Skip to main content

Nov
4
2011

  • 6. Les " peer bonus ". Encore du pouvoir pour des pairs. Ils récompensent l'effort particulier d'un collègue - souvent sur les projets transversaux - en lui attribuant une somme d'argent " symbolique " (100 $).
  • 9. Des bols d'air. Le programme maison de rotations, mensuelle, trimestrielle ou annuelle à l'international permet de sortir de sa bulle. Et chaque métier- commercial-marketing, RH, ingénieur- a le sien.
    Les collaborateurs occupent alors des missions temporaires de 1, 3 ou 12 mois dans l'un des 30 pays, grand ou petit, où Google est implanté.

"Google emploie 29 000 salariés dans le monde, dont 250 en France (bientôt 500). Son esprit start-up anticonformiste séduit et retient. Mais sous les apparences rugit un puissant moteur : partager le pouvoir pour mieux se nourrir de la vitalité de l'individu."

management Google review recruitment innovation failure networking culture informationsharing peerreview hr casestudies

  • 1. Un recrutement partagé et diversifié. Ni le manager, ni le recruteur ne choisissent seuls. Au moins un collaborateur, issu d'un autre service, mène un entretien individuel avec le postulant.
  • La priorité sera donnée à ceux qui ont prouvé une capacité à fonctionner en réseau, " en capillarité " avec les autres tout en gardant une certaine humilité. Les candidats doivent en outre être capables de s'engager sur " des missions qui les dépassent " et de de partager leur expertise.
  • 4 more annotation(s)...
Jul
24
2011

"One person is the Decider for final design choices. Not focus groups. Not data crunchers. Not committee consensus-builders. The decisions reflect the sensibility of just one person: Steven P. Jobs, the C.E.O.

By contrast, Google has followed the conventional approach, with lots of people playing a role. That group prefers to rely on experimental data, not designers, to guide its decisions. "

Apple Google innovation decision decisionmaking hiring

  • The auteur, a film director who both has a distinctive vision for a work and exercises creative control, works with many other creative people. “What the director is doing, nonstop, from the beginning of signing on until the movie is done, is making decisions,” Mr. Gruber said. “And just simply making decisions, one after another, can be a form of art.”
  • “Steve Jobs is not always right—MobileMe would be an example. But we do know that all major design decisions have to pass his muster. That is what an auteur does.”
  • 4 more annotation(s)...
Jul
18
2011

"The advent of the Internet, with sophisticated algorithmic search engines, has made accessing information as easy as lifting a finger. No longer do we have to make costly efforts to find the things we want. We can "Google" the old classmate, find articles online, or look up the actor who was on the tip of our tongue. The results of four studies suggest that when faced with difficult questions, people are primed to think about computers and that when people expect to have future access to information, they have lower rates of recall of the information itself and enhanced recall instead for where to access it. The Internet has become a primary form of external or transactive memory, where information is stored collectively outside ourselve"

knowledge knowledgemanagement Google search searchengines memory information informationmanagement

Mar
1
2011

"Ever since Gmail captured the imagination of consumers, Google has been trying to push Google Apps to enterprise customers. In spite of some news about problems in their implementation for big customers, it has been gaining traction steadily. The biggest attraction towards Google Apps Email over other systems is the cost. Even though other players like Microsoft and IBM have a cloud strategy, Google’s pricing makes Google Apps very attractive for many enterprises. "

google ibm email cloud cloudcomputing cisco socialbusiness

  • Cisco pulled the plug two days back. They will no longer be investing resources on this service and they will help the current customers move out to another email system of their choice after their contract gets over
  • The product has been well received, but we’ve since learned that customers have come to view their email as a mature and commoditized tool versus a long-term differentiated element of their collaboration strategy. We’ve also heard that customers are eager to embrace emerging collaboration tools such as social software and video.
  • 3 more annotation(s)...
Feb
5
2011

"For years, book after book and article after article have praised Google as a citadel of innovation. They have lauded the incredible corporate culture where employees are treated like entrepreneurs. They have waxed lyrical about the staff’s freedom to spend 20 percent of their time on whatever they feel like going. It’s portrayed as a brilliantly innovative place with the brightest of the bright. New ideas are bubbling up all over. Writers have glowed with delight as they watched this wonder child become the star of the stock market."

google innovation management focus goal customers customersneeds needs customersatisfaction

