Skip to main content

David Scrimshaw

David Scrimshaw's Public Library

20 Nov 09

Full recovery now possible for an 'untreatable' mental illness

Patients coping with the chaos and misery of Borderline Personality Disorder now have reason for strong confidence in making major life changes through a new treatment, Schema Therapy.

www.eurekalert.org/...isos-frn102209.php - Preview

Psychology psychiatry treatment borderline

CanLII - 2009 CanLII 63131 (ON S.C.)

To obtain an order rectifying a contract, the applicant must prove: (1) a common intention held by the parties to the contract before the making of the written contract alleged to be deficient; (2) that this common intention remained unchanged at the date that the written contract was signed; and (3) that the written contract, by mistake, does not conform to the parties’ prior common intention: Peter Pan Drive-In Ltd. v. Flambro Realty Ltd.

www.canlii.org/...2009canlii63131.html - Preview

Law contract Rectification

  • Equity’s remedy of
    rectification is available when contracting parties make a mistake and do not
    correctly express their actual agreement in their written contract.
    Rectification is concerned with mistakes in recording an agreement in writing.
    It is not concerned about mistakes in the underlying agreement. The purpose of
    rectification is to ensure that the written contract accurately expresses what
    was the parties’ agreement.

Island Timberlands LP v. Canada (Foreign Affairs), 2008 FC 1380 (CanLII)

The Minister’s failure to make a public statement of the rationale for the Policy is the most important element of the unfair nature of the processing of Island Timberlands’ applications

www.canlii.org/...2008fc1380.html - Preview

Law Administrative policy

  • given the importance of the October
    12th decision to Island Timberlands, and given that the decision was
    rendered in such a non-transparent manner in form and substance, even at the
    highest level of deference, and the lowest level of due process, a breach of due
    process occurred.

Canada (Attorney General) v. Mowat, 2009 FCA 309 (CanLII)

It is difficult, if not impossible, to conclude that the answer (either yes or no) can be said to fall within a range of possible acceptable outcomes. There is much to be said for the argument that where there are two conflicting lines of authority interpreting the same statutory provision, even if each on its own could be found to be reasonable, it would not be reasonable for a court to uphold both

www.canlii.org/...2009fca309.html - Preview

Law Administrative costs statutory Interpretation

  • [50]        
     
    There is
    binding authority to the effect that different standards of review can apply to
    different legal questions depending on the nature of the question and the
    relative expertise of the tribunal in those particular matters
  • [75]        
     
    The proper
    approach to statutory interpretation has been articulated repeatedly by the
    Supreme Court of Canada and is so entrenched that reference to specific
    authority is not necessary. The goal is to seek the intent of Parliament by
    reading the words of the provision in context and according to their grammatical
    and ordinary sense, harmoniously with the scheme and the object of the
    statute.
  • 2 more annotations...
13 Nov 09

Desjardins Ducharme Stein Monast v. Empress Jewellery (Canada) Inc., 2004 CanLII 15737 (QC C.S.)

the interests of a major unsecured creditor are considered to be unfairly prejudiced in a case where there is a closely-held corporation in which the directors and shareholders gain a personal advantage or a reduction in liability by keeping funds or assets out of such creditor's reach

www.canlii.org/...2004canlii15737.html - Preview

Law oppression corporate creditor

12 Nov 09

Rassouli-Rashti v. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, 2009 CanLII 62055 (ON S.C.D.C.)

  • courts have concluded that a regulatory body has implied authority to conduct an
    informal investigation in circumstances where it is not necessary to resort to
    the powers accorded to an individual who is conducting a formal investigation

Repic v. Hamilton (City), 2009 CanLII 60673 (ON S.C.)

[91] The City’s failure to provide a safe intersection for all users is disrepair and, accordingly, I am satisfied that the City of Hamilton has breached its statutory duty in its failure to make any modifications to the design of this intersection.

www.canlii.org/...2009canlii60673.html - Preview

Law Municipal roads Negligence bicycles

  • I find that the choice of the Parclo A4 interchange design at this location was
    a policy decision.  However, the actual construction of the interchange,
    any modifications to the design, decisions regarding markage, signage, traffic
    control devices, or any other such controls, are operation or implementation
    decisions and are subject to scrutiny by the court
  • the evidence of Mr. Vandermark was very telling. He testified that modifications
    to the design, such as signage, the movement of the light pole, or implementing
    concepts as suggested by Mr. Robinson, would not require City/Regional Council
    approval
  • 6 more annotations...

Nareerux Import Co. Ltd. v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, 2009 ONCA 764 (CanLII)

Contracts in which performance is dependent upon the exercise of discretion on the part of one of the parties are contracts that are particularly characterized by the implied duty of good faith performance.

www.canlii.org/...2009onca764.html - Preview

Law contract letter-of-credit

  • letters of credit are an important mechanism for ensuring that international
    commerce flows smoothly, effectively, and with some degree of assurance. 
     As one American authority has put it, albeit colourfully, letters of
    credit are intended “to grease the wheels of trade and commerce”: Alaska
    Textile Co., Inc. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.
    , 982 F.2d 813 (2d Cir.
    1992), at p. 824.  Care is required, therefore, to ensure that they are not
    interpreted and enforced in a way that might jeopardize their uniqueness and
    commercial efficacy or the relative certainty that must surround their
    use.  Hence the doctrines of autonomy, strict compliance and strict
    construction that will be discussed below
  • At the same time, however, letters of credit are not completely divorced from
    the general rules and principles of contract law, including those invoking
    notions of fairness and equity
  • 6 more annotations...

