Home
Bertrand Duperrin's Library tagged → View Popular
Top-down and Bottom-up Project Management: Leveraging the Advantages of the Two Approaches
Significant changes are taking place in management and especially project management today. We hear that organizations, like the New York Times, Tribune Co., Ernst & Young switched from the so-called top-down management style to bottom-up management. Others, including some of the world’s biggest corporations, such as Toyota and IBM, implemented bottom-up management style elements in some of their departments. The popularity of the bottom-up approach to management is growing. In spite of this fact, the discussions about the two major approaches are still hot. Why have organizations become so anxious about changing their management style? If we compare the two management approaches, the answer to this question will be clear.
-
. Team members are invited to participate in every step of the management process. The decision on a course of action is taken by the whole team. Bottom-up style allows managers to communicate goals and value, e.g. through milestone planning. Then team members are encouraged to develop personal to-do lists with the steps necessary to reach the milestones on their own.
-
These methods include are Enterprise 2.0 technologies – wikis, blogs, social networks, collaboration tools, etc. They come into organizations and change the original way of executing projects. They turn traditional project management into Project Management 2.0 and bring new patterns of collaboration, which are based on collective intelligence. Collective intelligence is a collection of valuable knowledge from different fields that each project team member is an expert in. This knowledge is now successfully collected and shared shared in a flexible, collaborative environment brought by second-generation project management software. The project manager is the one to conduct the work of his team and choose the right direction for the project development, based on the information received from the individual employees.
An alternative way to define IT project results
IT projects need define a combine the engineering work to be done and the results that they create. Doing so requires more than giving the project a business based name. Here are a few steps for an alternative way to define an IT project.
Combining these three ideas, when companies pay to execute a project, it’s not the project they want, it’s the result. They want more revenue generating customer relationships, not processes around a CRM system or even the capability to look up customer names. What they want is the result.
-
First, companies don’t pay for activities, they pay for results. As explains in the blog post http://blogs.gartner.com/mark_mcdonald/2009/06/30/activities-vs-results—the-difference-makes-all-the-difference/From this post.
Second, those results come from changing capabilities which are a more powerful definition of the business. So it’s the capability people want. http://blogs.gartner.com/mark_mcdonald/2009/07/02/capability-is-more-powerful-than-process/
-
Results can be defined in the following ways:
Wikinomics » Blog Archive » Is your Organization Talent Ready?
The very nature of work is changing. It is . . .
-
Project driven . . . based on roles not jobs.
-
Community based . . . the active use of collaboration tools to share information, create relationships, develop insights or create product is the work itself.
- 3 more annotations...
Top 10 PM Trends for 2009
ESI International just released a list of Top 10 Management Trends for 2009. Their most experienced consultants and Senior Management say these trends point to organizational need for expertise while coping with tighter budgets, fewer financial and human resources, and change. Do you believe that this is where your should focus in 2009 to drive project and organizational success?
-
Today’s economy will force organizations to confront the important roles middle managers play in the success of change efforts. Middle managers’ roles will shift from simple messenger of directives ‘from above’ to creating a positive environment to enable change
-
Powerful communication, key management strategies and new rules of engagement will be required to manage virtual teams
- 4 more annotations...
Eloge de l'incertitude
La réalité, c'est que la crise n'est que l'écume des choses qui vient révéler l'immobilisme face à la nécessité de prendre acte que le monde change. Et le fait est que le monde change vite et va changer encore plus vite car, justement, les crises ont cette faculté de faire bouger, de révéler que le train est déjà parti du quai, en fait.
Mais affronter l'incertitude n'est pas qu'une conclusion au présent, c'est aussi une des dure leçon de la partie vraie de la crise. Si celle-ci s'est produite, c'est notamment parce que personne n'a réagit aux signes annonceurs. Pourquoi ? non pas qu'il n'y a eu aucun signe annonceur, simplement que ceux-ci n'étaient pas dans le tableau de bord ou que le signal qui y apparaissait n'était pas identifié.
Management and Virtual Decentralised Networks: The Linux Project
This paper examines the latest of paradigms - the Virtual Network(ed) Organisation - and whether geographically dispersed knowledge workers can virtually collaborate for a project under no central planning. Co-ordination, management and the role of knowledge arise as the central areas of focus. The Linux Project and its development model are selected as a case of analysis and the critical success factors of this organisational design are identified. The study proceeds to the formulation of a framework that can be applied to all kinds of virtual decentralised work and concludes that value creation is maximized when there is intense interaction and uninhibited sharing of information between the organisation and the surrounding community. Therefore, the potential success or failure of this organisational paradigm depends on the degree of dedication and involvement by the surrounding community.
Project Management 2.0 Blog: Social Project Management. Social Project Management: Another Point of View
According to Leisa, they are: small teams, motivated people, limited planning, minimal scope, small projects, rapid release, responsiveness, and iterations. Leisa noted that the essential point of her presentation was that “there are other ways to manage projects than ye olde fashioned waterfall methodology.”
Project Management 2.0 Blog: Collaboration. Project Management. Definition of Project Management 2.0
I use the term Project management 2.0 to describe an evolution of project management practices inspired by Enterprise 2.0 tools. Traditional project management software implies project manager acting as a proxy in all project related communications, thus reducing productivity of project manager and the rest of the project team. New tools bring collaboration into the planning process, making the team much more productive and changing not only the technology, but process as well.
Projects As Social Interactions — Project Shrink
"A project is a localized energy field comprising a set of thoughts, emotions, and interactions continually expressing themselves in physical form."
Should Your Company Play Catchball? | The Relationship Economy......
a communication process in which parties engage in a series of information exchanges about the means for achieving a particular objective. The purpose for the exchange is to build consensus around the best approach for achieving an objective. Catchball is based on the belief that the best approach will evolve from the back and forth exchange of information between the person who is responsible for achieving the objective and the persons who will be most influential in achieving it. The secondary benefit from using catchball is a higher degree of commitment to achieve the objective.”
-
“a communication process in which parties engage in a series of information exchanges about the means for achieving a particular objective. The purpose for the exchange is to build consensus around the best approach for achieving an objective. Catchball is based on the belief that the best approach will evolve from the back and forth exchange of information between the person who is responsible for achieving the objective and the persons who will be most influential in achieving it. The secondary benefit from using catchball is a higher degree of commitment to achieve the objective.”
The FASTForward Blog » Designing with failure in mind: Enterprise 2.0 Blog: News, Coverage, and Commentary
When you are designing and building systems that incorporate people and technology, you had better think about both how to make things work and about how things might fail.
Globally local - locally global : Kicking off global intranet projects - some tips
Ce que vous devez savoir (et faire) pour que le lancement d'un projet intranet soit une réussite.
What you must know (and to) to make your intranet project kickoff a success.
Selected Tags
Related Tags
management (8)- projectmanagement (7)
- collaboration (5)
- enterprise2.0 (4)
- communities (4)
- projectmanagement2.0 (3)
- business (3)
- blogs (3)
- collectiveintelligence (2)
- productivity (2)
- strategy (2)
- socialprojectmanagement (2)
- interactions (2)
- blog (2)
- wiki (2)
- intranet (2)
- adoption (2)
- informationsystem (2)
- socialcomputing (2)
Sponsored Links
Top Contributors
Groups interested in project
-
Day in a Sentence
This is a list for all the ...
Items: 10 | Visits: 255
Created by: Sheryl A. McCoy
-
Collaborative Projects
Collaborative, online proje...
Items: 64 | Visits: 2065
Created by: mitzif
Diigo is about better ways to research, share and collaborate on information. Learn more »
Join Diigo