Skip to main content

David Corking's Library tagged Security   View Popular

Facebook Launches OpenID Support – Users Can Now Login With Gmail Accounts | May 2009

This is great - I need to log in to Yahoo! once, and I can use Facebook. I guess if someone gets my Yahoo! password, they can send spam from my Facebook profile too.

www.insidefacebook.com/...now-login-with-a-gmail-account - Preview

facebook Social Networking Security openid

  • Facebook has become the largest OpenID relying party on the web.
26 Aug 09

Mark's Software Forums :: View topic - Scanning all user folders as admin

simple cron script accomplishes this

markallan.co.uk/...viewtopic.php - Preview

Security Macintosh

  • /usr/local/clamXav/bin/clamscan -r /Path/To/File/Or/Folder/

General Security on Mac OS X - Archive

This site went off the air, but the article gives a gentle orientation in locking down a Mac OS X desktop.

web.archive.org/...index.php - Preview

Macintosh Security

20 Aug 09

Do you really need anti-virus on your Apple Mac? | Graham Cluley's blog | 2008

Do the (mis-named) anti-virus applications have fingerprints for these Trojan horses or their nefarious root kits?

www.sophos.com/...d-anti-virus-on-your-apple-mac - Preview

Security Macintosh

11 Aug 09

BackTrack penetration testing Live CD - Remote-Exploit.org

  • #1 Security Live Distribution by insecure.org. Security professionals as well as new comers are using BackTrack
17 Jun 09

Schneier on Security: Cloud Computing

  • Outsourcing is the future of computing. Eventually we'll get this right, but you don't want to be a casualty along the way.
30 Apr 09

hackademix.net » Mikeyy's StalkDaily Twitter Worm vs NoScript | April, 2009

Interesting NoScript tip here (it is in the appearance tab of options):

'However most tech savvy users do understand this issue and switch “Full domains” or “Full address” view (I use the former, and I guess therube does as well).'

hackademix.net/...daily-twitter-worm-vs-noscript - Preview

Security Firefox

29 Apr 09

Aral Balkan - A site dedicated to crossdomain.xml

  • For example, I cringe whenever I see ActionScript that contains database connection information -- you might as well not use a password if you're going to do that. This also applies to any private keys you may be using to access a web service. Don't forget that anyone can disassemble a SWF to get at any information that's included in it.

Cross-domain policy file specification | Adobe Developer Connection

I am clearly not getting something here, as it seems to give permission to the client to access privileged data, yet does not appear to prohibit the same thing being requested by a malicious client that doesn't care if it has permission or not. In theory the malicious client is in control of a person who has authenticated, so perhaps my concern is not relevant.

www.adobe.com/...ssdomain_policy_file_spec.html - Preview

Security

Jeremiah Grossman: I used to know what you watched, on YouTube | 2008

Fixed (phew!) But other sites could make similar errors.

jeremiahgrossman.blogspot.com/...-know-what-you-watched-on.html - Preview

Security Web design

  • So if an authenticated YouTube user visited an attacker-controlled page anywhere on the Web, the attacker could SRC in the google.com hosted SWF, and use it compromise the victims YouTube username, email address, first/last name, viewing history, and even comment or post/delete videos.

Jeremiah Grossman: I know if you're logged-in, anywhere | 2006

  • If these URL’s are dynamically loaded into a <* script src=””> tag, they will cause the JS Console to error differently because the response is HTML, not JS.

CSS History Hack | 2007

This proof of concept attack on your browser is slightly evil.

ha.ckers.org/...CSS-history-hack.html - Preview

Security

Jeremiah Grossman: I still know where you've been, without JavaScript | 2007

  • The hack still relies up the a:visited component of CSS,
  • mitigated in many ways by SafeHistory (Firefox)

GUYA.NET » Blog Archive » Malicious camera spying using ClickJacking | Oct 2008

  • Some of the clicks are real game clicks other are jacked clicks. Every time the click is needed to be jacked the content simply move behind the iframe using z-index

[whatwg] Dealing with UI redress vulnerabilities inherent to the current web

This is nasty, not as sophisticated as the Flash security settings hijack discovered the following month, but harder to protect against.

lists.whatwg.org/...016284.html - Preview

Security Web design

  • Problem definition: a malicious page in domain A may create an IFRAME
    pointing to an application in domain B, to which the user is currently
    authenticated with cookies. The top-level page may then cover portions of
    the IFRAME with other visual elements to seamlessly hide everything but a
    single UI button in domain B, such as "delete all items", "click to add
    Bob as a friend", etc. It may then provide own, misleading UI that implies
    that the button serves a different purpose and is a part of site A,

Clickjacking - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  • However, both Framekillers and IE8's mitigation approach require web developers to actively protect vulnerable pages by modifying their content or the way they are served, and even on "protected" pages they cannot prevent plugin-based Clickjacking variants, which don't need frames. Therefore the NoScript add-on for Firefox still remains the only free product providing automatic client-side protection, with no need for awareness and cooperation from the web site authors.
1 - 20 of 209 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page

Highlighter, Sticky notes, Tagging, Groups and Network: integrated suite dramatically boosting research productivity. Learn more »

Join Diigo