Kurdina v. Gratzer, 2009 CanLII 60403 (ON S.C.)

the issue before the court is not about the existence of psychotronic weapons or about how other professionals might treat Ms. Kurdina for her symptoms. Ms. Kurdina is entitled to her belief that such weapons exist and that she has been the victim of them. The issue is whether Dr. Gratzer was negligent as a psychiatrist, and that is an issue that must be decided based on relevant evidence about the standard of care of psychiatrists

www.canlii.org/...2009canlii60403.html - Preview

Law Mental Health standard-of-care

  • the standard of care of psychiatry is measured by the standard of care of
    practitioners of psychiatry and not by the standard of care of toxicologists or
    by practitioners of other disciplines of knowledge that believe in the existence
    of effects from psychotronic weapons

Miksche Estate v. Miksche, 2009 CanLII 60409 (ON S.C.)

A general retainer to act as counsel in litigation does not vest in the lawyer unfettered authority to “resolve matters” on terms he considers fit,

www.canlii.org/...2009canlii60409.html - Preview

Law settlement Professional-Responsibility

  • Under a retainer to act in litigation a lawyer must obtain the consent of his
    client before taking a material step in the litigation which would result in the
    incurrence of significant costs by the client or before compromising the
    client’s rights in the litigation, unless the retainer agreement contains clear,
    express language reposing discretion in the lawyer to act as he sees fit in
    specified circumstances.
  • The requirement of full disclosure is not met where a lawyer acts to compromise
    the client’s rights, for the financial benefit of the lawyer alone, without
    first obtaining the client’s informed consent
  • 2 more annotations...
06 Nov 09

CanLII - 2009 CanLII 60408 (ON S.C.)

Construction Lien Trust [11] That decision makes the point that where a breach of trust is alleged, the initial onus is on the plaintiff to prove the existence of the trust by showing three elements:
(a) the owner received money on account of the project;
(b) that the plaintiff supplied materials on that project; and
(c) the plaintiff was not paid.

www.canlii.org/...2009canlii60408.html - Preview

Law Construction Lien Trust accounts Payment

  • [32]      In my view the defendants
    cannot be allowed to benefit from their refusal to supply the plaintiff with the
    required information. It would be deleterious to provide an incentive to
    trustees to avoid keeping beneficiaries informed, despite their requests. The
    defendants should not benefit when the beneficiaries act reasonably in the face
    of an information gap created by the defendants. The advantage of this principle
    is that it provides an incentive for the contractor or owner to be forthcoming
    in the provision of information, but still requires the supplier or
    subcontractor to be proactive in making information requests. In other words if
    there is a duty imposed on the one party to inquire, there is a like duty on the
    other party to answer

Common plants can eliminate indoor air pollutants

Of the 28 species tested, Hemigraphis alternata (purple waffle plant), Hedera helix (English ivy), Hoya carnosa (variegated wax plant), and Asparagus densiflorus (Asparagus fern) had the highest removal rates for all of the VOCs introduced. Tradescantia pallida (Purple heart plant) was rated superior for its ability to remove four of the VOCs.

www.eurekalert.org/...asfh-cpc110409.php - Preview

plants Environment

05 Nov 09

Chisum Log Homes & Lumber Ltd. v. Investment Saskatchewan Inc., 2007 SKQB 368 (CanLII)

Section 219 of The Business Corporations Act does not establish a limitation period. Rather it permits actions to be brought against dissolved companies without the necessity of reviving those companies.

www.canlii.org/...2007skqb368.html - Preview

Law corporate director creditor

Danylchuk et al. v. Wolinsky et al. and Feierstein and Fishman Medical Corporation v. Wolinsky et al., 2007 MBQB 65 (CanLII)

since the directors have been sued in their personal capacity it is irrelevant whether or not the corporation was in existence at the time of the application

www.canlii.org/...2007mbqb65.html - Preview

Law corporate Director oppression Creditor

Desjardins Ducharme Stein Monast v. Empress Jewellery (Canada) Inc., 2004 CanLII 15737 (QC C.S.)

[37] In the Court's opinion, the interests of a major unsecured creditor are considered to be unfairly prejudiced in a case where there is a closely-held corporation in which the directors and shareholders gain a personal advantage or a reduction in liability by keeping funds or assets out of such creditor's reach. The Court is satisfied that the repayment of the shareholder loans, the payment of dividends, the payment of bonuses as well as the disposal of most of Empress' inventory and equipment were not reasonable and legitimate business decisions on behalf of Empress, but rather a form of self-dealing by Mr. and Mrs. Dubrovsky and Mr. Azran.

www.canlii.org/...2004canlii15737.html - Preview

Law oppression corporate Creditor

  • While lack of good faith can constitute oppressive or unfairly prejudicial
    conduct, it is not a necessary prerequisite for a remedy under section
    241 CBCA or its provincial equivalents

Apotex Inc. v. Laboratoires Fournier S.A., 2006 CanLII 38354 (ON S.C.)

If the oppressive conduct alone was enough to create the status of a creditor-complainant for the purposes of the oppression remedy, then the oppression remedy could be used by any plaintiff in any case where a corporation has caused damage through an otherwise conventional breach of contract or through tortious conduct.

www.canlii.org/...2006canlii38354.html - Preview

Law Creditor corporate oppression

  • The law is clear that the
    creditor-complainant has to be a creditor at the time of the alleged oppression:
  •      It is not
    enough that the complainant became a creditor as a result of the allegedly
    oppressive conduct, as was the case here.  If this were the law, then it
    would be “unsatisfactorily circular.” 
1 - 20 of 1488 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page

Diigo is about better ways to research, share and collaborate on information. Learn more »

Join Diigo