Clinton dips into pocket to keep up with Obama - Yahoo! News
-
Clinton dips into pocket to keep up with Obama
-
Clinton leads among "super-delegates," the
elected officials and party insiders who can switch allegiance
at will. -
broke all
records,
Arianna Huffington: A November Preview? - Politics on The Huffington Post
-
obama's economic stimulus plan was ranked the highest on the washington post--higher than all of the candidates, dems and reps.
-
war hero? that was an illegal war. do we call our soldiers war heros for fighting in illegal wars. he would have bombed every man woman and child in vietnam both north and south to win that war.
-
this is the insanity of americans that call their soldiers heros for invading and occupying other countries.
-
most americans are imperialists and many are war mongers. to move from almost last place to frontrunner in the repub party all mc cain had to do was sing bomb bomb iran and state we will be in iraq for 100 years.
that is the insanity of america. -
Clinton wakes some sort of Beast in most Republicans and they go beserk and start calling for 100 year wars. Obama doesn't, hence his ability to bring this country together again so we can start making progress instead of war again.
-
Hillary will do nothing but assure a Republican take over of the senate and possible loss of the House.
-
I wish more Latinos would realize that this is not a competition for first but opening doors for more. This is no different than the modern day civil rights movement laying the ground work for the migrant movement. I just wish more people of color and women would drop this who is the greater victim attitude and think progress not division!
-
We should definitely hope for an Obama - McCain contest. We need to end the Vietnam War; we need to change the militaristic tendencies; we need to focus on the next generation.
-
We know he wants to bomb Iran. He even sang to us about. He's a frightening creature.
-
Synergize the Country! Vote Obama the next motivational-speaker-in-chief!
-
You miss the point about the message. Change is part of it, but we also have to be personally responsible, go to the website and look up the Blueprint for Change, it clearly outlines all of the ways that he plans to "change" things. I would much rather tune in, and find a reason to stay tuned in than to tune into the message and tune out. I spent hours going over plans and their individual approaches. Anyone who says this is fluff has not read the individual plans...
-
And Obama? What to say - that was simply a masterful performance. I was riveted, and found my old cynical heart actually stirring a bit.
-
Ummm Hello? Have you even looked at a single national poll? Every poll shows Obama beats McCain in the General and Hill LOOSES!
-
Conservatives will storm the castle with torches to drive her away, as will the evangelicals.
-
Are you out of your gourd? Obama would wipe the floor with McCain.
-
Ari Fleischer even said it on CNN last night - the Repubs are praying for a Clinton victory because they know they can beat her.
-
a vote for Clinton in primary is a vote for McCain in the general.
-
Yep, spot on. I've never voted Dem in my life, and I detest McCain. If Obama wins the Dem nomination I will vote for him. If it's HRC then I'm voting McCain.
-
NOT Clinton who, even though she has good credentials, is so polarizing. Time for a younger crowd, and fresh ideas. And Obama is the one, on both sides of the aisle (wish the choices weren't so restricted by our rigid TWO-PARTY system).
-
Just depends on whether or not we are willing to nominate the man who is handily winning almost all the formerly Red states or if we want to try to rewind time and continue on this destructive Bush-Clinton hamster wheel only to end up with McCain.
-
I beg to differ. The reason Clinton can not win against McCain is simple: there is no one that will rally conservatives to hold their nose and vote for McCain. Clinton will be a battle cry for republicans and again the dems will self distruct amist a replay of travel gate, Jennifer Flowers, Whitewater and Bill slippey zipper. I have always been a Clinton supporter, but she is the wrong candidate for now. If nominated, get ready for Pres McCain.
-
That is where you can read the "Blueprint for Change" in it's entirety. Those of you who keep saying he is all fluff and no substance have not done your research. You just believe all the Clinton BS that they sell you. Act like a grown up and read it yourself, or are you so challenged that you need it spoonfed to you?
