Bertrand Duperrin's Library tagged → View Popular, Search in Google
"To stay competitive, organizations need to continually find opportunities for innovation in key processes such as customer service and product development, and adoption of a new process almost always requires the implementation of new information technology. In his 1990 classic HBR article "Reengineering Work: Don't Automate, Obliterate," Michael Hammer argued that IT must drive radical process innovation.
Unfortunately, this creates two problems. First, as Hammer argued, these large investments in new IT systems tend to deliver disappointing results, largely because companies tend to use technology to mechanize old ways of doing business. That is, they leave the existing processes intact and use computers simply to speed them up, rather than redesign them from scratch. "
-
Second, they don't take enough advantage of the innovative abilities of their people themselves. Employees often feel victimized rather than energized by the changes.
-
The best way to solve both of these problems — and make innovation efforts stick — is not to impose a new process or technology system, but rather have front-line employees drive the change.
- 4 more annotation(s)...
"Kodak has recently declared bankruptcy. Usually, when this hits the news it is analyzed by the numbers people who, looking at five years’ worth of financial data, give their quantitative and financial explanation of the failure. More qualitative types will go back 10 years sometimes, and even go beyond finances to talk about strategy, CEOs, competition, and the like. Recent well-done Financial Times articles (here and here) go back even further for Kodak. And yet people still fail to see Kodak’s real problem."
-
a new technology has fierce competitors, low margins and cannibalizes your high margin core business. And Kodak did not take decisive action to combat the inevitable challenges.
-
Answer: The organization overflowed with complacency
- 3 more annotation(s)...
"This corporate immune system, as you might have guessed, is known as company culture. It’s a shared set of norms, practices, customs, expectations, and habits that have formed around and perpetuate how a company works and operates. While company culture is great at making the business function as expected and helps foster continuity and order, it’s also astonishingly good at killing off attempted changes to the system; undesirable and desirable both. It’s one reason why the entire industry of change management has emerged, so that companies can keep up with the our era’s ever increasing rate of change, of which technology itself is the most disruptive and high-velocity example."
-
In reality, the technology of social business isn’t much of an obstacle, at least once you get beyond the internecine platform battles that are common in many large organizations.
- 2 more annotation(s)...
-
-
"But, while the dramatic advances in digital technologies have been well measured and quantified, their impact on firms, economies and individuals has been more anecdotal. We talk about how this digital revolution has been transforming just about every aspect of business, society and our personal lives, bringing us both near-magical products and services as well as their accompanying creative destruction and pain. But, how can we quantify this revolution beyond its technological foundations?"
-
But, while the dramatic advances in digital technologies have been well measured and quantified, their impact on firms, economies and individuals has been more anecdotal
-
The economic performance of US companies has been steadily declining over the past decades, as measured by Return on Assets (ROA), a general indicator of a company’s profitability. It is now 75 percent lower than the levels in 1965.
- 2 more annotation(s)...
"Définir de façon précise et universelle ce que l’on entend par gouvernance de l’information prendrait des mois car chaque personne est susceptible d’avoir une perception très personnelle, très intime de ce terme. Nous avons donc décidé de prendre une voie plus simple, qui s’inscrit d’ailleurs dans l’ADN même de ce qu’on appelle la gouvernance de l’information :"
-
La gouvernance de l’information est une discipline « simplement » complexe, une approche analytique mènerait à une consommation d’énergie faramineuse. Un raisonnement systémique permettrait de suivre les phases de changement humaines, et de travailler par couches de plus en plus fine.
-
L’information est à considérer comme étant indépendamment un document papier, un document numérique, un élément ou ensemble d’une base de données, un flux transactionnel, une vidéo, une bande sonore, une photo, un commentaire, un email, une note donnée à un article, un échange de messagerie instantanée, etc. Tout ce qui a une valeur pour au moins un membre de l’organisation à un moment donné.
- 3 more annotation(s)...
"Earlier this month I gave a couple of webinars on encouraging user adoption of your social intranet. As long as we’ve been building intranet software and as long as we’ve been going to conferences, the theme of adoption is always present. And for good reason.
This blog post covers some of the ideas about adoption, what it is, why it matters, and how to encourage it."
