isaac Mao's Library tagged → View Popular
Wikipedia和财政投入
-
最近金融海啸,闹得全世界不得安宁。中央说要财政投入8000亿,以振兴国内产业。可是,谁也没有想到,不声不响之间,中宣部一下子给全国投资了6500个亿。
-
所以说,不声不响之间,中宣部给全国投资了6500亿。当然,这6500亿原来不是中宣部的,而是属于发明Wikipedia的人和所有贡献词条的网民。现在我们也终于可以自由地贡献并分享知识了。
Solidot | 维基百科重新定义“真实”的含义
-
查证”是要求文章的观点和事实来自有公信力的消息来源如出版物,所要求的并非是真实性,而显然许多出版物并没有去核查事实的真实性。“非原创研究”则导致如下情况:Jaron Lanier无法根据其第一手资料修正自己的维基百科条目,因此Jaron Lanier将维基百科称为“数字毛泽东主义”的一个实例。也就是说在维基百科,事实就是一致的观点。
关于阎崇年:警惕网上的“逆维基效应”_信海光:感性、破坏性_新浪博客
作者没有看到这是一个过程
-
很难说网友在做这些“加料”时有什么深谋远虑,可能只是为了好玩,为了加大批判力度。从短期来讲,这些“加料”很有煽动性,起到了打击对手的效果,但从长远看,却是在帮助对方。本来一篇文章有99%的材料都是真实的,但就因为那1%的“加料”,对手会质疑这整篇文章的真实性乃至作者的人格。事实是,自从“孙中山是韩国人”的假新闻被澄清后,一些韩国媒体就抓住不放,要找出中韩史学争论背后的所谓“反韩情结”。
RConversation: Wikipedia's Jimmy Wales meets China's censors
-
Wales: I mentioned that there have been problems of access in the past, though things are currently good, and we hope that things will remain good going forward.
-
Wales: We didn't discuss it. But, I am not cool with any censorship of Wikipedia. However, I do think it is much better for a few politically sensitive pages to be blocked than for everything to be blocked. And we will never cooperate with any blocking or censorship of neutral encyclopedic content.
维基百科的“BUG”_环球企业家
-
维基过去是9个人的运营团队,一个位居前10位的网站只有不到10人的正式员工,他们最近增加到了15个人。去年的经费是220万美元,今年则增加到460万美元。
-
威尔士把麦斯登介绍进来,麦斯登以前是加拿大广播公司网站的一名记者。
- 2 more annotations...
edublogs: Community-building - why bottom-up alone doesn't work
-
It's no mistake that Jimmy Wales has called 'his' wiki's Editors the 'aristocracy' of Wikipedia, with him as the Monarch. But it works. Bottom-up, it seems, always requires a bit of state, monarch or Parliament, to make it work in the long term.
Monitor | The battle for Wikipedia's soul | Economist.com
-
The internet: The popular online encyclopedia, written by volunteer contributors, has unlimited space. So does it matter if it includes trivia?
Illustration by Frazer Hudson
IT IS the biggest encyclopedia in history and the most successful example of “user-generated content” on the internet, with over 9m articles in 250 languages contributed by volunteers collaborating online. But Wikipedia is facing an identity crisis as it is torn between two alternative futures. It can either strive to encompass every aspect of human knowledge, no matter how trivial; or it can adopt a more stringent editorial policy and ban articles on trivial subjects, in the hope that this will enhance its reputation as a trustworthy and credible reference source. These two conflicting visions are at the heart of a bitter struggle inside Wikipedia between “inclusionists”, who believe that applying strict editorial criteria will dampen contributors' enthusiasm for the project, and “deletionists” who argue that Wikipedia should be more cautious and selective about its entries.
-
Deletionists believe that Wikipedia will be more successful if it maintains a certain relevance and quality threshold for its entries.
Ex-Wikipedia staffer harpoons Wales over expenses | The Register
-
According to Wool, this $30,000 went unpaid until another Foundation employee or board member threatened to leak the problem to Wikipedia's community of volunteer editors. Wales returned about $7,000 of the money, Wool says, but the rest is unaccounted for.
-
also said that Wales asked the Foundation to reimburse him for a rather expensive steak dinner for four. Wool told The Reg that the dinner included two bottles of wine, one priced at $400 and one priced at $250.
Selected Tags
Related Tags
Sponsored Links
Top Contributors
Groups interested in Wikipedia
Highlighter, Sticky notes, Tagging, Groups and Network: integrated suite dramatically boosting research productivity. Learn more »
Join Diigo

