<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Theenergynet's Favorite Links on debate from Diigo</title>
    <link>http://www.diigo.com/user/Theenergynet/debate</link>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 18:50:07 -0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 18:50:07 -0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>The Case For and Against Nuclear Power - WSJ.com</title>
      <link>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121432182593500119.html?mod=googlenews_wsj</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Is nuclear power the answer for a warming planet? Or is it too expensive and dangerous to satisfy future energy needs?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Interest in nuclear power is heating up, as the hunt intensifies for &amp;quot;green&amp;quot; alternatives to fossil fuels like coal and natural gas. Even some environmentalists have come on board, citing the severity of the global-warming threat to explain their embrace of the once-maligned power source.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Highlights and Sticky Notes:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;&lt;img title=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/EY-AA132_NUK2_20080624140634.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;[Image]&quot; /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/nuclear' rel='tag'&gt;nuclear&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/energy' rel='tag'&gt;energy&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/debate' rel='tag'&gt;debate&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/us' rel='tag'&gt;us&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/nuke.news' rel='tag'&gt;nuke.news&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet'&gt;theenergynet&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 18:50:07 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The great nuclear debate - Greenlife - News - Manchester Evening News</title>
      <link>http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greenlife/s/1054428_the_great_nuclear_debate</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;THE new nuclear era could bring the solution to our energy needs - or leave the nation a `poisonous and dangerous' legacy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That was the divided opinion from an M.E.N. debate featuring experts from academia, business and politics.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/nuclear' rel='tag'&gt;nuclear&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/energy' rel='tag'&gt;energy&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/debate' rel='tag'&gt;debate&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/uk' rel='tag'&gt;uk&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/nuke.news' rel='tag'&gt;nuke.news&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet'&gt;theenergynet&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 22:50:22 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>America | The National Catholic Weekly - Five Myths About Nuclear Energy</title>
      <link>http://www.americamagazine.org/content/article.cfm?article_id=10884</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A tomic energy is among the most impractical and risky of available fuel sources. Private financiers are reluctant to invest in it, and both experts and the public have questions about the likelihood of safely storing lethal radioactive wastes for the required million years.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/nuclear' rel='tag'&gt;nuclear&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/energy' rel='tag'&gt;energy&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/safety' rel='tag'&gt;safety&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/economics' rel='tag'&gt;economics&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/security' rel='tag'&gt;security&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet'&gt;theenergynet&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 06:02:33 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stephen Thomas: This nuclear agenda is losing power | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk</title>
      <link>http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/jun/12/nuclearpower.nuclear?commentpage=1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;John Hutton claims there will be no nuclear monopoly. Is this the first chink in the government's no-subsidies armour?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/nuclear' rel='tag'&gt;nuclear&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/debate' rel='tag'&gt;debate&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/uk' rel='tag'&gt;uk&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/nuke.comments' rel='tag'&gt;nuke.comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet'&gt;theenergynet&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 19:44:06 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>timestranscript.com - Reacting to the nuclear trend</title>
      <link>http://timestranscript.canadaeast.com/article/319968</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;One could be forgiven for thinking we've overcome the problems associated with nuclear power. Everywhere you turn, nuclear is being touted as a &amp;quot;green&amp;quot; energy source and a solution to global warming. Our prime minister recently sang the benefits of both nuclear power and uranium mining in a speech to a business crowd in London, England. &amp;quot;As the largest producer of uranium, we can contribute to the renaissance of nuclear energy, a no-emissions source that will be expanding here in Britain and around the world,&amp;quot; Stephen Harper said.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/nuclear' rel='tag'&gt;nuclear&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/energy' rel='tag'&gt;energy&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/debate' rel='tag'&gt;debate&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/nuke.comments' rel='tag'&gt;nuke.comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/canada' rel='tag'&gt;canada&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet'&gt;theenergynet&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 07:33:56 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>HeraldNet: Nuclear power is not  the answer</title>
