David Scrimshaw's Library tagged → View Popular
1013952 Ontario Inc. (Silverado Restaurant and Nightclub) v. Sakinofsky, 2009 CanLII 60783 (ON S.C.)
a lawyer is liable for the negligent acts of his or her employees, including junior lawyers. The failure of a principal to supervise the work of a junior lawyer is grounds for professional negligence. See: McKay v. Cowan, 1989 CanLII 2808 (BC S.C.), 1989 CanLII 2808 (BC S.C.). The obligation to supervise does not flow upward from the junior to the senior. Rosso’s argument to the contrary flies in the face of the common law. It also ignores the way in which work is assigned and supervised in law offices. It would be a surprising result if the most junior, least knowledgeable and least experienced employee was liable in law for a senior lawyer’s errors or omissions on a file
Rassouli-Rashti v. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, 2009 CanLII 62055 (ON S.C.D.C.)
-
courts have concluded that a regulatory body has implied authority to conduct an
informal investigation in circumstances where it is not necessary to resort to
the powers accorded to an individual who is conducting a formal investigation
Miksche Estate v. Miksche, 2009 CanLII 60409 (ON S.C.)
A general retainer to act as counsel in litigation does not vest in the lawyer unfettered authority to “resolve matters” on terms he considers fit,
-
Under a retainer to act in litigation a lawyer must obtain the consent of his
client before taking a material step in the litigation which would result in the
incurrence of significant costs by the client or before compromising the
client’s rights in the litigation, unless the retainer agreement contains clear,
express language reposing discretion in the lawyer to act as he sees fit in
specified circumstances. -
The requirement of full disclosure is not met where a lawyer acts to compromise
the client’s rights, for the financial benefit of the lawyer alone, without
first obtaining the client’s informed consent - 2 more annotations...
R. v. Bevan, 2009 ONCJ 487 (CanLII)
[17] Prudent and experienced counsel will not, however, engage in interviews with an opposing witness and in particular a complainant, without having a third party witness present
Carleton v. Beaverton, 2008 CanLII 48808 (ON S.C.)
d. No counsel shall bill their clients for any of their time for those matters.
e. Each counsel shall send a copy of this endorsement to their respective clients within 7 days and file an affidavit with the court file verifying that they have done so.
-
Add Sticky Note[40] As I informed counsel I shall
be making a complaint to the Law Society of Upper Canada concerning Mr.
Neinstein’s conduct. The fact that a month after he had made many
allegations of unprofessional conduct, including deliberate deception, against
Mr. Forget which were either not proven or groundless he would write a letter
saying, “In view of the obvious bias of the Whitby courts, the only solution for
a fair hearing is to move this action to Toronto” warrants further consideration
in light of Rule 4 of the Rules of Professional Conduct.- The Law Society is already quite familiar with Mr. Neinstein: http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onscdc/doc/2008/2008canlii48142/2008canlii48142.html - on 2008-10-03
R. v. Terrigno, 2008 ABPC 240 (CanLII)
Mr. Terrigno gave his evidence-in-chief in a rehearsed manner. It was apparent that he was basing his self-serving testimony on what he believed he would have done and not what he actually recalled doing. For example, when asked if he got in front of Sergeant Brar, Mr. Terrigno stated “there is just no way I did that. I am smart enough not to do that.” Observing the way he said that gave the distinct impression that he was not actually recalling the event but rather was basing his answer on how he would have acted with sober aforethought
-
It was apparent that he was basing his self-serving testimony on what he
believed he would have done and not what he actually recalled doing. For
example, when asked if he got in front of Sergeant Brar, Mr. Terrigno stated
“there is just no way I did that. I am smart enough not to do that.”
Observing the way he said that gave the distinct impression that he was not
actually recalling the event but rather was basing his answer on how he would
have acted with sober aforethought -
His characterization of his words as “inappropriate” at trial, much minimizes
their actual atrociousness. - 2 more annotations...
Phinny v. Macaulay, 2008 CanLII 47015 (ON S.C.)
An excellent overview of Registry Act title requirements, requisitions, easements, abandonment, duty Lawyers owe clients, and mitigation.
-
Mr. Provenzano was negligent and in breach of his contract to Mr. Phinny in
keeping relevant information from his client, preventing his client to assess
his obligations under the Agreement given the change in circumstances,
preventing his client from instructing him, preventing Mr. Phinny from
evaluating his risk in not closing, failing to advise the client as to the new
information obtained and alternative court remedies as to the then issues
between the parties and loosing an opportunity to purchase the property. -
Accordingly, Mr. Provenzano is
responsible in law for any liability determined owing to the plaintiffs by Mr.
Phinny’s failure to close and to repay his client his deposit with interest in
such event
v\Law Society of Upper Canada v. Evans, 2008 CanLII 34276 (ON S.C.D.C.)
Sex harasser judge gets readmitted to the bar with conditions.
-
In this case, the Hearing Panel held that the applicant had “the burden to
present clear and convincing proof based on cogent evidence that the application
should be granted.” (Hearing Panel Reasons, para 8) -
The test to be met for restoration ensures that persons guilty of past
misconduct are not restored without due regard to the protection of the
public. However, there is no precedent for imposing on top of that
difficult test the additional burden of meeting the test based on the enhanced
“Bernstein standard”. - 5 more annotations...
Selected Tags
Related Tags
Sponsored Links
Highlighter, Sticky notes, Tagging, Groups and Network: integrated suite dramatically boosting research productivity. Learn more »
Join Diigo