-
There you go again. You want a fully-formed, vetted, and edited "plan" in place just ten months before the general election? Then I have a question for you: where is Hillary's plan?? Where is McCain's?? Where is ANYBODY's plan???
NO CANDIDATE can answer in detail at this point. It's just not possible. Getting elected takes everything a candidate has, and ALL of their free time. I don't expect them to start governing until they're sworn in, thanks very much. -
Money wins most elections.
The Page - by Mark Halperin - TIME
-
get the candidates together and make some kind of an arrangement.
Barack Obama : : Change We Can Believe In | Sam Graham-Felsen's Blog: Obama Wins Super Tuesday: Wins Most States, Wins Most Delegates
-
One report I read indicated that there are no rules when it comes to persuading superdelegates to vote one way or another. Still, superdelegates have to be re-elected so start writing to your local delegates.
-
After last night where by all accounts he STILL holds the popular vote, the graphs/charts now favor Clinton due to the Superdelegate lead she's had in her favor since November.
-
Obama did a incredible job because he closed a HUGE gap
Obama Bullish; Clinton Looks to March - Politics on The Huffington Post
-
So Dean said that he'll call the two candidates, Hillary and Obama in and bully them into an agreement before the convention. Let's see how this conversation would go:
Look Sen, you have the best campaign staff, you raise about $30m a month, you have more committed delegates. In addition, you are attracting more new voters than ever, you're attracting young voters who would be apt to stay with the Democratic party and you're filling stadiums as never before, not Reagan, not George Bush nor Bill Clinton ever attracted crowds like you have.
Having said that Barack, I want you to run as Hillary's VP so that you could raise money and wipe out Hillary's debt. I'm doing you a big favor here Barack, I'm making Hillary put you on the ticket. What do you say to that, Barack? -
An analysis by the Campaign Finance Institute, which tracks trends in political money, found that Obama raised about a third of his money in 2007 from donors who gave $200 or less. Only one-third of his money came from donors who have given the legal maximum of $2,300, compared to Clinton who raised about half of her money from "maxed out" donors and only 14 percent from donors of $200 or less.
-
Sen. Clinton's "share of their joint resources."
-
The Clinton's financial disclosures, which reveal only broad ranges of assets, place their wealth between $10 million to $50 million.
-
Wisconsin, which has virtually sealed the nomination for other Democrats in years past.
-
Wisconsin's Democratic electorate is largely liberal and college educated, and its open primary allows independents to vote _ all factors that favor Obama.
-
Hawaii, where Obama grew up,
-
the so-called Potomac primary Feb. 9,
-
Penn conceded the campaign would rely on surrogates to campaign for her in most of states holding contests Saturday, including President Clinton and daughter Chelsea. It was a tacit admission that the former first lady was unlikely to win any of those states outright.
-
who has generated unprecedented activism and fundraising through the Internet.
-
The Clinton camp was eager to take the luster off of Obama's status as a "movement candidate"
-
Clinton advisers were stunned by Obama's January fundraising and have marveled at his ability to raise small-dollar amounts from a vast field of donors.
-
Clinton campaign chairman Terry McAuliffe said last week the Clinton campaign raised only $13.5 million for the month. The $5 million loan was in addition to that amount, Wolfson said.
-
Obama, riding a wave of fundraising both from large donors and small Internet contributors, raised a stunning $32 million in January.
-
"I loaned it because I believe very strongly in this campaign," Clinton told reporters Wednesday. "We had a great month fundraising in January, broke all records, but my opponent was able to raise more money and we intended to be competitive and we were."
-
On Wednesday, she sent out an e-mail appeal to donors Wednesday seeking $3 million in three days _ an effort, that if successful, would match the fundraising rate Obama averaged for the entire month of January.
-
In a sign of Obama's growing financial advantage, Clinton acknowledged Wednesday that she loaned her campaign $5 million late last month as Obama was outraising and outspending her heading into Feb. 5 Super Tuesday contests.