  • The reality is somewhat different. The truth is that Google gets 95 percent of its revenues from a single core business—ads from searches.
  • Gmail is popular but makes little money. Apart from Android, Google has produced a series of flops like Google Wave, Google Buzz, and Orkut.
  • 4 more annotation(s)...
Aug
5
2010

"e innovation zealot in me felt instant disappointment today upon reading that Google Wave is no longer. The official word from Google:

But despite these wins, and numerous loyal fans, Wave has not seen the user adoption we would have liked. We don’t plan to continue developing Wave as a standalone product, but we will maintain the site at least through the end of the year and extend the technology for use in other Google projects."

collaboration context google googlwave collaborativetools businessprocess process workprocess problemsolving

    • But there’s a more important issue at play here. My sense is that the primary culprit here is lack of context.  No matter how sexy, the use case for silo’ed, dumb “un-smart” collaboration still generally goes like this:

       
      • Think up/get notified of a process problem or event
      • Remember that a bunch of tools and metaphors (email, phone, he conf room, software) exists that can help decision facilitation/brainstorming
      • Group/find the right people to collaborate
      • Pick a collaboration metaphor that works for everyone
      • Solve the problem
      • Go back to the system of record or powers that be, to deliver the outcomes.
  • Organizations still need to understand how to design work processes that blend optimal process and collaboration but its hell of a lot easier when the software plays nice.
Feb
13
2010

"I was lucky enough to be invited with one of my clients to Paris MS Campus to have a conversation about Microsoft social platform (Infopedia, AcademyMobile, Mingle, ...). It was the second time I had the opportunity to see a social platform. The first time was when I visited Dassault Systèmes. And when I think about the two approaches, I think we are in front of two major trends. The third one, obviously, is Google's."

microsoft dassaultsystemes intranet enterprise2.0 socialmedia legacysystems google

  • . As someone at MS told me, the really useful knowledge, more often than not, is in your legacy systems. So MS will manage to have those legacy systems talk with the social platform, and it will actually try to feed some social data and content into those systems.
Jan
29
2010

"In reality, Google has replaced opinions. We used to solicit people’s opinions a lot more often in the workplace because we needed to gather information about how things were being done in other companies where they may have worked in the past. We lacked the huge library of potential solutions that we have today, when a simple Google search can provide us with a myriad of opinions and best practices to choose from. So it no longer makes sense to use our precious talent and resources to try to generate ideas and opinions. I would rather they use their expertise to make the decision work! "

opinion google decision decisionmaking leadership

  • For 90% of people in any organization at any given time, their role is simply to be informed – not to make, or comment on, a decision. If you subscribe to the idea that everyone’s opinion has to count, in effect you are handing out veto power to the majority while only a minority has the power to say “yes.” This sets up a paradigm in which it’s very difficult to take positive action. You also create a situation in which people feel buy-in is optional. This leads to resistance that can stall or even sabotage your plans. Reality-Based Leaders are clear that the highest value the talent under their leadership can offer is to implement with excellence. They value action over opinion.
  • If you are not in the position of ultimate decision maker, offer expertise – not editorials. If you are asked your opinion about a potential decision, be proactive. Offer up a variety of ideas to the decision makers, outlining the potential benefits of each course of action along with the corresponding risks, complete with your team’s plan to mitigate the risks of any chosen option.
  • 2 more annotation(s)...
Nov
17
2009

"At the office, you've got a sluggish computer running aging software, and the email system routinely badgers you to delete messages after you blow through the storage limits set by your IT department. Searching your company's internal Web site feels like being teleported back to the pre-Google era of irrelevant search results.

At home, though, you zip into the 21st century. You've got a slick, late-model computer and an email account with seemingly inexhaustible storage space. And while Web search engines don't always figure out exactly what you're looking for, they're practically clairvoyant compared with your company intranet.

This is the double life many people lead: yesterday's technology for work, today's technology for everything else. The past decade has brought awesome innovations to the marketplace—Internet search, the iPhone, Twitter and so on—but consumers, not companies, embrace them first and with the most gusto."

technology productivity IT ITpolicies personaltechnology corporatetechnology google outlook virtualmachines search spotlight apple macintosh

  • Companies now have an array of technologies at their disposal to give employees greater freedom without breaking the bank or laying out a welcome mat for hackers
  • Some forward-thinking companies are already giving employees more freedom to pick mobile phones, computers and applications for work—in some cases, they're even giving workers allowances to spend on outfitting themselves. The result, they've found, is more-productive
  • 5 more annotation(s)...
Jun
26
2009

So when the company says it’s missing out on good ideas, this is both surprising, and perhaps somewhat expected. Surprising, because how does a company consistently ranked at the top of innovation surveys miss good ideas? Expected, because Google now employs 20,000. With that many people, how does a company stay on top of all those ideas?