-
“Driving adoption”, by the way, is one of my least favourite expressions. It sounds like driving cattle. Or herding cattle.
-
Usage is contextual – it depends entirely on your organization’s goals and the intranet’s purpose.
- 17 more annotation(s)...
"When considering culture change, more than a few of the senior leaders I’ve engaged with say, “You can’t change corporate culture.” I’m not surprised at this belief. Blanchard’s experience indicates that most senior leaders, in their careers, have not lived through successful culture change. Even fewer have led successful culture change."
-
- Setting clear performance goals.
- Directing, supporting, coaching and delegating where needed.
- Measuring progress and accomplishment.
- Celebrating progress and accomplishment.
Leaders change the way individuals perform by:
-
- Purpose: The reason you in business.
- Deliverables: Your promise of high-quality products and services.
- Culture: Values you stand for and live by daily with stakeholders, peers and customers.
Changing your organization’s culture is no different from changing how your organization performs. It requires intentional definition of, communication of and accountability for your company’s:
- 1 more annotation(s)...
"LE NUMERIQUE, MOTEUR DU CHANGEMENT
C'était le thème du colloque proposé par l'Institut Edgar Quinet qui s'est tenu au Sénat le 30 mars dernier. Après une ouverture du colloque faite par le sénateur David Assouline, j'ai assisté aux 2 premières tables rondes, la première évoquant le numérique comme moteur de l'économie et la deuxième les rapports sociaux à l'ère du numérique"
-
la révolution du numérique ou comment le numérique révolutionne notre quotidien de salarié, de citoyen, de particulier...bref, le numérique apporte la nouvelle révolution industrielle.
-
- Tradition et modernité. Etonnant mélange non? et pourtant, plein de bon sens. C'est Edwy Plenel qui lança ces 2 mots en expliquant qu'il faut toujours chercher la modernité mais en gardant le meilleur de la tradition.
- 4 more annotation(s)...
"On ne peut pas envisager d’améliorer la place de l’humain dans l’entreprise sans changer la fonction Ressources Humaine. De la même façon, rien ne changera si on ne change pas la dénomination de la personne chargée de piloter cette évolution. Mais transformer le Directeur des Ressources Humaines en Directeur du Capital Humain cela implique quoi ?"
-
Aujourd’hui parler de Ressources Humaines est dépassé. Hier, cette expression de Ressources Humaines est venue remplacer celle d’Administration du Personnel
-
Nous sommes entrés dans un monde industriel, commercial et administratif où l’humain tend à se faire rare. A ce titre de rareté, l’humain n’est plus un facteur de production, il est devenu un investissement stratégique dans le capital immatériel de l’entreprise
- 8 more annotation(s)...
"Frequent airplane passengers are likely to have read the following message prior to watching an in-flight movie: “the following film has been modified from its original version. it has been formatted to fit this screen.” for purposes of this airborne analogy, let’s fasten our seatbelts, power off any electronic devices, and firmly adjust our trays to the upright position. Better yet, let’s substitute the word film for new employee and the word screen for organization so it reads as: “the following new employee has been modified from its original version. it has been formatted to fit this organization.”"
-
New employees enter into an organization with two things in mind. First, they want to perform well in the eyes
of those who have made the hire in the first place. -
Second, the new employee yearns to do well for himself. He also has made a decision, in this case accepting the job offer. It’s important for this new employee to do well in his own eyes. No one wants a sketchy past of poor career decision
- 10 more annotation(s)...
"In March 2010, CEO Hiroshi Mikitani (HBS MBA '93) stood in front of his employees at online retail giant Rakuten's Tokyo headquarters and dropped a bomb: all 7,100 workers would have two years to become proficient in English—the "language of business"—or risk demotion.
"I was simply astonished," said an engineer interviewed after the announcement. "Many Rakuten employees are allergic to English."
In a company where just 10 percent of all workers at the time spoke English, Mikitani's move was radical and divisive. He even coined a term for the conversion: "Englishnization.""
-
Even American-based companies with operations overseas need a language strategy
-
teaching non-English speakers a new language risks drops in productivity, causes some employees to lose status, and can engender belief that they aren't as effective in their second tongue
- 8 more annotation(s)...
