Bertrand Duperrin's Library tagged → View Popular, Search in Google
"When I worked for IBM, the customer was always right. In today’s column I interview Vineet Nayer, CEO of HCL Technologies, one of the largest I.T. outsourcing firms in the world. Vineet argues that how it got to be one of the world’s largest IT firms is by putting employees first and customers second. Sounds radical, but when he explains, it makes sense."
-
The question is “what is the core business of any corporation?” and the answer is to create different shared value for its customers.
-
The answer to that question is the business of managers and management should be to enthuse and encourage employees so that they can create a different shared value: enhance employees first and customers second.
- 4 more annotation(s)...
"Executives tell me their teams make decisions all the time. "Bob," a CEO will say, "I know you think that individuals — not groups — make most decisions. But that's not true. My team and I make lots of decisions together."
In fact, they don't. It's an illusion."
-
But then I ask the CEO two questions. First: "Were you part of the consensus?" If the answer is yes, then in reality the group didn't decide; they agreed on a course of action that was acceptable to the boss.
-
The group discussion helped evolve the boss's thinking, which reshaped the ultimate decision. But even if the decision wasn't one the boss would have initially made or isn't his or her top choice, the fact is that the CEO was part of the consensus.
- 4 more annotation(s)...
"Pourquivons sur notre série d’article sur la Génération Y et l’innovation Managériale avec L’individualisme. Il est assez fréquent de reprocher à la « génération Y » son individualisme.
Mais qu’entend-on par là ? Il règne une certaine confusion entre « égoïsme », « égocentrisme » et « individualisme »."
-
Si l’égoïsme consiste à se préoccuper essentiellement de son plaisir ou de son intérêt
-
Différent, l’individualisme est une tendance qui fait prévaloir l’individu sur toute autre forme de réalité. Dans le contexte d’entreprise, l’individualisme accorde plus d’importance à l’humain qu’à l’économiqu
- 6 more annotation(s)...
"In many companies, the relationship between IT and business leaders is a very troubled marriage indeed. Miscommunication is rife, leaving executives struggling to figure out what's working for the company, what's not, and how to improve the situation. Can a marriage like this be saved?"
-
The first step in fixing the situation was to understand exactly what IT costs and performance really were, not just what they seemed to be.
-
The key in bridging the gap is for IT leaders to explain clearly the reasoning behind saying "no." If they give the business side enough insight, future requests might even be more reasonable.
"When Sam Palmisano retired as CEO of IBM on Dec. 31, it marked the end of one of the most remarkable tenures in corporate history. Over his decade as IBM's leader, he made a number of moves, each instructive, but their power came from their cumulative effect in the transformation of a good company back into a great one."
-
That council of barons was replaced by teams for strategy, technology, and operations whose members included the next generation of operating leaders.
-
The consulting arm of PriceWaterhouseCoopers was bought to provide thousands of professionals who understood the process needs of key industries. In a near-miraculous feat of management, those consultants were partnered with technologists and successfully integrated into the company.
- 1 more annotation(s)...
"La gouvernance de l’information, c’est un peu comme l’entreprise 2.0 (et ce n’est pas un hasard) : on en parle beaucoup, mais on la “réalise” peut être un peu moins !
La gouvernance de l’information est un élément indispensable à la construction de l’entreprise de demain car elle est déterminante pour la CONFIANCE.
Pour beaucoup, la gouvernance a été jusqu’alors une stratégie de défense, de protection et les mises en oeuvre de solutions ont été principalement faites pour répondre à des litiges !
C’est peu dire que la gouvernance n’est pas encore directement “intégrée” dans notre quotidien !"
-
la gouvernance de l’information doit être réfléchie principalement en tant que soutien aux affaires et non pas seulement comme une stratégie de défense décidée par les “risk managers” et les directions juridiques.
