Christine Robinson's Library tagged → View Popular, Search in Google
This is the original blog post that brought the term "folksonomy" to the world wide web audience. It provides a short list of the benefits and drawbacks of folksonomy at the time of the post (2004).
in list: EDES 501
-
- None of the current implementations have synonym control (e.g. "selfportrait" and "me" are distinct Flickr tags, as are "mac" and "macintosh" on Del.icio.us).
- Also, there's a certain lack of precision involved in using simple one-word tags--like which Lance are we talking about? (Though this is great for discovery, e.g. hot or Edmonton)
- And, of course, there's no heirarchy and the content types (bookmarks, photos) are fairly simple.
think folksonomies can work well for certain kinds of information because they offer a small reward for using one of the popular categories (such as your photo appearing on a popular page). People who enjoy the social aspects of the system will gravitate to popular categories while still having the freedom to keep their own lists of tags.
On the other hand, I can see a few reasons why a folksonomy would be less than ideal in a lot of cases:
Still, the idea of socially constructed classification schemes (with no input from an information architect) is interesting. Maybe one of these services will manage to build a social thesaurus.
Selected Tags
Related Tags
Top Contributors
Groups interested in folksono...
-
UDL and Web 2.0: Confronting the Drunk Librarian
A presentation and discussio...
Items: 21 | Visits: 401
Created by: Jeremy Price
-
Tag research
Tags, Tagging, and Folksonom...
Items: 4 | Visits: 124
Created by: Vincent Tsao
Diigo is about better ways to research, share and collaborate on information. Learn more »
Join Diigo