"If we have learned anything during the past few years it is that the pace of change is absolutely ridiculous. No matter what part of the organization you are in, your ability to keep pace is challenged daily. If we can accept this as a truth, then there is uniquely one best practice that might stand a chance, how we adapt to change. Other than that, all other ‘Best Practices’ are simply roadblocks to success and excuses to remain irrelevant. "
-
“Best Practice is a forensic science, an autopsy on a corpse. Learning is an activity of the living.
-
they are stories, there for you to pick out the pieces which make sense to you, your team and your organization. Don’t assume someone else knows best. Has anyone really been doing what you have longer than you have been doing it? Sure, some parts, of course. But all of it?
- 1 more annotation(s)...
"Tom Kelly, general manager of IDEO, the world-renowned design firm, likes to quote French novelist Marcel Proust, who famously said, "The real act of discovery consists not in finding new lands but in seeing with new eyes." What goes for novelists goes for leaders searching to craft a novel strategy for their company, a new product for their customers, or a better way to organize their employees. In a world that never stops changing, great leaders never stop learning."
-
Today, the challenge for leaders at every level is no longer just to out-hustle, out-muscle, and out-maneuver the competition. It is to out-think the competition in ways big and small, to develop a unique point of view about the future and help your organization get there before anyone else does
-
First, the best leaders (and learners) have the widest field of vision. - 6 more annotation(s)...
"It's rare to find a corporate human resources function that accelerates change by actively finding ways to help drive new strategies. Most HR groups sit back and wait for requests from the business for administrative people transactions. In their role of stewards of policy compliance, they can tend to be a brake on change.
But not at IBM. Its HR function has been instrumental in the $100 billion company's metamorphosis from a floundering computer manufacturer in the 1990s to a prosperous software and consulting services company today. HR has helped the organization absorb more than 125 acquisitions since 2000, and integrate globally, saving $6 billion since 2005."
-
"We observed that 80% of leadership development is based on work experience. We looked to see what we could do to create a work-related development opportunity.
-
we took the top people in mature markets and assigned them to help and mentor people in the growth markets. Growth market leaders learn from major markets, and equally important, vice versa."
- 7 more annotation(s)...
"Un article récent de Jonathan Miles sur son blog intitulé “A group of would be friends” (« Un groupe d’amis potentiels »), dont l’origine est partie d’une discussion sur twitter, s’interroge sur les raisons pour lesquelles les gens ne s’engagent pas dans l’apprentissage. Jane Hart pense que ce phénomène vient du fait que les gens ne sont pas intéressés par leur travail ; par conséquent, comment pourraient-ils être intéressés par l’apprentissage ? On a demandé à Jonathan de raconter son histoire, qui correspond au propos de son post. C’est un bon exemple d'une communauté qui s’épanouit dès lors qu’elle se construit sur l’humain. Et si Jane a tout à fait raison, sa réponse n'est qu'une partie du problème."
-
On pourrait se demander si les comportements parentaux, les normes sociales, les systèmes scolaires (merci à Roger Schank pour avoir examiné ce point !) et tout ce qui tourne autour de la vie des jeunes ne conspirent pas en vue de refouler la capacité à produire des idées neuves et originales et à concevoir l’extraordinaire.
-
Si une personne a été habituée au non-apprentissage et au fait que notre environnement ne fait pas la distinction entre ceux qui apprennent et ceux qui ne le font pas, qu’est ce qui peut la motiver pour que cette aptitude innée fondamentale resurgisse ? Si la personne qui apprend reçoit la même récompense que celle qui « se repose sur ses lauriers », à quoi bon apprendre?
- 5 more annotation(s)...
"Management vs. leadership — it's a distinction we all hear over and over these days. It says management focuses on getting work done on time, on budget, and on target — in other words, steady execution and control — while leadership focuses on change and innovation. "
-
Most writers about leadership then and now explicitly note the continuing importance of management. Success still depends on execution, controls and boundaries, systems, processes, and continuity.
-
Both leadership and management are crucial, and it doesn't help those responsible for the work of others to romanticize one and devalue the other. To survive and succeed, all groups and businesses must simultaneously change in some ways and remain the same in others. They must execute and innovate, stay the course and foster change.
