Skip to main content

May
9
2012

"Six Sigma, Kaizen, Lean, and other variations on continuous improvement can be hazardous to your organization's health. While it may be heresy to say this, recent evidence from Japan and elsewhere suggests that it's time to question these methods."

sixsigma lean kaizen continuousimprovement

  • Looking beyond Japan, iconic six sigma companies in the United States, such as Motorola and GE, have struggled in recent years to be innovation leaders. 3M, which invested heavily in continuous improvement, had to loosen its sigma methodology in order to increase the flow of innovation
  • Customize how and where continuous improvement is applied. One size of continuous improvement doesn't fit all parts of the organization. The kind of rigor required in a manufacturing environment may be unnecessary, or even destructive, in a research or design shop
  • 2 more annotation(s)...
May
8
2012

"La taille d’une organisation influe sur les modes de prise de décision, de transfert d’information ou de coopération, ce qui fait que les « bonnes recettes » à 10 personnes ne fonctionnent pas forcément à 100 ou encore moins à 1000. Plus précisément, un grand nombre de problèmes apparaissent lorsque la taille augmente, et l’efficacité n’est pas proportionnelle à la force de travail disponible. Cette constatation n’est pas sans rappeler ce qu’on observe dans les systèmes parallèles (cf. la loi d’Admdhal) qui montre que la puissance que l’on obtient en multipliant les processeurs est compensée par la tâche croissante de synchronisation. Ce n’est pas une surprise : les petites structures souffrent moins des problèmes de coordination et de synchronisation !"

organization coordination dunbar scale scalability context teams management structure organizationaldesign lean interfaces autonomy SOA complexity networks socialnetworks enterprise2.0 socialbusiness podularity

  • La tentation d’éviter les tares des grandes organisations opérationnelles en les découpant en plus petites est pertinente si le coefficient est faible, et pas forcément efficace dans le cas contraire. Ce qui nous ramène à la thèse initiale : la bonne organisation dépend du contexte et de la taille.
  • Je pense que la taille de 150 est un seuil critique dans la gestion des organisations, et ceci est conforté par 20 ans de discussions avec des managers opérationnels.
  • 15 more annotation(s)...
Apr
11
2012

"Le Lean est très actuel, d’où sa popularité. Il incarne des valeurs qu’attendent aujourd’hui nos sociétés : agilité, temps réel, absence de gaspillage (toutes les questions de responsabilité des entreprises, qu'elle soit sociale ou environnementale), en quête aussi d’harmonie tant personnelle que collective.
Pour toutes ces raisons, à la fois positives pour les entreprises et nécessaires pour les individus, le RSE (réseau social d’entreprise) pourrait bien être le « véhicule » du Lean en entreprise. C’est même, selon moi, l’endroit du Lean par excellence…, ce qui explique aussi son succès. Et je vais tenter de vous le démontrer en comparant usine et numérique."

lean enterprise2.0 socialbusiness socialnetworks management pdca problemsolving kaizen

  • Tout d’abord, il s’agit d’impliquer l’ensemble des salariés à l’évolution de l’entreprise. C’est exactement la définition d’un RSE,
  • 11 more annotation(s)...
  • Le Lean Management a besoin des réseaux sociaux d’entreprise
Apr
4
2012

"L'objectif d'hier soir était d'échanger sur la gestion des egos en faisant se rencontrer deux mondes, celui de la haute performance sportive et de l' "élevage de champions", et celui des “knowledge workers” en prise avec les nouvelles approches collaboratives du travail. "

egos egoless knowledgeworkers management lean enterprise2.0

Feb
14
2012

""This business model is right for a company selling Purina Dog Chow, circa 1970."

"There's no way we could ever be this collaborative."

