Bill Hooker's Library tagged → View Popular
The serials crisis and open access: a white paper for the Commission on Research, Virginia Tech - E-LIS
The open access movement is an attempt to free scholarly communication from restrictions on access, control, and cost, and to enable benefits such as data mining and increased citations. While open access is approached here from the problem of subscription inflation, open access is not merely a library issue; it affects the availability of research to current and future students and scholars. This white paper offers an introduction to open access as well as a look at its current development.
University of Toronto Press - Journal Article
Journal prices have long been a matter of controversy. Lacking has been any objective information on costs that could be used to judge whether price increases have been justified by rising costs. Using a rare, publicly available set of data for the American Economic Review, the premier journal in economics, this article normalizes costs for number of issues per annum, number of pages per issue, and print quantities per issue to construct an index for the costs of producing this journal. It shows that costs have in fact increased more slowly than the general rate of inflation and argues that the cost experience of this journal provides a reference point for academic journals generally.
University of Toronto Press - Journal Article
Recession is currently causing a resurgence of the academic serials crisis. Profit-mongering by commercial publishers is once again denounced as the key driver of the crisis. However, a critical analysis of institutional and bibliometric data does not reveal excessive corporate greed in recent years; instead, it suggests that the present hurdles stem largely from years of inadequate budget allocations to academic libraries and from a publishing frenzy fuelled by simplistic methods of evaluating faculty productivity. To prevent what is likely to be the publishing equivalent of a tsunami in the next few years, universities and research institutions urgently need to re-emphasize quality over quantity in the publishing process, and they must find ways to include peer-reviewing efficiency among their criteria for productivity and impact.
SSRN-Whose Metrics? On Building Citation, Usage and Access Metrics as Information Service for Scholars by Chris Armbruster
As the Internet has enhanced the collection and provision of citation, usage and access metrics, the challenge lies neither in the technology nor the method, but in constructing databases that deliver services of value to the scholar. However, the development of metrics has hitherto been driven by the needs of external research assessment (governments and funders), while publishers and libraries have focused on their own needs (e.g. journal impact and usage factors). Scholars often criticize research assessment and the use of particular metrics as a zero-sum game whose undesirable consequences far outweigh the benefits. However, this is not to be confused with a general prejudice against metrics, which are principally compatible with the scholarly recognition and rewards system. But it does indicate that current metric information services often do not serve the needs of scholars. The question everybody should be asking is: What kind of metric information services would serve scholars?
The argument proceeds in six steps. First, the problematic and controversial nature of assessment metrics is discussed. Second, the limited value of current metric information services is outlined. Third, the notion of metrics as research information services is clarified. Fourth, some examples of such services are offered. Fifth, the potential value is sketched from the perspective of a postdoc. Sixth, it is indicated that societies and publishers could begin building more metric information services since tried-and-tested technology and methods are available already.
From Publishing to Knowledge Networks
Today’s publishing infrastructure is rapidly changing. As electronic journals, digital libraries, collaboratories, logic servers, and other knowledge infrastructures emerge on the internet, the key aspects of this transformation need to be identified. Here, the author details the implications that this transformation is having on the creation, dissemination and organization of academic knowledge. The author shows that many established publishing principles need to be given up in order to facilitate this transformation. The text provides valuable insights for knowledge managers, designers of internet-based knowledge infrastructures, and professionals in the publishing industry. Researchers will find the scenarios and implications for research processes stimulating and thought-provoking.
Live-blogging the 2009 Vancouver PKP Conference — PKP Scholarly Publishing Conference Blog 2009
Don't Format Manuscripts :The Scientist [2009-07-01]
Journals should use a generic submission format until papers are accepted.
Create Change
"In the age of the Internet, the ways you share and use academic research results are changing — rapidly, fundamentally, irreversibly. There’s great potential in change. After all, faster and wider sharing of journal articles, research data, simulations, syntheses, analyses, and other findings fuels the advance of knowledge. It’s a two-way street — sharing research benefits you and others. But will the promise of digital scholarship be fully realized? How will yesterday’s norms adapt to tomorrow’s possibilities?
This website will help you understand the changing landscape and how it affects you and your research. It also offers practical ways to look out for your own interests as a researcher.
A scholarly revolution is underway. It enables you to get a greater return from your research. All you have to do is share it."
The State of Scholarly Publishing Challenges and Opportunities Albert N. Greco, Editor
For decades, university presses and other scholarly and professional publishers in the United States played a pivotal role in the transmission of scholarly knowledge. Th eir books and journals became the “gold standard” in many academic fi elds for tenure, promotion, and merit pay. Th eir basic business model was successful, since this diverse collection of presses had a unique value proposition. Th ey dominated the scholarly publishing fi eld with preeminent sales in three major markets or channels of distribution: libraries and institutions; college and graduate school adoptions; and general readers (i.e., sales to general retailers).
