This post is going to get a lot of people riled up, I know, because in THEORY, you should be able to see a difference. But you can’t.
And I’m hoping this little test can save you some bucks the next time you’re shopping for a camera.
Tags: podcasts on 2006-12-18 and saved by 47 people -All Annotations (0) -About
more frompodcastpickle.com
Tags: podcasts on 2006-12-18 and saved by 61 people -All Annotations (0) -About
more fromwww.podcastbunker.com
Tags: music, radio on 2006-12-18 and saved by 1474 people -All Annotations (17) -About
more fromwww.last.fm
Tags: music, radio on 2006-12-18 and saved by 2 people -All Annotations (0) -About
more fromwww.accuradio.com
Tags: photoblog on 2006-12-18 and saved by 5 people -All Annotations (0) -About
more fromwww.photoblogs.org
Tags: rentals, vacation on 2006-12-13 and saved by 113 people -All Annotations (0) -About
more fromwww.vrbo.com
Tags: ipod, tips on 2006-12-04 and saved by 3 people -All Annotations (0) -About
more fromdigitalmedia.oreilly.com
you can copy the full-size photo files to transfer them to another computer—good news if you're a photographer and you want to haul around a big, print-ready photo collection.
Best Canalbuds: CX300 ($80 (Best Current Price: $49.99); Sennheiser)
Halfway between earbuds and in-ear-canal (“canalphone”) headphones sit what we call canalbuds. Instead of sealing firmly inside your ear canals using foam or flanged-rubber eartips, like true canalphones, canalbuds have small rubber eartips that sit at the ends of your ear canals—they don’t fully seal out external noise, but they’re easier to put in and take out and they’re more comfortable for many listeners than full-fledged in-ear-canal models. This category has long been dominated by Sony’s EX series, but Sennheiser’s new CX300—the company’s first attempt at canalbuds, no less—handily beats Sony’s offerings in the sound department while also being lightweight (just four grams) and comfortable. And with a street price of around $55, the CX300 is priced competitively.—DF
Best Earbuds: Remix M-Class ($50 (Best Current Price: $26.25); V-Moda)
![]() |
We’re generally not big fans of earbuds here at Playlist. Like Apple’s included headphones, most earbuds—thanks to their small size and loose fit in your outer ear—provide poor bass and mediocre overall sound. In fact, the genre has been so bad, relative to other headphone styles, that we’ve been recommending variations on the same Sennheiser earbuds for several years. (Not to mention that, as earbuds go, Apple’s stock models that ship with each iPod aren’t that bad.) But this year we have a new favorite: V-Moda’s Remix M-Class. At $50, they’re more expensive than most earbuds, but well worth it considering their excellent sound quality (good bass response, excellent detail, and a warm overall sound); quality build (each earbud, as well as the headphone plug enclosure and Y-connector on the cables, is made of polished metal alloy); and attractive design (available in metallic blue, metallic pink, or silver). And they’re comfortable to boot.—DAN FRAKES
Tags: free, international, phone on 2006-11-24 -All Annotations (0) -About
more fromwww.advicegoddess.com
There’s no contract, no ads, nothing to sign up for. At the prompt, press 1 for English. Then punch in 011, the country code and the phone number. The call rings through immediately.
Fine print: In some countries, you can reach only landlines, not cellphones. And in part because FuturePhone’s lines have been flooded, its success at placing calls is not, ahem, 100 percent.
But it’s hard to argue with “free,” which, according to the company, it will be until at least 2010.
Tags: barton, bill, funeral., obituary on 2006-11-24 -All Annotations (0) -About
more fromwww.spokesmanreview.com
Tags: no_tag on 2006-11-22 and saved by 10 people -All Annotations (2) -About
more frompogue.blogs.nytimes.com
“I don’t get it,” wrote one. “A ten-megapixel camera produces photos about 3640 pixels wide–enough to make a 12-inch print at 300 dpi (dots per inch) on a good printer. Sure, you can go lower, but quality is sacrificed; you can’t make an 11×14 print, let alone anything bigger.”
I have to say, the math sounds right. But I also have to say that he’s wrong.
This post is going to get a lot of people riled up, I know, because in THEORY, you should be able to see a difference. But you can’t.
And I’m hoping this little test can save you some bucks the next time you’re shopping for a camera.
Tags: culture, mexico, news, rich on 2006-11-20 -All Annotations (0) -About
more fromwww.freerepublic.com
Tags: blogging, osx, tools on 2006-11-19 and saved by 27 people -All Annotations (0) -About
more fromwww.problogger.net
Tags: maps, yahoo on 2006-11-17 and saved by 244 people -All Annotations (1) -About
more frommaps.yahoo.com
Notation: * = Private bookmark and comment|… = Clipping [?] | … = Public highlight [?]
