Yule Heibel's Bookmarks tagged innovation → View Popular

You are here: Diigo Home > Yule Heibel's Bookmarks

Ads by Google

Expand All 1 - 15 of 15

The HBR List 2009 - "Breakthrough Ideas for 2009"

QUOTE
This year’s HBR List includes ideas that we think are more useful than fanciful, more immediately practicable than speculative. Although we began compiling and winnowing contenders many months ago, we nonetheless did our best to anticipate the context in which you now read them. Thus some of the articles you’ll find here comment directly on the economic crisis, but most of them address other matters that business leaders must contend with: strategic decision making, tapping new markets, finding and keeping top talent, harnessing network effects, dealing with disruptive technologies and business models.
UNQUOTE

Tags: harvard_business, innovation, ideas, 2009 on 2009-02-11 -All Annotations (0) -About

more fromhbr.harvardbusiness.org

Where Real Innovation Happens - Forbes.com

"...don't follow the money. Follow the excitement. The people inventing the future are doing so just because it's fun."

Tags: tim_oreilly, innovation on 2009-02-09 and saved by 3 people -All Annotations (1) -About

more fromwww.forbes.com

2Expand

The Frontal Cortex : Urban Innovation

Jonah Lehrer discusses Ed Glaeser's recent post in the NYT blog on NYC and why it's "America's most resilient city." Lots of great points, interesting comments thread, too. Closing line by Lehrer nails it.

Tags: jonah_lehrer, frontal_cortex, urbanization, creative_class, innovation, talent, edward_glaeser on 2009-01-01 -All Annotations (2) -About

more fromscienceblogs.com

Amsterdam cracks down on prostitution, cannabis: lessons for Victoria? « Robertrandall’s Weblog

Rob blogged about Amsterdam's re-think of its liberal laws regarding drug use (and prostitution, too). I left a *long* comment, a thinking-out-loud about how the factory system of education, coupled with a repression of creative risk-taking and innovation in the culture, enables and exacerbates turning to drugs.

Tags: robert_randall, drugs, socialcritique, drug_addiction, education, innovation, risk, youth, comments on 2008-12-13 -All Annotations (0) -About

more fromrobertrandall.wordpress.com

Toward Society 3.0: A New Paradigm for 21st century education - SlideShare

Slide show presentation from John Moravec, U. of Minnesota, on getting schooling (? education) into the 21st century and into a 3.0 mode.

Tags: slideshare, education, web2.0, innovation, john_moravec, educationfutures on 2008-11-20 and saved by 13 people -All Annotations (0) -About

more fromwww.slideshare.net

7Expand

Faster horses in the age of co-creation, by JP Rangaswami (Confused of Calcutta blog)

Thought-provoking blog entry in Confused of Calcutta (JP Rangaswami) about innovation, focusing on the role of the user in co-creation (customer choice and voice, eg.).

Tags: jp_rangaswami, socialtheory, confused_of_calcutta, cocreation, innovation on 2008-11-16 and saved by 2 people -All Annotations (7) -About

more fromconfusedofcalcutta.com

I was part of the Do Not Dumb Down group, by the way. But that was nearly thirty years ago, I had just trained to become a callow economist, and my head was full of strange ideas. Ideas like merit goods. Ideas that allowed us to get to a point where, in many nations, Nanny State Knows Best. Where it was apparently considered normal to visualise a class of people who knew better than other classes of people.

Now, as I look back on those times and those discussions, I wonder at myself. Was I that arrogant? What residue of that arrogance do I carry now?

