Mag T's Library tagged → View Popular
Under the Radar » Blog Archive » Why Care About Web 2.0
-
37signals
-
The money will come from being able to charge people for services that they value. 37signals makes money at everything it does, because they are tapping into real needs.
- 2 more annotations...
gauthampai: Web 2.0 service aggregation tools
-
These are the problems I faced:* Most tag search engines are not intelligent enough to provide RSS feeds for such searches.* The page is not intelligent enough to remove duplicate links. For example, suppose I have a page bookmarked in delicious having the tags as semantic-web and rdf, then that particular link shows up in both the tag searches. So if I combine the tag search results, the page shows up twice.* Most of the service providers do not have an option to turn off non-English pages. So many Japanese and French (or Latin?!) pages turn up in the results.* I want a hierarchy. I should be able to create a group "Semantic web" which contains feed results for the search query given above and another group, say "Web 2.0" which has a similar query. I should be able to relate the results of "Semantic web" group with those of "Web 2.0".* The ability to view feeds using different views - "Technical" and "Non-technical" or "Office related" or "Non office related".* Finally, there should be a theme. I would like to read my "Technical feeds" once a day and "Comics" once a week. How do I separate them?I am still looking for a solution.
-
I found an inherent problem in these services.What I tried to do is to set up a page which contains feeds of my interest based on various other tag search results. In particular, I wanted it to aggregate feeds from delicious, Technorati, Google blog search, Yahoo news search, Feedster, Icerocket etc. I wanted search results for:(semanticweb OR semantic-web OR semweb OR sw OR semantic_web) AND (owl OR rdf OR rdfs OR ontology OR ontologies OR taxonomy OR rdql OR SPARQL OR w3c OR metadata OR semantic OR semantics OR knowledge)
TECHNOSIGHT
-
The digital divide is segmenting itself a bit more. The technical side of the equation is being refined. Putting the average users mentioned above aside, here’s how I’d generalize the other two groups out there: -
2005 was a big year for the Web. It consisted of a slew of conferences, a seemingly unending amount of product and service launches, significant acquisitions by major players, and an incredible adoption of many new technologies.
Sample showcase of Diigo's highlight / annotation features
-
Keep in mind I’m reaching back into a moldy corner of my brain here so what follows is a bare bones summary of what I read. Basically, a team of researchers put up two display stands in a grocery store. The stands, if I remember correctly, were located at opposite ends of the store. One display had something like fifty varieties of mustard the shoppers could browse and buy.
-
First, I received an invite from the nice folks at diigo to play with their new social annotation, bookmarking service, which looks very useful,
robhyndman.com
-
I'm a lawyer practicing technology, internet and e-commerce law in Toronto, Canada. I help technology businesses grow
mathewingram.com/work
-
I'm a technology writer The Globe and Mail, and this is where I blog about things I come across on the Web
Selected Tags
Related Tags
Sponsored Links
Ads by Google
Top Contributors
Groups interested in web2.0
Related Lists on Diigo
-
Web 2.0
Items: 261 | Visits: 2675
Created by: Peter Van Gils
-
web 2.0 research
A collection of resources f...
Items: 31 | Visits: 2495
Created by: Mark Marino
-
web20tools
A list of links to support ...
Items: 94 | Visits: 11390
Created by: Kathy Schrock
Highlighter, Sticky notes, Tagging, Groups and Network: integrated suite dramatically boosting research productivity. Learn more »
Join Diigo
