Skip to main content

CWWgroup 's Library tagged court   View Popular

08 Jul 08

Group opposed to wind farm near Carlock to get day in court

The group of residents trying to stop the construction of White Oak Energy Center near their homes will have their lawsuit against White Oak Wind Energy LLC and the McLean County Board and Zoning Board of Appeals heard Oct. 27 in McLean County Court.

"The merits of the case are substantial and include numerous constitutional violations that occurred during the process of approving the special use permit for the construction ... of 100, 137-ton, 499-foot (tall) wind turbines in an area that includes no fewer than 450 households," the statement reads.

www.pjstar.com/...ar-Carlock-to-get-day-in-court - Preview

Industrial Wind Environment Court Case Turbines

28 Jun 08

Wind critics appeal ruling

The Wind Power Ethics Group has appealed a state Supreme Court judge's ruling that three documents cannot be included in the record of an earlier appeal regarding dismissal of the group's Article 78 proceeding against the town's Zoning Board of Appeals.

batr.net/...ind-critics-appeal-ruling.html - Preview

Industrial Wind Cape Vincent Power Ethics Group Court Article 78

State court to hear Greenbrier wind power case

  • State Supreme Court justices this morning will hear arguments over a proposal to build 124 giant wind-power turbines along 23 miles of Greenbrier County ridges.


    Local opponents of the Beech Ridge Energy LLC project are appealing the state Public Service Commission’s decision to approve the $300 million development.


    Mountain Communities for Responsible Energy argues that the PSC ignored its own permit regulations and did not obtain adequate information about the wind project’s potential impacts before approving it.

    - cwwgroup on 2008-01-20

Defendants in Mt. Storm wind lawsuit specified

  • Charleston attorney and former Supreme Court justice Richard Neely, representing the plaintiffs in the case, argued to Judge Phil Jordan of the 21st Circuit that Shell should be included in the suit because he has been unable to get information from NedPower or Shell to pursue his case. He said that the suit was originally filed “before the first footer was laid” and NedPower was the entity listed as building the project.

    - cwwgroup on 2008-01-20

Ruling a setback for wind project

  • WARREN — A new court ruling will delay the Jordanville Wind project and is raising questions whether the developer might drop the project in southern Herkimer County.

    State Supreme Court Justice Donald Greenwood of Onondaga County ruled that the Warren Town Board failed to look closely enough at the project’s potential impact. The town was the lead agency for a state-required environmental review.

    The town’s process and decision to approve the review was “arbitrary, capricious and an abuse of discretion,” Greenwood’s decision states.
    - cwwgroup on 2008-01-20
1 - 7 of 7
Showing 20 items per page

Highlighter, Sticky notes, Tagging, Groups and Network: integrated suite dramatically boosting research productivity. Learn more »

Join Diigo