Skip to main content

Jan
26
2012

  • Le chef d'entreprise loué aujourd'hui pour sa capacité à entretenir un réseau (54%), séducteur et bon orateur (41%), sans renier un certain côté dur pour atteindre ses objectifs (44%), est-il déjà has been ? Oui, à en croire l'étude, puisque dans les qualités attendues du dirigeant de demain, figurent désormais la capacité à savoir piloter et préserver l'intérêt de l'entreprise à long terme (61%), un aspect visionnaire (46%), et une capacité à créer l'innovation (33%) tout en préservant un comportement exemplaire, en interne comme en externe (42%). Bref, le dirigeant de demain serait le reflet inversé du dirigeant actuel...
  • Le dirigeant de demain? Tout le contraire de celui d'aujourd'hui
Oct
12
2011

"Incentive programs are ubiquitous in corporations, but there are serious flaws in how they have been implemented, particularly for executives. For an incentive system to usefully support a firm's long-term, society-focused agenda, companies need to lessen their reliance on financial rewards to motivate top management, strengthen share-ownership requirements and stock-vesting conditions for senior executives and board members, and change CEOs' perception of compensation as a tool to "keep score" vis-à-vis their peers and bolster their own egos."

incentives CEO longterm rewards

  • Given the limited effectiveness of economic incentives in bringing about desired behaviors, it goes without saying that all companies — but particularly those committed to creating value for society — should avoid focusing inordinately on monetary rewards to motivate their executives.
  • he also relied on "pride and recognition that come from being a good citizen and living up to the values of society" to drive the right behaviors. In fact, he emphasized that he didn't want "pay to disturb motivation."
  • 2 more annotation(s)...
Oct
4
2011

"Some years ago, the then-CEO of Air Products told me that it took his team two months to decide and plan layoffs, two weeks to do them, and two years to recover. When I asked why the company had done something that caused so much damage, the reply was that it was expected by Wall Street and his CEO peers. "

CEO courage management stocks longterm

  • As these examples illustrate, CEOs not only need a new set of beliefs, they need the courage of their convictions to act on those beliefs.
  • As former Procter & Gamble CEO A. G. Lafley has noted, the best time to gain market share is when your competitors are in retreat. And, as common sense suggests, if you want to earn exceptional returns, you can't simply copy what everyone else is doing.
  • 2 more annotation(s)...

"In my latest book, Fixing the Game: Bubbles, Crashes, and What Capitalism can Learn from the NFL, I wrote about the negative impact of executive stock-based compensation on corporate short-termism. Eliminating stock-based compensation would help reduce the incentive for executive leadership to focus on the short term. But there is a residual problem which has long frustrated me. The answer finally popped into my brain (funny how that works). As usual, the solution won't be easy to pull off (but that has never stopped me)."

shortterm longterm compensation stocks

  • Worried that short-term-oriented arbitrageurs will put their company in play and short-term-oriented shareholders will gain majority or effective control of the company, ending their ability to steer the long-term trajectory of the company, they focus on making short-term decisions to protect their positions. The paradoxical result is that they never get around to taking those long-term-oriented decisions.
  • It follows that companies should value shareholders relative to both the volume of shares they hold and the length of time they have held their shares.
  • 3 more annotation(s)...
Sep
19
2011

"I've always been a big believer in using results as the differentiator between success and failure. You either achieve your goals or you don't. Energy, creativity, and activity are all good things — but they don't create value unless results are achieved.

Most organizations take the same stance. They put a great deal of emphasis on reporting and celebrating quarterly and yearly results — with the assumption that there is a huge upside to being perceived as a winning company. After all, positive results attract investors, raise stock prices, reinforce customers, draw talent, and more.

But only athletic events produce clear winners and losers in the short-term — and most organizations are not actively engaged in those. In fact, in many cases, the immediate "results" are in reality unknown, ambiguous, or disconnected from current performance."

performance results scorecard scoreboard longterm dialogue

  • This is not to say that we should abandon any of these ways of viewing organizational performance. Rather, we need to better understand how these numbers were achieved and what they are actually saying about a company's long-term health. In other words, metrics are starting points for dialogue rather than conclusio
  • As individual managers we do not have the luxury of personal analysts, so we have to interpret the true meaning of results ourselves. But all too many managers avoid or ignore this part of their job — either because it takes too much time, is too difficult, or will lead to uncomfortable discussions. So instead they treat scorecards like scoreboards, with black and white numbers that they think tell the whole story.
  • 2 more annotation(s)...
Nov
15
2010

"The time horizon: "Pull" does not mean thinking only about the short-term Many of the people we have talked to about our book have the misconception that pull is driven by a short-term mindset. After all, one of the key drivers of the move from push to pull platforms is the increasing difficulty in forecasting and predicting demand and the consequent challenges this presents"

pull push longterm indicators strategy iterations iterativethinking

  • The paradox we cited at the outset can be resolved: the long-term view is not a detailed forecast but a high-level direction, a trajectory and a set of challenging goals, which help to focus and guide near-term efforts.
  • he key for pull is to iterate rapidly back and forth between two horizons — long-term direction and short-term (6-12 month) action
  • 1 more annotation(s)...
Oct
25
2010

"One area of thinking around innovation that doesn’t get much attention is how ownership and governance affects the ability of an organization to be innovative. It’s an issue that’s been playing on my mind for a few years but a recent conversation has prompted me to write down some ideas. First. I’ll just outline the conversation and then I’ll put down a few thoughts about links between corporate governance and innovation. "

innovation ownership governance ROI corporateboards longterm shortterm risk

  • As a partnership, the way to become a partner was to sacrifice work-life balance for twenty years to get a substantial ‘annuity’. Asking partners to invest in more risky and longer term business proposals is really like asking them to risk their annuity for a return that they may never see. Getting short-term and incremental business improvements funded was no problem, but the partners were never going to have the necessary risk appetite for innovation.
  • On the other hand, a lot of innovative firms that I know are owned by entrepreneurial people who have an appetite for risk and understand the innovation process. There may be a real advantage here for owner-operated firms.
May
6
2009

Seeing Enterprise 2.0 as a number of short-term initiatives that will immediately boost the productivity of knowledge workers, improve collaboration and fuel innovation will do us more harm than good. There are definitely quick wins to be made, but we need more time to make the large and persistent wins. Harvesting the potential business benefits of Enterprise 2.0 requires insight, motivation, commitment, patience, perseverance, flexibility - and a large doze of good old-fashioned stubbornness. Why? Because it is about making people change.

enterprise2.0 adoption socialsoftware people business longterm transformation change productivity

Jan
5
2009

OUR financial catastrophe, like Bernard Madoff’s pyramid scheme, required all sorts of important, plugged-in people to sacrifice our collective long-term interests for short-term gain. The pressure to do this in today’s financial markets is immense. Obviously the greater the market pressure to excel in the short term, the greater the need for pressure from outside the market to consider the longer term. But that’s the problem: there is no longer any serious pressure from outside the market. The tyranny of the short term has extended itself with frightening ease into the entities that were meant to, one way or another, discipline Wall Street, and force it to consider its enlightened self-interest.

shortterm longterm finance downturn crisis

1 - 9 of 9
Showing 20 items per page

Diigo is about better ways to research, share and collaborate on information. Learn more »

Join Diigo
Move to top