Yet this insulated world changed abruptly in the late 1990s. What happened? This book contains a superb series of articles originally published in The Journal of Scholarly Publishing, by some of the best experts on scholarly communication in the western hemisphere, Europe, Asia, and Africa. Th ese authors analyze in depth the diverse and exciting challenges and opportunities scholars, universities, and publishers face in what is a period of unusual turbulence in scholarly publishing.
The topics given attention include: copyrights, the transformation of scholarly publishing from a print format to a digital one, open access, scholarly publishing in emerging nations, problems confronting journals, and information on how certain academic disciplines are coping with the transformation of scholarly publishing. This book is a must read for anyone interested in the scholarly publishing industry’s past, its current focus, or future plans and developments.
NEJM Beta
On the Journal's beta site, we pursue new ideas in publishing and showcase innovative ways to present information for use in medical education, research, and clinical practice. This beta site is part of our commitment to physicians who "Never Stop Learning". Please check back often.
Electronic Scientific, Technical, and Medical Journal Publishing and Its Implications: Report of a Symposium
The Symposium on Electronic Scientific, Technical, and Medical (STM) Journals and Its Implications addressed five key areas. The first two areas addressed--costs of publication and publication business models and revenue--focused on the STM publishing enterprise as it exists today and, in particular, how it has evolved since the advent of electronic publishing. The following section reviewed copyright and licensing issues of concern to the authors and to universities. The final two sessions looked toward the future, specifically, at what publishing may be in the future and what constitutes a publication in the digital environment.
PET: PHP Entrez Tools.
PET is a library of PHP classes for use with the Entrez API. They give easy access to the NCBI databases, including PubMed, PubMed Central, OMIM, and the various *omics databases. The library is currently primitive, but under active development. Because PHP is one of the easiest languages to learn and is in very widespread use, it is hoped that PET may give those without extensive programming skills the ability to quickly produce useful services.\nPET services\n\nFive publically available services currently run with PET:\n\nAssEd:\n The semi-automatic assistant editor: a device for comparing multiple pubmed search results in order to find authors in common between them. Use when you are searching for an author who has published on two or more subjects, but where it is not important whether the two subjects occur in the same paper.\nOAFF:\n The open-access friend finder: a device for searching PubMed Central and returning a list of the most-published authors on a particular topic (or location). Use when searching for those authors in a field who most friendly toward open-access publishing.\nTiPS:\n Trends in Publishing Science: a device for creating graphs to show monthly trends in PubMed depositions for a particular topic, journal, location, etc.\nPubMed Cloud:\n A toy which runs a PubMed search and then generates the HTML for a word cloud from all of the abstracts in that search.\nAuthor Profile:\n Displays somebody's PubMed record, but with useful statistics and trends. You can use it from the search box on the left, or from the links in AssEd and OAFF results.
Web 2.0 and scholarly communication « putting down a marker
Topics covered include:
* What is Web 2.0?
* Web 1.0 and scholarly communication
* Web 2.0 and Open Access
* Blogs
* Social bookmarking
* Social networking
* Podcasts
* Wikis
* Data
* Peer review
* Reasons for lack of uptake to date
UK PubMed Central Blog: RCUK - further support for open access
Research Councils UK (RCUK) have published an independent study commissioned by the Research Councils into open access to research outputs.
The purpose of the study was to identify the effects and impacts of open access on publishing models and institutional repositories in light of national and international trends. This included the impact of open access on the quality and efficiency of scholarly outputs, specifically journal articles. The report presents options for the Research Councils to consider, such as maintaining the current variation in Research Councils’ mandates, or moving towards increased open access, eventually leading to Gold Standard.
Selected Tags
Related Tags
scholarlycommunication (13)
oa (7)
publishing.models (7)
oa.money (5)
peerreview (2)
serialscrisis (1)
scientometrics (1)
bibliometrics (1)
socialsoftware (1)
socialmedia (1)
publicknowledgeproject (1)
openjournalsystems (1)
oaos.talks (1)
bjoernbrembs (1)
readthis (1)
webtools (1)
joedunckley (1)
openscience (1)
oa.mandates (1)
Sponsored Links
Top Contributors
Groups interested in publishing
-
script resources
list of resources to find s...
Items: 30 | Visits: 100
Created by: Jody Reppert
-
Document Sharing
Document Hosting and Sharin...
Items: 10 | Visits: 109
Created by: Sergey Kapustin
Diigo is about better ways to research, share and collaborate on information. Learn more »
Join Diigo