Skip to main content

Bertrand Duperrin's Library tagged participation   View Popular

28 Dec 09

Crowdsourcing: 5 Reasons It's Not Just For Startups Any More

"While some companies, notably Netflix (the just renewed the Netflix Prize) and Emporis (real estate data), have built their own crowdsourcing capabilities internally, this is not something most companies are experienced with or prepared to do themselves. It also often doesn't make sense to build a crowdsourcing environment in-house unless the work to be done is strategic to the business. For these organizations there are now commercial services available which have all the necessary ingredients to begin using them right away to crowdsource."

www.ebizq.net/...dsourcing_5_reasons_its_no.php - Preview

crowdsourcing problemsolving innovation participation design work testing support

  • How Crowdsourcing Works in 6 Easy Steps
  • While Internet startups have had considerable success with crowdsourcing over the last few years, including with its more serious cousin peer production, it's only recently that they've focused on creating the tools and communities that can be readily consumed by enterprises.
  • 6 more annotations...
17 Nov 09

Entreprise 2.0 : Les promesses du management moderne enfin tenues ?

"Peter Drucker est le premier à définir le Knowledge Worker en 1929. L’excellent David Weinberger (un des terroristes du Cluetrain Manifesto) peut bien dire qu’il s’agit là d’une définition pompeuse, elle n’en reste pas moins prodigieusement visionnaire. Toute sa théorie sur les organisations du XXème siècle est articulée autour de ce travailleur de la connaissance."

ceciiil.wordpress.com/...ses-du-management-enfin-tenues - Preview

peterdrucker management knowledgeworkers participation collaboration emergence agility transparence simplicity trust entreprise2.0 management2.0

  • Cette notion de management participatif est aussi au coeur de la reflexion de Peter Drucker :


    Most discussions of decision making assume that only senior executives make decisions or that only senior executives’ decisions matter. This is a dangerous mistake.

  • La réputation dans le monde connecté est l’évaluation quantifiée de la contribution de l’individu par ses pairs.
  • 2 more annotations...
20 Oct 09

Maximizing Business Value from Enterprise 2.0 through Fun & Motivation

"I am a strong believer that organizations, should focus and facilitate the use of these tools in order to maximize organizational benefits. To drive value, I've often referred to the engagement factors and in this post I wanted to focus on ons of the factors, "Motivation".

How do we address motivation? Do we adopt the "build it and they will come" approach? No. But what about Wikipedia? it seems like complete "self-organization" has made it successful. But consider that only 1% of the people who visit Wikipedia actually contribute content. That's alright with a population set of the world, but 1% of your company may not be enough and if you have specific objectives you may need to motivate others to participate"

rexsthoughtspot.blogspot.com/...izing-business-value-from.html - Preview

engagement motivation socialmedia participation management fun incentive enterprise2.0

  • In fact, bigger incentives causes worse results for cognitive tasks.
  • Fun, as a design principle shouldn't be overlooked as it impacts the application design from look and feel, through context, content and process. It also should be addressed when designing events leveraging social computing technologies
24 Sep 09

Simple Definition of Enterprise 2.0

“Enterprise 2.0 is about applications where business value is determined through the contributions of participants.”

www.fastforwardblog.com/...3741 - Preview

enterprise2.0 definition businessvalue contribution participation

16 Sep 09

Top-down and Bottom-up Project Management: Leveraging the Advantages of the Two Approaches

Significant changes are taking place in management and especially project management today. We hear that organizations, like the New York Times, Tribune Co., Ernst & Young switched from the so-called top-down management style to bottom-up management. Others, including some of the world’s biggest corporations, such as Toyota and IBM, implemented bottom-up management style elements in some of their departments. The popularity of the bottom-up approach to management is growing. In spite of this fact, the discussions about the two major approaches are still hot. Why have organizations become so anxious about changing their management style? If we compare the two management approaches, the answer to this question will be clear.