Both are comments I got about my book, back in 2009, about setting direction, collaboratively. The first is from a Google executive; the second, from an exec at Cisco. Same business model architecture, two entirely different responses: obvious or unachievable."

social businessmodel lean conversations valuechain sharing competitiveadvantage value valuecreation

  • I have used the term social era. It's not to create more jargon, it's to emphasize a point: that social is more than the stuff the marketing team deals with. It's something that allows organizations to do things entirely differently — if we let it become the backbone of our business models.
  • Lean, not big
  • 8 more annotation(s)...

"es premiers résultats montrent que les modèles d’affaires peuvent aujourd’hui être l’objet d’un certain nombre de ruptures, mais aussi que le modèle de pilotage des processus de gouvernance, voire des formes de leadership dans l’entreprise, peuvent être largement impactées par l’irruption du numérique. Deux dimensions que l’on se propose de traiter, à la fois la stratégie et gouvernance"

lean enterprise2.0 socialbusiness strategy governance process culture taylor IT collaboration innovation complexity customer customerfeedback customerexperience

  • Pour ceux qui ne se souviennent plus, le management scientifique, c’est « Breakdown and Specialize », « je décompose et je spécialise »
  • La complication peut être attaquée par la réduction. La complexité, ce sont tous les liens qui font que l’on ne peut plus réduire. Dans le monde du 21ème siècle, on va devoir travailler autrement, on va devoir passer du compliqué au complexe.
  • 7 more annotation(s)...
Jan
30
2012

"Toujours en préambule du E2.0 Summit qui va se tenir à Paris les 7 et 8 février prochain, je vous propose une nouvelle interview d’un des intervenants principaux : Yves Caseau, le DGA de Bouygues Telecom en charge des technologies et de l’innovation dont je vous avais déjà parlé du livre (Un livre pour tout savoir sur la collaboration et le lean management).

Je vous livre ici une traduction de l’interview menée par l’organisateur de la conférence."

enterprise2.0 process lean leanmanagement collaboration book yvescazeau structuredcollaboration unstructuredcollaboration emergentcollaboration emergentprocesses management decisionmaking

  • L’objectif des initiatives d’Entreprise 2.0 vis à accélérer le processus de décision (pour faire face aux exigences de notre environnement compétitif), ceux-ci reposent sur une propagation rapide de l’information et sur la capacité à passer la bonne information à la bonne personne. Les pratiques « 2.0″ sont donc employées pour optimiser l’attention des collaborateurs et pour maximiser l’utilisation des talents.
  • La modularité est nécessaire au sein d’une organisation, 2.0 ou non. Je suis partisan d’une approche « fractale » où les pratiques de collaboration s(organisent autour de communautés de toute taille. Idéalement, on ne devrait pas abuser d’usages communautaires à l’échelle de l’entreprise. Il y a également un défi à éviter la sur-utilisation des outils de communication « 2.0″, à trouver la bonne culture de collaboration et définir les bonnes pratiques.
  • 8 more annotation(s)...
Nov
18
2011

"I have been blogging quite substantially about Lean Management lately and I have noticed a common purpose with Agile methodologies (which get me blogging 4 years ago) and Enterprise 2.0 (which has kept my blogging busy for the last 2 years) : they all address complexity and permanent change, the key characteristics of our business world. This is one of the key ideas of the great book by Yves Caseau Processus & Entrerprise 2.0 [FR]."

lean agility knowledgeeconomy organization management leanmanagement taylorism complexity behavioralsciences education middlemanagement

  • We use the latest technologies, we mention innovation in every other sentences and yet we lag behind manufacturing in terms of management innovation as they’ve successfully implemented Lean Management.
  • Right now, your company has 21st-century Internet-enabled business processes, mid-20th-century management processes, all built atop 19th-century management principles.
  • 8 more annotation(s)...

