Yule Heibel's Library tagged → View Popular
A User's Guide to 21st Century Economics - Umair Haque - HarvardBusiness.org
Umair Haque's Jan.7/09 piece, self-explanatory title. Lots of great ideas - and something about the reference to "symmetrical competition" made me think of Greg Lynn's rejection of symmetry in architecture (to maximize resources) and also of how waste is a major 21st c. trope.
QUOTE
Where do new rules come from? Here are five questions every decision maker should kick off 2009 by asking - and five results summarizing some of the new rules we've learned over the last year at the Lab.
UNQUOTE
-
20th century business isn't fit for 21st century economics. Yesterday's businesses were built for a world of overconsumption, artificially cheap production, symmetrical competition, and macroeconomic stability. That was yesterday. Today, the herd of industrial-era dinosaurs is going to be mercilessly culled - unless they can evolve to fit a radically altered economic environment.
-
Where do new rules come from? Here are five questions every decision maker should kick off 2009 by asking - and five results summarizing some of the new rules we've learned over the last year at the Lab.
- 9 more annotations...
How To Be a 21st Century Capitalist - Umair Haque
Haque makes a case similar to "Natural Capitalism"'s - if you capitalize what's currently expended (as a negative externality, say), you attach "real" value to it.
Some interesting points/ questions, too:
QUOTE:
Capital deepening is the foundation of next-generation value creation. Why is capital deepening so important? The reason that capitalism can destroy the world is that most of the world doesn't exist in an economic sense. And so when we capitalize rainforests, endangered species, community, the foregone opportunities of the poor, our own well-being - then they will finally have value: they can finally be priced, and so the fatcats of the world won't be free to destroy them with impunity.
(...)
Today's so-called capitalists are anything but: mostly, they're charlatans, impostors, and poseurs. But today's most radical innovators are revolutionary, ironically enough, because they are learning to be genuine capitalists once again - capitalists in the 21st century sense of the word. They are discovering how to create value by growing new resources composed of social, natural, human, and cultural capital. By doing so, they are pumping new blood into capitalism's failing heart.
UNQUOTE
The bit on capital being a consensus is also thought-provoking.
-
So here's what 21st century capitalism looks like.
-
20th century capitalism, in other words, marginally valued pure financial capital too highly, while marginally valuing human, natural, social, and cultural capital at zero - or, at the limit, negatively.
- 8 more annotations...
Obama's Seven Lessons for Radical Innovators - Umair Haque
As usual, a brilliant essay by Umair Haque on Obama's win and what business can learn from it in terms of innovation.
QUOTE
Barack Obama is one of the most radical management innovators in the world today. Obama's team built something truly world-changing: a new kind of political organization for the 21st century. It differs from yesterday's political organizations as much as Google and Threadless differ from yesterday's corporations: all are a tiny handful of truly new, 21st century institutions in the world today.
Obama presidential bid succeeded, in other words, as our research at the Lab has discussed for the past several years, through the power of new DNA: new rules for new kinds of institutions.
UNQUOTE
-
1. Have a self-organization design. What was really different about Obama's organization? We're used to thinking about organizations in 20th century terms: do we design them to be tall, or flat?
But tall and flat are concepts built for an industrial era. They force us to think - spatially and literally - in two dimensions: tall organizations command unresponsively, and flat organizations respond uncontrollably.
Obama's organization blew past these orthodoxies: it was able to combine the virtues of both tall and flat organizations. How? By tapping the game-changing power of self-organization. Obama's organization was less tall or flat than spherical - a tightly controlled core, surrounded by self-organizing cells of volunteers, donors, contributors, and other participants at the fuzzy edges. -
2. Seek elasticity of resilience.
- 10 more annotations...
Selected Tags
Related Tags
Sponsored Links
Top Contributors
Diigo is about better ways to research, share and collaborate on information. Learn more »
Join Diigo