With no losers, the fight goes on - Los Angeles Times
-
The battle between Clinton and Obama will continue, probably through the March 4 primaries in Ohio and Texas and possibly beyond.
-
Clinton and Obama divided the nation almost down the middle, with Clinton winning at least eight states, including giants California and New York. Obama won at least 13 states, including Illinois and Georgia. The close result guaranteed days of uncertainty over the delegate count, followed by weeks more of renewed campaigning.
With the two candidates separated by only modest policy differences, Tuesday's results illuminated divisions of what scholars call "identity politics." Latinos turned out in large numbers and mostly supported Clinton; African American voters turned out too and voted overwhelmingly for Obama; and white voters divided, giving pluralities to Clinton in some states, to Obama in others.
Crooks and Liars
Tags: no_tag on 2008-02-06 and saved by54 people -All Annotations (0) -About
more fromwww.crooksandliars.com
-
The Los Angeles County Registrar of Voters decided in they could save a few bucks by creating a complicated ballot design for the presidential primary. In 2008, that decision has now lead to the disenfranchisement of countless voters. What we don’t know is the scope of the problem.
-
(correction) Another huge sweeping victory as far as the total number of voters for the Democratic Party in what has become another important election narrative:
In last week’s SC GOP primary, McCain and Huckabee (the top 2 finishers), got 147,283 and 132,440 votes respectively. That’s a total of 279,723. Obama just pulled down 291,000 by himself.
So the totals are roughly: GOP - 442,918 Dems 530,322
(It looks like we’re back up!)
-
How many orphans have we created? How many widows? How many people who weep and cry every night while trying to fall asleep on straw mats?
-
Paul explains how U.S. foreign policy helped fuel the attacks of 9/11, and from there, the rest of the candidates go on the offense.
> Watching them try to explain how the islamofacists hate us for our freedoms
and why America’s actions play no role in terrorism
> is nothing short of comical. -
Democratic presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich filed a complaint with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) on Friday after ABC News excluded him, fellow Democrat Mike Gravel and Republican Duncan Hunter from today’s debates.
-
O’Reilly: I’m gonna say this on the Factor and people should write it down. Musharraf’s last chance. Musharraf is going to wind up in a pool of blood. Just like Miss Bhutto, if he doesn’t throw in with NATO and the United States and throw in tomorrow.
-
Markos Moulitsas of The Daily Kos and Newsweek joined Keith Olbermann on Friday’s Countdown to talk about the FISA fiasco and the feckless Senate Majority? Leader Harry Reid, who is prepared to once again cower to the worst president in American history and give him everything he wants in the new FISA bill, including amnesty for the telecommunications companies.
Markos, like the rest of us, was at a loss as to why the Democratic majority seems to be so afraid to stand up to the minority party and their president. He also says that the Democrats shouldn’t fold like a cheap card table every time the Republicans threaten a filibuster — when what they really should be doing is MAKING them actually filibuster so that America can see exactly who is blocking progress in Washington.
-
(at least John Edwards is lending his voice to fight the good fight).
-
Unlike
the
> show trial put on by Republicans against President Clinton, a proper impeachment hearing would involve a fair and objective presentation of the facts without hyperbole or political gamesmanship. The hard evidence that is presented at the hearings will be judged fully both by Congress and the American people. The evidence alone will determine the outcome, and if it is determined that Vice President Cheney committed “High Crimes and Misdemeanors” he should be properly impeached and put on trial before the Senate. -
What I’m saying is I’m going to be the president, like Teddy Roosevelt, and like others like him-Harry Truman, who understood that there is an important battle against those interests-well financed, well entrenched, that prevent the kind of change that the country needs, that’s for the greater good. That’s for the greater good of the people. That’s the battle I’m talking about and that’s the fight I’m going to take on and win. And those who think you can do it by making a deal with him or compromising and conciliation…what possible reason do they have to give their power away voluntarily? They will not do it until you effectively taken their power away from them.