- 2 more annotation(s)...
Il apparaît à de plus en plus de gens que nos organisations héritées du taylorisme disposent avec les nouvelles technologies de larges réserves d’efficacité qui ne demandent qu’à être libérées. A condition d’intégrer pleinement les possibilités offertes par les nouveaux usages numériques, et de pouvoir conduire le changement, et dans les structures et dans les mentalités. Et de savoir où aller, et par quoi commencer.
-
Il apparaît à de plus en plus de gens que nos organisations héritées du taylorisme disposent avec les nouvelles technologies de larges réserves d’efficacité qui ne demandent qu’à être libérées. A condition d’intégrer pleinement les possibilités offertes par les nouveaux usages numériques, et de pouvoir conduire le changement, et dans les structures et dans les mentalités. Et de savoir où aller, et par quoi commencer.
-
les communautés ne peuvent pas être à elles seules réguler la nouvelle organisation du travail. Et n’ont d’ailleurs jamais eu cette vocation.
- 5 more annotation(s)...
"New research just released by Capgemini/MIT reveals that two-thirds of global enterprise companies are failing to evolve into digital enterprises. According to the report, people and culture are the biggest barriers to digital transformation."
-
slick marketers have brainwashed senior execs into thinking that the path to digital transformation is a disruptive, revolutionary path, rather than an evolutionary process.
-
If the IT marketing people are to be believed, senior execs need to rip out their existing mission-critical tools like email and documents, and replace them with relatively unproven technologies such as blogs, wikis, and allied next-generation tools.
- 5 more annotation(s)...
"Organizations adding social elements to their intranets are finding that doing so creates new opportunities for collaboration. When I spoke to Jack MacKay, CIO of the American Hospital Association, he told me the AHA lists the key initiatives of its 13 business units along with how they tie into the AHA's central strategic plan. The result is "a direct line of sight" into projects that makes it easier to track them and identify possible areas for improvement. And as MacKay said, "As people become more aware of activities of other departments, they start seeing opportunities for cross-departmental collaboration.""
-
Organizations adding social elements to their intranets are finding that doing so creates new opportunities for collaboration. When I spoke to Jack MacKay, CIO of the American Hospital Association, he told me the AHA lists the key initiatives of its 13 business units along with how they tie into the AHA's central strategic plan. The result is "a direct line of sight" into projects that makes it easier to track them and identify possible areas for improvement. And as MacKay said, "As people become more aware of activities of other departments, they start seeing opportunities for cross-departmental collaboration."
-
Social networks among workers. As Hinchcliffe notes, networks usually feature rich user profiles that maintain an employee's connections to their colleagues and often employ updates and live work streams. By using search tools and querying connections, folks can readily find coworkers with relevant expertise.
- 7 more annotation(s)...
"You know your organization needs to change. You've developed a strategic view about where you need to go and you've matched that up with an understanding of the changes that will require in your culture. You've thought very hard about organizational mindsets and personal behaviors that will need to shift to get there. Now, you actually have to do something to shift them. "
-
what we've seen is that the starkest differentiator between organizations that can change successfully (and sustain higher performance over time) and all the others isn't in what they say, it's in what they do--how they actually implement change. You can't just have a workshop and put up a few posters, you have to intervene in the system.
- 5 more annotation(s)...
-
Selected Tags
Related Tags
changemanagement (31)
enterprise2.0 (31)
management (29)
culture (22)
adoption (20)
organization (16)
innovation (14)
collaboration (12)
socialmedia (11)
leadership (10)
transformation (10)
casestudies (10)
strategy (10)
process (6)
humanresources (6)
behaviors (6)
intranet (6)
socialsoftware (5)
communication (4)
Top Contributors
Groups interested in change
-
1998 Clinton's WMD and "Iraqi Liberation Act" 1998
America's congress passed th...
Items: 12 | Visits: 359
Created by: liveinfreedom .
-
Garnaut Draft Report
The Garnaut Climate Change R...
Items: 18 | Visits: 108
Created by: Suhit Anantula
Highlighter, Sticky notes, Tagging, Groups and Network: integrated suite dramatically boosting research productivity. Learn more »
Join Diigo