What I’m seeing is a company that is is progressively systematizing its innovation practice. Google is following the path of its large enterprise brethren, adapting its internal processes to account for its size and its need to grow across multiple fronts. It really has to. It’s no longer the small company where ideas get tossed around on a white board, and everyone knows what’s going on. I mean, there are 20,000 people employed there.

Google is getting serious about innovation.

google innovation scorecard innovationmanagementscorecard

Jun
17
2009

I think this integration and the development of more focused capabilities that sit on top of Wave will be key to its success. As I mentioned earlier, I think that the completely open Wave will get some use as a novelty and even as a collaboration platform. However, it is too open ended for many work applications, as people will not want to recreate the functionality and features. It can potentially serve as a meeting point for applications. On the other hand, people might want to shape application themselves and not be forced to follow the structure of existing applications.

google googlewave collaboration email sharepoint

  • Since Wave may serve as a useful meeting place for applications, it may not replace many but become a useful platform.
Mar
7
2009

Some people complain that enterprise search should behave more like Google search, which I vehemently disagree with, for one primary reason: enterprise search is a FUNDAMENTALLY different problem than internet search. Here are some examples:

google search searchengines enteprisesearch relevance context

Jan
1
2009

Chez Kimind nous avons accompagné pendant un an un grand compte français dans le choix et l’adoption de Google Apps pour l’ensemble de l’entreprise, soit à peu près 30.000 postes de travail. C’est une première mondiale, car ce grand-compte a choisi l’ensemble de l’offre Google Apps, aussi bien la dimension messagerie (gmail, calendar, gtalk) que la dimension collaborative (docs + sites) pour remplacer à terme Microsoft Office et Lotus Notes dans 90% de leurs usages quotidiens. Jusqu’à présent les grands-comptes qui avaient adopté Google Apps à cette échelle l’avaient fait pour l’une des deux dimensions, pas les deux ensemble.

google googleapps office2.0 methodology adoption productivity microsoft microsoftoffice

    • les utilisateurs réclament la simplicité et la facilité dans la production et l’échange des informations avec leurs collaborateurs. Dès qu’ils ont compris que Google Docs par exemple leur offre ces deux dimensions instantanément, ils sont prêts à sacrifier quelques usages avancés des produits existants pour obtenir les bénéfices de la solution Google.
  • Au moins 90% des usages normaux quotidiens d’un employé sont couverts par les outils Google. Nous pouvons même dire que 100% des usages d’une très grande majorité d’utilisateurs sont couverts par la solution Google. Seuls ce que l’on peut appeler des “power users” auront besoin dans certains cas des fonctions avancées d’Excel ou de PowerPoint (nous mettons Word dans une autre catégorie, car il est à 99% très rapidement remplacé par la production en ligne directe en mode wiki ou doc partagé). Dans ce cas on conservera des version de MS Office pour ces gens-là et ces usages-là, ce qui réduit drastiquement les besoin de licences (une licence Google Apps coûte 10 fois moins)
Sep
13
2008

So the difference here is really one of time: with the Internet, problems sprout up and spread quicker than ever; but solutions are still handled by us slow (but thoughtful) real people.

We live in a dangerous world these days, where "intelligent" algorithms determine for us what is real and what should be trusted. Should Google be held accountable for this? Should they fix their news algorithms so that they are forced to verify stories and information?

information control google unitedairlines bloomberg trust accountability

La culture de l'information des jeunes ne s'est pas améliorée avec un accès élargi à la technologie", pointe le document.

google googlegeneration generationy internet informationculture culture information

Jun
5
2008

What about Google’s management style is so powerful, yet still transferable to other organizations?

google innovation decision management management2.0 enterprise2.0 internalblogs collaboration

  • What Enterprise 2.0 technologies make possible, Management 2.0 should embrace.
  • Look at areas of your operation where embracing employee input is critical to a successful outcome
  • 2 more annotation(s)...
1 - 20 of 29 Next ›
Showing 20 items per page

Diigo is about better ways to research, share and collaborate on information. Learn more »

Join Diigo
Move to top