Skip to main content

Michel Roland's Library tagged plagiarism   View Popular

06 Mar 08

Duplication and plagiarism increasing among students : Article : Nature

  • plagiarism in scientific writing is on the increase
  • Undergraduates regularly expropriate whole articles from Wikipedia. They are not scared by anti-plagiarism software, as they know it is not routinely applied. As today's undergraduates will become tomorrow's researchers, the problem can only get worse.

Attributor: Get more value from your original content

  • Get your original content into Attributor

    You decide which content you want to monitor by pointing us to the appropriate RSS feeds or pages within your web site.

    Sit back while Attributor monitors the Internet for copies

    Attributor scans billions of web sites, blogs and social networks on a continuous basis to find copies of your content across the web. The Internet is a big place, and we’re constantly adding new pages as they are created.

AEF - agence d'informations spécialisées - [L'Université de Lyon dote l'ensemble des établissements lyonnais d'un logiciel anti-plagiat ]

  • depuis cette rentrée, tous les enseignants lyonnais qui le souhaitent peuvent utiliser le logiciel anti-plagiat compilatio.net, à partir du portail web de leur établissement, pour vérifier que les travaux de leurs étudiants ne sont pas de simples patchworks de copier/coller.

About Crossref

  • At the 2006 CrossRef Annual Meeting, members were asked to rank potential new strategic initiatives for CrossRef, and a cross-publisher plagiarism detection (PD) service emerged as one of the top priorities.
  • Current state-of-the-art in PD works by comparing a submitted manuscript to a database of published content. When the system detects a degree of textual overlap between the submitted manuscript and items in the database, the system produces an originality report, which can be used by editorial staff in order to determine whether the overlap is benign, or a case of plagiarism. The problem with these PD systems is that they are only effective if the database of published content contains items that are relevant to the domain of the documents being checked. Without a database of relevant existing published scholarly and professional content, it is impossible to effectively check purportedly scholarly/professional new content for plagiarism.



    Currently, existing PD systems do not index the majority of scholarly/professional content because it is inaccessible to crawlers directed at the open web. The only scholarly literature that is currently indexed by PD systems is that which is available openly (e.g. OA, Archived or illegitimately posted copies) or that which has been made available via third-party aggregators (e.g. ProQuest). This, in turn, means that any publisher who is interested in employing PD systems in their editorial work-flow is unable to do so effectively. Even if a particular publisher doesn't have a problem with plagiarized manuscripts, they should have an interest in making sure that their own published content is not plagiarized or otherwise illegitimately copied.
  • 1 more annotations...

Compilatio.net, outil en ligne de détection de plagiat.

  • Pensé en
    premier lieu pour répondre aux attentes de l'enseignement
    supérieur, COMPILATIO.NET vous
    indique le coefficient d'authenticité du document analysé. COMPILATIO.NET vous
    permet également d'identifier les passages
    douteux de tout type de document numérique et vous fournit
    les sources probables.
1 - 9 of 9
Showing 20 items per page

Highlighter, Sticky notes, Tagging, Groups and Network: integrated suite dramatically boosting research productivity. Learn more »

Join Diigo