"In today’s increasingly dynamic business environment, organizations must continuously adapt to survive. Ironically, change management has become a major bottleneck. Inefficient offline reviews are disconnected from daily operations and unresponsive to evolving requirements. Organizations’ need a practical mechanism for managing controlled variance and change in-flight to break the logjam."

lean leanmanagement agility collaboration social socialcollaboration flexibility changemanagement businessprocess IT context

  • The more flexible an organization’s systems infrastructure, the better it can support desired or necessary change
  • The last forty years of mainstream business computing brought tremendous efficiencies through standardization, but this was predicated on relatively static models of processes, data, and capabilities.
  • 14 more annotation(s)...
Oct
12
2011

"The concept of waste has lately been transferred from manufacturing to other practices such as product development. According to lean principles, when a development project is started, the goal is to complete it as rapidly as possible. In a sense, ongoing development projects are just like inventory sitting around in a factory. Design and prototypes are only valuable when (paying) customers are involved."

LEAN waste processes customer customerinvolvement communication networks agility agilebusiness unpredictability conversations dynamicprocesses dynamicbusiness

  • People are used to lean thinking when it comes to technology and processes but it is still very rare to look at taking waste out of communication. Many managers still trivialize the power of conversation. They think that social interaction issues are soft compared to the hard issues of technology and process.
  • We still don’t understand that work is communication: we live and work in a network of conversations. Being lean means understanding that conversations are never neutral. They always affect the quality and pace of the outcome. Communication either accelerates or slows down. Communication either creates value or creates waste. Communication can create energy and inspiration or take energy away and reduce inspiration.
  • 4 more annotation(s)...
Aug
8
2011

"Even though it's what keeps companies operationally in shape, front-line process improvement is hard to sustain. Why? Consider the story of Technicolor."

process casestudies technicolor improvement lean attrition engagement

  • each Technicolor employee had a target of suggesting two process improvements per month. That sounded like a great way to keep a process improvement program going
  • But there wasn't much activity until six months later when Mike Karol, vice president of operations, told his managers to make it their responsibility.
  • 9 more annotation(s)...
Aug
4
2011

"Si toutes ces méthodes peinent à obtenir des résultats significatifs et durables – quelle grande DSI peut aujourd’hui se targuer d’être le chouchou du COMEX pour ses réussites ? C’est bien que ces pré-requis ne sont que très rarement remplis. Alors pourquoi se focaliser sur des techniques innovantes, les X management, plutôt que sur le fond de la toile : la confiance qui permet l’autonomie, le respect d’un pacte social qui désinhibe le changement, et le sens qui fonde l’action ?"

management leanmanagement lean trust ITdepartment sense sensemaking

  • La confiance. Les économistes et les psychologues sont formels, la confiance est un facteur de productivité d’ordre 1, et pire, les mesures incitatives ou coercitives destinées à mobiliser les troupes sont en réalité sans effets sur leur performance
  • Nous segmentons le flux de valeur en de multiples départements et intervenants, de la maîtrise d’ouvrage à l’exploitation. Alors qu’au fond quel frein nous empêche de déléguer à des équipes produit la totalité d’un service à l’utilisateur,
  • 4 more annotation(s)...
Dec
23
2010

"There is a movement taking place in the IT industry that is really driven by major consumer technology vendors including Apple, Google and Facebook. What these three companies do is really starting to set the tone for what people expect from a software application. The expectations of a software application may have historically centered around its ability to solve business problems or to enable specific types of transactions or management processes. Today, the software application is expected to let users communicate and interact with each other the way that they can on Facebook. Organic and guided search as found on Google is also expected, as is the intuitive usability of the iPad.
In fact, employees and managers of most any business are already communicating with each other through various Web 2.0 technologies — the problem being that all of this communication is taking place outside the bounds of formal and secure IT systems."

IT enterprise2.0 socialmedia ERP knowledge LEAN security risk liability

  • While some business software companies work to integrate their offerings directly with online tools like Twitter or Facebook, the real business benefits will come from enterprise resources planning (ERP) and other enterprise software that mimics the functionality of these popular online tools
  • When technologies or individuals circumvent ERP, these security measures are rendered ineffective. Building social media-type enterprise 2.0 functionality into ERP will leverage the inherent security benefits of the ERP system.
  • 6 more annotation(s)...
Aug
30
2009

Vous connaissez Twitter, ce fameux outil de micro-blogging qui permet de partager à peu près tout ce que vous pouvez imaginer en 140 caractères… Pour ceux qui ne connaissent pas encore Twitter, cliquer ici.

