Skip to main content

Clay Burell's Library tagged writingprocess   View Popular

01 Oct 07

Collaborative Writing


    • Survey one, which was administered to a large group of writers
      (approximately 800), provides information on the amount of time spent on the
      various phases of the writing process. The results show that generating
      ideas (14%), note-taking (13%), organizational planning (13%), drafting
      (32%), revising (15%), editing (13%) contribute to the total writing
      process. Ede and Lunsford [39] also examined co


      llaborative authoring and the results
      indicates that the level of satisfaction in the group writing process is influenced by eight items:

      • the degree to which goals are articulated and shared;
      • the degree of openness and mutual respect;
      • the degree of control the writers have over the text;
      • the degree to which writers can respond to others who modify the text;
      • the way in which credit (directly or indirectly) is acknowledged;
      • the presence of an agreed upon procedure for managing conflicts and
        resolving disputes;
      • the number and types of (bureaucratic) constraints imposed on the authors--
        deadlines, technical/legal requirements, etc., and;
      • the status of the project within the organization.
    • Again, interesting for wiki-based projects.  The percentages of total project time taken by each phase of the writing process is especially relevant to the student-created wiki textbook project I'm launching in my history class this week.
      - on 2007-03-25
    Add Sticky Note

    • Based on the results of the study conducted by Ede and Lunsford
      [39], seven organizational patterns for collaborative authoring were
      identified. These patterns are:

      1. the team plans
        and outlines the task, then each writer prepares his/her part and the group
        compiles the individual parts, and revises the whole document as needed;
      2. the team plans and outlines the writing task, then one member prepares
        a draft, the team edits and revises the draft;
      3. one member of the team
        plans and writes a draft, the group revises the draft;
      4. one person
        plans and writes the draft, then one or more members revises the draft
        without consulting the original authors;
      5. the group plans and writes
        the draft, one or more members revise the draft without consulting the
        original authors;
      6. one person assigns the tasks, each member completes
        the individual task, one person compiles and revises the document;

      7. one dictates, another transcribes and edits. Results from the study
        indicated that the percentage of writing groups that use these methods often
        or very often range from 3% (method 5) to 31% (method 3).
    • Interesting research on collaborative writing models.  Obvious relevance to classroom wiki workshop designs and roles.
      - on 2007-03-25
    Add Sticky Note
1 - 5 of 5
Showing 20 items per page

Diigo is about better ways to research, share and collaborate on information. Learn more »

Join Diigo