentially, adding a — an additional doctor who then has to be called in an emergency situation to come in and make these assessments is really designed simply to burden the original decision of the woman and the physician to induce labor and perform an abortion.

Now, if that’s the case — and — and I know that some of us feel very strongly one way or another on that issue — that’s fine, but I think it’s important to understand that this issue ultimately is about abortion and not live births. Because if these are children who are being born alive, I, at least, have confidence that a doctor who is in that room is going to make sure that they’re looked after.

This is staggering. As Obama spoke these words, he well knew that children were being born alive but precisely not looked after by the abortion doctors whose water the senator was carrying.

As Stanek put it, as many as one in five — twenty percent — were left to die. That was what prompted the legislation in the first place.

But in reality, this had nothing to do with “burden[ing] the original decision of the woman and the physician to induce labor and perform an abortion.” It was about the legal and moral responsibilities of doctors and nurses in circumstances where, despite that decision, a living human being was delivered.

Through Obama’s radical prism, everything “is about abortion and not live births.”

Obama wasn’t worried about “the least of my brothers,” the child. He agitated, instead, over “what liabilities the doctor might have in this situation.”

And what kind of doctor? A charlatan who would somehow “continue to think that it’s nonviable” notwithstanding that “there’s, let’s say, movement or some indication that, in fact, they’re not just coming out limp and dead.”

Given the choice between the charlatan and “that fetus, or child — however you want to describe it,” Barack Obama went with the charlatan.

The baby would end up limp and dead, whether in the operating room or the utility closet. It was, Obama insisted, about abortion, not live births.

— Andrew C. McCarthy is NR’s legal-affairs editor and the author of Willful Blindness: A Memoir of the Jihad. < Back  1    2

<!--###########################--->
<!--START RIGHTHAND INTERNAL PAGE ADS--->
<!--###########################--->

<!------ OAS SETUP begin ------>
<script language="JavaScript">
<!--
//configuration
OAS_url = 'http://oasc03012.247realmedia.com/RealMedia/ads/';
//OAS_sitepage = window.location.hostname + window.location.pathname;
OAS_sitepage = 'article.nationalreview.com';
OAS_listpos = 'x04,x05,x80';
OAS_query = '';
OAS_target = '_top';
//end of configuration
OAS_version = 10;
OAS_rn = '001234567890'; OAS_rns = '1234567890';
OAS_rn = new String (Math.random()); OAS_rns = OAS_rn.substring (2, 11);
function OAS_NORMAL(pos) {
document.write('<A HREF="' + OAS_url + 'click_nx.ads/' + OAS_sitepage + '/1' + OAS_rns + '@' + OAS_listpos + '!' + pos + '?' + OAS_query + '" TARGET=' + OAS_target + '>');
document.write('<IMG SRC="' + OAS_url + 'adstream_nx.ads/' + OAS_sitepage + '/1' + OAS_rns + '@' + OAS_listpos + '!' + pos + '?' + OAS_query + '" BORDER=0></A>');
}
//-->
</script>

<script language="JavaScript1.1">
<!--
OAS_version = 11;
if (navigator.userAgent.indexOf('Mozilla/3') != -1 || navigator.userAgent.indexOf('Mozilla/4.0 WebTV') != -1)
OAS_version = 10;
if (OAS_version >= 11)
document.write('<SCR' + 'IPT LANGUAGE=JavaScript1.1 SRC="' + OAS_url + 'adstream_mjx.ads/' + OAS_sitepage + '/1' + OAS_rns + '@' + OAS_listpos + '?' + OAS_query + '"><\/SCRIPT>');//-->
</script><script src="http://oasc03012.247realmedia.com/RealMedia/ads/adstream_mjx.ads/article.nationalreview.com/1061523398@x04,x05,x80?" language="JavaScript1.1"></script>

<script language="JavaScript">
<!--
document.write('');
function OAS_AD(pos) {
if (OAS_version >= 11)
OAS_RICH(pos);
else
OAS_NORMAL(pos);
}
//-->
</script>
<!------ OAS SETUP end ------>

<script language="JavaScript">
<!--
OAS_AD('x04');
//-->
</script><!-- FASTCLICK.COM 120x600 and 160x600 SkyScraper CODE for Enter Site Name -->
<script src="http://media.fastclick.net/w/get.media?sid=41282%20&m=3&tp=7&d=j&t=n" language="javascript"></script>


<!-- FASTCLICK.COM 120x600 and 160x600 SkyScraper CODE for Enter Site Name -->








<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-7596656896688386";
google_ad_width = 160;
google_ad_height = 600;
google_ad_format = "160x600_as";
google_ad_type = "text_image";
google_ad_channel = "";
google_color_border = "336699";
google_color_bg = "FFFFFF";
google_color_link = "0000FF";
google_color_text = "000000";
google_color_url = "008000";
//-->
</script>
<script src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js" type="text/javascript">
</script>




<script language="JavaScript">
<!--
OAS_AD('x05');
//-->
</script>

Ron Paul: The Federal Burglars Are Stealing Your Prosperity, Again

Posted by Lew Rockwell at July 24, 2008 09:24 AM

Oh, and this monstrous "law" includes further crackdowns on our privacy for the tax police.

This time to reward the fascist Fannie and Freddie, other corrupt agencies, the banks, and politically connected borrowers.

Just another day in the district of parasites.