Why am I sharing all this? To make the point that for many years, even for centuries, it was considered normal for customers to have neither voice nor choice. That it was considered normal for one group of people to decide what other groups of people could have, should have, would have.
We’ve had choice for many years now, but it’s been vendor-dominated choice. Modern, more sophisticated, more elaborate versions of Any Colour You Want As Long As It’s Black. Nowadays it’s more akin to Any Colour You Want As Long As It’s Mine. People consider it normal to ask questions like “So what’s your lock-in?”. How do you enslave the customer? Will you come in to my parlour, said the Spider.
When it comes to voice, Nader and his crew did their bit, but it took the Cluetrain gang, Chris Locke et al, to get me going. Making me realise the problems caused by building walls between firms and their customers, the stupidity of Fortress Enterprise. That was then followed up by people like Esther Dyson explaining how the User is in Control, Kathy Sierra entrancing me with Creating Passionate Users, and Hugh Macleod working on the Social Object and discovering the evolution of Blue Monsters, David Weinberger explaining how folksonomies empowered customers, Doc Searls starting up the VRM movement.
In the past, it was culturally not just defensible but acceptable to deny customers both choice as well as voice. Capital and land tended to be the scarce factors of production. But that was a very long time ago. In the past, it was culturally not just defensible but acceptable to deny customers control. Education tended to be scarce, and social status was allowed to be a basis for the bestowal of control. Mummy knows best. In the past, it was culturally not just defensible but acceptable to believe that the customer didn’t know what she wanted, that when she did know she was wrong, that the customer needed to be educated about what she really wanted, which fortuitously happened to be what you had.

All that was in the past.

Today, the abundances and scarcities that characterise our era are different. The scarcest, most precious resource around is the customer. That customer knows what she wants. If she doesn’t know it, she knows how to find out what it is she wants. She knows it when she sees it.

That customer knows that part of what she wants is to be able to figure out what she wants. She is both consumer and producer, a partner in the process of co-creating value. The senior partner in the process of co-creating value.
We need to be in the business of providing the customer what she wants when she wants it, where she wants it, how she wants it. We need to focus on making things that the customer wants to buy, rather than trying to get customers to pay for things they neither want nor need.

There was a time when we could decide for the customer. There was a time when we could constrain the customer’s voice and choice. There was a time when dinosaurs ruled the earth.
Stuart French said:

“The next hyper-step in this age of consumer intelligence IMHO, is how much longer we are going to require political representatives to make the big decisions for us. But maybe now I’m thinking a little too far out of the box :-)”

I don’t think so- I think it’s a social revolution, not just about consumers/ marketing- whatever you think of Obama’s policies, he won many supporters who voted Republican before, by (at the very least) making them feel like he was listening to their horse preferences. McCain didn’t do anything similar at all. The effect of this “marketing” difference is being widely underestimated by the media, where most things are framed in a primarily political context.
The question I keep asking myself is “Why do people think that inventors, geniuses and creators of disruption are all *not* to be found in the class of humans called “customers”? What causes this separation? What happens if the tools used by geniuses and inventors and creators of disruption are made available to customers? Won’t we get *more* as a result? or is there a reason to have a holy of holies, a place where customers aren’t allowed to go but inventors can?

LED Lamp is Powered by Dirt | PSFK - Trends, Ideas & Inspiration

I wonder whether something like this could be used to power city streetlights? Just stick the poles in the ground, and ...?
QUOTE
Sounding like something out of a science fair project, the Soil Lamp runs on mud. Designer Marieke Staps says that the metabolism of biological life within the soil produces enough electricity to power the lamp’s LED bulb. The mud is housed within copper and zinc cells that conduct the electricity produced within the wet soil. Maintenance is simple - pour a little water in the dirt, and the lamp will keep going.
UNQUOTE

Tags: psfk, lighting, environment, innovation on 2008-11-13 -All Annotations (0) -About

more fromwww.psfk.com

12Expand

Obama's Seven Lessons for Radical Innovators - Umair Haque

As usual, a brilliant essay by Umair Haque on Obama's win and what business can learn from it in terms of innovation.
QUOTE
Barack Obama is one of the most radical management innovators in the world today. Obama's team built something truly world-changing: a new kind of political organization for the 21st century. It differs from yesterday's political organizations as much as Google and Threadless differ from yesterday's corporations: all are a tiny handful of truly new, 21st century institutions in the world today.

Obama presidential bid succeeded, in other words, as our research at the Lab has discussed for the past several years, through the power of new DNA: new rules for new kinds of institutions.
UNQUOTE

Tags: obama, umair, umair_haque, management, innovation, business_model on 2008-11-10 and saved by 20 people -All Annotations (37) -About

more fromdiscussionleader.hbsp.com

1. Have a self-organization design. What was really different about Obama's organization? We're used to thinking about organizations in 20th century terms: do we design them to be tall, or flat?

But tall and flat are concepts built for an industrial era. They force us to think - spatially and literally - in two dimensions: tall organizations command unresponsively, and flat organizations respond uncontrollably.