-
- rendre la “prise de décision” plus facile et transparente,
- définir clairement les rôles et les responsabilités,
- décider de “règles” (guidelines) à propos des contenus partagés et générés par les “utilisateurs” (versus ceux générés au niveau des applications d’infrastructure)
- et ,, pouvoir “quantifier” les coûts de la non conformité des informations par rapport aux “règles” métiers (usages) ce qui implique de pouvoir disposer d’indicateurs clairs et pertinents pour le “business”.
Dans le contexte plus concret du quotidien des organisations, cela oblige, pour autant qu’on le veuille, à un certain nombre de “nouveautés”, à savoir :
"To unleash the creative potential of teams, HR leaders must help set a solid foundation, provide insights so team members can successfully cope with differences and coach team leaders on positive ways to approach the collaboration so the team will be high-performing, "
-
Human resource executives can help their organizations use teams more effectively by providing resources for team leaders to deal with friction, dissension and dissatisfaction head on. When this happens, teams not only produce outstanding results but also unleash the creativity of team members and build commitment to the organization and its goals.
-
Lack of support for a team culture. This shows up in various ways, all of which are damaging. For example, management "empowers" the team, but still demands that everything be cleared through senior leadership, or management refuses to decrease other responsibilities for people participating on the team.
- 9 more annotation(s)...
"HR and learning and development (L&D) have come in for some serious criticism over the years, in terms of value for money. If I felt they needed defending I would suggest that managing people in organisations is a much more complex affair than most operational managers realise or are prepared to admit. Certainly HR administration can become very costly if not managed well."
-
Trying to apply these principles in a world where ‘intangibles’ are now accepted as having a significant, albeit indeterminate, value is proving to be a real auditing challenge.
-
Unfortunately many accountants have not been trained in the setting of non-financial objectives and are used to defining objectives in qualitative rather than quantitative terms, e.g. the best xxx, the biggest yyy, more effective zzz, etc.
- 5 more annotation(s)...
"The news that Cisco is dismantling its unique structure of councils and boards to reduce bureaucracy presents a cautionary tale and an insight into the true meaning of teamwork and collaboration in organizations."
-
But rather than reorganize to move from a functional structure to solutions groups, or implement a matrix organization, Cisco created overlays on top of the same organization structure. Councils and boards had their own hierarchy — boards reported to councils, projects emanated from boards, and they all drew resources from the functional groups
-
for a technology company that must be nimble and responsive, this became a drag not an accelerator.
- 5 more annotation(s)...
". Everybody knows there are downsides to management-as-usual, but are they any alternatives? We can dream about organizations where employees eagerly challenge their superiors, where honesty trumps deference and where the pyramid has been turned upside down—but then again, we can also dream about world peace and cold fusion."
-
– Transparent Financial Data. Vineet realized it’s hard to feel empowered if your manager has a lot of data you don’t. With this in mind, HCLT’s IT team created a simple widget that gave every employee a detailed set of financial metrics for their own team and other teams across the company.
-
– U&I. Early on, Vineet and his leadership team set up an online forum and encouraged employees to ask tough questions and offer honest feedback. Nothing was censored on the “U&I” site; every post, however virulent, was displayed for the entire company to see
- 6 more annotation(s)...
"Cette pesée des postes revient à formaliser : comment le travail s’appréhende, se structure et se valorise dans l’entreprise. Jon explique très bien comme la méthode Hays fonctionne (les autres comme TowersPerrin sont très proches au final).
Sa démonstration met en valeur que ces méthodes qui datent des années 50 ou 60 ne savent pas appréhender les transformations apportées par l’économie de la connaissance à l’heure de l’entreprise 2.0. Elles ont toutes une vision héritée de Taylor. La structure hiérarchique des organisations est le reflet d’une conception hiérarchisée des compétences et des responsabilités."
-
1) ce n’est pas celui qui sait (”know-how”) qui fera (”problem solving”) ou qui sera responsable de sa mise en oeuvre (”accountability”)
2) la construction d’un savoir, l’application ou la responsabilité des mises en oeuvre sont collectives, protéiformes… imprévisibles !
-
ant qu’une entreprise ne mettra pas à jour son système de pesée des postes à l’aune des nouveaux modes de travail, elle ne sera qu’un réacteur dont on a rénové des fonctions annexes sans toucher le coeur du réacteur.