      <link>http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20080603/OPINION02/532858470</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Regarding the Friday letter, &amp;quot;Nuclear energy can answer our needs&amp;quot;:&amp;#0092;n&amp;#0092;nIn the 1950s, nuclear power looked like our best option for future energy. Today nuclear power seems obsolete and expensive. Nuclear power's costs are rising because it requires tremendous amounts of costly fossil fuels to mine, process and transport uranium and build nuclear power plants. Plus, there are serious environmental concerns our federal government cannot seem to address.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/nuclear' rel='tag'&gt;nuclear&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/energy' rel='tag'&gt;energy&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/debate' rel='tag'&gt;debate&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/nuke.comments' rel='tag'&gt;nuke.comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/anti-nuclear' rel='tag'&gt;anti-nuclear&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet'&gt;theenergynet&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 23:31:27 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nuclear questions for Lovins | Gristmill</title>
      <link>http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/6/4/114643/8098</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Amory Lovins is on the warpath against nuclear power, battling the industry PR push that says nuclear is a viable climate solution. He's got a new report, co-authored with Imran Sheikh, called &amp;quot;The Nuclear Illusion&amp;quot; [PDF]. Spinning off from that report are a Newsweek article called &amp;quot;Missing the Market Meltdown&amp;quot; and an article on the RMI site called &amp;quot;Forget Nuclear.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/nuclear' rel='tag'&gt;nuclear&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/energy' rel='tag'&gt;energy&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/debate' rel='tag'&gt;debate&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/lovins' rel='tag'&gt;lovins&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/nuke.news' rel='tag'&gt;nuke.news&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet'&gt;theenergynet&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 23:05:55 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>David Suzuki: A nuclear reaction | Straight.com</title>
      <link>http://www.straight.com/article-148255/david-suzuki-a-nuclear-reaction</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;One could be forgiven for thinking we’ve overcome the problems associated with nuclear power. Everywhere you turn, nuclear is being touted as a “green” energy source and a solution to global warming. Our prime minister recently sang the benefits of both nuclear power and uranium mining in a speech to a business crowd in London, England. “As the largest producer of uranium, we can contribute to the renaissance of nuclear energy, a no-emissions source that will be expanding here in Britain and around the world,” Stephen Harper said.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/nuclear' rel='tag'&gt;nuclear&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/energy' rel='tag'&gt;energy&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/debate' rel='tag'&gt;debate&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/history' rel='tag'&gt;history&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/nuke.comments' rel='tag'&gt;nuke.comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet'&gt;theenergynet&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 22:57:37 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rebuklear | Gristmill: The environmental news blog | Grist</title>
      <link>http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/5/30/14423/4313</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In a long, detailed, and devastating cover story in The Nation, Christian Parenti asks, &amp;quot;What Nuclear Renaissance?&amp;quot; Peeling away the hype and PR, he discovers that there's much less than meets the eye:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/nuclear' rel='tag'&gt;nuclear&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/energy' rel='tag'&gt;energy&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/debate' rel='tag'&gt;debate&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/nuke.news' rel='tag'&gt;nuke.news&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/nuke.comments' rel='tag'&gt;nuke.comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet'&gt;theenergynet&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 20:25:02 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SaskPower nuclear reactor report stirs up northern debate</title>
      <link>http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2008/05/09/nuclear-north.html</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;People in northern Saskatchewan are of two minds about a possible nuclear power station in their region.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A consultant's report prepared for SaskPower and obtained by CBC earlier this week named Lac La Loche as one of two regions where a nuclear reactor might be located.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/nuclear' rel='tag'&gt;nuclear&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/energy' rel='tag'&gt;energy&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/debate' rel='tag'&gt;debate&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/canada' rel='tag'&gt;canada&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/development' rel='tag'&gt;development&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet'&gt;theenergynet&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 07:40:35 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Public Citizen | Press Room - Don’t Be Fooled by Nuclear Industry Shill; Environmentalists Are Not Backing New Reactors</title>