-
The American Civil Liberties Union today filed a motion asking a federal judge to hold the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in contempt, charging that the agency flouted a court order when it destroyed at least two videotapes documenting the harsh interrogation of prisoners in its custody….
“The interrogation techniques employed by our government raise fundamental questions of human rights and decency,” said Arthur Eisenberg, New York Civil Liberties Union Legal Director. “The CIA cannot avoid those questions by simply destroying the evidence.” Read more…
-
And it’s not even April 1st:
Negative news coverage may have cost former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales his job, but it won him a dubious honor Wednesday from a magazine published by the American Bar Association: Lawyer of the Year.
Additionally, the ABA Journal named Gonzales’ successor, Attorney General Michael Mukasey, as its top lawyer for 2008 — mostly in anticipation of how often he’ll be in the media spotlight for trying to repair the beleaguered Justice Department.
I wish I could say this is a joke, but I would be lying.
-
Now waterboarding is a joke to threaten guests with whom you disagree?
-
Bush Doesn’t Recall if He Mentioned Saudi Rape Case to King Abdullah
-
one that gives you any kind of platform to continue to further your utter and complete wrongness.
-
Neocon Grandfather Emeritus Norman Podhoretz–now serving as FOREIGN POLICY ADVISOR (oh, help us all) to Rudy Giuliani–has decided that the NIE report is a deliberate attempt by the CIA to subvert the Bush Doctrine.
-
It is not every day that something from a blog post ends up in the CBS Evening News, but then again using children with cancer to try and steal the White House is pretty egregious. A diarist at Daily Kos noticed that the dirty tricksters, who are advancing an initiative that would switch 20 of California’s electoral college votes to the Republicans were using children’s cancer as a bait-and-switch to get people to sign the initiative and place it on the ballot. The Courage Campaign sent a film crew led by Erik Love to go tape
-
Biden said last week that if the president chose to bypass Congress and invade Iran he would immediately call for his impeachment.
-
Biden stood behind those comments today, saying they were a warning to President Bush and that he has no constitutional authority to take us to war without congressional approval.
-
Flashback: Bush Warns of World War III: They Knew Iran had stopped all along!
-
One day after voting to elevate a divisive conservative judge to the federal appeals court in New Orleans, California Sen. Dianne Feinstein was the president’s guest aboard Air Force One. She had been invited to survey the damage from the recent spate of Southern California wildfires.
Two weeks later, Feinstein was one of two Democrats on the Senate judiciary committee to vote to send Michael Mukasey’s nomination to be the new attorney general to the full Senate. Her support helped turn the tide in favor of a nomination that faced an uncertain future after Mukasey refused to say whether waterboarding was torture.
Now, a coalition of progressive Democrats upset with Feinstein’s controversial votes will ask the California Democratic Party to censure her at its executive board meeting this weekend, the Huffington Post has learned.
-
The Courage Campaign is looking for your help to ensure that this censure resolution has legs… We need to remind DiFi that she is answerable to her constituency, not her buddies in the Bush Administration or the defense industry.
C’mon, we don’t need another Lieber-Dem Bush Dog in the Senate.
-
So far, so good. I don’t think that many of us would disagree that the current bunch of Democratic candidates do seem to be underestimating the American people. Certainly, they could do a much better job of recognizing that we’re looking for people who won’t be afraid to stand up and say what needs to be said, rather than triangulate and be careful.
-
And that right there sums up the Clinton candidacy and why I'm not on board. If you want the country to change for the better, YOU have to change for the better. That includes the candidate AND the voter. If the voter and the candidate both say "well everyone does it, it's been happening forever, that's just politics" that's not a recipe for progress, but a recipe for maintaining the status quo. The country will not get turned around by doing what has always been done. And the voter should demand it, not rationalize it by associating bad behavior with standards of practice.
-
Ever wonder why Hillary has so much trouble with Honest Questions?
