Bertrand Duperrin's Library tagged → View Popular, Search in Google
"Déjà 10 ans que les bases du Web 2.0 ont été posées. L’irruption des médias sociaux dans les stratégies d’entreprise est plus récente. Facebook, Twitter ou encore LinkedIn, impliquant tous un usage grand public et personnel, entrent désormais peu à peu dans la sphère professionnelle, conduisant à brouiller les univers."
-
l’entreprise du futur ne se conçoit plus uniquement en termes technologiques, mais de manière fondamentale via son approche managériale.
-
ncore faut-il que les collaborateurs soient d’accord pour modifier leurs habitudes de travail, travailler de manière plus ouverte alors que la culture reste encore parfois au huis clos ou aux "réunionites" internes, trouver une nouvelle valeur ajoutée au travail fourni, et accepter d’être en permanence sollicité par l’ensemble des parties prenantes des projets.
- 5 more annotation(s)...
"Which is more important to promoting collaboration: a clearly defined approach toward achieving the goal, or clearly specified roles for individual team members? The common assumption — and my personal approach for many years — is that carefully spelling out the approach is essential, while leaving the roles of individuals within the team open and flexible will encourage people to share ideas and contribute in multiple dimensions."
-
But our research has shown that the opposite is true: collaboration improves when the roles of individual team members are clearly defined and well understood — in fact, when individuals feel their role is bounded in ways that allow them to do a significant portion of their work independently.
-
Without such clarity, team members are likely to waste energy negotiating roles or protecting turf, rather than focusing on the task.
- 1 more annotation(s)...
" Over the last year I've been speaking with many corporate business and HR leaders and have heard a common theme: we need our organizations to be more agile. We need to redesign the organization so we can learn faster, communicate better, and respond more rapidly to change. This quest for the agile organization has changed the nature of what we call a job. "
-
Something very profound is happening. Jobs are getting more specialized, people work in teams and cross functional boundaries, and success is being redefined by expertise, not span of control.
And people without specialized skills are finding it harder to find work. Seth Godin calls it “the end of the average worker.”
- 10 more annotation(s)...
-
"La gouvernance de l’information, c’est un peu comme l’entreprise 2.0 (et ce n’est pas un hasard) : on en parle beaucoup, mais on la “réalise” peut être un peu moins !
La gouvernance de l’information est un élément indispensable à la construction de l’entreprise de demain car elle est déterminante pour la CONFIANCE.
Pour beaucoup, la gouvernance a été jusqu’alors une stratégie de défense, de protection et les mises en oeuvre de solutions ont été principalement faites pour répondre à des litiges !
C’est peu dire que la gouvernance n’est pas encore directement “intégrée” dans notre quotidien !"
-
la gouvernance de l’information doit être réfléchie principalement en tant que soutien aux affaires et non pas seulement comme une stratégie de défense décidée par les “risk managers” et les directions juridiques.
-
- rendre la “prise de décision” plus facile et transparente,
- définir clairement les rôles et les responsabilités,
- décider de “règles” (guidelines) à propos des contenus partagés et générés par les “utilisateurs” (versus ceux générés au niveau des applications d’infrastructure)
- et ,, pouvoir “quantifier” les coûts de la non conformité des informations par rapport aux “règles” métiers (usages) ce qui implique de pouvoir disposer d’indicateurs clairs et pertinents pour le “business”.
Dans le contexte plus concret du quotidien des organisations, cela oblige, pour autant qu’on le veuille, à un certain nombre de “nouveautés”, à savoir :
"One of the questions that comes up all-too-frequently when discussing social collaboration in the enterprise these days is the (still) infamous ROI question. Sometimes this is because the various manifestations of Enterprise 2.0 and social intranets haven't gone past the "we'd better start adopting or we'll be in the stone ages" stage that e-mail or traditional intranets themselves reached well over a decade ago."
-
What's often missing now is the clarity around how a newly social enterprise actually looks and what the functions and roles are.
- 4 more annotation(s)...
-
"The problem with these psychological approaches is that they focus on the traits of individuals, in the absence of any business context. They presuppose that it is something about an individual's personality, experience, psychology, or talents that determines whether that individual will be a valuable contributor to your social media rollout. What it misses is the central importance of organizational role. "
-
the most reliable way to generate sustained Enterprise 2.0 adoption is to target business functions and activities that are structurally motivated to improve collaboration. In other words, look for individuals whose professional success in their role depends on the things that Enterprise 2.0 will help them do.
-
I haven't seen strong correlations between enterprise social media adoption and age, gender, tech-savviness, political affiliation, sexual orientation, toothpaste preference, or any other identifiable psychological characteristics
Selected Tags
Related Tags
Top Contributors
Groups interested in roles
-
Gender roles
Items: 20 | Visits: 38
Created by: kristha
-
Hum Core: Society
Items: 10 | Visits: 7
Created by: kazeko
Highlighter, Sticky notes, Tagging, Groups and Network: integrated suite dramatically boosting research productivity. Learn more »
Join Diigo