Obama's organization blew past these orthodoxies: it was able to combine the virtues of both tall and flat organizations. How? By tapping the game-changing power of self-organization. Obama's organization was less tall or flat than spherical - a tightly controlled core, surrounded by self-organizing cells of volunteers, donors, contributors, and other participants at the fuzzy edges.
2. Seek elasticity of resilience.
What happened when McCain attacked Obama with negative ads in September? Such attacks would have depleted the coffers of a 20th century organization, who would have been forced to retaliate quickly and decisively in kind. Yet, Obama's organization responded furiously in exactly the opposite way: with record-breaking fundraising. That's resilience: reflexively bouncing back to an existential threat by growing, augmenting, or strengthening resources.
3. Minimize strategy.
4. Maximize purpose. Change the game? That's 20th century thinking at its finest - and narrowest. The 21st century is about changing the world.
Bigness of purpose is what separates 20th century and 21st century organizations: yesterday, we built huge corporations to do tiny, incremental things - tomorrow, we must build small organizations that can do tremendously massive things.
And to do that, you must strive to change the world radically for the better - and always believe that yes, you can. You must maximize, stretch, and utterly explode your sense of purpose.
5. Broaden unity.
Obama intuitively understands a larger truth of next-generation economics. Unified markets are what a world driven to collapse by hyperconsumption is desperately going to need. We're going to need not a hundred different kinds of razors - and their spiralling costs of complexity and waste - but a single razor that everybody, from the slums of Rio to the lofts of Tribeca, is overjoyed to use.
6. Thicken power.
7. Remember that there is nothing more asymmetrical than an ideal.
That seventh lesson is the starting point for tomorrow's radical innovators - because it's the thread that knits the others together. And it's where you should start if you want to use these seven rules to start building 21st century institutions - whether businesses, non-profits, social enterprises, or political campaigns.

6Expand

AURP Releases National Strategy for Building America's Communities of Innovation

AURP (Association of University Research Parks) "offers a series of urgent recommendations for the U.S. Government, so that it can more precisely support American innovation and American innovators with both economic and policy-based changes." (See article for proposal targets.)

Does this apply to university research parks in Canada, too?

Interesting references to the importance of place and the creative class.

See this PDF for "The Power of Place": http://www.aurpcanada.ca/pdf/AURP%20The%20Power%20of%20Place_Final.pdf (via www.aurpcanada.ca)

Tags: aurp, innovation, research, university, technology_parks, creative_class, place_making on 2008-10-06 -All Annotations (6) -About

more fromwww.vitp.ca

From establishing the first research park in
the world, to building world-class research universities and federal
laboratories while pioneering technology transfer and patent reform for
public-private research partnerships, the U.S. has led the world in attracting
research talent, funding scientific advances, and commercializing new
discoveries.
The United States is losing ground competitively. The ambitious entrepreneurs
and scientists who are willing to invest time and money into an idea are being
lost at a staggering pace to other countries. These foreign governments provide
incentives for this U.S. human capital to uproot and move. These individuals
find that the challenge of surviving in a foreign country is outweighed by the
tremendous economic benefit these foreign communities provide.
At the present time, the U.S. is losing ground because we do not provide the
Place for the Creative Class to prosper. We have left the responsibility
of creating Place to local communities, many of which cannot bear the
speculative burden of creating Place without governmental financial
support.
Our proposal targets the following:
· Creating American Innovation Zones to drive the creation of modern research
and development collaboration;
· Expanding the availability of visas for skilled researchers; and

· Encouraging in-migration of foreign start-ups through “soft landing”
programs.

WATT: World's 1st Sustainable Dance Club (SDC)

Page for WATT, Rotterdam's Sustainable Dance Club. Includes a really cool video (one guy, quoting verbatim, talks about how we're "leaving the tree hugger age" and moving into a whole new era that embraces innovation etc.). Found via Inhabitat (see http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/10/02/sustainable-dance-club-opens-in-rotterdam/), which includes more images.

Tags: dance_club, sustainability, innovation, rotterdam, environment on 2008-10-03 -All Annotations (0) -About

more fromwww.sustainabledanceclub.com

Can You Become a Creature of New Habits? - New York Times

Creating new habits = essential for innovation; old habits remain, but can be lessened (if bad,eg.) by new habits.
QUOTE:
...brain researchers have discovered that when we consciously develop new habits, we create parallel synaptic paths, and even entirely new brain cells, that can jump our trains of thought onto new, innovative tracks.

