Home
Bertrand Duperrin's Library tagged → View Popular
5 Impressive Real-Life Google Wave Use Cases
"Should you happen to be one of those people, we’ve got a number of different resources that you can use to get up to speed with Google Wave. This time around, however, we wanted to look at how people are actually using it now. From process modelling and customer service, to project collaboration, annotation, and gaming, the examples listed here highlight the power of the newborn medium, and in part, showcase what we can expect as the platform matures."
Entreprise 2.0 : Les promesses du management moderne enfin tenues ?
"Peter Drucker est le premier à définir le Knowledge Worker en 1929. L’excellent David Weinberger (un des terroristes du Cluetrain Manifesto) peut bien dire qu’il s’agit là d’une définition pompeuse, elle n’en reste pas moins prodigieusement visionnaire. Toute sa théorie sur les organisations du XXème siècle est articulée autour de ce travailleur de la connaissance."
-
Cette notion de management participatif est aussi au coeur de la reflexion de Peter Drucker :
Most discussions of decision making assume that only senior executives make decisions or that only senior executives’ decisions matter. This is a dangerous mistake.
-
La réputation dans le monde connecté est l’évaluation quantifiée de la contribution de l’individu par ses pairs.
- 2 more annotations...
I don’t want to share, that’s counter to meeting my objectives…and reward!!
"Even if we do all the right things like facilitate, understand human behaviour, create and nurture conditions for participation, have an enterprise-wide concept…I don’t think it’s enough.
We need a complementary top-down shift to a new culture of working, as I said in my last post, a move from a competitive to collaborative organisation. "
-
If I’m rewarded just for my achieving my personal output, I don’t have an incentive to share as what I know gives me the edge, it’s not about the organisation, it’s all about me.
-
So yes it’s natural to share, as it’s a need, actually it’s survival…but this needs to be seriously recognised and harnessed as a strategy, and a smart strategy where it cooperates and is cohesive with other strategies. ie you can’t have a strategy about sharing is important, if you have another strategy that essentially says hoarding is important
- 1 more annotations...
Management 2.0 : Leadership et collaboratif
"es managers doivent prendre confiance en eux dans ce nouveau challenge et répondre notamment à deux défis, souvent inhabituelle dans les organisations traditionnelles :
* Savoir coordonner sans centralisme
* Savoir animer sans hiérarchie"
Is Enterprise 2.0 a Savior or a Charlatan? How Strategy-Driven Execution can pave the path to proving legitimate business value
"In this post, I want to describe what I saw at the conference, what I believe to be the missing components of the full Enterprise 2.0 picture, and also discuss how becoming "Driven to Perform" by understanding Strategy-Driven Execution is the best way to justify the value of Enterprise 2.0 in your organization.
"
-
I believe a significant part of the problem that crops up in the Enterprise 2.0 value discussions stems from the fact that the champions of Enterprise 2.0 significantly underweight the complexity and pervasiveness of the existing information technologies in the enterprise and the reasons why these technologies evolved.
-
They key activity steps of enterprise business processes embodied into today's ERP, CRM, SCM et al software, such order-to-cash, procure-to-pay, hire-to-retire, or record-to-report need to be highly structured for a variety of reasons, not the least of which is efficiency, their primary reason for being, but also for significant compliance concerns they address. I don't foresee a point any time in the near future where enterprises will leverage Enterprise 2.0 principles in the core of accounting, or payroll, or order management because there are serious risks to doing so for a business. These enterprise business processes are complicated enough without any unstructured processes surrounding in them, as you can see here in this offer creation process which we diagrammed in Driven to Perform in our chapter on Risk-Aware Marketing Performance Management.
- 3 more annotations...
McKinsey: What Matters: Using technology to improve workforce collaboration
"Knowledge workers fuel innovation and growth, yet the nature of knowledge work remains poorly understood—as do the ways to improve its effectiveness. The heart of what knowledge workers do on the job is collaborate, which in the broadest terms means they interact to solve problems, serve customers, engage with partners, and nurture new ideas. Technology and workflow processes support knowledge worker success and are increasingly sources of comparative differentiation. Those able to use new technologies to reshape how they work are finding significant productivity gains. This article shares our research on how technology can improve the quality and output of knowledge workers. "
-
The nature of collaborative work ranges from high levels of abstract thinking on the part of scientists to building and maintaining professional contacts and information networks to more ground-level problem solving.
