Yule Heibel's Library tagged condos →  View Popular

Not surprisingly perhaps, Torontonians remain fixated on height, which can be counted on to raise the inevitable hackles. Often overlooked in the clamour is the growing number of small, infill schemes that fill gaps in the urban fabric. These can be seen along arteries such as Queen St. E., King St. E., Kingston Rd. and even the laneways and alleys of the old city.

Municipal authorities – political and bureaucratic – have fought the charge to intensify these lesser avenues, but at some point resistance will be futile. It is an idea whose time has come and which can no longer be denied.

The most glaring oversight of the industry and city officials is the lack of family-sized units. Finding apartments with enough bedrooms can be difficult, if not impossible. Indeed, the trend is to smaller and smaller units.

Historically, middle-class Canadians have disapproved of families living in highrises, unless, of course, they are poor. That, too, has started to change. The flight to the suburbs that traditionally occurs when couples have kids has slowed and more families are opting to stay downtown.

Thus the condo builders' focus on young professionals and empty-nesters no longer reflects reality.

In other words, the condo industry is struggling to keep up with a market whose demands grow ever more sophisticated. In light of developers' deep-seated conservatism, this should be expected. What it means is that the city must adopt a more proactive stance, encouraging appropriate built form with tax and density incentives.

excise taxes on gasoline and the municipal grants pegged to them are levied on volume, not price. The less gasoline people buy for private automobiles, therefore, the lower the value of federal grants for public transit. If those grants were pegged to sales rather than excise taxes, they would be the next thing to a perfect carbon tax.

Meanwhile, the free market is applying its own time-tested solution to the problem of overconsumption, with salutary political as well as social consequences. Hillary Clinton never stooped lower than when she promised a summer "gas-tax holiday," joining John McCain in the promise. Barack Obama never looked better than when he condemned it.

left-wing doppelgangers predict that high gas prices will bring about "the end of suburbia," destroying uncountable billions of dollars in real-estate value and devastating the sprawlscape like a nuclear weapon. Neither view accounts for the capacity of people to adapt. Most Europeans pay more than $2 a litre to fill up. They pay more in gas taxes than Canadians pay for gas. Both here and there, the price of fuel accounts for about one-fifth of the total cost of owning and operating a vehicle, behind depreciation. People will cope with high gas prices by moving to smaller cars. It happened before, it's no big deal.

The big deal is what's happening to the skyline of our own city, its dramatic growth the purest expression of a post-carbon age.