Rather than dismissing ourselves as unchangeable creatures of habit, we can instead direct our own change by consciously developing new habits. In fact, the more new things we try — the more we step outside our comfort zone — the more inherently creative we become, both in the workplace and in our personal lives.
UNQUOTE
This reminds me very much of SEED magazine's 2006 article, The Reinvention of the Self," by Jonah Lehrer, which profiled the work of Prof. Elizabeth Gould.
http://www.seedmagazine.com/news/2006/02/the_reinvention_of_the_self.php?page=all&p=y

Tags: psychology, brain, habits, innovation, success, business on 2008-05-10 -All Annotations (0) -About

more fromwww.nytimes.com

The State of Wireless in Canada Sucks

includes an excellent slide share presentation

Tags: canada, innovation, competitiveness, mobile, wireless, telcoms, thomas_purves, wirelessnorth on 2008-04-21 -All Annotations (0) -About

more fromwww.techvibes.com

SDTC The Funding Gap

SDTC = Sustainable Development Technology Canada; this particular page describes the Innovation Chain, particularly in Canada. Points out its weak spots, very interesting.

Tags: canada, funding, innovation, research, sustainability, technology on 2007-12-22 -All Annotations (0) -About

more fromwww.sdtc.ca

4Expand

BLDGBLOG: Church of God, Elevator

- starts with a great story about Mark Twain, and asks a trenchant question about the adventurousness (or absence thereof) in architectural design today

Tags: architecture, bldgblog, innovation, montreal on 2007-12-20 -All Annotations (0) -About

more frombldgblog.blogspot.com

40Expand

How Should We Be Thinking About Urbanization? A Freakonomics Quorum - Freakonomics - Opinion - New York Times Blog

A "quorum of smart thinkers" discusses what problems and opportunities majority urbanism presents, "What effects has it had on our local and global culture? Economy? Health?"

Tags: alan_berube, cities, dolores_hayden, edward_glaeser, freakonomics, innovation, james_kunstler, opinion, robert_bruegmann, urban_development on 2007-12-20 and saved by 6 people -All Annotations (0) -About

more fromfreakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com

Most observers tend to extrapolate current trends and assume that what we see now will continue moving in the same direction — ever-larger cities, etc. I don’t see it that way. The global energy predicament now gathering around us will synergize with climate change to produce a very different outcome.
Add Sticky Note
- - of course he has to say that, since he has staked his speaking career on "the long emergency"...
  - Kunstler drives me nuts.
  posted by lampertina on 2007-12-20
Some of our cities will not make it. Phoenix, Tucson, and other Sunbelt cities will dry up and blow away. In Las Vegas, the excitement will be over. Other mega-cities will have to downscale or face extreme dysfunction.
Add Sticky Note
- - it's obvious that he used to write science fiction, too
  posted by lampertina on 2007-12-20
The suburbs, for the most part, are toast. They have three possible outcomes in the twenty-first century: as slums, salvage yards, or ruins.
Add Sticky Note
- - see previous comment
  posted by lampertina on 2007-12-20
Edward Glaeser, professor of economics at Harvard and director of the Taubman Center for State and Local Government at the Kennedy School of Government:
Add Sticky Note
- - his entire text is worth highlighting!
  posted by lampertina on 2007-12-20
A central paradox of the twenty-first century is that declining communication and transportation costs have made cities more vital than ever.
Add Sticky Note
- - I wonder how the declining transportation costs aspect would sit with Kunstler, who would presumably counter with "just you wait, that'll be over soon"...
  posted by lampertina on 2007-12-20
In the developing world, cities are the intellectual gateways between the human capital of India and China and the markets of the West. In the developed world, cities have enjoyed a remarkable resurgence over the last 25 years as the density that once made it easier to move hogsheads onto clipper ships now serves to spread knowledge in finance and new technology.
Globalization and the death of distance increased the returns for being smart, and you become smart by hanging out with smart people. As such, cities remain important because they create the intellectual connections that forge human capital and spur innovation.
Add Sticky Note
- - an important aspect here is that "smart" also means smart in different ways, and as Aristotle said (paraphrase): a city is composed of many different kinds of people (ok, he said men, but we mean people), and it's that rubbing up against difference (and tolerance) that makes cities so very valuable.
  - disagreement is good
  posted by lampertina on 2007-12-20
Cities sometimes have a bad reputation because of their association with problems like poverty, pollution, and disease; but this association does not imply causation.