-
But for knowledge workers, what might be thought of as collaboration productivity depends on the quality and quantity of interactions occurring
- 12 more annotations...
Enterprise 2.0 : knowledge, innovation and productivity
The objective is to address key issues faced by organizations built around knowledge : management of not only knowledge but also innovation and productivity. First to see the current limitations with the tools and processes in place and then to see how collaborative platform and enterprise 2.0 approach can offer competitive advantages to the company.
We Work In Public
"The Dachis Group Collaboratory launched two weeks ago and we have been actively sharing our thoughts on social business design, while allowing the world to view a window on our work. Recently, the documentary “We Live In Public” has been in screenings around the U.S., chronicling the activities of Josh Harris a decade ago and foreshadowing many characteristics of today’s “social” mania. We have only partially opened the window on our work world, but the view it provides has caused us to reflect on what we do."
-
I am not in favor of 100% transparency as what defines an open company… or 100% of people seeing 100% of a companies information 100% of the time. That is a bad idea. Anyone advocating for that type of transparency is simply not working in reality.
-
However, providing the right people with the right information at the right time in the most transparent way is the only way successful businesses will win in the information economy marketplace.
- 7 more annotations...
Pegasystems Brings Social Media Collaboration to BPM Solution
"Pegasystems’ SmartBPM uses social media as an interactive and real-time collaborative environment to aid the planning and execution of business improvement projects. By extending is existing tools for ad hoc collaboration, SmartBPM makes it even easier for project teams to connect, add user-generated content, vote, and rank items associated with any given project. By reaching out to customers and clients, SmartBPM now allows critical real-time customer feedback into the process improvement process."
SAP’s Gravity Prototype: Business Collaboration Using Google Wave
"The prototype was featured at the SAP TechEd event in Phoenix this week, and one team at the Business Process Design Slam event have posted on their experience of using the tool, using it to automate business processes related to forming a virtual community-based power plant made up of resident’s personal solar wind generation."
Le modèle collaboratif de l'Open Source appliqué à l’entreprise : à quand "l’Open Entreprise" ?
"En cela, le mouvement Open Source rejoint le credo déjà partagé par un grand nombre : nous quittons le monde de l’organisation hiérarchique – command and control - pour entrer dans un nouveau monde plus foisonnant, plus créatif, plus riche humainement. En cela aussi, le mouvement Open Source décline à sa manière les mots : participatif, collaboratif, 2 ou 3.0, communautés, crowdsourcing... "
-
La proposition de valeur
organisationnelle de l'Open Source est d’avoir su répondre à la croissance du couple
complexité-temps (toujours plus complexe, plus rapidement), par une intelligence
répartie dans l’organisation. -
La proposition de valeur d’une organisation collaborative à un
dirigeant devient : "dans un monde toujours plus complexe et rapide, pour ne
rien perdre en pouvoir, je répartie la responsabilité".
Enterprise 2.0 and the Paradigm of Social Partnerships
"Outside of internal team collaboration (say, a group of marketers, a group of engineers, etc.), no spray & pray / general purpose employee collaborative strategy (or tool application) is going to really show sustainable impact for every tribe or collective. And just like traditional business ecosystem partnerships (customers, suppliers, channel), these internal partnerships also get significantly rattled in the face of industry consolidation"
-
First, existing structural inefficiencies in how internal or external partners liaise as a result of little adherence to basic human interaction constructs and incentive structures, and unnecessary process centric technology that restricts human capital flow
-
. No doubt that the current tools will play a significant role towards simplifying these relationships. But to accelerate business performance via social computing constructs, lots of design work is needed along with the filling of critical technology gaps to truly account for context, cognizance of both process and social at the business activity level, and a deep understanding of and response to individual incentive that makes participation a natural instinct.
Missing Voices: Why Employees Are Afraid to Speak Up At Work
"So why aren’t employees speaking up? And when they do, what are they saying, and to whom? And what’s the danger to the company when it’s not listening to employee voices?
Burris sought to answer these questions in an ongoing study in which he and his colleagues are surveying more than 3,000 employees at 11 different credit unions around the country about their experience in speaking up at work."