blog.softwareprojects.org/p-down-and-bottom-up-1936.html - Preview

projectmanagement topdown bottomup management project participation collaboration enterprise2.0 projectmanagement2.0 collectiveintelligence

  • . Team members are invited to participate in every step of the management process. The decision on a course of action is taken by the whole team. Bottom-up style allows managers to communicate goals and value, e.g. through milestone planning. Then team members are encouraged to develop personal to-do lists with the steps necessary to reach the milestones on their own.
  • These methods include are Enterprise 2.0 technologies – wikis, blogs, social networks, collaboration tools, etc. They come into organizations and change the original way of executing projects. They turn traditional project management into Project Management 2.0 and bring new patterns of collaboration, which are based on collective intelligence. Collective intelligence is a collection of valuable knowledge from different fields that each project team member is an expert in. This knowledge is now successfully collected and shared shared in a flexible, collaborative environment brought by second-generation project management software. The project manager is the one to conduct the work of his team and choose the right direction for the project development, based on the information received from the individual employees.
02 Jun 09

New Twitter Research: Men Follow Men and Nobody Tweets

We examined the activity of a random sample of 300,000 Twitter users in May 2009 to find out how people are using the service. We then compared our findings to activity on other social networks and online content production venues. Our findings are very surprising.

blogs.harvardbusiness.org/...witter_research_men_follo.html - Preview

twitter microblogging socialnetworks adoption participation

15 Jan 09

Library clips :: More thoughts on community structure and creation :: January :: 2009

Whereas, existing organisational teams wanting to form a community are a bit harder as the team already has a structure and dynamic, instead of it being born in the community.
They like having order and one community being the definitive hub for a topic, but the problem is that this community is too big, and people don’t always feel comfortable participating in such a big circle.

Smaller communities are better as people trust their peers and feel confident to participate, plus they have a similar shared context, so community activity is to your calibre…soon it becomes your favourite coffee shop to hang out and talk with your favourites friends about your favourite topic.

libraryclips.blogsome.com/...mmunity-structure-and-creation - Preview

communities structure participation creation

  • 1. Usually the lead wants to build a community for their people (a one stop shop of conversations and documents for their business unit). So we build a community for hundreds of people, and structure it by region or topic or sub-teams etc.
  • 2. Another idea, much to the chagrin of the lead, is to have many communities, as now there will be more places to visit to find information, but that’s OK because we can perhaps aggregate or be able to batch communities together and search multiple communities in one go.
  • 2 more annotations...
17 Aug 08

Gartner Asks - Are You Generation X, Y or V?

There are four levels of engagement in this new Generation V. Each level is related to the extent to which a customer engages with other customers and the level of engagement a business must have to enable them:


SPONSORSHIP


* Creators: Up to 3% o

www.cmswire.com/...generation-x-y-or-v-003000.php - Preview

adoption gartner generationv engagement communities participation metrics

18 May 08

Library clips :: Participation is the currency of the knowledge economy :: May :: 2008

  • Enterprise 2.0 is not based on utopian ideals. It is instead based on the very principles that drive all free-market economies. Organisations that adopt enterprise 2.0 will do so for auto-preservation and corporate gain - to help their bottom line.” Period.”
  • In this type of setting why would I want to share my knowledge, it’s my “power”, we are all on our own, and my personal know-how is going to get me ahead. If I don’t share I will meet my expectations (and no-one else), but on the same hand if I don’t find any knowledge, I may not meet my expectations.
  • 1 more annotations...
20 Apr 08

Rex's Thought Spot: 5 Social Computing Benefits that Adoption Rates Don't Show

here are 5 points that should help you explain that it's not just about the percentage of people that actively participate.

rexsthoughtspot.blogspot.com/...l-computing-benefits-that.html - Preview

enterprise2.0 adoption metrics participation

1 - 20 of 23 Next ›
Showing 20 items per page

Highlighter, Sticky notes, Tagging, Groups and Network: integrated suite dramatically boosting research productivity. Learn more »

Join Diigo