Arne van Elk's Library tagged → View Popular
Google Now Personalizes Everyone’s Search Results (Danny Sullivan)
Zelfs als je niet bent ingelogd gaat Google standaard gepersonaliseerde zoekresultaten aanbieden. Je kunt daar wel onderuit, hoewel de knop daarvoor in het Nederlandse taalgebied nog niet te zien is (ws. is het sowieso in NL nog niet ingevoerd). Maar afgezien van privacy-aspecten: "If Google rewards the sites you like, does that mean eventually you’ll only see stuff you like?"
-
Beginning today, Google will now personalize the search results of anyone who uses its search engine, regardless of whether they’ve opted-in to a previously existing personalization feature. Searchers will have the ability to opt-out completely, and there are various protections designed to safeguard privacy. However, being opt-out rather than opt-in will likely raise some concerns. The company has an announcement here. Below, a deeper look.
-
An important aspect to the change is understanding that there’s no way for you — or anyone — to see what you’ve searched on or clicked on in the past, if you’re using the signed-out version of web history.
- 2 more annotations...
Eric Schmidt: How Google Can Help Newspapers - WSJ.com
Het antwoord van Google-topman Eric Schmidt op het gedoe rond Google News en al dan niet betaalde krantensites:
nrc.nl - Economie - Google beperkt gratis zoeken naar nieuws
Eén van de artikelen over de wijziging van de First Click Free-regeling bij Google Nieuws. Een hoop gedoe 'about nothing'?
-
Het lijkt nogal een stap: Google, voorvechter van een open internet, helpt
restricties op te leggen. Maar volgens internetdeskundige Henk van Ess is
het een loze maatregel die Google nu neemt. „De gemiddelde Google
News-bezoeker leest hooguit vijf tot acht keer artikelen uit het hele
aanbod. Mensen die per dag meer dan vijf artikelen uit één krant lezen zijn
nieuwsfanaten; die hebben genoeg manieren om gratis aan artikelen te komen.”
Josh Cohen Of Google News On Paywalls, Partnerships & Working With Publishers
Interview van Danny Sullivan met Josh Cohen, Google Business Product Manager, over hoe Google omgaat met content van betaalsites.
-
Want to do a paywall with no “first click free?” That’s fine with Google, says business product manager Josh Cohen. Want to do micropayments? Google will be “flexible” in considering support of new business models like this. But if you charge, expect less traffic, and also expect that your competitors will be “ecstatic” to pick up your loss, he said. Cohen’s comments on paywall issues were part of a wide-ranging interview I had with him about Google and its news service.
-
Below, you’ll find Cohen’s comments on these and other issues, along with a summary of how Google handles free, registration and subscription-based content. I spoke with Cohen in early October (a busy month in search has kept me from getting this posted until now). His comments are even more relevant given that talk of news publishers perhaps blocking Google have only ramped up in the past weeks
Search: Where Does It Go from Here?
De toekomst van zoekmachines: welke veranderingen kunnen we verwachten volgens een aantal experts.
Make Google Search Real-Time With This URL Hack
Verwijzing naar een mooie (maar oude) truck om de URL van een zoekvraag bij Google zo te veranderen dat alleen de resultaten van de laatste x seconden, minuten, weken etc. worden getoond. NB: hier wordt een iets andere syntax genoemd dan die ik al eerder kende. En natuurlijk geldt: Een artikel kan veel eerder geschreven zijn maar pas net (in zogenaamd 'real-time') ontdekt zijn door de Google bots.
-
Google web search results can be limited by timeframe using the "search options" link on every page, but one startup company CEO discovered today that searches can also be limited to results indexed minutes or seconds ago by making a simple change to the search results page URL.
Startup search engine Omgili's CEO Ran Geva wrote on his company blog today that time-limited search results pages include a parameter called QDR - perhaps standing for Query Date Range. You can change the number following the letters qdr and change the timeframe for your search.
Internet News: Google Doesn't Always Look for All the Words
Het blijkt dat Google soms op eigen houtje besluit om niet alle zoektermen mee te tellen bij het selecteren van resultaten, waardoor je dus een grotere set resultaten krijgt dan je eigenlijk wilt. Maar wanneer doet Google dat wel en wanneer niet!!! Check in ieder geval wat er onderaan de resultatenlijst staat.
How Google Wave is Changing the News
Google wave in the newsroom & building a community with your audience.
-
Although it’s still invitation only and in preview, the real-time wiki collaboration platform is being used by some media companies for community building, real-time discussion, crowdsourcing, collaboration both inside and outside the newsroom, and for cross publishing content.
Handleiding: Google PageRank werking uitgelegd – EdWords.nl Zoekmachine Marketing Blog
Zeer nuttig! Neemt ook een paar misverstanden rond Pagerank weg.
-
PageRank is altijd het paradepaardje geweest van Google, bedacht door de oprichters van Google en vernoemt naar één van hen (Larry Page).