Could it be because ... she has SO few Honest Answers?
... could be?
-
And Hillary isn't a vagina-bater?
-
Not being in command of a story about planting questions so that she can look in command at the event doesn't fit comfortably inside that frame.
-
The problem with Hillary is that her husband is "hornier than a full grown deer".
-
Here comes the backlash..."I'm not stupid alright, how dare you! Hillary is 44 and I know so because she is the one real grassroots candidate, and it's not like half the country despises her or anything, and she is in it to win it...AND ready for change...AND ready to lead...and the Clinton's administration was GREAT...except for the health care mistakes, which were not even Hillary's fault...though she has the scars to show for it. Same with NAFTA, that was all Bill too. Nevermind her vote on the Peru trade deal, she has to do that because she is in "general election" mode."
-
I love listening to Hillary supporters give their completely incoherent rationale for supporting her. They sound like my 5 year old cousin...
-
You just showed that you are more of a Clinton groupie than concerned with what Bush has done to the country. This is exactly what the Bush types do. Hillary is obviously not as bad as Bush with respect to crowd control. But come on. Stop blindly being a Hillary shill all the time and be concerned with the party first for a change and not one person.
-
This has taken her off the table for good for me. Why on holy hell would she do this? Is she that paranoid, afraid of answering questions? Is she that scripted? Is she that fake, phoney?
Enough. Just enough.
-
Jeebus, Clinton uses FEMA marketing methods. Smart. Very smart.
-
Ah really bad joke about hillary and faking it comes to mind... MUST. RESIST.
-
Screw your either for Hillary or you are a Naderite bullshit. That comment alone demonstrates quite clearly that you are a fascist and not a real Democrat.
-
Frankly you are the the one that buys into the Bush/Cheney philosophy that many of us have been fighting for years. In fact some of us have been fighting these type of distorted generalizations for decades. During Vietnam those of us that protested against and tried to put an end to the war were labeled by the fascists as Commie sympathizers. Guess what? We were frickin right then just like we are right now. So take your frickin fascist Hillary support and cozy up with your Neocon friends. We don't need your kind in the Democratic party. Just because you are Republican Lite doesn't mean you aren't still a Republican.
-
I for one am tired of fascists like you that claim that any disagreement with Hillary Clinton is siding with the Neocons.
-
I have ZERO respect with yipping attacking ankle biting know nothing , half educated, resent filled fools and flakes like you..
I have never ever been rude to anyone who argues on the issues EVER....its likely there are many here who know more about some of these thigs than me, of course...its just you ignorant and foolish haters ....who pretend you KNOW ANYTHING AT ALL about the politics of getting elected at all - which you clearly do not... on these things . you people are dumber than a brick.
and those like you who then parrot the attacks coming from our enemies in the media and tthe gop who yell about a dem being dishoest and corrupt - just like the dipshits for bradley who called Gore a liar - you are risking and justt may cause a loss in november, just like 2000...
and Im disrespectful? Damn right I am.
I hate anybody who helps the Republicans win the white House...ie, people like you.
-
You are right. Clinton supporters do kiss her ass. In fact they worship her ass because nothing Hillary says or does is wrong with them.
-
If you Clinton lovers did not mistitle diaries accusing Obama instead of his aides regarding the silly whining about the lack of enough attention on Clinton's sex life, maybe you would have had more people condemning the aides' tactics.
Don't you Clintonites have any shame? Do you ever condemn a single Clinton thing or do you just kiss her ass 24/7 like Bushies do with Bush?
What a bunch of shameless people.
Just once, I would like to see some fucking objectivity by your types.
-
What the heck is wrong with these people? She actually used the term “diminished transparency,” and “diminished Congressional oversight” to describe what might happen in the Justice department if Bush had a hissy fit…Isn’t that what we’ve had since Bush and Cheney took office? I could go on, but what would be the point. Please contact her and let her know (It does help) this is not acceptable:
-
We’re only interested in what Mukasey’s views on torture are, Dianne. He’s the one trying to get confirmed here. And if they don’t match up to your view on waterboarding then why did you push his nomination through? Sigh…Then she goes on to quiver at the thought of what George Bush might do if he doesn’t get his way. Mr. 24% is making her nervous.
