Carla Arena's Bookmarks tagged reading → View Popular

You are here: Diigo Home > Carla Arena's Bookmarks

Expand All 1 - 11 of 11

YouTube - Scott Thornbury on Repetition in English Language Teaching

Author Scott Thornbury talking about the use of Repetition in English language teaching. For more information see www.macmillanenglish.com/methodology.

Tags: reading, narrowreading, scotthornbury, repetition, register, elt, presentation, youtubevideo, video, youtube on 2008-10-09 -All Annotations (0) -About

more fromwww.youtube.com

The Future of Reading - Using Video Games as Bait to Hook Readers - Series - NYTimes.com

Tags: nytimes, article, videogames, writing, reading, 21stcenturyskills, web2.0, webtools4educators, education, learning, activities on 2008-10-07 and saved by3 people -All Annotations (0) -About

more fromwww.nytimes.com

14Expand

Is Google Making Us Stupid?

Tags: learningwithcomputers, article, google, technology, reading, brain, neurology, TheAtlantic, magazine on 2008-07-10 and saved by199 people -All Annotations (103) -About

more fromwww.theatlantic.com

hyperlinks don’t merely point to related works; they propel you toward them.)
They supply the stuff of thought, but they also shape the process of thought. And what the Net seems to be doing is chipping away my capacity for concentration and contemplation. My mind now expects to take in information the way the Net distributes it: in a swiftly moving stream of particles. Once I was a scuba diver in the sea of words. Now I zip along the surface like a guy on a Jet Ski.
“power browse” horizontally through titles, contents pages and abstracts going for quick wins
We are not only what we read
We are how we read
Wolf worries that the style of reading promoted by the Net, a style that puts “efficiency” and “immediacy” above all else, may be weakening our capacity for the kind of deep reading that emerged when an earlier technology, the printing press, made long and complex works of prose commonplace
Our ability to interpret text, to make the rich mental connections that form when we read deeply and without distraction, remains largely disengaged.
The human brain is almost infinitely malleable. People used to think that our mental meshwork, the dense connections formed among the 100 billion or so neurons inside our skulls, was largely fixed by the time we reached adulthood. But brain researchers have discovered that that’s not the case
Still, their easy assumption that we’d all “be better off” if our brains were supplemented, or even replaced, by an artificial intelligence is unsettling. It suggests a belief that intelligence is the output of a mechanical process, a series of discrete steps that can be isolated, measured, and optimized. In Google’s world, the world we enter when we go online, there’s little place for the fuzziness of contemplation. Ambiguity is not an opening for insight but a bug to be fixed. The human brain is just an outdated computer that needs a faster processor and a bigger hard drive.
It’s in their economic interest to drive us to distraction.
The kind of deep reading that a sequence of printed pages promotes is valuable not just for the knowledge we acquire from the author’s words but for the intellectual vibrations those words set off within our own minds. In the quiet spaces opened up by the sustained, undistracted reading of a book, or by any other act of contemplation, for that matter, we make our own associations, draw our own inferences and analogies, foster our own ideas. Deep reading, as Maryanne Wolf argues, is indistinguishable from deep thinking.
If we lose those quiet spaces, or fill them up with “content,” we will sacrifice something important not only in our selves but in our culture.
I come from a tradition of Western culture, in which the ideal (my ideal) was the complex, dense and “cathedral-like” structure of the highly educated and articulate personality—a man or woman who carried inside themselves a personally constructed and unique version of the entire heritage of the West. [But now] I see within us all (myself included) the replacement of complex inner density with a new kind of self—evolving under the pressure of information overload and the technology of the “instantly available.”
As we are drained of our “inner repertory of dense cultural inheritance,” Foreman concluded, we risk turning into “‘pancake people’—spread wide and thin as we connect with that vast network of information accessed by the mere touch of a button.”