I want my students to learn something, so I have no problem with having objectives and learning goals (which are clearly stated–if not executed in scripted text). Now, how does this relate to scripted reading programs? I teach with a scripted program, and while there are parts that are convenient, and enjoyable, the whole idea is not just degrading, but ridiculous. To borrow from a wag, if scripted instruction programs are the answer, it must have been a very peculiar question being asked. In the particular program I use (Open Court), the scaffolding is poor, and the kids don’t seem to get much from it. As a result, teachers have to supplement with there own materials/methods.
I think this is because ultimately, you can’t always script this sort of teaching. Going back to a link from Doug Noon, good teachers are constantly “reading” their class, and adjusting their instruction. A script can’t tell you that. I think the teacher featured in the story that started all this gives a good example of how to make the learning accessible, engaging, and meaningful. I can only hope to do as well.
