Skip to main content

TransTracker 's Library tagged "cyber command"   View Popular

22 Sep 09

Cyber threat calls for flexibility in command model, general says

  • Technology's dark side has created a new battlefield in cyberspace, and that brings new considerations to the way military commands should be structured, according to Lt. Gen. William Lord, chief of warfighting integration and chief information officer of the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force.
    • A nice little bit of tech determinism there. - on 2009-09-22
    Add Sticky Note
  • To be successful in such a domain, the U.S. Cyber Command and any other military force that deals with the cyber threat must develop a command structure that can be flexible, Lord said. Although the structure should be based on a traditional command model, it needs to incorporate some non-traditional elements, he said. “We need to operate without heavy restrictions. There are enormous restrictions in the offensive domain. The biggest problem isn’t the enemy, the biggest problem is us."
    • Sounds like a "don't ask, don't tell" policy on offense in cyberspace. Cyberwar is so dangerous and so fast, that there's no time for oversight. Just let us do our thing; we promise we'll be good. No thanks. - on 2009-09-22
    Add Sticky Note
  • 1 more annotations...
02 Aug 09

Halted ’03 Iraq Plan Illustrates U.S. Fear of Cyberwar Risk

  • While the Bush administration seriously studied computer-network attacks, the Obama administration is the first to elevate cybersecurity — both defending American computer networks and attacking those of adversaries — to the level of a White House director, whose appointment is expected in coming weeks.
  • “We are deeply concerned about the second- and third-order effects of certain types of computer network operations, as well as about laws of war that require attacks be proportional to the threat,” said one senior officer.
  • 8 more annotations...
31 Jul 09

USAF Cyber Command Winnows Base List

This is an old piece, but it's the first I've seen where a prominent official with influence over cyberwar policy has come so close to acknowledging what I have called the possibility (or threat) of "cross-domain response" to cyberattack. In this case, the (rather optimistic" term is "cross-domain synergies."

www.aviationweek.com/...story_channel.jsp - Preview

cyber command cyberwar

  • Lord also referred to what he called "cross-domain synergies," or the ability to use both kinetic and non-kinetic weapons "in concert, more efficiently. The bottom line is about changing enemy behavior," which doesn't necessarily have to result in total destruction. "Now you can have a more gradual and perhaps different kind of warfare where both a potential belligerent and another nation are not killing and maiming people" to effect change, Lord said.



    "[Cyber] can potentially be a weapon of mass disruption."

15 Jul 09

Costs of War: Chasing Cyberghosts

  • The North Koreans “need to be sent a strong message, whether it is a counterattack on cyber, [or] whether it is more international sanctions,” said Republican Rep Peter Hoekstra, a ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee. “The only thing they will understand is some kind of show of force and strength.”



    It would be easy to dismiss such opinions, especially from a lawmaker who has something of a reputation for over-statement.



    But alarmingly enough, the US military has openly discussed the possibility of retaliating against cyberattacks with real bombs. "You don’t take any response options off the table from an attack on the United States of America,” said Air Force General Kevin Chilton, the head of US Strategic Command, earlier this year. “Why would we constrain ourselves on how we would respond?”
  • cybersecurity fears are hugely overblown, and that the real danger may come from state over-reaction to a threat of which the paucity of public understanding is matched only by the unlikeness that it will ever materialize.



    The prospect of unknown attackers disabling banking systems or the power grid, “certainly sounds scary,” Morozov writes, “almost as scary as raptors in Central Park or a giant asteroid heading toward the White House. The latter two are not, however, being presented as ‘national security risks’ yet."
    • Well actually, colliding asteroids have been constructed as a security threat in the past. See...

      Mellor, Felicity (2007) 'Colliding Worlds: Asteroid Research and the Legitimization of War in Space', Social Studies of Science 37(4): 499-531.
      - on 2009-07-15
    Add Sticky Note
26 Jun 09

DOD creates Cyber Command as U.S. Strategic Command subunit

  • Defense Secretary Robert Gates issued a much-anticipated order June 23 establishing the U.S. Cyber Command, which will assume responsibility for the defense of the military’s portion of cyberspace.