Cities are full of poor people because cities attract poor people, not because cities make people poor. Millions of the least advantaged come to urban areas not because cities are bad for them, but because cities are good for them.
Add Sticky Note
- - exactly! Or, in the West's case, because the poor can expect to access services that they wouldn't get in less urban places
  posted by lampertina on 2007-12-20
There is no doubt that the general process of industrialization and growth adversely impacts the environment, at least initially, but cities shouldn’t be blamed for every smokestack. Cities are not factories. They are the concentration of people at high densities, and that concentration is pretty green. After all, we use a lot less energy when we cluster together in cities than when we spread throughout the country and drive hundreds of miles each day in commuting.
Humans are a social species, and our greatest achievements are all collaborative. Cities are machines for making collaboration easier. Thus, I am delighted that our planet has become increasingly urban.
Add Sticky Note
- - well said.
  posted by lampertina on 2007-12-20
Robert Bruegmann, professor of art history, architecture, and urban planning at the University of Illinois at Chicago:
In the long run, however, the policies were probably less important than the eventual result — an equally massive move from the cities back into the countryside. In virtually every affluent nation on earth, the old Nineteenth-century industrial cities have exploded outward, allowing densities to plummet at the core as residents move further and further out into low-density suburbia and a very low-density exurban penumbra around that. The city of Paris today has a third fewer residents than it did a century ago, and the suburban and exurban territory around it leapfrogs more or less from the English Channel to Burgundy. In this process, the very distinction between urban and rural has all but disappeared as citizens in almost every part of affluent societies are able to participate in what is essentially an urban culture.
Add Sticky Note
- - that's a very interesting (and different) way to characterize sprawl... much more "organic," with interdependencies...
  - have to think about this one...
  posted by lampertina on 2007-12-20
Of course, this huge outward migration of people has caused problems, just as the migration to the cities did. And public authorities have once again tried to slow or halt the process, now pejoratively called “sprawl,” often with the explicit aim of preserving the distinction between the urban and the rural. This effort is likely to be just as futile as the effort to stop people from moving into the cities, and just as likely to be counterproductive. No one knows what the next chapter of urban history will bring, but if there is any lesson to draw from what has happened to date, it is that abstract ideas about the proper form of settlement, whether urban or rural or hybrids we can’t yet imagine, tend to lag far behind the reality on the ground.
Dolores Hayden, professor of architecture, urbanism, and American studies at Yale and author of Building Suburbia: Green Fields and Urban Growth, 1820-2000:
Old divisions between “city” and “countryside” have become misleading in urbanized nations like the U.S. “City” in the U.S. today really means “metropolitan region,” because we are a predominantly suburban nation. After almost two centuries of peripheral urban growth, American suburbs have overwhelmed the centers of cities, creating urban regions largely formed of suburban parts. By 2000, more Americans lived in suburbs than in central cities and rural areas combined.
For years, when urban historians wrote about the “city,” they meant the center, the skyline, downtown. Suburbs were left out of traditional “city biographies” emphasizing economic development, population growth, and the achievements of business leaders. Everyone knew that large suburbs existed and had something to do with the process of urbanization. But most historians thought they were less significant than the city center: spatially, because they were less dense than centers; culturally, because more of their attractions involved nature than architecture; and socially, because their daytime activities involved women and children more than men.
Add Sticky Note
- - that's an excellent precis!
  posted by lampertina on 2007-12-20
Because of prejudices about density, high culture, and gender, suburbia resisted scrutiny for decades. It evaded both art historical analysis (based on the aesthetic assessment of outstanding buildings), and urban analysis (based on demographic and economic statistics).
Today, Americans need to come to terms with the urbanized landscapes we have created. As Harlan Douglas, a perceptive sociologist, defined the urban region composed of suburbs in the 1920s, “It is the city trying to escape the consequences of being a city while still remaining a city. It is urban society trying to eat its cake and keep it, too.”
