Dan Keldsen's Library tagged → View Popular, Search in Google
Today's organizations operate in what the U.S. Army War College defines as a VUCA environment. Volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity are constant realities in the 21st century. The military seeks to prepare for the challenges it will inevitably face by crafting realistic training scenarios and routinely integrating such activities into its ongoing operations. The goal is not to teach them what to think, but to enhance their ability to think critically and creatively about the myriad of contingencies posed by a fluid environment — in essence to teach them how to think.
In industry, 90% of time is typically devoted to executing business actions, and less than 10% is allocated for increasing organizational and individual capabilities through training. The military, on the other hand, spends as much time training as it does executing — even in the midst of high stress/high risk operations. A unit in Afghanistan or Iraq will not suspend its experiential training program while involved in combat operations, because its ability to cogently and creatively address future challenges is enhanced by an enduring commitment to improving people's competence and adaptability through experiential exercises, as well as actual experiences. But the real lesson for industry leaders is not simply that training is important. What's really valuable is how the military crafts its training opportunities.
The Army defines leadership as both accomplishing the mission and improving the organization. Permanently improving the organization requires the development of its human capital. The military believes you substantively improve people by improving their ability to adroitly address challenges in their environment. Therefore, we do not seek to confine people's thinking by restricting the solutions available to them, unless the proposed action violates any of these criteria: is it immoral, unsafe, unethical, or illegal?
Interesting - very interesting take on the failures of over automation and complex systems... Anyone with more experience than I in flying or designing such systems care to comment?
See -> The Paradox of ‘Simplicity’
"Air France Flight 447 went down in a giant, dangerous, violent storm that might not have been survivable under any circumstances. But as the Airbus A-330 penetrated that huge system of thunderstorms, sensors, systems and computers on the plane started failing in a rapid cascade that would make any pilot’s head spin – even if he was not in the middle of extreme turbulence flying blind in the night..."
Selected Tags
Related Tags
hutchinson_associates (1)
patti_anklam (1)
social_networking (1)
emergence (1)
ii_speaker_potential (1)
michael_lissack (1)
failure (1)
simplicity (1)
usability (1)
ambiguity (1)
bernard_banks (1)
ciritical_thinking (1)
companies (1)
creative_problem_solving (1)
creative_thinking (1)
harvard (1)
innovation (1)
leadership (1)
uncertainty (1)
Top Contributors
Groups interested in complexity
-
Theory Of Computation
Theory of computation, compu...
Items: 7 | Visits: 38
Created by: Danny Thorne
-
Complexity theory in management
List of most useful sites fo...
Items: 30 | Visits: 30
Created by: Adrian Raynor
-
WWI
World War I archives, biogra...
Items: 146 | Visits: 18
Created by: Amy Haggstrom
Diigo is about better ways to research, share and collaborate on information. Learn more »
Join Diigo