-
- As Mad In The Middle shows us, if you want to live like a Republican, vote Democratic.
-
ver been a better time. Both mainstream parties are looking likely to nominate deeply flawed candidates. If the race comes down to Hillary and Giuliani, the Green Party could nominate Big Bird and win 28% of the vote. And a third party is definitely needed, since the Democrats have become captives of the money wing of their party.
-
our recent RS piece ‘The War Party‘ blasted the GOP presidential candidates as “fourth-rate buffoons.” Is this a good time for a major third party to formulate?
-
An event some have long prophesied as the first horseman of the apocalypse.”
-
The idiotic “Islamo-fasicsts” week is pure lunacy, but David craves your disapproval. He uses the canard that he’s trying to also make people aware that women are being oppressed in the Middle East too. I’m sure he’s a big Feminist…
-
Please go and see this new movie about the way the government uses the media to sell war after war after war. It’s a brilliant flick that dissects the great propaganda machine which is a curse to our democracy.
War Made Easy reaches into the Orwellian memory hole to expose a 50-year pattern of government deception and media spin that has dragged the United States into one war after another from Vietnam to Iraq. Narrated by actor and activist Sean Penn, the film exhumes remarkable archival footage of official distortion and exaggeration from LBJ to George W. Bush, revealing in stunning detail how the American news media have uncritically disseminated the pro-war messages of successive presidential administrations…read on
-
You would think the old axiom “once bitten, twice shy” would somehow apply to these idiots in the right wing echo chamber that are beating the drums for war with Iran. After all, they believed Ahmed Chalabi over their own common sense. And by all accounts, the two fronts they are already cheerleading are going so poorly, by what bizarre metric could they possibly consider a third front against Iran a good idea?
But no, all those right wing hacks are trying to find ANY reason to demonize Iran to goad us into another war. And as Sadly, No! documented earlier this week, that includes making fraudulent claims from movie stills. As Gavin points out, even everyone’s favorite cheerleader Michelle Malkin only wants the facts that fit their pre-conceived notions. But don’t try to point out the truth or facts to them…then they’ll just break out the sock puppets to insult you:
Here’s a cautionary tale about Middle-Eastern dissidents who seek to advance their causes - even after the lesson of Iraq - by making common cause with American right-wing extremists and their phony ‘human rights’ campaigns. (Banafsheh Zand-Bonazzi is the daughter of Iranian political prisoner Siamak Pourzand, and lately an organizer (with Michael Ledeen) of the extraordinarily fishy Secular Islam Summit)
-
WH has a new talking point which it will sell attacking Iran and as usual, our media will lap it up. The CIA has created an Iran Study Group with dozens of new members with the goal of launching a strike against Iran, including ground forces. Bush feels that using the nuclear threat as the reason to bomb Iran has failed miserably, so they switched talking points and are going to say they are defending themselves against Iranian meddling in Iraq. We told you so….
Daily Kos: State of the Nation
Tags: no_tag on 2008-02-06 and saved by105 people -All Annotations (0) -About
more fromwww.dailykos.com
-
Obama Takes Connecticut, Helped by Lamont Voters
That primary experience set the stage for Obama's win last night: "The Lamont campaign was part of my political awakening," said Bill Dauphin, 47, a technical writer who attended the Obama campaign’s victory party Tuesday night at the Sweet Jane Bar in Hartford. "That’s the thing that got me off the sofa and onto the street." -
The scary terrorists will attack us if we don't elect Hillary! Or something.
An act of desperation for a campaign dead in the water.
-
This conflict—change vs experience—was the main fault line of the debate. On the change team was Obama and Edwards, with Clinton and Richardson on the experience team.