Since the mid-1930s, the federal government has encouraged green field development on raw land outside of urban centers, usually through tax subsidies rather than direct spending. These incentives account for extended metropolitan expansion promoted by “growth machines” — alliances of bankers, developers, and business leaders profiting from hidden federal subsidies for suburban development.
Excessive green field growth lies behind the national energy shortage and the mortgage crisis. Using federal incentives to constantly expand urban peripheries with commercial and residential development has had serious consequences. Reliance on imported oil, pursuit of war in the Middle East, and the credit crunch shaking Wall Street suggest that wise patterns of urban land use are more important to economic well-being than many Americans recognize.
Add Sticky Note
- - really well put; another reason to remediate brown fields and build on them; conserve greenfields.
  posted by lampertina on 2007-12-20
Alan Berube, research director of the Brookings Metropolitan Policy Program:
The way the U.N. — and most economists — look at it, a city encompasses not just the political geography that lies at the heart of an urban region, but the entire surrounding metropolitan area that functions as an economic whole. So New York isn’t just the five boroughs (population 8.2 million), but the enormous labor market that extends from Rockland County upstate, west to the Poconos, east to Suffolk County, and south to the Jersey Shore (population 18.8 million). What separates us from the world’s developing nations (and many developed ones, too) is that most Americans who live in these “cities” or “urban agglomerations” would describe themselves as living in the suburbs.
But if you live in Westchester County, N.Y.; Cobb County, Ga.; Lake County, Ill.; or Collin County, Tex., would you really have a reason to be there if it weren’t for New York City, Atlanta, Chicago, or Dallas?
Regardless, the same economic forces that are attracting people to large urban regions in the developing world apply here in the U.S. (and really always have). Firms and workers derive benefits from co-locating in large metro areas, in that they can each find a better “match” with one another given a greater variety of options. Big urban areas can cost-effectively support critical infrastructure like international airports, passenger and freight rail, and wireless networks. And urban proximity generates spillovers across workers, firms, and universities, embodied in the “network innovation” that powers areas like Silicon Valley (and in the venture capital that is its lifeblood). The result: big places are getting bigger. While the nation’s 100 largest metro areas (containing at least half a million people) contain 65 percent of U.S. population, they have captured 76 percent of its recent population growth. No wonder; as Ed Glaeser has argued, urbanization makes us more productive and, in the end, wealthier.
Add Sticky Note
- - the benefits of co-location
  posted by lampertina on 2007-12-20
My colleagues at Brookings and I have argued that in light of this reality, we ought to begin to tackle critical national challenges — on economic growth, education and skills, infrastructure, and the environment — with a keener eye toward the big, complex, messy, metropolitan way in which the majority of Americans (and now, our global counterparts) live their lives.
Add Sticky Note
- - interesting -- argues for the importance at fixing infrastructure *because* the Friedman model ("the world is flat" and it matters not where you live) isn't going to become a reality any time soon. Quite the opposite.
  posted by lampertina on 2007-12-20
Kunstler is a nostalgic fear-mongerer. Why are we listening to the opinions of a guy who was a theater major in college?
Add Sticky Note
- - that's what I ask myself, too...
  posted by lampertina on 2007-12-20

1 - 15 of 15

List 20 50 100

Notation: * = Private bookmark and comment|… = Clipping [?] | … = Public highlight [?]

Yule Heibel's Related Tags

Selected tags

innovation

Related tags

See More Top Contributors

Martin Koser Jimmy Breeze Kevin Alexandre Cabanis Johann Richard dannno

Related Groups on Diigo

Mission FNEP 2008

Members (7)

bookmarks (599)
Innovation

Members (5)

bookmarks (53)
P2V-innovation

Members (16)

bookmarks (39)

Related Lists on Diigo

Elearning

A collection of helpful sit...

Items: 19 | Visits: 803

Created by: Maggie Tsai
Companies in brief: Week of October 28th News

From company rankings based...

Items: 48 | Visits: 110

Created by: Lisa Damast
Net Zero Electric commercial building

collection of article about...

Items: 0 | Visits: 204

Created by: Net Zero

Yule Heibel's Bookmarks tagged innovation → View Popular

Yule Heibel's Related Tags

See More Top Contributors

Related Groups on Diigo

Diigo - Highlight and Share the Web!