    The new Cybercom will be a subunit of the U.S. Strategic Command and will be commanded by the director of the National Security Agency. It is expected to be headquartered with NSA at Fort Meade, Md., and to reach initial operating capacity in October, with full operating capacity coming in October 2010.

  • The order is recognition that cyberspace is a distinct military domain, along with land, sea and air, and the Defense Department must be prepared to defend and conduct offensive operations in it.


    “Cyberspace and its associated technologies offer unprecedented opportunities to the United States and are vital to our nation’s security and, by extension, to all aspects of military operations,” Gates wrote in his order. “Yet our increasing dependency on cyberspace, alongside a growing array of cyber threats and vulnerabilities, adds a new element of risk to our national security. To address this risk effectively and to secure freedom of action in cyberspace, the Department of Defense requires a command that possesses the required technical capability and remains focused on the integration of cyberspace operations.”

  • 3 more annotations...
29 May 09

Pentagon Plans New Arm to Wage Cyberspace Wars

  • The Pentagon plans to create a new military command for cyberspace, administration officials said Thursday, stepping up preparations by the armed forces to conduct both offensive and defensive computer warfare.


    The military command would complement a civilian effort to be announced by President Obama on Friday that would overhaul the way the United States safeguards its computer networks.

  • White House officials say Mr. Obama has not yet been formally presented with the Pentagon plan. They said he would not discuss it Friday when he announced the creation of a White House office responsible for coordinating private-sector and government defenses against the thousands of cyberattacks mounted against the United States — largely by hackers but sometimes by foreign governments — every day.


    But he is expected to sign a classified order in coming weeks that will create the military cybercommand, officials said. It is a recognition that the United States already has a growing number of computer weapons in its arsenal and must prepare strategies for their use — as a deterrent or alongside conventional weapons — in a wide variety of possible future conflicts.

    • Indeed, announcements of impending secret plans to authorize the offensive use of cyber-weapons were not forthcoming in today's press conference. - on 2009-05-29
    Add Sticky Note
  • 6 more annotations...
21 May 09

Defense contractor EADS plans to add 50 to 75 jobs

There's clearly lots of money to be made by those capable of convincing us that cyberwar is a big enough threat to national security.

www.bizjournals.com/...daily24.html - Preview

cyber command cyberwar

  • EADS North America Defense Security and Systems Solutions Inc. will be looking to fill between 50 and 75 positions over the next year as the company gears up to provide support services for the new cyber command, according to the company’s chairman and CEO Johnnie Hernandez.
  • Hernandez says the cyber command will be focused on defending the nation’s networks from threats, while the NSA facility will focus on launching attacks.



    “We have the full package in San Antonio,” Hernandez says.



    The 24th Air Force command is slated to have up to a $1 billion budget and create up to 400 military and civilian jobs. It will have an annual payroll of $40 million to $45 million.



    Hernandez says the importance of cyber defense is growing as the country becomes increasingly dependent on technology.



    “The United States is the most technologically advanced country in the world,” he says. “But we still have adversaries who try to break into our networks everyday.” Hernandez says there are an estimated 20,000 cyber attacks against government networks every week.



    “We don’t have enough trained people to mitigate all of these attacks,” Hernandez says. “We need to keep moving forward and this is a step in the right direction.”

10 Mar 09

Cyber Command - Why stop there?

  • Last year the term cyberspace was officially defined (Defense Department adopts new definition of 'cyberspace', May 2008) and last fall elevated to a new domain:


    cyberspace - A global domain within the information environment consisting of the interdependent network of information technology infrastructures, including the
    Internet, telecommunications networks, computer systems, and embedded processors and controllers. (CJCS CM-0363-08)
    REF: Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms (JP 1-02) (12 April 2001 - As Amended Through 17 October 2008)


    To further the discussion, it is also necessary to present the definition of another domain medium from the same publication:


    space - A medium like the land, sea, and air within which military activities shall be conducted to achieve US national security objectives. (JP 3-14)


    With all of the redundancies across the various services, why not consolidate them into a new service?  Analogous to the National Security Act of 1947, which created the Air Force from the Army Air Force, a 21st century reorganization could create a CyberSpace Force. (The exact name is not significant, using CyberSpace Force as a generic moniker.) This new force, formed from components in all of the services, would concentrate the existing disparate and duplicative efforts into one organization.  No service would lose capabilities, because we fight as a Joint team now.  Personnel from the newly created force would join operations and command structures as dictated by mission requirements.