      <link>http://www.citizen.org/pressroom/release.cfm?ID=2655</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;AUSTIN, Texas – While an environmental consultant brought to Victoria to tout nuclear energy is quick to claim that a new reactor proposed for the area would be “clean and safe,” he is less likely to discuss today at a private gathering of business and community leaders his ties to the industry, which is sponsoring his speaking tour.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Since 2006, Patrick Moore has been a paid spokesperson for the nuclear industry. He is co-chair of the Clean and Safe Energy Coalition, which is wholly funded by the nuclear industry lobby group, the Nuclear Energy Institute.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/nuclear' rel='tag'&gt;nuclear&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/energy' rel='tag'&gt;energy&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/debate' rel='tag'&gt;debate&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/moore' rel='tag'&gt;moore&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/nuke.news' rel='tag'&gt;nuke.news&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet'&gt;theenergynet&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 08:59:17 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>MWC News - A Site Without Borders - - Nuclear power is undemocratic</title>
      <link>http://mwcnews.net/content/view/22282/26</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A small group of citizens in California are trying to reclaim their rights -- both those rights taken unconstitutionally by the federal government, and those rights relinquished by their own state agencies to the feds.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/nuclear' rel='tag'&gt;nuclear&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/energy' rel='tag'&gt;energy&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/debate' rel='tag'&gt;debate&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/security' rel='tag'&gt;security&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/nuke.news' rel='tag'&gt;nuke.news&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet'&gt;theenergynet&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 08:44:07 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Wikipedia distorts nuclear history: Rutland Herald Online</title>
      <link>http://www.rutlandherald.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080501/OPINION03/805010312/1039/OPINION03</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;There are only seven Web sites that more people use than Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia that lets anyone edit most of its articles. None of the sites that are more popular than Wikipedia have as their main purpose producing information about the world. The top sites, Google and Yahoo, mainly function as links to other sites. Facebook and Myspace, which people use to keep in touch with their friends, are third and fifth most popular, respectively. The other sites that are more visited than Wikipedia are YouTube (a kind of online TV), eBay (a virtual flea market), and Microsoft's version of Google.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/nuclear' rel='tag'&gt;nuclear&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/energy' rel='tag'&gt;energy&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/online' rel='tag'&gt;online&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/debate' rel='tag'&gt;debate&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/history' rel='tag'&gt;history&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet'&gt;theenergynet&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 19:04:48 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Environmentalists speak against adding reactors 042808 - The Augusta Chronicle</title>
      <link>http://chronicle.augusta.com/stories/042808/met_196644.shtml</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A proposal to add two new reactors to Plant Vogtle drew praise from politicians and economic developers Sunday but brought renewed concerns from environmentalists over the reactors' potential impact on dwindling water supplies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/nuclear' rel='tag'&gt;nuclear&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/energy' rel='tag'&gt;energy&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/debate' rel='tag'&gt;debate&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/ga' rel='tag'&gt;ga&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/nuke.news' rel='tag'&gt;nuke.news&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet'&gt;theenergynet&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 05:07:27 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The fanatic anti-nuclear movement: Rutland Herald Online</title>
      <link>http://www.rutlandherald.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080424/OPINION03/804240320/1039/OPINION03</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Over Vermont's 230 years several strange political movements persisted long enough to enter the history books. Among them, anti-Masonry, the anti-Catholic and anti-immigrant Know Nothing movement, and the Prohibition crusade all fizzled after initial successes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The most notable fringe movement still alive today is the crusade against nuclear energy. It is, naturally, focused on Vermont's lone nuclear reactor, Vermont Yankee, that went on line in 1972.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/nuclear' rel='tag'&gt;nuclear&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/energy' rel='tag'&gt;energy&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/debate' rel='tag'&gt;debate&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/nuke.comments' rel='tag'&gt;nuke.comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/pro-nuclear' rel='tag'&gt;pro-nuclear&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet'&gt;theenergynet&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 19:32:35 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>newsobserver.com | Cost of nuclear plant fuels battle</title>
