Skip to main content

Bertrand Duperrin's Library tagged businessneed →  View Popular, Search in Google

Jun
8
2010

"As I mentioned on twitter, my peer Jeanne Murray and I are presenting a session at the Enterprise2.0 conference in Boston next week that describes an overall view of how we think e2.0 has evolved in our organization. The focus here is not on the technologies themselves but on the human capabilities, interests, and mindset as it has evolved over time. It talks about what we used to think about social computing and how that as changed or evolved with each stage. "

www.ibm.com/...ution_of_enterprise2_0_at_ibm1
- Preview

ibm organization transformation enterprise2.0 businessneed processes socialprocess

  • -          <!--[endif]-->Stage 1 – Seeing a need for social computing in business

      

    <!--[if !supportLists]-->-          <!--[endif]-->Stage 2 – Recognizing the business uses and value

      

    <!--[if !supportLists]-->-          <!--[endif]-->Stage 3 – Bringing people together into a common frame

      

    <!--[if !supportLists]-->-          <!--[endif]-->Stage 4 – Building better social-enabled processes

      

    <!--[if !supportLists]-->-          <!--[endif]-->Stage 5 – Shifting the overall perspective to a dynamic, agile mindset

Mar
22
2010

  • Fabrice Poireaud-Lambert showed a very interesting 4 axis graphs (Organization and HR / Competencies / Methods and Tools / Culture and Behaviors) that LdE used to evaluate the change factor of such a project on the enterprise scale. They reached a 12/16 value which is pretty high.
  • Executives support for project involving change of such magnitude. Big changes project need legitimation. The reason : without strong leadership and executive support, the project is a lost cause against managers who have day to day budget and objectives.
  • 3 more annotation(s)...
Nov
15
2009

"Le livre blanc ne cache pas les problèmes du secteur en citant d’entrée de jeu les chiffres de Gartner où l’on apprend que 70% des implantations de logiciels sociaux à l’interne sont des échecs. Trop d’entreprises, selon Socialtext, ont adopté l’approche entreprise 2.0 seulement pour faire partie de la parade. D’où la nécessité d’établir au départ une stratégie avec des objectifs d’affaires clairs qui peuvent être mesurés d’autant plus facilement."

www.rezopointzero.com/...ectif-d%e2%80%99affaires-clair
- Preview

entreprise2.0 formal informal businessneed customers partners value businessvalue process

  • Les départements les plus propices à améliorer leurs processus formels avec des outils sociaux sont ceux où les indicateurs de performance sont peu élevés, où tout le monde procède à sa façon sans savoir comment font les meilleurs d’entre eux et où on réinvente la roue au lieu de profiter du travail déjà accompli.
  • Les départements les plus intéressants pour introduire des processus informels de collaboration en ligne sont ceux où les gens ont beaucoup de difficultés à se coordonner quand le rythme de leurs activités devient trop rapide. Les détails tombent dans les craques faute d’un partage efficace de l’information.
  • 4 more annotation(s)...
Aug
6
2009

As people embrace social media in their private lives, they naturally expect to use similar tools within the enterprise. This is especially true for younger workers who use these tools in everyday life. Open communication, collaboration, and content generation are as much a part of their standard toolkit as using a computer or mobile phone.

So, how should companies deal with the increasing expectation that Web 2.0 will drive Enterprise 2.0?

* Taking the slow road means that companies will risk losing workers who expect innovation in the outside world to reflect directly on how they communicate at work.
* Going for quick adoption means that companies must find ways to overcome the risks to corporate culture that adopting these tools can entail.

If your organization is still unsure about what to do with these emerging technologies and how to adapt them to suit its culture, you're in good company. A main finding from our study's interviews is that most companies are not very far along in a wholesale adoption of Web 2.0 technologies — unless "thinking about social software" is considered progress. The oft-repeated refrain from interviewees was "talk to us next year."

www.useit.com/...social-intranet-features.html
- Preview

socialnetworks intranet socialsoftware intranet2.0 enterprise2.0 jakobnielsen culture adoption businessneed

  • Business need is the big driver. Although our report discusses specific tools (blogs, wikis, and such), enterprise 2.0's power is not about tools, it's about the communication shift that those tools enable.
  • So, rather than saying: "X is hot on the Web, let's get it on the intranet," say: "We need to accomplish Y; can X help us?"
  • 2 more annotation(s)...
Jul
15
2009

IT projects need define a combine the engineering work to be done and the results that they create. Doing so requires more than giving the project a business based name. Here are a few steps for an alternative way to define an IT project.

Combining these three ideas, when companies pay to execute a project, it’s not the project they want, it’s the result. They want more revenue generating customer relationships, not processes around a CRM system or even the capability to look up customer names. What they want is the result.

blogs.gartner.com/...y-to-define-it-project-results
- Preview

IT results project ITproject business businessneed control productivity visibility engagement customervalue finance ROI

1 - 5 of 5
Showing 20▼ items per page
Move to top