27 Feb 09

Rules of engagement

A great piece from Defense Systems IT about current DoD cyberwar efforts.

defensesystems.com/...Rules-of-engagement.aspx - Preview

cyberwar cyber command

  • In the face of an increasingly dangerous collection of network-enabled terrorists, politically and economically motivated hackers, and potentially adversarial countries flexing their muscle in the cyber realm, the Defense Department is in the process of creating a doctrine for waging — and preventing — war in cyberspace.





    That effort has included the creation of command structures to equip and train a new class of cyber operators. The most visible of those efforts was the Air Force’s provisional Cyber Command, now destined to be a numbered Air Force under the umbrella of the Air Force Space Command. The Army also has established a cyber warfare unit, the provisional Army Network Warfare Battalion at Fort Meade, Md., created in July 2008.

  • At the same time, DOD has been wrestling with the question of how to conduct operations in a realm that is fraught with complexity, developing theory and doctrine for cyber warfare. When is an attack in cyberspace a criminal act, and when is it an act of war? How can the source of cyberattacks be attributed when most methods of attack easily screen the identity of the responsible party? How is deterrence possible in a world where a single person can launch an attack that does millions of dollars of financial damage or compromises national security in a way that aids enemies in taking lives? Those are all questions that DOD is seeking to answer.
  • 6 more annotations...
20 Nov 08

Space CO foresees smooth move to cyberspace

  • The next several months will bring massive changes to Air Force Space Command, stripping it of nuclear weapons and missiles, adding the emerging mission of defending cyberspace and shifting some 21,500 airmen and civilians into or out of the command.

    But Gen. Bob Kehler, commander of AFSPC, said the changes are not as earthshaking as some might imagine.

    The space, missile and cyberspace missions are closely intertwined, Kehler said.

    • Indeed, not that different at all. I mean, two of the three both have the word "space" in them. So, they've got to be pretty similar, right? - on 2008-11-20
    Add Sticky Note
  • The Air Force announced Oct. 24 that Air Combat Command’s nuclear-capable B-52s and B-2s, along with AFSPC’s intercontinental ballistic missile forces, will transfer to the new Global Strike Command, and Air Force Cyber Command (Provisional) will be renamed 24th Air Force and move from ACC to AFSPC.

    Global Strike Command will stand up by September 2009, and Cyber Command is expected to move to AFSPC next spring or summer.

    • Global Strike Command sounds an awful lot like reconstituting Strategic Air Command. I haven't heard any talk of putting the aerial refueling tankers under GSC though, which would be necessary for this to truly be SAC II. - on 2008-11-20
    Add Sticky Note
  • 1 more annotations...
14 Aug 08

Pentagon Puts AF Cyber Command on Hold

  • The Pentagon this week delayed and may kill the Air Force's nascent Cyberspace Command, according to a memo obtained by The Associated Press. This comes as Russia used a major computer network attack to begin its assault on Georgia.
  • The Russian computer takedown served the same purpose as a traditional air attack on enemy radars and communications antennae, said Michael Wynne, the former U.S. Air Force Secretary who made cyberwar a central mission of the Air Force.


    "The Russians just shot down the government command nets so they could cover their incursion," said Wynne. "This was really one of the first aspects of a coordinated military action that had cyber as a lead force, instead of sending in air planes. We need to figure out a way not only see the attack coming but to block it, and in blocking it chase it home."


    "I think this is a very poor time to send a signal that the United States is not interested in focusing on warfighting in the cyber domain," Wynne added.

    • If Wynne is correct about what the Russians were able to do, then I might have to agree that now is a bad time to not be serious about cyberwar capabilities. Though, I have been critical in the past of the Air Force's technology-centered approach to cyberwar. - on 2008-08-14
    Add Sticky Note
  • 2 more annotations...
1 - 13 of 13
Showing 20 items per page

Highlighter, Sticky notes, Tagging, Groups and Network: integrated suite dramatically boosting research productivity. Learn more »

Join Diigo