      <link>http://www.newsobserver.com/business/story/1048035.html</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;As the fight over nuclear energy shifts from safety to cost, timing the public release of the multibillion-dollar expense takes on an increasingly strategic value to both sides.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The estimated cost of new nuclear power plants has tripled in the past few years, with projections now hitting $6 billion to $9 billion per reactor. Cost estimates are expected to continue escalating. Soaring costs make the prospect of new nuclear power even harder to sell to a public that will ultimately pay for new plants through rate increases.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/nuclear' rel='tag'&gt;nuclear&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/energy' rel='tag'&gt;energy&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/economics' rel='tag'&gt;economics&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/sc' rel='tag'&gt;sc&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/development' rel='tag'&gt;development&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet'&gt;theenergynet&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 19:32:00 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Nuclear Renaissance?</title>
      <link>http://www.thenation.com/doc/20080512/parenti</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;If you listen to the rhetoric, nuclear power is back. Smashing atoms will replace burning carbon-based coal, gas and oil. In the face of a disaster movie-like future of runaway climate change--bringing drought, floods, famine and social breakdown--carbon-free nukes are cast as the deus ex machina to save us at the last minute.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Even a few greens support nuclear power--most famously James Lovelock, father of the Gaia theory. In the popular press, discussion of nuclear energy is dominated by its boosters, thanks in part to sophisticated industry PR.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/nuclear' rel='tag'&gt;nuclear&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/energy' rel='tag'&gt;energy&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/development' rel='tag'&gt;development&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/debate' rel='tag'&gt;debate&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/nuke.news' rel='tag'&gt;nuke.news&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet'&gt;theenergynet&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 19:24:54 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Don't dismiss nuclear risks -- baltimoresun.com</title>
      <link>http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/opinion/oped/bal-op.nukes18apr18001519,0,3757514.story</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;With the recent settlement between the state of Maryland and Constellation Energy Group, the power company is once again championing Calvert Cliffs as the site of a new nuclear power plant. This is not a cause for celebration.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On July 13, Constellation submitted the first new application to build a nuclear power plant in the U.S. since Three Mile Island. But the company threatened to go elsewhere if Maryland lawmakers re-established state regulatory control on new power plants. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/nuke.comments' rel='tag'&gt;nuke.comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/anti-nuclear' rel='tag'&gt;anti-nuclear&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/debate' rel='tag'&gt;debate&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/development' rel='tag'&gt;development&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/md' rel='tag'&gt;md&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet'&gt;theenergynet&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 20:21:39 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fredericksburg.com - Residents: Reactor requires close look</title>
      <link>http://fredericksburg.com/News/FLS/2008/042008/04182008/372474</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The Nuclear Regulatory Commission should revisit some of the environmental aspects of Dominion's plan for a third reactor at North Anna Power Station.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That was the suggestion of several speakers at a well-attended public information session by the agency Wednesday night at Louisa County High School.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/nuclear' rel='tag'&gt;nuclear&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/energy' rel='tag'&gt;energy&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/debate' rel='tag'&gt;debate&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/nrc' rel='tag'&gt;nrc&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/north-anna' rel='tag'&gt;north-anna&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet'&gt;theenergynet&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 20:20:32 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>On rare stage, nuclear sides face off - The Boston Globe</title>
      <link>http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2008/04/13/on_rare_stage_nuclear_sides_face_off</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/nuclear' rel='tag'&gt;nuclear&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/energy' rel='tag'&gt;energy&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/ma' rel='tag'&gt;ma&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/plymouth' rel='tag'&gt;plymouth&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet/debate' rel='tag'&gt;debate&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/theenergynet'&gt;theenergynet&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 07:40:06 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
  </channel>
</rss>