Workers of the world, go remote!
During this time of economic crisis and reinvention of global capitalism, one of the things crying out for reinvention is the rigid workplace of the last century. It is amazing in the digital age that most work is still associated with industrial age work rhythms and the symbolic chains that tie workers, knowledge and otherwise, to fixed locations. Flexible workplaces with flexible hours and days are long in coming.
If an organisation is only focused on outcome-based accountability can it thrive in more active or random environments? It seems that most markets and socio-economic structures are becoming more chaotic - just try to predict the price of gas for next month. Re-framing the concept of accountability is an important conversation to start with HR professionals and executives.
First, the good news from a new study from Hewitt Associates and the Human Capital Institute: Most companies now have a talent-management strategy in place.
The bad news? Very few of those companies are executing that strategy successfully.
-
In his work with corporate leaders and companies, Robinson has found several repeating themes as to why talent-management processes are not adhered to and strategies are not executed.
Among them:
a) Not enough time.
b) Compensation systems that do not incent managers to develop people.
c) CEOs rarely model behavior consistent with talent-management strategies.
d) Inadequate funding for talent-management execution. -
For HR leaders aiming to beef up execution of talent-management strategies, Campbell of Hewitt suggests focusing on three steps.
1. Determine the most critical areas of the business to support. Ask what aspects of talent management are most closely aligned with the company's top business priorities.
2. Position HR to be the internal experts on talent management. Present the HR department as a professional consulting team, equipped to provide guidance to managers and insights to company leaders.
3. Measure the results. Use predictive analytics and metrics to determine if talent-management initiatives are being implemented and are effective.
In developed economies today the most important factors associated with corporate competitiveness and growth are invisible. These intangible assets – collectively called intellectual capital – range from staff and management skills, software, R&D, brands and patents all the way to strategies, processes, and relationships with suppliers and customers. Yet despite its paramount importance, intellectual capital is still neither reported by companies nor valued by capital markets systematically and broadly.
The current state of accounting for a company’s assets, developed over centuries according to evolving economic needs, is not synchronised with today’s economic reality. If this less than full treatment of intellectual capital is continued, the associated adverse effects could be far-reaching: the cost of capital could remain inadequately high for many companies (particularly for those innovative, highly knowledge-intensive ones), investors and lenders might risk missing out on potential opportunities, and the economy on potential growth.
So the difference here is really one of time: with the Internet, problems sprout up and spread quicker than ever; but solutions are still handled by us slow (but thoughtful) real people.
We live in a dangerous world these days, where "intelligent" algorithms determine for us what is real and what should be trusted. Should Google be held accountable for this? Should they fix their news algorithms so that they are forced to verify stories and information?
Enterprise 2.0 and web 2.0 environments may have their differences, but trying to veil transparency isn’t going to do any good. We also have to work at generating network effects, we need to encourage and facilitate participation, and lastly we need a way to measure or value an individuals social productivity. This can all be helped by reviewing job descriptions, corporate strategies, and job evaluations to include or encourage social participation.
-
Accountability
1. How does one put a value on the value of knowledge?
2. What do you call it after you recognize that knowledge in your enterprise has value?
3. And how do you use knowledge as opposed to indiscriminately discarding it as an asset?
It looks like we still have no software in the enterprise to make the people accountable
What features do we need?
In social continuous processes, aka the value chains, ownership has to be clear and accountability towards the owner and all that is dependent on my work is a must. That's the reality meeting Web 2.0 when it redefines itself to Enterprise 2.0.
Selected Tags
Related Tags
Top Contributors
Groups interested in accounta...
-
Charity Monitoring Organizations
Items: 4 | Visits: 15
Created by: Patti Larson
-
Resources
Debate information for Soc. ...
Items: 3 | Visits: 17
Created by: Alisha Kiser
Highlighter, Sticky notes, Tagging, Groups and Network: integrated suite dramatically boosting research productivity. Learn more »
Join Diigo
