Skip to main content

Jan
3
2012

A modest proposal to give Free Software equal legal standing as proprietary - http://t.co/cXzm0e3c raises important points #law

law twitter

Feb
8
2009

  • In other words, contrary to the received wisdom, stock markets do not  produce conflicting opinions. They unduly favour mimicry among investors,  not for obscure reasons of crowd psychology, but because that is what good sense dictates. Going against long-term market developments is too risky.
  • The explicit  strategy was to create a single financial market where all stakeholders (banks,  funds, companies, individuals, states) could share in all maturities  (short-term, medium-term and long-term) using all the instruments available  (stocks, bonds, derivatives and currencies). It was a world of universal  interconnection and perfect, unhindered liquidity.
  • 3 more annotation(s)...
Apr
11
2011

In English law, your name is what you are known by: and so long as you are not doing so for purposes of fraud or pecuniary gain, you can call yourself what you like. Identity theft? Another nonsense excuse. Your identity is in practice a bundle of proofs

gender law delicious

  • And there’s a clue. I have spent many years working with systems, analysing, developing and streamlining processes. In many, many of the cases I have encountered, companies have real difficulty in ‘changing’ a name because as far as their system is concerned a name is a unique thing: something you have one of at a time and - again in system terms - a personal attribute without a past. Your name is what you are called now.
     
     It is not conceptually difficult to set systems up differently: to maintain a personal history and an audit trail, so that individuals can change names, with some record of previous aliases for checking purposes. Passport offices do so, some benefit systems, too. That would make life that much simpler, less fraught for all those who do undergo name changes: mostly women and the transgendered.
     
     IT systems, however, tend historically to have been designed by men, who have next to no experience of the sheer inconvenience that follows on a change of name. At the same time, they are just as likely to dismiss any complaint about ‘the way things are’ as no more than the usual feminine whinge. After all, its such a small inconvenience, why would anyone ever mind?
1 - 6 of 6
Showing 20 items per page

Diigo is about better ways to research, share and collaborate on information. Learn more »

Join Diigo
Move to top