Ce matin, j’aimerais vous présenter un article de Ralph Bernstein paru sur le blogue Lean Insider… Est-ce que Twitter est un outil Lean ?

twitter lean GM customerrelationship customers

Jun
29
2009

My triggering point for this post was a post by Peter Bergman in the Harvard Business blogs on the best way to change corporate culture. It is in many ways a recapitulation of fundamental issues organizations face on the cultural side. He says: "Performance reviews and training programs define the firm's expectations. Financial reward systems reinforce them. Memos and communications highlight what's important. And senior leadership actions — promotions for people who toe the line and a dead end career for those who don't — emphasize the firm's priorities. In most organizations these elements develop unconsciously and organically to create a system that, while not always ideal, works."

What all of this really boils down is two things - human and social capital. Toyota in my view could be one such company - the robust and high performance knowledge sharing network they have built across their supply chain is a case in point. See research paper here .

enterprise2.0 toyota knowledgesharing humancapital socialcapital collaboration lean

  • "Toyota’s network has solved three fundamental dilemmas with regard to knowledge sharing by devising methods to (1) motivate members to participate and openly share valuable knowledge (while preventing undesirable spillovers to competitors), (2) prevent free riders, and (3) reduce the costs associated with finding and accessing different types of valuable knowledge
  • Technology makes things possible; people collaborating makes it happen."
  • 1 more annotation(s)...
Jun
21
2009

The Toyota Way is not the Toyota Production System (TPS) . The 14 Principles of the Toyota Way is a management philosophy used by the Toyota corporation that includes TPS, also known as lean manufacturing. TPS is the most systematic and highly developed example of what the principles of the Toyota Way can accomplish. The Toyota Way consists of the foundational principles of the Toyota culture, which allows the TPS to function so effectively.

toyota management philosophy organization culture toyotaway problemsolving push tps lean

Feb
24
2009

Goals are indeed a pull system. Goals come from internal processes. We have individual and shared goals that motivate us to act.
Goals pull us, we ideally act based on goals. These individual actions are tasks. The tasks we take on are in service of the goals. However, if we don’t actually enjoy what we’re doing in service of these goals or, worse yet, act contrary to our goals – we are squandering our lives.

In a business context, if goals are clear amongst teams and the organization, the work involved in achieving those goals is more likely to be rewarding. We are happier in doing it. And this is a pull process.

lean organization pull management goal

  • The push of drive is the artificial force necessary to apply to people to get them to work contrary to their own goals.

    Enter here the concept of friction.  When you apply an external force to an object to get it to move, friction occurs.  The amount of friction is the amount of energy lost in the transfer of momentum from one object to another.  Loss of energy = waste.

    In a pull system, things operate faster by removing friction or constraints.  In a push system, things operate faster by applying more force.

Aug
7
2008

Managers 2.0 must learn to be what Philip Kotter has called “leaders”. I.e. they must learn to lead change. This implies that they must learn to use people as clever human beings. Above all they must learn to manage groups. No longer consider companies as sets of disconnected individuals. Groups and societies have implicit rules (ethnologists’ “culture”). Their members, more or less consciously, follow these rules. Acting on them instantly transforms the organisation (Jay Forrester’s “leverage change”). What scientists call “complexity” is all about these properties of groups or “social networks”. Web 2.0 has started to use them.

management2.0 management leadership change changemanagement web2.0 lean creativedestruction innovation

1 - 20 of 21 Next ›
Showing 20 items per page

Highlighter, Sticky notes, Tagging, Groups and Network: integrated suite dramatically boosting research productivity. Learn more »

Join Diigo
Move to top