PageRank was in de beginjaren dan ook de kern van Google’s zoekmachine en daar dankt PageRank z’n populariteit aan.
Maar is die populariteit ook nu nog terecht? En hoe werkt PageRank eigenlijk? Lees hieronder mijn uitgebreide uitleg en antwoorden op deze en andere vragen over Google PageRank.
The Risks of Personalized Search : Beyond Search
Door 'personalisatie' is het steeds minder goed te voorspellen welke zoekresultaten een zoekmachine iemand voorschotelt. Dit is vooral een probleem voor mensen die zich helemaal niet realiseren hoe groot de verschillen (kunnen) zijn wanneer een zoekmachine een vraag anders interpreteert dan de zoeker denkt.
-
First, users who think they are great searchers will rely on “recipes” (systems and methods) to deliver information tailored to their needs as determined by software agents. In short, the clueless will have no clue what their query has been interpreted to mean. The clueless searcher will get results and assume that their search expertise has returned exactly what the user wanted. Wrong. The smart system returns what the algorithms determine the user wanted. Perception is one thing; reality is another.
-
Second, searchers with confidence in their search skills often overlook the reality that sources may or may not be correct. Not even Google’s smart software can deliver phone numbers that match an organization’s current phone number. Even more egregious errors exist within any result set. Users who lack basic search skills are likely to accept information in a results list at face value. Users lack a foundation in determining what is reliable and what is not.
- 1 more annotations...
Google Social Search Launches, Gives Results From Your Trusted "Social Circle"
Danny Sullivan met een lang artikel over de mogelijkheden van Google Social Search. Hij benadrukt dat we google social search NIET moeten verwarren met real-time search.
-
Google Social Search is rolling out, a new service from Google that allows you to easily find material written by people you know and trust. It’s a pretty cool idea, especially in that it’s pretty painless to get started using it. The service will be available through Google Labs Experimental later today. Below, a look at the service.
-
But the important thing is….
GOOGLE SOCIAL SEARCH IS NOT REAL TIME SEARCH
That’s not bad, by the way. In fact, Google Social Search is pretty cool. It’s just important that it doesn’t get confused with a completely different type of search engine.
Social Search Is Trusted Search
Why There's Nothing to Fear in Social Search
Door de nieuwe social search-functie van Google wordt er niet opeens allerlei ongewenste info. over je gevonden. Het was altijd al zo dat als je onvoorzichtig bent, dat vroeg of laat onhandig uit komt.
-
Social search was in the news this past week when Google and Bing announced that they would be getting access to the Twitter fire hose. A flurry of subsequent posts speculated on what this "social search" would entail, and some expressed concerns over privacy and spam.
But social search is not something to be afraid of. It's really just an extension of behaviors that we're used to in the real world, brought online, thanks to the advent of real-time social computing.
Google Search Gets Personal: Social Search Launches in Google Labs
nog zo'n artikel, van RWW
-
How it Works and How to Trigger Social Search Explicitly
Once activated, Social Search results will appear at the bottom of the standard search results page and will be clearly labeled as "results from people in your social circle." As Google's search evangelist Matt Cutts pointed out to us in an interview earlier today, it is important to note that not every search will trigger Social Search results. When it does, however, the results should be highly relevant.
You can also explicitly trigger Social Search from the search options panel. There, Google will now also present a list of your friends that it thinks are the most closely related to the keywords you were searching for. By clicking on a name, you can restrict your search even further and just see results from this one person.
Google Social Search
De nieuwe dienst (in Google Labs). Via je Google profiel bepaal je zelf welke van jouw sociale netwerken gebruikt mogen worden.
-
The feature is opt-in and it's strongly connected to Google Profiles and Gmail. For example, if you add a link to your Twitter page to your Google profile, Google will find the people you follow and the content they produce: blogs, photo albums, videos, reviews. If your query returns useful results from your social connections, Google will display the results at the bottom of the search results pages.
The Myth Of Great Search Engine Results
Danny Sullivan heeft het idee dat zoekmachineresultaten steeds slechter worden, maar omdat er geen algemene benchmark is, is dat niet makkelijk te kwantificeren/bewijzen. Hij geeft voorbeelden van Bing en Google, met de zoekterm "search term research".
-
Things Feel Worse, But Hard To Quantify
Sadly, we still have no commonly accepted measurements of relevancy across search engines, and it’s an area that gets harder and harder to assess, as more material is blended in alongside web page results. That’s something I’d still like the search engine to collaborate on, some independent regular assessment of their quality.
To me, it feels like they’re getting worse, not better. But I can’t document that. What I can do is demonstrate without much difficulty, for areas where I have subject expertise, how bad they can be. They get by because along with the bad, there’s enough good. But they should be better than this.