-
They also showed they could be light and funny. When told of local polls that showed Obama more likeable than Clinton, she joked that "that hurts my feelings...But I'll try to go on." She was very warm and funny; it was one of the rare flashes of Hillary Clinton's humor that we often hear about but that seldom comes through in public.
-
One does get the sense that Hillary's operation is just throwing mud against the wall to see what will stick. Obama needs the independent vote in NH, and the Clinton campaign is obviously trying to scare them away from Obama.
If she succeeds, they'll end up voting for McCain helping to give Republicans their strongest general election candidate. Seems kind of self-defeating, doesn't it? But she needs to stem the bleeding. So suddenly, we have a situation in which the best interests of the Democratic Party is at odds with her short-term interests.
-
Iraqi soldier killed two American soldiers last month
-
Obama may not be my favorite on a policy level, his speeches may often leave me cold, but he could be a transformative candidate and president.
-
The Democrats Who Support George Bush's War
-
Another round in what, last May 19, I called "capitulation by installments." Another infuriatingly unnecessary kowtow to Mister Bush:
-
National Intelligence Estimate: Iran shelved nuke plans in 2003.
Your "Liberal Media" (AP): US: Iran Still Able to Develop Nukes
-
And remember, even a little -- $5 or $10 -- helps. With numbers we can accomplish what's supposed to be impossible. Let's send a message: to corrupt Democrats, let's tell them that bringing in the Nancy Pelosis will actually hurt them, rather than help. To the Nancy Pelosis, let's tell them that we're watching their actions and will hold them accountable for protecting their most corrupt members.
-
"We have to make responsible decisions in the Congress that are not driven by the dissatisfaction of anybody who wants the war to end tomorrow," Pelosi told the gathering at the Sofitel, arranged by the Christian Science Monitor. Though crediting activists for their "passion," Pelosi called it "a waste of time" for them to target Democrats. "They are advocates," she said. "We are leaders."
-
I just got a look at Senator Clinton's statement on her vote on the Kyl-Lieberman amendment that passed the Senate the other day,
-
I said it would be a mistake of historical proportion if the Administration thought that the 2002 resolution authorizing force against Iraq was a blank check for the use of force against Iran
-
Nor should the President think that the 2001 resolution authorizing force after the terrorist attacks of 9/11, in any way, authorizes force against Iran.
-
"Legislation should not be passed in response to fear-mongering," said Representative Rush Holt, Democrat of New Jersey.
-
left Democratic lawmakers, who have long been anxious about appearing weak on national security issues, facing an August spent fending off charges from Mr. Bush and Republicans that they left Americans exposed to terrorism threats.
-
Speaker Nancy Pelosi said the measure "does violence to the Constitution of the United States."
-
Tonight, several Democrats said the bill would "eviscerate" the Fourth Amendment. Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) said that lawmakers were being "stampeded by fearmongering and deception" into voting for the bill. Rep. Jane Harman (D-Calif.) warned the bill would lead to "potential unprecedented abuse of innocent Americans' privacy."
-
"There are a lot of people who felt we had to pass something," said one angry Democratic lawmaker who requested anonymity, citing the sensitivity of caucus discussions. "It was tantamount to being railroaded."
-
Democrats should recognize that the time has come to use the full power accorded Congress in time of war: the power of the purse. As Senator Russ Feingold says, "Some will claim that cutting off funding for the war would endanger our brave troops on the ground. Not true. The safety of our servicemen and -women in Iraq is paramount, and we can and should end funding for the war without putting our troops in further danger."
Instead of negotiating with Bush to give him another year of his war before facing consequences, Democrats should refuse to write another blank check.
-
You will find that fighting injustice and evil requires a vision of goodness and truth. - May, 2004
-
one might ask what the hell Rice thinks she's talking about, and how she is in any position to tell them, to tell us, that the sacrifice as been "worth" it.