-
“There’s lots of research that shows when employees don’t feel involved in the workplace, they tend to withdraw. They don’t engage in all the extra activities that aren’t required for the job, such as helping a coworker, staying late or taking on extra responsibilities. It’s not the formal, required part of the job, but it’s certainly necessary for the organization to succeed.”
-
Many employees say they don’t speak up to their boss because of fear of repercussions. But are workers just being paranoid? Burris’ research says no.
- 3 more annotations...
Employee Computing for Collaboration, Innovation, and Productivity
The anecdotes come from the fieldwork of a major study of employee computing released by nGenera Corporation earlier this week. A group of colleagues and I spent more than a year conducting the research, which was sponsored by a blue-ribbon syndicate of global corporations that are members of our nGenera Insight programs. We interviewed individuals at top vendors, global companies, and major government agencies to understand the best way to unleash employee creativity, support new forms of collaboration, and drive new levels of productivity.
Networked community management
Online work team environments do not and cannot have this level of complexity or work would not get done in the manner that those paying for it would like. The work may be complicated but there are rules, boundaries and processes. Work groups need managers who can direct activities in order to achieve goals. This type of work is collaborative.
Adoption of social tools in Clifford Chance
During our Insight Event last week, Sam Dimond (Director of Knowledge Systems) outlined his thoughts on how to get started with social tools, drawing from his experience of the adoption of blogs and wikis in Clifford Chance.
Top-down and Bottom-up Project Management: Leveraging the Advantages of the Two Approaches
Significant changes are taking place in management and especially project management today. We hear that organizations, like the New York Times, Tribune Co., Ernst & Young switched from the so-called top-down management style to bottom-up management. Others, including some of the world’s biggest corporations, such as Toyota and IBM, implemented bottom-up management style elements in some of their departments. The popularity of the bottom-up approach to management is growing. In spite of this fact, the discussions about the two major approaches are still hot. Why have organizations become so anxious about changing their management style? If we compare the two management approaches, the answer to this question will be clear.
-
. Team members are invited to participate in every step of the management process. The decision on a course of action is taken by the whole team. Bottom-up style allows managers to communicate goals and value, e.g. through milestone planning. Then team members are encouraged to develop personal to-do lists with the steps necessary to reach the milestones on their own.
-
These methods include are Enterprise 2.0 technologies – wikis, blogs, social networks, collaboration tools, etc. They come into organizations and change the original way of executing projects. They turn traditional project management into Project Management 2.0 and bring new patterns of collaboration, which are based on collective intelligence. Collective intelligence is a collection of valuable knowledge from different fields that each project team member is an expert in. This knowledge is now successfully collected and shared shared in a flexible, collaborative environment brought by second-generation project management software. The project manager is the one to conduct the work of his team and choose the right direction for the project development, based on the information received from the individual employees.
How 3M Forged a Culture of Collaboration
The Post-it company built and nurtured a system in which employees across divisions are encouraged—even expected—to collaborate
The Nexus of Defined Business Process and Ad Hoc Collaboration
ECM enables controlled, repeatable content publication processes, whereas social software empowers rapid, collaborative creation and sharing of content. There is a place for both in large enterprises. Sameer’s suggestion was that social software be used for authoring, sharing, and collecting feedback on draft documents or content chunks before they are formally published and widely distributed. ECM systems may then be used to publish the final, vetted content and manage it throughout the content lifecycle.
Selected Tags
Related Tags
enterprise2.0 (63)- management (37)
- web2.0 (29)
- communities (28)
- innovation (25)
- organization (23)
- socialsoftware (21)
- adoption (21)
- business (16)
- socialnetworks (15)
- socialnetworking (15)
- productivity (14)
- socialcomputing (13)
- intranet (12)
- culture (12)
- blogs (12)
- networks (11)
- email (11)
- participation (10)
Sponsored Links
Top Contributors
Groups interested in collabor...
-
Web 2.0
These tools could be used i...
Items: 271 | Visits: 122
Created by: Dean Mantz
-
Mindfeedr
I'm a computer geek and a F...
Items: 93 | Visits: 113
Created by: kiwially
-
Read Reflect Write Web
Items: 2 | Visits: 122
Created by: Michael Richards
Diigo is about better ways to research, share and collaborate on information. Learn more »
Join Diigo