Bing, Google and “real time content” search
Goed artikel, kanttekeningen bij de Twitter-deals van Google en Bing. Past een realtime Twitter stroom eigenlijk wel bij de activiteit zoeken? En hoe gaat al dat getwitter op een zinvolle manier gerangschikt worden?
-
- DISCOVERING: Something is happening, it may or may not be something I care about, and I don’t know it’s happening. I usually find out about it via some source, personal network, facebook, twitter, digg, CNN, etc. I don’t have a specific mission to know it before I find out about it.
- ALERTING: Something is happening and I knew ahead of time I wanted to know about it when it happens. I usually find out about these things via some source such as Google Alerts or Filtrbox. Alerts behave a little like a broad based search with asynchronous results that come back some day.
- SEARCHING: Something is happening or has happened or simply exists. I want to know more about it. I generally want the best answer, or the most recent answer. I may want the best recent answer, but that’s highly subjective and generally defaults back to my trust in the source as the tie breaker.
Search, however, is inherently post facto. It is a mechanism of forensics to help humans parameterize what they are looking for on the interwebs and the search tools diligently do their job to identify and produce results in a fairly consistent ‘page rank’-oriented way. Then you start the laborious process of hunting through the results to find the needle in the haystack and hope it’s relevant. In other words, an event happens, the search engine indexes this event (even if moments after it was created in near real time) and thus allows it to be discovered later via search. I think that our CEO Todd Vernon summed up three distinct categories for search really succinctly in his post on this subject of examining real time search…
A Deeper Look At Robots.txt
Wat moet je doen om er voor te zorgen dat Google (delen van) je website niet indexeert.
-
The Robots Exclusion Protocol (REP) is not exactly a complicated protocol and its uses are fairly limited, and thus it’s usually given short shrift by SEOs. Yet there’s a lot more to it than you might think. Robots.txt has been with us for over 14 years, but how many of us knew that in addition to the disallow directive there’s a noindex directive that Googlebot obeys? That noindexed pages don’t end up in the index but disallowed pages do, and the latter can show up in the search results (albeit with less information since the spiders can’t see the page content)? That disallowed pages still accumulate PageRank? That robots.txt can accept a limited form of pattern matching? That, because of that last feature, you can selectively disallow not just directories but also particular filetypes (well, file extensions to be more exact)? That a robots.txt disallowed page can’t be accessed by the spiders, so they can’t read and obey a meta robots tag contained within the page?
Google Fixes Usenet Archive; Old Geeks Rejoice
Google heeft eindelijk iets gedaan aan de slechte indexering van zijn oude usenet-archieven, maar is nog niet klaar.
-
In response to a Wired article that ran yesterday, Google is fixing its archives of Usenet posts, one of the richest and oldest repositories of user-generated content ever to exist online.
For those of you under the age of 30, Usenet began in 1979 in Chapel Hill as a collection of newsgroups. In the years that followed, Internet history unfolded, jargon was coined, and lore was created in these discussions. In 2001, Google acquired two Usenet archives comprising 700 million posts and failed to index them in any meaningful way. As of today, that wrong is being righted.
In the past, searching Usenet posts archived in Google Groups often yielded few or no results. For example, this recent discussion thread is all about the brokenness of Google's Usenet archives and search capabilities.
5 Ways to Add a Search Sidebar to Google SERPs | Search Engine Journal
Verbeter de zoekresultaten van Google met deze addons. Unified Search en het greasemonkey-script zijn ws. het interessantst.
-
No matter how much Google team tries, more often than not Google search results are not enough. We need to dig deeper, check various sources, ask friends’ advice etc. This post looks at various ways to make Google search results page exhaustive and more scannable: how to add a search sidebar to Google SERPs:
Innovation: The psychology of Google Wave - tech - 09 October 2009 - New Scientist
Eén van de betere artikelen over Google Wave (sinds de introductie).
-
Early reviews have been positive, and demand for invitations outstrips supply (Google says ours is still on the way). But even for those who have tried and liked it, Wave's potential is still hard to assess. The problem is that most talk about it is focussed on technology, not people.
Selected Tags
Related Tags
zoekmachines (56)
zoeken (50)
search (33)
SEO (26)
zoekmachineoptimalisatie (24)
personalisatie (23)
Pagerank (19)
zoekmachinemarketing (16)
zoekresultaten (15)
zoekcursus (15)
web 2.0 (15)
web (15)
personalization (14)
news (14)
personalized search (11)
nieuws (11)
webdiensten (11)
software (10)
RSS (10)
Sponsored Links
Top Contributors
Groups interested in google
-
Learning google analytics
Resources for understanding...
Items: 12 | Visits: 161
Created by: Joel Liu
-
IBP_overview
iBusinessPromoter (IBP) is ...
Items: 13 | Visits: 310
Created by: nmstrategies _
-
Credibility-search
ask google "should we have ...
Items: 8 | Visits: 188
Created by: tony curzon price
Diigo is about better ways to research, share and collaborate on information. Learn more »
Join Diigo